2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-30 15:10:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-07 18:49:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 17:16:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-12 20:39:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 17:16:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-24 13:01:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-12 20:39:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-24 13:01:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 17:16:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-23 20:24:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 17:16:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-20 00:06:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-18 13:50:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-05 16:31:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 20:20:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/fourcc: Add DRM_FORMAT_D[1248]
As Rn covers single-channel formats with a direct relationship between
channel value and brightness, and Cn can be any colors, there are
currently no fourcc codes to describe single-channel formats with an
inverse relationship between channel value and brightness.
Introduce fourcc codes for a single-channel frame buffer format with
two, four, sixteen, or 256 brightness ("darkness") levels, where there
is an inverse relationship between channel value and brightness.
As the number of bits per pixel may be less than eight, some of these
formats rely on proper block handling for the calculation of bits per
pixel and pitch.
The fill order (the order in which multiple pixels are packed in a byte)
is the same order as used for grayscale (2, 4, and 16 levels) images in
the PNG specification, Version 1.2.
This order is also the recommended and default order (FillOrder = 1) for
bilevel and grayscale (16 levels) images in the TIFF 6.0 Specification,
and is also used for monochrome images in the PBM file format,
monochrome Linux frame buffer logos, and BDF and PSF (Linux kernel) font
files.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6119f3abeda9baaa88652843960adc032da276b4.1657294931.git.geert@linux-m68k.org
2022-07-08 20:20:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/fourcc: Add DRM_FORMAT_R[124]
Introduce fourcc codes for single-channel frame buffer formats with two,
four, and sixteen brightness levels, where there is a direct
relationship between channel value and brightness.
As the number of bits per pixel is less than eight, these rely on proper
block handling for the calculation of bits per pixel and pitch.
The fill order (the order in which multiple pixels are packed in a byte)
is the same order as used for grayscale (2, 4, and 16 levels) images in
the PNG specification, Version 1.2.
This order is also the recommended and default order (FillOrder = 1) for
bilevel and grayscale (16 levels) images in the TIFF 6.0 Specification,
and is also used for monochrome images in the PBM file format,
monochrome Linux frame buffer logos, and BDF and PSF (Linux kernel) font
files.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/96561a88e53c59cac72e66642bf4c097aacefd18.1657294931.git.geert@linux-m68k.org
2022-07-08 20:20:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 20:20:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-09 01:38:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 20:20:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-28 02:31:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 20:20:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-28 02:31:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 20:20:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-04 19:38:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-09 01:38:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-04 19:38:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-19 22:03:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-12 17:38:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-12 17:40:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-16 21:52:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-19 13:17:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-16 21:52:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
drm/fourcc: Add AFBC yuv fourccs for Mali
As we look to enable AFBC using DRM format modifiers, we run into
problems which we've historically handled via vendor-private details
(i.e. gralloc, on Android).
AFBC (as an encoding) is fully flexible, and for example YUV data can
be encoded into 1, 2 or 3 encoded "planes", much like the linear
equivalents. Component order is also meaningful, as AFBC doesn't
necessarily care about what each "channel" of the data it encodes
contains. Therefore ABGR8888 and RGBA8888 can be encoded in AFBC with
different representations. Similarly, 'X' components may be encoded
into AFBC streams in cases where a decoder expects to decode a 4th
component.
In addition, AFBC is a licensable IP, meaning that to support the
ecosystem we need to ensure that _all_ AFBC users are able to describe
the encodings that they need. This is much better achieved by
preserving meaning in the fourcc codes when they are combined with an
AFBC modifier.
In essence, we want to use the modifier to describe the parameters of
the AFBC encode/decode, and use the fourcc code to describe the data
being encoded/decoded.
To do anything different would be to introduce redundancy - we would
need to duplicate in the modifier information which is _already_
conveyed clearly and non-ambigiously by a fourcc code.
I hope that for RGB this is non-controversial.
(BGRA8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC) is a different format from
(RGBA8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC).
Possibly more controversial is that (XBGR8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC)
is different from (BGR888 + MODIFIER_AFBC). I understand that in some
schemes it is not the case - but in AFBC it is so.
Where we run into problems is where there are not already fourcc codes
which represent the data which the AFBC encoder/decoder is processing.
To that end, we want to introduce new fourcc codes to describe the
data being encoded/decoded, in the places where none of the existing
fourcc codes are applicable.
Where we don't support an equivalent non-compressed layout, or where
no "obvious" linear layout exists, we are proposing adding fourcc
codes which have no associated linear layout - because any layout we
proposed would be completely arbitrary.
Some formats are following the naming conventions from [2].
The summary of the new formats is:
DRM_FORMAT_VUY888 - Packed 8-bit YUV 444. Y followed by U then V.
DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010 - Packed 10-bit YUV 444. Y followed by U then
V. No defined linear encoding.
DRM_FORMAT_Y210 - Packed 10-bit YUV 422. Y followed by U (then Y)
then V. 10-bit samples in 16-bit words.
DRM_FORMAT_Y410 - Packed 10-bit YUV 444, with 2-bit alpha.
DRM_FORMAT_P210 - Semi-planar 10-bit YUV 422. Y plane, followed by
interleaved U-then-V plane. 10-bit samples in
16-bit words.
DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT - Packed 8-bit YUV 420. Y followed by U then
V. No defined linear encoding
DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT - Packed 10-bit YUV 420. Y followed by U
then V. No defined linear encoding
Please also note that in the absence of AFBC, we would still need to
add Y410, Y210 and P210.
Full rationale follows:
YUV 444 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
The currently defined AYUV format encodes a 4th alpha component,
which makes it unsuitable for representing a 3-component YUV 444
AFBC stream.
The proposed[1] XYUV format which is supported by Mali-DP in linear
layout is also unsuitable, because the component order is the
opposite of the AFBC version, and it encodes a 4th 'X' component.
DRM_FORMAT_VUY888 is the "obvious" format for a 3-component, packed,
YUV 444 8-bit format, with the component order which our HW expects to
encode/decode. It conforms to the same naming convention as the
existing packed YUV 444 format.
The naming here is meant to be consistent with DRM_FORMAT_AYUV and
DRM_FORMAT_XYUV[1]
YUV 444 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
There is no currently-defined YUV 444 10-bit format in
drm_fourcc.h, irrespective of number of planes.
The proposed[1] XVYU2101010 format which is supported by Mali-DP in
linear layout uses the wrong component order, and also encodes a 4th
'X' component, which doesn't match the AFBC version of YUV 444
10-bit which we support.
DRM_FORMAT_Y410 is the same layout as XVYU2101010, but with 2 bits of
alpha. This format is supported with linear layout by Mali GPUs. The
naming follows[2].
There is no "obvious" linear encoding for a 3-component 10:10:10
packed format, and so DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010 defines a component
order, but not a bit encoding. Again, the naming is meant to be
consistent with DRM_FORMAT_AYUV.
YUV 422 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
The existing DRM_FORMAT_YUYV (and the other component orders) are
single-planar YUV 422 8-bit formats. Following the convention of
the component orders of the RGB formats, YUYV has the correct
component order for our AFBC encoding (Y followed by U followed by
V). We can use YUYV for AFBC YUV 422 8-bit.
YUV 422 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
There is no currently-defined YUV 422 10-bit format in drm_fourcc.h
DRM_FORMAT_Y210 is analogous to YUYV, but with 10-bits per sample
packed into the upper 10-bits of 16-bit samples. This format is
supported in both linear and AFBC by Mali GPUs.
YUV 422 10-bit, 2-plane
-----------------------
The recently defined DRM_FORMAT_P010 format is a 10-bit semi-planar
YUV 420 format, which has the correct component ordering for an AFBC
2-plane YUV 420 buffer. The linear layout contains meaningless padding
bits, which will not be encoded in an AFBC stream.
YUV 420 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
There is no currently defined single-planar YUV 420, 8-bit format
in drm_fourcc.h. There's differing opinions on whether using the
existing fourcc-implied n_planes where possible is a good idea or
not when using modifiers.
For me, it's much more "obvious" to use NV12 for 2-plane AFBC and
YUV420 for 3-plane AFBC. This keeps the aforementioned separation
between the AFBC codec settings (in the modifier) and the pixel data
format (in the fourcc). With different vendors using AFBC, this helps
to ensure that there is no confusion in interoperation. It also
ensures that the AFBC modifiers describe AFBC itself (which is a
licensable component), and not implementation details which are not
defined by AFBC.
The proposed[1] X0L0 format which Mali-DP supports with Linear layout
is unsuitable, as it contains a 4th 'X' component, and our AFBC
decoder expects only 3 components.
To that end, we propose a new YUV 420 8-bit format. There is no
"obvious" linear encoding for a 3-component 8:8:8, 420, packed format,
and so DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT defines a component order, but not a
bit encoding. I'm happy to hear different naming suggestions.
YUV 420 8-bit, 2-, 3-plane
--------------------------
These already exist, we can use NV12 and YUV420.
YUV 420 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
As above, no current definition exists, and X0L2 encodes a 4th 'X'
channel.
Analogous to DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT, we define DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT.
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-July/184598.html
[2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/medfound/10-bit-and-16-bit-yuv-video-formats
Changes since RFC v1:
- Fix confusing subsampling vs bit-depth X:X:X notation in
descriptions (danvet)
- Rename DRM_FORMAT_AVYU1101010 to DRM_FORMAT_Y410 (Lisa Wu)
- Add drm_format_info structures for the new formats, using the
new 'bpp' field for those with non-integer bytes-per-pixel
- Rebase, including Juha-Pekka Heikkila's format definitions
Changes since RFC v2:
- Rebase on top of latest changes in drm-misc-next
- Change the description of DRM_FORMAT_P210 in __drm_format_info and
drm_fourcc.h so as to make it consistent with other DRM_FORMAT_PXXX
formats.
Changes since v3:
- Added the ack
- Rebased on the latest drm-misc-next
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/291759/?series=57895&rev=1
2018-10-05 10:27:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-04 17:26:33 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-19 13:17:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-04 17:26:33 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-19 13:17:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-04 17:26:33 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-11-01 15:11:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/fourcc: Add AFBC yuv fourccs for Mali
As we look to enable AFBC using DRM format modifiers, we run into
problems which we've historically handled via vendor-private details
(i.e. gralloc, on Android).
AFBC (as an encoding) is fully flexible, and for example YUV data can
be encoded into 1, 2 or 3 encoded "planes", much like the linear
equivalents. Component order is also meaningful, as AFBC doesn't
necessarily care about what each "channel" of the data it encodes
contains. Therefore ABGR8888 and RGBA8888 can be encoded in AFBC with
different representations. Similarly, 'X' components may be encoded
into AFBC streams in cases where a decoder expects to decode a 4th
component.
In addition, AFBC is a licensable IP, meaning that to support the
ecosystem we need to ensure that _all_ AFBC users are able to describe
the encodings that they need. This is much better achieved by
preserving meaning in the fourcc codes when they are combined with an
AFBC modifier.
In essence, we want to use the modifier to describe the parameters of
the AFBC encode/decode, and use the fourcc code to describe the data
being encoded/decoded.
To do anything different would be to introduce redundancy - we would
need to duplicate in the modifier information which is _already_
conveyed clearly and non-ambigiously by a fourcc code.
I hope that for RGB this is non-controversial.
(BGRA8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC) is a different format from
(RGBA8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC).
Possibly more controversial is that (XBGR8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC)
is different from (BGR888 + MODIFIER_AFBC). I understand that in some
schemes it is not the case - but in AFBC it is so.
Where we run into problems is where there are not already fourcc codes
which represent the data which the AFBC encoder/decoder is processing.
To that end, we want to introduce new fourcc codes to describe the
data being encoded/decoded, in the places where none of the existing
fourcc codes are applicable.
Where we don't support an equivalent non-compressed layout, or where
no "obvious" linear layout exists, we are proposing adding fourcc
codes which have no associated linear layout - because any layout we
proposed would be completely arbitrary.
Some formats are following the naming conventions from [2].
The summary of the new formats is:
DRM_FORMAT_VUY888 - Packed 8-bit YUV 444. Y followed by U then V.
DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010 - Packed 10-bit YUV 444. Y followed by U then
V. No defined linear encoding.
DRM_FORMAT_Y210 - Packed 10-bit YUV 422. Y followed by U (then Y)
then V. 10-bit samples in 16-bit words.
DRM_FORMAT_Y410 - Packed 10-bit YUV 444, with 2-bit alpha.
DRM_FORMAT_P210 - Semi-planar 10-bit YUV 422. Y plane, followed by
interleaved U-then-V plane. 10-bit samples in
16-bit words.
DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT - Packed 8-bit YUV 420. Y followed by U then
V. No defined linear encoding
DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT - Packed 10-bit YUV 420. Y followed by U
then V. No defined linear encoding
Please also note that in the absence of AFBC, we would still need to
add Y410, Y210 and P210.
Full rationale follows:
YUV 444 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
The currently defined AYUV format encodes a 4th alpha component,
which makes it unsuitable for representing a 3-component YUV 444
AFBC stream.
The proposed[1] XYUV format which is supported by Mali-DP in linear
layout is also unsuitable, because the component order is the
opposite of the AFBC version, and it encodes a 4th 'X' component.
DRM_FORMAT_VUY888 is the "obvious" format for a 3-component, packed,
YUV 444 8-bit format, with the component order which our HW expects to
encode/decode. It conforms to the same naming convention as the
existing packed YUV 444 format.
The naming here is meant to be consistent with DRM_FORMAT_AYUV and
DRM_FORMAT_XYUV[1]
YUV 444 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
There is no currently-defined YUV 444 10-bit format in
drm_fourcc.h, irrespective of number of planes.
The proposed[1] XVYU2101010 format which is supported by Mali-DP in
linear layout uses the wrong component order, and also encodes a 4th
'X' component, which doesn't match the AFBC version of YUV 444
10-bit which we support.
DRM_FORMAT_Y410 is the same layout as XVYU2101010, but with 2 bits of
alpha. This format is supported with linear layout by Mali GPUs. The
naming follows[2].
There is no "obvious" linear encoding for a 3-component 10:10:10
packed format, and so DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010 defines a component
order, but not a bit encoding. Again, the naming is meant to be
consistent with DRM_FORMAT_AYUV.
YUV 422 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
The existing DRM_FORMAT_YUYV (and the other component orders) are
single-planar YUV 422 8-bit formats. Following the convention of
the component orders of the RGB formats, YUYV has the correct
component order for our AFBC encoding (Y followed by U followed by
V). We can use YUYV for AFBC YUV 422 8-bit.
YUV 422 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
There is no currently-defined YUV 422 10-bit format in drm_fourcc.h
DRM_FORMAT_Y210 is analogous to YUYV, but with 10-bits per sample
packed into the upper 10-bits of 16-bit samples. This format is
supported in both linear and AFBC by Mali GPUs.
YUV 422 10-bit, 2-plane
-----------------------
The recently defined DRM_FORMAT_P010 format is a 10-bit semi-planar
YUV 420 format, which has the correct component ordering for an AFBC
2-plane YUV 420 buffer. The linear layout contains meaningless padding
bits, which will not be encoded in an AFBC stream.
YUV 420 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
There is no currently defined single-planar YUV 420, 8-bit format
in drm_fourcc.h. There's differing opinions on whether using the
existing fourcc-implied n_planes where possible is a good idea or
not when using modifiers.
For me, it's much more "obvious" to use NV12 for 2-plane AFBC and
YUV420 for 3-plane AFBC. This keeps the aforementioned separation
between the AFBC codec settings (in the modifier) and the pixel data
format (in the fourcc). With different vendors using AFBC, this helps
to ensure that there is no confusion in interoperation. It also
ensures that the AFBC modifiers describe AFBC itself (which is a
licensable component), and not implementation details which are not
defined by AFBC.
The proposed[1] X0L0 format which Mali-DP supports with Linear layout
is unsuitable, as it contains a 4th 'X' component, and our AFBC
decoder expects only 3 components.
To that end, we propose a new YUV 420 8-bit format. There is no
"obvious" linear encoding for a 3-component 8:8:8, 420, packed format,
and so DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT defines a component order, but not a
bit encoding. I'm happy to hear different naming suggestions.
YUV 420 8-bit, 2-, 3-plane
--------------------------
These already exist, we can use NV12 and YUV420.
YUV 420 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
As above, no current definition exists, and X0L2 encodes a 4th 'X'
channel.
Analogous to DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT, we define DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT.
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-July/184598.html
[2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/medfound/10-bit-and-16-bit-yuv-video-formats
Changes since RFC v1:
- Fix confusing subsampling vs bit-depth X:X:X notation in
descriptions (danvet)
- Rename DRM_FORMAT_AVYU1101010 to DRM_FORMAT_Y410 (Lisa Wu)
- Add drm_format_info structures for the new formats, using the
new 'bpp' field for those with non-integer bytes-per-pixel
- Rebase, including Juha-Pekka Heikkila's format definitions
Changes since RFC v2:
- Rebase on top of latest changes in drm-misc-next
- Change the description of DRM_FORMAT_P210 in __drm_format_info and
drm_fourcc.h so as to make it consistent with other DRM_FORMAT_PXXX
formats.
Changes since v3:
- Added the ack
- Rebased on the latest drm-misc-next
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/291759/?series=57895&rev=1
2018-10-05 10:27:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-09 11:05:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-18 23:47:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 17:28:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-23 17:37:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm/fourcc: Add AFBC yuv fourccs for Mali
As we look to enable AFBC using DRM format modifiers, we run into
problems which we've historically handled via vendor-private details
(i.e. gralloc, on Android).
AFBC (as an encoding) is fully flexible, and for example YUV data can
be encoded into 1, 2 or 3 encoded "planes", much like the linear
equivalents. Component order is also meaningful, as AFBC doesn't
necessarily care about what each "channel" of the data it encodes
contains. Therefore ABGR8888 and RGBA8888 can be encoded in AFBC with
different representations. Similarly, 'X' components may be encoded
into AFBC streams in cases where a decoder expects to decode a 4th
component.
In addition, AFBC is a licensable IP, meaning that to support the
ecosystem we need to ensure that _all_ AFBC users are able to describe
the encodings that they need. This is much better achieved by
preserving meaning in the fourcc codes when they are combined with an
AFBC modifier.
In essence, we want to use the modifier to describe the parameters of
the AFBC encode/decode, and use the fourcc code to describe the data
being encoded/decoded.
To do anything different would be to introduce redundancy - we would
need to duplicate in the modifier information which is _already_
conveyed clearly and non-ambigiously by a fourcc code.
I hope that for RGB this is non-controversial.
(BGRA8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC) is a different format from
(RGBA8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC).
Possibly more controversial is that (XBGR8888 + MODIFIER_AFBC)
is different from (BGR888 + MODIFIER_AFBC). I understand that in some
schemes it is not the case - but in AFBC it is so.
Where we run into problems is where there are not already fourcc codes
which represent the data which the AFBC encoder/decoder is processing.
To that end, we want to introduce new fourcc codes to describe the
data being encoded/decoded, in the places where none of the existing
fourcc codes are applicable.
Where we don't support an equivalent non-compressed layout, or where
no "obvious" linear layout exists, we are proposing adding fourcc
codes which have no associated linear layout - because any layout we
proposed would be completely arbitrary.
Some formats are following the naming conventions from [2].
The summary of the new formats is:
DRM_FORMAT_VUY888 - Packed 8-bit YUV 444. Y followed by U then V.
DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010 - Packed 10-bit YUV 444. Y followed by U then
V. No defined linear encoding.
DRM_FORMAT_Y210 - Packed 10-bit YUV 422. Y followed by U (then Y)
then V. 10-bit samples in 16-bit words.
DRM_FORMAT_Y410 - Packed 10-bit YUV 444, with 2-bit alpha.
DRM_FORMAT_P210 - Semi-planar 10-bit YUV 422. Y plane, followed by
interleaved U-then-V plane. 10-bit samples in
16-bit words.
DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT - Packed 8-bit YUV 420. Y followed by U then
V. No defined linear encoding
DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT - Packed 10-bit YUV 420. Y followed by U
then V. No defined linear encoding
Please also note that in the absence of AFBC, we would still need to
add Y410, Y210 and P210.
Full rationale follows:
YUV 444 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
The currently defined AYUV format encodes a 4th alpha component,
which makes it unsuitable for representing a 3-component YUV 444
AFBC stream.
The proposed[1] XYUV format which is supported by Mali-DP in linear
layout is also unsuitable, because the component order is the
opposite of the AFBC version, and it encodes a 4th 'X' component.
DRM_FORMAT_VUY888 is the "obvious" format for a 3-component, packed,
YUV 444 8-bit format, with the component order which our HW expects to
encode/decode. It conforms to the same naming convention as the
existing packed YUV 444 format.
The naming here is meant to be consistent with DRM_FORMAT_AYUV and
DRM_FORMAT_XYUV[1]
YUV 444 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
There is no currently-defined YUV 444 10-bit format in
drm_fourcc.h, irrespective of number of planes.
The proposed[1] XVYU2101010 format which is supported by Mali-DP in
linear layout uses the wrong component order, and also encodes a 4th
'X' component, which doesn't match the AFBC version of YUV 444
10-bit which we support.
DRM_FORMAT_Y410 is the same layout as XVYU2101010, but with 2 bits of
alpha. This format is supported with linear layout by Mali GPUs. The
naming follows[2].
There is no "obvious" linear encoding for a 3-component 10:10:10
packed format, and so DRM_FORMAT_VUY101010 defines a component
order, but not a bit encoding. Again, the naming is meant to be
consistent with DRM_FORMAT_AYUV.
YUV 422 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
The existing DRM_FORMAT_YUYV (and the other component orders) are
single-planar YUV 422 8-bit formats. Following the convention of
the component orders of the RGB formats, YUYV has the correct
component order for our AFBC encoding (Y followed by U followed by
V). We can use YUYV for AFBC YUV 422 8-bit.
YUV 422 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
There is no currently-defined YUV 422 10-bit format in drm_fourcc.h
DRM_FORMAT_Y210 is analogous to YUYV, but with 10-bits per sample
packed into the upper 10-bits of 16-bit samples. This format is
supported in both linear and AFBC by Mali GPUs.
YUV 422 10-bit, 2-plane
-----------------------
The recently defined DRM_FORMAT_P010 format is a 10-bit semi-planar
YUV 420 format, which has the correct component ordering for an AFBC
2-plane YUV 420 buffer. The linear layout contains meaningless padding
bits, which will not be encoded in an AFBC stream.
YUV 420 8-bit, 1-plane
----------------------
There is no currently defined single-planar YUV 420, 8-bit format
in drm_fourcc.h. There's differing opinions on whether using the
existing fourcc-implied n_planes where possible is a good idea or
not when using modifiers.
For me, it's much more "obvious" to use NV12 for 2-plane AFBC and
YUV420 for 3-plane AFBC. This keeps the aforementioned separation
between the AFBC codec settings (in the modifier) and the pixel data
format (in the fourcc). With different vendors using AFBC, this helps
to ensure that there is no confusion in interoperation. It also
ensures that the AFBC modifiers describe AFBC itself (which is a
licensable component), and not implementation details which are not
defined by AFBC.
The proposed[1] X0L0 format which Mali-DP supports with Linear layout
is unsuitable, as it contains a 4th 'X' component, and our AFBC
decoder expects only 3 components.
To that end, we propose a new YUV 420 8-bit format. There is no
"obvious" linear encoding for a 3-component 8:8:8, 420, packed format,
and so DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT defines a component order, but not a
bit encoding. I'm happy to hear different naming suggestions.
YUV 420 8-bit, 2-, 3-plane
--------------------------
These already exist, we can use NV12 and YUV420.
YUV 420 10-bit, 1-plane
-----------------------
As above, no current definition exists, and X0L2 encodes a 4th 'X'
channel.
Analogous to DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT, we define DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT.
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-July/184598.html
[2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/medfound/10-bit-and-16-bit-yuv-video-formats
Changes since RFC v1:
- Fix confusing subsampling vs bit-depth X:X:X notation in
descriptions (danvet)
- Rename DRM_FORMAT_AVYU1101010 to DRM_FORMAT_Y410 (Lisa Wu)
- Add drm_format_info structures for the new formats, using the
new 'bpp' field for those with non-integer bytes-per-pixel
- Rebase, including Juha-Pekka Heikkila's format definitions
Changes since RFC v2:
- Rebase on top of latest changes in drm-misc-next
- Change the description of DRM_FORMAT_P210 in __drm_format_info and
drm_fourcc.h so as to make it consistent with other DRM_FORMAT_PXXX
formats.
Changes since v3:
- Added the ack
- Rebased on the latest drm-misc-next
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/291759/?series=57895&rev=1
2018-10-05 10:27:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-10 03:57:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 10:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 17:28:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-17 18:05:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 11:27:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-26 16:32:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
drm/vc4: Add T-format scanout support.
The T tiling format is what V3D uses for textures, with no raster
support at all until later revisions of the hardware (and always at a
large 3D performance penalty). If we can't scan out V3D's format,
then we often need to do a relayout at some stage of the pipeline,
either right before texturing from the scanout buffer (common in X11
without a compositor) or between a tiled screen buffer right before
scanout (an option I've considered in trying to resolve this
inconsistency, but which means needing to use the dirty fb ioctl and
having some update policy).
T-format scanout lets us avoid either of those shadow copies, for a
massive, obvious performance improvement to X11 window dragging
without a compositor. Unfortunately, enabling a compositor to work
around the discrepancy has turned out to be too costly in memory
consumption for the Raspbian distribution.
Because the HVS operates a scanline at a time, compositing from T does
increase the memory bandwidth cost of scanout. On my 1920x1080@32bpp
display on a RPi3, we go from about 15% of system memory bandwidth
with linear to about 20% with tiled. However, for X11 this still ends
up being a huge performance win in active usage.
This patch doesn't yet handle src_x/src_y offsetting within the tiled
buffer. However, we fail to do so for untiled buffers already.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170608001336.12842-1-eric@anholt.net
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
2017-06-07 17:13:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 14:18:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-18 15:51:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-03 10:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-18 15:51:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-23 20:46:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-10 13:12:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-01 15:20:04 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-26 17:48:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-05 14:41:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-26 17:48:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-23 20:46:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-09 13:36:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-26 14:12:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-10 17:16:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 15:08:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-10 17:16:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 15:08:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-10 17:16:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-27 11:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-12 20:39:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-27 11:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-01 09:58:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-21 14:05:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-28 13:40:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-14 22:13:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-23 17:49:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-14 22:13:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 13:55:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-11 17:34:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-11 17:34:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-23 17:49:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-11 17:34:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-14 21:42:39 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-08-16 14:52:28 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-30 20:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 10:36:22 -02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-30 20:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-10 15:28:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 19:00:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-04 10:06:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-26 16:32:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-09 11:30:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-08 16:50:42 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-08 16:50:42 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-08 16:50:42 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
drm/tegra: Sanitize format modifiers
The existing format modifier definitions were merged prematurely, and
recent work has unveiled that the definitions are suboptimal in several
ways:
- The format specifiers, except for one, are not Tegra specific, but
the names don't reflect that.
- The number space is split into two, reserving 32 bits for some
"parameter" which most of the modifiers are not going to have.
- Symbolic names for the modifiers are not using the standard
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* prefix, which makes them awkward to use.
- The vendor prefix NV is somewhat ambiguous.
Fortunately, nobody's started using these modifiers, so we can still fix
the above issues. Do so by using the standard prefix. Also, remove TEGRA
from the name of those modifiers that exist on NVIDIA GPUs as well. In
case of the block linear modifiers, make the "parameter" smaller (4
bits, though only 6 values are valid) and don't let that leak into any
of the other modifiers.
Finally, also use the more canonical NVIDIA instead of the ambiguous NV
prefix.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
2017-10-12 16:39:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
Builds upon the existing NVIDIA 16Bx2 block linear
format modifiers by adding more "fields" to the
existing parameterized
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifier
macro that allow fully defining a unique-across-
all-NVIDIA-hardware bit layout using a minimal
set of fields and values. The new modifier macro
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_BLOCK_LINEAR_2D is
effectively backwards compatible with the existing
macro, introducing a superset of the previously
definable format modifiers.
Backwards compatibility has two quirks. First,
the zero value for the "kind" field, which is
implied by the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK
macro, must be special cased in drivers and
assumed to map to the pre-Turing generic kind of
0xfe, since a kind of "zero" is reserved for
linear buffer layouts on all GPUs.
Second, it is assumed backwards compatibility
is only needed when running on Tegra GPUs, and
specifically Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier. This
is based on two assertions:
-Tegra GPUs prior to Xavier used a slightly
different raw bit layout than desktop GPUs,
making it impossible to directly share block
linear buffers between the two.
-Support for the existing block linear modifiers
was incomplete, making them useful only for
exporting buffers created by nouveau and
importing them to Tegra DRM as framebuffers for
scan out. There was no support for adding
framebuffers using format modifiers in nouveau,
nor importing dma-buf/PRIME GEM objects into
nouveau userspace drivers with modifiers in Mesa.
Hence it is assumed the prior modifiers were not
intended for use on desktop GPUs, and as a
corollary, were not intended to support sharing
block linear buffers across two different NVIDIA
GPUs.
v2:
- Added canonicalize helper function
v3:
- Added additional bit to compression field to
support Tesla (NV5x,G8x,G9x,GT1xx,GT2xx) class
chips.
Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2019-12-11 12:55:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-08 16:50:42 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-16 15:04:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drm/vc4: Add T-format scanout support.
The T tiling format is what V3D uses for textures, with no raster
support at all until later revisions of the hardware (and always at a
large 3D performance penalty). If we can't scan out V3D's format,
then we often need to do a relayout at some stage of the pipeline,
either right before texturing from the scanout buffer (common in X11
without a compositor) or between a tiled screen buffer right before
scanout (an option I've considered in trying to resolve this
inconsistency, but which means needing to use the dirty fb ioctl and
having some update policy).
T-format scanout lets us avoid either of those shadow copies, for a
massive, obvious performance improvement to X11 window dragging
without a compositor. Unfortunately, enabling a compositor to work
around the discrepancy has turned out to be too costly in memory
consumption for the Raspbian distribution.
Because the HVS operates a scanline at a time, compositing from T does
increase the memory bandwidth cost of scanout. On my 1920x1080@32bpp
display on a RPi3, we go from about 15% of system memory bandwidth
with linear to about 20% with tiled. However, for X11 this still ends
up being a huge performance win in active usage.
This patch doesn't yet handle src_x/src_y offsetting within the tiled
buffer. However, we fail to do so for untiled buffers already.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170608001336.12842-1-eric@anholt.net
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
2017-06-07 17:13:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-16 15:04:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 10:17:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-16 15:04:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-20 17:17:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 14:18:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-03 11:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 14:18:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-04 14:12:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-12 20:39:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-07-01 18:07:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-04 14:12:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 14:18:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-09 15:58:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 14:18:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-09 15:58:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-10 14:18:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-09 15:58:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 09:32:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-01 18:07:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-04 14:12:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-18 15:51:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-03 10:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-10 13:51:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-03 10:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-10 13:51:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-03 10:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-23 11:05:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-03 10:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-12-12 20:39:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-03 10:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 17:21:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 15:33:05 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2024-02-02 14:00:27 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-02 14:00:27 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-25 11:23:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 15:33:05 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2024-02-02 14:00:27 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-01 19:53:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-02 14:00:27 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 18:55:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 18:55:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 18:55:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 18:55:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-15 09:39:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 18:55:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-13 18:55:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-21 20:39:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-21 20:39:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-30 12:58:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-07 18:49:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-14 14:51:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
