2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-21 14:37:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 18:06:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2024-01-05 14:57:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-08 12:36:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-18 21:07:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-18 21:07:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-08 12:36:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-08 12:36:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-01-07 18:39:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-01-07 18:39:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-08 12:36:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-05-20 16:12:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-18 21:07:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-15 18:06:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm: Provide a means of invalidation without using launder_folio
Implement a replacement for launder_folio. The key feature of
invalidate_inode_pages2() is that it locks each folio individually, unmaps
it to prevent mmap'd accesses interfering and calls the ->launder_folio()
address_space op to flush it. This has problems: firstly, each folio is
written individually as one or more small writes; secondly, adjacent folios
cannot be added so easily into the laundry; thirdly, it's yet another op to
implement.
Instead, use the invalidate lock to cause anyone wanting to add a folio to
the inode to wait, then unmap all the folios if we have mmaps, then,
conditionally, use ->writepages() to flush any dirty data back and then
discard all pages.
The invalidate lock prevents ->read_iter(), ->write_iter() and faulting
through mmap all from adding pages for the duration.
This is then used from netfslib to handle the flusing in unbuffered and
direct writes.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@lists.orangefs.org
2024-03-27 08:51:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm: Provide a means of invalidation without using launder_folio
Implement a replacement for launder_folio. The key feature of
invalidate_inode_pages2() is that it locks each folio individually, unmaps
it to prevent mmap'd accesses interfering and calls the ->launder_folio()
address_space op to flush it. This has problems: firstly, each folio is
written individually as one or more small writes; secondly, adjacent folios
cannot be added so easily into the laundry; thirdly, it's yet another op to
implement.
Instead, use the invalidate lock to cause anyone wanting to add a folio to
the inode to wait, then unmap all the folios if we have mmaps, then,
conditionally, use ->writepages() to flush any dirty data back and then
discard all pages.
The invalidate lock prevents ->read_iter(), ->write_iter() and faulting
through mmap all from adding pages for the duration.
This is then used from netfslib to handle the flusing in unbuffered and
direct writes.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@lists.orangefs.org
2024-03-27 08:51:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-18 21:07:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-01-29 09:49:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-26 08:48:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-01-29 09:49:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm: Provide a means of invalidation without using launder_folio
Implement a replacement for launder_folio. The key feature of
invalidate_inode_pages2() is that it locks each folio individually, unmaps
it to prevent mmap'd accesses interfering and calls the ->launder_folio()
address_space op to flush it. This has problems: firstly, each folio is
written individually as one or more small writes; secondly, adjacent folios
cannot be added so easily into the laundry; thirdly, it's yet another op to
implement.
Instead, use the invalidate lock to cause anyone wanting to add a folio to
the inode to wait, then unmap all the folios if we have mmaps, then,
conditionally, use ->writepages() to flush any dirty data back and then
discard all pages.
The invalidate lock prevents ->read_iter(), ->write_iter() and faulting
through mmap all from adding pages for the duration.
This is then used from netfslib to handle the flusing in unbuffered and
direct writes.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@lists.orangefs.org
2024-03-27 08:51:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
netfs: Optimise away reads above the point at which there can be no data
Track the file position above which the server is not expected to have any
data (the "zero point") and preemptively assume that we can satisfy
requests by filling them with zeroes locally rather than attempting to
download them if they're over that line - even if we've written data back
to the server. Assume that any data that was written back above that
position is held in the local cache. Note that we have to split requests
that straddle the line.
Make use of this to optimise away some reads from the server. We need to
set the zero point in the following circumstances:
(1) When we see an extant remote inode and have no cache for it, we set
the zero_point to i_size.
(2) On local inode creation, we set zero_point to 0.
(3) On local truncation down, we reduce zero_point to the new i_size if
the new i_size is lower.
(4) On local truncation up, we don't change zero_point.
(5) On local modification, we don't change zero_point.
(6) On remote invalidation, we set zero_point to the new i_size.
(7) If stored data is discarded from the pagecache or culled from fscache,
we must set zero_point above that if the data also got written to the
server.
(8) If dirty data is written back to the server, but not fscache, we must
set zero_point above that.
(9) If a direct I/O write is made, set zero_point above that.
Assuming the above, any read from the server at or above the zero_point
position will return all zeroes.
The zero_point value can be stored in the cache, provided the above rules
are applied to it by any code that culls part of the local cache.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
2023-11-24 13:39:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 11:38:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|