kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-16 22:39:48 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h

26 lines
700 B
Raw Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[ARM] move include/asm-arm to arch/arm/include/asm Move platform independent header files to arch/arm/include/asm, leaving those in asm/arch* and asm/plat* alone. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-02 10:55:55 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
ARM: 5700/1: ARM: Introduce ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT to define cache line size Currently kernel believes that all ARM CPUs have L1_CACHE_SHIFT == 5. It's not true at least for CPUs based on Cortex-A8. List of CPUs with cache line size != 32 should be expanded later. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-09-15 10:23:53 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[ARM] 5534/1: kmalloc must return a cache line aligned buffer Define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN in asm/cache.h At the request of Russell also move ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN to this file. Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-01 09:19:37 +01:00
dma-mapping: rename ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN Now each architecture has the own dma_get_cache_alignment implementation. dma_get_cache_alignment returns the minimum DMA alignment. Architectures define it as ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN (it's used to make sure that malloc'ed buffer is DMA-safe; the buffer doesn't share a cache with the others). So we can unify dma_get_cache_alignment implementations. This patch: dma_get_cache_alignment() needs to know if an architecture defines ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN or not (needs to know if architecture has DMA alignment restriction). However, slab.h define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN if architectures doesn't define it. Let's rename ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is used only in the internals of slab/slob/slub (except for crypto). Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-10 18:03:22 -07:00
[ARM] 5534/1: kmalloc must return a cache line aligned buffer Define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN in asm/cache.h At the request of Russell also move ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN to this file. Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-01 09:19:37 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00