2018-09-21 06:40:20 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 10:29:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-15 11:15:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-06 15:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-27 10:28:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 15:50:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-27 10:28:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 15:50:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-27 10:28:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-11 11:45:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-17 14:44:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 15:50:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-17 14:44:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-30 14:02:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 15:50:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-03 17:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-17 14:44:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-03 17:03:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-03 17:03:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-06-28 12:37:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-17 13:13:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-09 16:34:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-28 12:37:04 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-05 08:48:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-30 11:53:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-17 14:44:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-06 15:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-09 10:40:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-23 23:44:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 17:26:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-23 23:44:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-23 23:44:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-23 23:44:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-27 10:28:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-11 15:03:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-11 15:03:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-29 17:14:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-11 11:23:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-24 11:45:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-15 11:15:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-11 11:23:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-11 15:03:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-19 13:01:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 10:29:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 10:29:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-15 11:15:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-21 01:57:42 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 14:06:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 12:21:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-30 11:53:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-27 10:28:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-24 13:06:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-23 12:27:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-30 11:53:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-16 13:20:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-16 13:20:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-16 13:20:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-16 13:20:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 13:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-16 13:04:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-16 13:04:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-26 20:59:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-16 10:59:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-26 20:59:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-20 11:55:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-11 15:03:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-23 14:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-15 11:42:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-09 10:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of each
cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
enabled for this support to be available.
Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
add a write attribute if though relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-16 10:59:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-09 10:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-26 20:59:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-24 17:15:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-20 15:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-20 15:15:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-20 15:15:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:07:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-20 15:15:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-20 15:15:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-20 15:15:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 14:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-11 11:00:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-17 14:44:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-17 14:44:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-30 14:03:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-30 14:03:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-02 15:25:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-02 15:25:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 09:31:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 09:31:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 09:31:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-11 11:00:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-02 23:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-02 23:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-02 23:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-28 15:55:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-02 23:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-10 09:48:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-03 11:52:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-11 11:00:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-27 10:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 18:30:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 13:45:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 13:35:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-04 16:18:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-11 11:00:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:07:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:07:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-11 12:07:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-04 18:21:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-30 14:19:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 13:36:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-13 11:32:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-26 11:34:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-26 11:34:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-26 11:34:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 11:06:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-10 13:22:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-11 09:33:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-30 12:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-30 12:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-11 09:33:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-30 12:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-11 09:33:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-30 12:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-30 12:12:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-30 12:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 13:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-22 23:02:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-13 14:19:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-24 20:28:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they
pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long'
argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended
on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an
unsigned type.
However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int'
argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are
8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'.
Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that
were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any
users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments.
This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
because there are probably still architecture specific users
elsewhere.
Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off
using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'.
The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for
is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove
the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'.
For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions
are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior.
I was using this definition for testing:
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \
unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with
the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed
to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time
warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument.
I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended
up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After
the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion
(fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus
asked me to send the whole thing again.
[ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-27 23:23:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-21 06:40:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-21 18:34:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices
Current layout support was initially written without modules support in
mind. When the requirement for module support rose, the existing base
was improved to adopt modularization support, but kind of a design flaw
was introduced. With the existing implementation, when a storage device
registers into NVMEM, the core tries to hook a layout (if any) and
populates its cells immediately. This means, if the hardware description
expects a layout to be hooked up, but no driver was provided for that,
the storage medium will fail to probe and try later from
scratch. Even if we consider that the hardware description shall be
correct, we could still probe the storage device (especially if it
contains the rootfs).
One way to overcome this situation is to consider the layouts as
devices, and leverage the native notifier mechanism. When a new NVMEM
device is registered, we can populate its nvmem-layout child, if any,
and wait for the matching to be done in order to get the cells (the
waiting can be easily done with the NVMEM notifiers). If the layout
driver is compiled as a module, it should automatically be loaded. This
way, there is no strong order to enforce, any NVMEM device creation
or NVMEM layout driver insertion will be observed as a new event which
may lead to the creation of additional cells, without disturbing the
probes with costly (and sometimes endless) deferrals.
In order to achieve that goal we create a new bus for the nvmem-layouts
with minimal logic to match nvmem-layout devices with nvmem-layout
drivers. All this infrastructure code is created in the layouts.c file.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215111536.316972-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 11:15:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-27 12:13:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|