linux/Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst

987 lines
34 KiB

PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
docs: dma: correct dma_set_mask() sample code There are bunch of codes in driver like if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) Actually it is wrong because if dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64) fails, dma_set_mask_and_coherent(32) will fail for the same reason. And dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64) never returns failure. According to the definition of dma_set_mask(), it indicates the width of address that device DMA can access. If it can access 64-bit address, it must access 32-bit address inherently. So only need set biggest address width. See below code fragment: dma_set_mask(mask) { mask = (dma_addr_t)mask; if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask)) return -EIO; arch_dma_set_mask(dev, mask); *dev->dma_mask = mask; return 0; } dma_supported() will call dma_direct_supported or iommux's dma_supported call back function. int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { u64 min_mask = (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT; /* * Because 32-bit DMA masks are so common we expect every architecture * to be able to satisfy them - either by not supporting more physical * memory, or by providing a ZONE_DMA32. If neither is the case, the * architecture needs to use an IOMMU instead of the direct mapping. */ if (mask >= DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) return 1; ... } The iommux's dma_supported() actually means iommu requires devices's minimized dma capability. An example: static int sba_dma_supported( struct device *dev, u64 mask)() { ... * check if mask is >= than the current max IO Virt Address * The max IO Virt address will *always* < 30 bits. */ return((int)(mask >= (ioc->ibase - 1 + (ioc->pdir_size / sizeof(u64) * IOVP_SIZE) ))); ... } 1 means supported. 0 means unsupported. Correct document to make it more clear and provide correct sample code. Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> [jc: fixed then/than typo] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401174159.642998-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com
2024-04-01 13:41:59 -04:00
docs: dma: correct dma_set_mask() sample code There are bunch of codes in driver like if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) Actually it is wrong because if dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64) fails, dma_set_mask_and_coherent(32) will fail for the same reason. And dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64) never returns failure. According to the definition of dma_set_mask(), it indicates the width of address that device DMA can access. If it can access 64-bit address, it must access 32-bit address inherently. So only need set biggest address width. See below code fragment: dma_set_mask(mask) { mask = (dma_addr_t)mask; if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask)) return -EIO; arch_dma_set_mask(dev, mask); *dev->dma_mask = mask; return 0; } dma_supported() will call dma_direct_supported or iommux's dma_supported call back function. int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { u64 min_mask = (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT; /* * Because 32-bit DMA masks are so common we expect every architecture * to be able to satisfy them - either by not supporting more physical * memory, or by providing a ZONE_DMA32. If neither is the case, the * architecture needs to use an IOMMU instead of the direct mapping. */ if (mask >= DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) return 1; ... } The iommux's dma_supported() actually means iommu requires devices's minimized dma capability. An example: static int sba_dma_supported( struct device *dev, u64 mask)() { ... * check if mask is >= than the current max IO Virt Address * The max IO Virt address will *always* < 30 bits. */ return((int)(mask >= (ioc->ibase - 1 + (ioc->pdir_size / sizeof(u64) * IOVP_SIZE) ))); ... } 1 means supported. 0 means unsupported. Correct document to make it more clear and provide correct sample code. Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> [jc: fixed then/than typo] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401174159.642998-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com
2024-04-01 13:41:59 -04:00
docs: dma: correct dma_set_mask() sample code There are bunch of codes in driver like if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) Actually it is wrong because if dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64) fails, dma_set_mask_and_coherent(32) will fail for the same reason. And dma_set_mask_and_coherent(64) never returns failure. According to the definition of dma_set_mask(), it indicates the width of address that device DMA can access. If it can access 64-bit address, it must access 32-bit address inherently. So only need set biggest address width. See below code fragment: dma_set_mask(mask) { mask = (dma_addr_t)mask; if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask)) return -EIO; arch_dma_set_mask(dev, mask); *dev->dma_mask = mask; return 0; } dma_supported() will call dma_direct_supported or iommux's dma_supported call back function. int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { u64 min_mask = (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT; /* * Because 32-bit DMA masks are so common we expect every architecture * to be able to satisfy them - either by not supporting more physical * memory, or by providing a ZONE_DMA32. If neither is the case, the * architecture needs to use an IOMMU instead of the direct mapping. */ if (mask >= DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) return 1; ... } The iommux's dma_supported() actually means iommu requires devices's minimized dma capability. An example: static int sba_dma_supported( struct device *dev, u64 mask)() { ... * check if mask is >= than the current max IO Virt Address * The max IO Virt address will *always* < 30 bits. */ return((int)(mask >= (ioc->ibase - 1 + (ioc->pdir_size / sizeof(u64) * IOVP_SIZE) ))); ... } 1 means supported. 0 means unsupported. Correct document to make it more clear and provide correct sample code. Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> [jc: fixed then/than typo] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401174159.642998-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com
2024-04-01 13:41:59 -04:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00
PCI: Add pci_bus_addr_t David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f3df9 added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231 Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
2015-05-27 17:23:51 -07:00