kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-10 20:48:12 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c

339 lines
8.6 KiB
Raw Normal View History

drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first mutex of a given class locked in a sequence. This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked while other mutexes of the same class remain locked and then its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will incorrectly assume that memory is freed with a held lock in there. For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed object lock last. v2: - Fix a typo (Danilo Krummrich) - Reword the commit message a bit. - Add a Fixes: tag Related lock alloc tracking warning: [ 322.660067] ========================= [ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed! [ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N [ 322.660078] ------------------------- [ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there! [ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981: [ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660135] stack backtrace: [ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 [ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 322.660152] Call Trace: [ 322.660155] <TASK> [ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0 [ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160 [ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290 [ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40 [ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140 [ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm] [ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60 [ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit] [ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0 [ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 [ 322.660358] </TASK> [ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230906095039.3320-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2023-09-06 11:50:39 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects In cases where the # is known ahead of time, it is silly to do the table resize dance. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/568338/
2023-11-20 16:38:50 -08:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects In cases where the # is known ahead of time, it is silly to do the table resize dance. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/568338/
2023-11-20 16:38:50 -08:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next Kickstart 6.9 development cycle. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:20:23 +01:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects In cases where the # is known ahead of time, it is silly to do the table resize dance. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/568338/
2023-11-20 16:38:50 -08:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects In cases where the # is known ahead of time, it is silly to do the table resize dance. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/568338/
2023-11-20 16:38:50 -08:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects In cases where the # is known ahead of time, it is silly to do the table resize dance. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/568338/
2023-11-20 16:38:50 -08:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
mm: kvmalloc: align kvrealloc() with krealloc() Besides the obvious (and desired) difference between krealloc() and kvrealloc(), there is some inconsistency in their function signatures and behavior: - krealloc() frees the memory when the requested size is zero, whereas kvrealloc() simply returns a pointer to the existing allocation. - krealloc() behaves like kmalloc() if a NULL pointer is passed, whereas kvrealloc() does not accept a NULL pointer at all and, if passed, would fault instead. - krealloc() is self-contained, whereas kvrealloc() relies on the caller to provide the size of the previous allocation. Inconsistent behavior throughout allocation APIs is error prone, hence make kvrealloc() behave like krealloc(), which seems superior in all mentioned aspects. Besides that, implementing kvrealloc() by making use of krealloc() and vrealloc() provides oppertunities to grow (and shrink) allocations more efficiently. For instance, vrealloc() can be optimized to allocate and map additional pages to grow the allocation or unmap and free unused pages to shrink the allocation. [dakr@kernel.org: document concurrency restrictions] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240725125442.4957-1-dakr@kernel.org [dakr@kernel.org: disable KASAN when switching to vmalloc] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240730185049.6244-2-dakr@kernel.org [dakr@kernel.org: properly document __GFP_ZERO behavior] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240730185049.6244-5-dakr@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240722163111.4766-3-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-07-22 18:29:24 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00