kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-09-26 18:16:26 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/fs/ufs/util.h

566 lines
16 KiB
Raw Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: wrong type cast There are two ugly macros in ufs code: #define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi) #define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi) when uspi looks like struct { struct ufs_buffer_head ; } and USPI_UBH has some sence, ucpi looks like struct { struct not_ufs_buffer_head; } To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and fix "ucpi" structure. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:22 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: wrong type cast There are two ugly macros in ufs code: #define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi) #define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi) when uspi looks like struct { struct ufs_buffer_head ; } and USPI_UBH has some sence, ucpi looks like struct { struct not_ufs_buffer_head; } To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and fix "ucpi" structure. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:22 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: one way to access super block Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512, this cause some problems. Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block: 1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with size <=512 2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction: bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two variants cause unnecessary code duplication. This patch remove the second variant. Also patch contains some CodingStyle fixes. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:29 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: ubh_ll_rw_block cleanup In ufs code there is function: ubh_ll_rw_block, it has parameter how many ufs_buffer_head it should handle, but it always called with "1" on the place of this parameter. This patch removes unused parameter of "ubh_ll_wr_block". Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:31 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: truncate should allocate block for last byte This patch fixes buggy behaviour of UFS in such kind of scenario: open(, O_TRUNC...) ftruncate(, 1024) ftruncate(, 0) Such a scenario causes ufs_panic and remount read-only. This happen because of according to specification UFS should always allocate block for last byte, and many parts of our implementation rely on this, but `ufs_truncate' doesn't care about this. To make possible return error code and to know about old size, this patch removes `truncate' from ufs inode_operations and uses `setattr' method to call ufs_truncate. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-01 04:36:24 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs cleanup Here is update of ufs cleanup patch, brought on by the recently fixed ubh_get_usb_second() bug that made some ugly code rather painfully obvious. It also includes - fix compilation warnings which appears if debug mode turn on - remove unnecessary duplication of code to support UFS2 I tested it on ufs1 and ufs2 file-systems. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-14 11:42:06 +03:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs cleanup Here is update of ufs cleanup patch, brought on by the recently fixed ubh_get_usb_second() bug that made some ugly code rather painfully obvious. It also includes - fix compilation warnings which appears if debug mode turn on - remove unnecessary duplication of code to support UFS2 I tested it on ufs1 and ufs2 file-systems. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-14 11:42:06 +03:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] fs: ufs add missing bracket Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-12-06 20:40:09 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs2 write: block allocation update Patch adds ability to work with 64bit metadata, this made by replacing work with 32bit pointers by inline functions. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 00:54:32 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs2 write: block allocation update Patch adds ability to work with 64bit metadata, this made by replacing work with 32bit pointers by inline functions. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 00:54:32 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: make fsck -f happy ufs super block contains some statistic about file systems, like amount of directories, free blocks, inodes and so on. UFS1 hold this information in one location and uses 32bit integers for such information, UFS2 hold statistic in another location and uses 64bit integers. There is transition variant, if UFS1 has type 44BSD and flags field in super block has some special value this mean that we work with statistic like UFS2 does. and this also means that nobody care about old(UFS1) statistic. So if start fsck against such file system, after usage linux ufs driver, it found error: at now only UFS1 like statistic is updated. This patch should fix this. Also it contains some minor cleanup: CodingSytle and remove unused variables. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:30 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: wrong type cast There are two ugly macros in ufs code: #define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi) #define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi) when uspi looks like struct { struct ufs_buffer_head ; } and USPI_UBH has some sence, ucpi looks like struct { struct not_ufs_buffer_head; } To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and fix "ucpi" structure. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:22 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs: wrong type cast There are two ugly macros in ufs code: #define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi) #define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi) when uspi looks like struct { struct ufs_buffer_head ; } and USPI_UBH has some sence, ucpi looks like struct { struct not_ufs_buffer_head; } To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and fix "ucpi" structure. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-25 05:47:22 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] ufs2 write: block allocation update Patch adds ability to work with 64bit metadata, this made by replacing work with 32bit pointers by inline functions. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 00:54:32 -08:00