linux/drivers/base/base.h

140 lines
4.8 KiB

[PATCH] drivers/base - fix sparse warnings There are a number of sparse warnings from the latest sparse snapshot being generated from the drivers/base build. The main culprits are due to the initialisation functions not being declared in a header file. Also, the firmware.c file should include <linux/device.h> to get the prototype of firmware_register() and firmware_unregister(). This patch moves the init function declerations from the init.c file to the base.h, and ensures it is included in all the relevant c sources. It also adds <linux/device.h> to the included headers for firmware.c. The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated, but reduces the count significantly. drivers/base/core.c:161:1: warning: symbol 'devices_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/core.c:417:12: warning: symbol 'devices_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:253:6: warning: symbol 'sysdev_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_resume' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'system_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:133:1: warning: symbol 'bus_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:667:12: warning: symbol 'buses_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/class.c:759:12: warning: symbol 'classes_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/platform.c:313:12: warning: symbol 'platform_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/cpu.c:110:12: warning: symbol 'cpu_dev_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'firmware_register' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:23:6: warning: symbol 'firmware_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:28:12: warning: symbol 'firmware_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/init.c:28:13: warning: symbol 'driver_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/dmapool.c:174:10: warning: implicit cast from nocast type drivers/base/attribute_container.c:439:1: warning: symbol 'attribute_container_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/power/runtime.c:76:6: warning: symbol 'dpm_set_power_state' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-10-13 17:54:41 +01:00
[PATCH] drivers/base - fix sparse warnings There are a number of sparse warnings from the latest sparse snapshot being generated from the drivers/base build. The main culprits are due to the initialisation functions not being declared in a header file. Also, the firmware.c file should include <linux/device.h> to get the prototype of firmware_register() and firmware_unregister(). This patch moves the init function declerations from the init.c file to the base.h, and ensures it is included in all the relevant c sources. It also adds <linux/device.h> to the included headers for firmware.c. The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated, but reduces the count significantly. drivers/base/core.c:161:1: warning: symbol 'devices_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/core.c:417:12: warning: symbol 'devices_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:253:6: warning: symbol 'sysdev_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_resume' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'system_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:133:1: warning: symbol 'bus_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:667:12: warning: symbol 'buses_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/class.c:759:12: warning: symbol 'classes_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/platform.c:313:12: warning: symbol 'platform_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/cpu.c:110:12: warning: symbol 'cpu_dev_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'firmware_register' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:23:6: warning: symbol 'firmware_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:28:12: warning: symbol 'firmware_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/init.c:28:13: warning: symbol 'driver_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/dmapool.c:174:10: warning: implicit cast from nocast type drivers/base/attribute_container.c:439:1: warning: symbol 'attribute_container_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/power/runtime.c:76:6: warning: symbol 'dpm_set_power_state' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-10-13 17:54:41 +01:00
[PATCH] drivers/base - fix sparse warnings There are a number of sparse warnings from the latest sparse snapshot being generated from the drivers/base build. The main culprits are due to the initialisation functions not being declared in a header file. Also, the firmware.c file should include <linux/device.h> to get the prototype of firmware_register() and firmware_unregister(). This patch moves the init function declerations from the init.c file to the base.h, and ensures it is included in all the relevant c sources. It also adds <linux/device.h> to the included headers for firmware.c. The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated, but reduces the count significantly. drivers/base/core.c:161:1: warning: symbol 'devices_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/core.c:417:12: warning: symbol 'devices_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:253:6: warning: symbol 'sysdev_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_resume' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'system_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:133:1: warning: symbol 'bus_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:667:12: warning: symbol 'buses_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/class.c:759:12: warning: symbol 'classes_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/platform.c:313:12: warning: symbol 'platform_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/cpu.c:110:12: warning: symbol 'cpu_dev_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'firmware_register' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:23:6: warning: symbol 'firmware_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:28:12: warning: symbol 'firmware_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/init.c:28:13: warning: symbol 'driver_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/dmapool.c:174:10: warning: implicit cast from nocast type drivers/base/attribute_container.c:439:1: warning: symbol 'attribute_container_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/power/runtime.c:76:6: warning: symbol 'dpm_set_power_state' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-10-13 17:54:41 +01:00
[PATCH] drivers/base - fix sparse warnings There are a number of sparse warnings from the latest sparse snapshot being generated from the drivers/base build. The main culprits are due to the initialisation functions not being declared in a header file. Also, the firmware.c file should include <linux/device.h> to get the prototype of firmware_register() and firmware_unregister(). This patch moves the init function declerations from the init.c file to the base.h, and ensures it is included in all the relevant c sources. It also adds <linux/device.h> to the included headers for firmware.c. The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated, but reduces the count significantly. drivers/base/core.c:161:1: warning: symbol 'devices_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/core.c:417:12: warning: symbol 'devices_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:253:6: warning: symbol 'sysdev_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_resume' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/sys.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'system_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:133:1: warning: symbol 'bus_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/bus.c:667:12: warning: symbol 'buses_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/class.c:759:12: warning: symbol 'classes_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/platform.c:313:12: warning: symbol 'platform_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/cpu.c:110:12: warning: symbol 'cpu_dev_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'firmware_register' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:23:6: warning: symbol 'firmware_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/firmware.c:28:12: warning: symbol 'firmware_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/init.c:28:13: warning: symbol 'driver_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/dmapool.c:174:10: warning: implicit cast from nocast type drivers/base/attribute_container.c:439:1: warning: symbol 'attribute_container_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/base/power/runtime.c:76:6: warning: symbol 'dpm_set_power_state' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2005-10-13 17:54:41 +01:00
drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism Allow drivers to report at probe time that they cannot get all the resources required by the device, and should be retried at a later time. This should completely solve the problem of getting devices initialized in the right order. Right now this is mostly handled by mucking about with initcall ordering which is a complete hack, and doesn't even remotely handle the case where device drivers are in modules. This approach completely sidesteps the issues by allowing driver registration to occur in any order, and any driver can request to be retried after a few more other drivers get probed. v4: - Integrate Manjunath's addition of a separate workqueue - Change -EAGAIN to -EPROBE_DEFER for drivers to trigger deferral - Update comment blocks to reflect how the code really works v3: - Hold off workqueue scheduling until late_initcall so that the bulk of driver probes are complete before we start retrying deferred devices. - Tested with simple use cases. Still needs more testing though. Using it to get rid of the gpio early_initcall madness, or to replace the ASoC internal probe deferral code would be ideal. v2: - added locking so it should no longer be utterly broken in that regard - remove device from deferred list at device_del time. - Still completely untested with any real use case, but has been boot tested. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Dilan Lee <dilee@nvidia.com> Cc: Manjunath GKondaiah <manjunath.gkondaiah@linaro.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-03-05 08:47:41 -07:00
Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based /dev Devtmpfs lets the kernel create a tmpfs instance called devtmpfs very early at kernel initialization, before any driver-core device is registered. Every device with a major/minor will provide a device node in devtmpfs. Devtmpfs can be changed and altered by userspace at any time, and in any way needed - just like today's udev-mounted tmpfs. Unmodified udev versions will run just fine on top of it, and will recognize an already existing kernel-created device node and use it. The default node permissions are root:root 0600. Proper permissions and user/group ownership, meaningful symlinks, all other policy still needs to be applied by userspace. If a node is created by devtmps, devtmpfs will remove the device node when the device goes away. If the device node was created by userspace, or the devtmpfs created node was replaced by userspace, it will no longer be removed by devtmpfs. If it is requested to auto-mount it, it makes init=/bin/sh work without any further userspace support. /dev will be fully populated and dynamic, and always reflect the current device state of the kernel. With the commonly used dynamic device numbers, it solves the problem where static devices nodes may point to the wrong devices. It is intended to make the initial bootup logic simpler and more robust, by de-coupling the creation of the inital environment, to reliably run userspace processes, from a complex userspace bootstrap logic to provide a working /dev. Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de> Tested-By: Harald Hoyer <harald@redhat.com> Tested-By: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2009-04-30 15:23:42 +02:00