kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-18 19:12:56 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/lib/kunit/executor.c

226 lines
5.8 KiB
Raw Normal View History

kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: Add 'kunit_shutdown' option Add a new kernel command-line option, 'kunit_shutdown', which allows the user to specify that the kernel poweroff, halt, or reboot after completing all KUnit tests; this is very handy for running KUnit tests on UML or a VM so that the UML/VM process exits cleanly immediately after running all tests without needing a special initramfs. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Tested-By: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-26 14:24:04 -07:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and kunit_filter_suites(). Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites corresponding to each test file. This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global variables to make it testable. It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test easier to write than it otherwise would have been. Tested by running just the new tests using itself $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*' Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-04-20 19:04:27 -07:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and kunit_filter_suites(). Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites corresponding to each test file. This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global variables to make it testable. It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test easier to write than it otherwise would have been. Tested by running just the new tests using itself $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*' Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-04-20 19:04:27 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: fix too small allocation when using suite-only kunit.filter_glob When a user filters by a suite and not a test, e.g. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'suite_name' it hits this code const int len = strlen(filter_glob); ... parsed->suite_glob = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); which fails to allocate space for the terminating NULL. Somehow, it seems like we can't easily reproduce this under UML, so the existing `parse_filter_test()` didn't catch this. Fix this by allocating `len + 1` and switch to kzalloc() just to be a bit more defensive. We're only going to run this code once per kernel boot, and it should never be very long. Also update the unit tests to be a bit more cautious. This bug showed up as a NULL pointer dereference here: > KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0"); `filtered.start[0][0]` was NULL, and `name` is at offset 0 in the struct, so `...->name` was also NULL. Fixes: 3b29021ddd10 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-01 18:36:35 -07:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: use kmemdup in kunit_filter_tests(), take suite as const kmemdup() is easier than kmalloc() + memcpy(), per lkp bot. Also make the input `suite` as const since we're now always making copies after commit a127b154a8f2 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob"). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-16 09:54:46 -07:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: use kmemdup in kunit_filter_tests(), take suite as const kmemdup() is easier than kmalloc() + memcpy(), per lkp bot. Also make the input `suite` as const since we're now always making copies after commit a127b154a8f2 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob"). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-16 09:54:46 -07:00
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-11 14:16:26 -07:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked. Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered' failing. Note that there may also have been a similar issue in kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites". This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@intel.com/ And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-13 07:25:27 +08:00
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-11 14:16:26 -07:00
kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked. Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered' failing. Note that there may also have been a similar issue in kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites". This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@intel.com/ And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-13 07:25:27 +08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: Add 'kunit_shutdown' option Add a new kernel command-line option, 'kunit_shutdown', which allows the user to specify that the kernel poweroff, halt, or reboot after completing all KUnit tests; this is very handy for running KUnit tests on UML or a VM so that the UML/VM process exits cleanly immediately after running all tests without needing a special initramfs. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Tested-By: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-26 14:24:04 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and kunit_filter_suites(). Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites corresponding to each test file. This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global variables to make it testable. It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test easier to write than it otherwise would have been. Tested by running just the new tests using itself $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*' Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-04-20 19:04:27 -07:00
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-11 14:16:26 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and kunit_filter_suites(). Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites corresponding to each test file. This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global variables to make it testable. It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test easier to write than it otherwise would have been. Tested by running just the new tests using itself $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*' Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-04-20 19:04:27 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-11 14:16:26 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: Add 'kunit_shutdown' option Add a new kernel command-line option, 'kunit_shutdown', which allows the user to specify that the kernel poweroff, halt, or reboot after completing all KUnit tests; this is very handy for running KUnit tests on UML or a VM so that the UML/VM process exits cleanly immediately after running all tests without needing a special initramfs. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Tested-By: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-26 14:24:04 -07:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html. 1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header 2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines 2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This “# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec (https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is used to define the test name before the results. Original output: TAP version 14 1..1 # Subtest: kunit-test-suite 1..3 ok 1 - kunit_test_1 ok 2 - kunit_test_2 ok 3 - kunit_test_3 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 ok 1 - kunit-test-suite New output: KTAP version 1 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: kunit-test-suite 1..3 ok 1 kunit_test_1 ok 2 kunit_test_2 ok 3 kunit_test_3 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 ok 1 kunit-test-suite Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-11-23 18:25:58 +00:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html. 1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header 2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines 2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This “# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec (https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is used to define the test name before the results. Original output: TAP version 14 1..1 # Subtest: kunit-test-suite 1..3 ok 1 - kunit_test_1 ok 2 - kunit_test_2 ok 3 - kunit_test_3 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 ok 1 - kunit-test-suite New output: KTAP version 1 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: kunit-test-suite 1..3 ok 1 kunit_test_1 ok 2 kunit_test_2 ok 3 kunit_test_3 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 ok 1 kunit-test-suite Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-11-23 18:25:58 +00:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when running on other arches. 1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures". Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked. 2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown(). This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU process doesn't ever exit. Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-13 11:37:07 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.enable to enable/disable KUnit test This patch adds the kunit.enable module parameter that will need to be set to true in addition to KUNIT being enabled for KUnit tests to run. The default value is true giving backwards compatibility. However, for the production+testing use case the new config option KUNIT_DEFAULT_ENABLED can be set to N requiring the tester to opt-in by passing kunit.enable=1 to the kernel. Signed-off-by: Joe Fradley <joefradley@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-08-23 07:24:54 -07:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-11 14:16:26 -07:00
kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when running on other arches. 1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures". Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked. 2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown(). This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU process doesn't ever exit. Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-13 11:37:07 -07:00
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-11 14:16:26 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:45 -07:00
kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format TAP 14 allows an optional test plan to be emitted before the start of the start of testing[1]; this is valuable because it makes it possible for a test harness to detect whether the number of tests run matches the number of tests expected to be run, ensuring that no tests silently failed. Link[1]: https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md#the-plan Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:44 -07:00
kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-09 11:19:58 +08:00
kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-05 16:08:52 -08:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when running on other arches. 1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures". Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked. 2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown(). This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU process doesn't ever exit. Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-13 11:37:07 -07:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00
kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and kunit_filter_suites(). Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites corresponding to each test file. This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global variables to make it testable. It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test easier to write than it otherwise would have been. Tested by running just the new tests using itself $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*' Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-04-20 19:04:27 -07:00
kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-04 13:47:42 -07:00