2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-01 15:35:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-12 12:26:47 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-04-03 16:05:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-03 16:05:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-03 16:05:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-04-03 16:05:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exfat: limit log print for IO error
For exFAT filesystems with 4MB read_ahead_size, removing the storage device
when the read operation is in progress, which cause the last read syscall
spent 150s [1]. The main reason is that exFAT generates excessive log
messages [2].
After applying this patch, approximately 300,000 lines of log messages
were suppressed, and the delay of the last read() syscall was reduced
to about 4 seconds.
[1]:
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000120>
read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000032>
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000119>
read(4, 0x7fccf28ae000, 131072) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) <150.186215>
[2]:
[ 333.696603] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.697378] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.698156] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
2025-08-15 17:32:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-03 16:05:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: limit log print for IO error
For exFAT filesystems with 4MB read_ahead_size, removing the storage device
when the read operation is in progress, which cause the last read syscall
spent 150s [1]. The main reason is that exFAT generates excessive log
messages [2].
After applying this patch, approximately 300,000 lines of log messages
were suppressed, and the delay of the last read() syscall was reduced
to about 4 seconds.
[1]:
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000120>
read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000032>
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000119>
read(4, 0x7fccf28ae000, 131072) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) <150.186215>
[2]:
[ 333.696603] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.697378] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.698156] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
2025-08-15 17:32:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: limit log print for IO error
For exFAT filesystems with 4MB read_ahead_size, removing the storage device
when the read operation is in progress, which cause the last read syscall
spent 150s [1]. The main reason is that exFAT generates excessive log
messages [2].
After applying this patch, approximately 300,000 lines of log messages
were suppressed, and the delay of the last read() syscall was reduced
to about 4 seconds.
[1]:
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000120>
read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000032>
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000119>
read(4, 0x7fccf28ae000, 131072) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) <150.186215>
[2]:
[ 333.696603] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.697378] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.698156] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
2025-08-15 17:32:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: limit log print for IO error
For exFAT filesystems with 4MB read_ahead_size, removing the storage device
when the read operation is in progress, which cause the last read syscall
spent 150s [1]. The main reason is that exFAT generates excessive log
messages [2].
After applying this patch, approximately 300,000 lines of log messages
were suppressed, and the delay of the last read() syscall was reduced
to about 4 seconds.
[1]:
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000120>
read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000032>
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000119>
read(4, 0x7fccf28ae000, 131072) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) <150.186215>
[2]:
[ 333.696603] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.697378] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.698156] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
2025-08-15 17:32:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exfat: limit log print for IO error
For exFAT filesystems with 4MB read_ahead_size, removing the storage device
when the read operation is in progress, which cause the last read syscall
spent 150s [1]. The main reason is that exFAT generates excessive log
messages [2].
After applying this patch, approximately 300,000 lines of log messages
were suppressed, and the delay of the last read() syscall was reduced
to about 4 seconds.
[1]:
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000120>
read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000032>
write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000119>
read(4, 0x7fccf28ae000, 131072) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) <150.186215>
[2]:
[ 333.696603] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.697378] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
[ 333.698156] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5)
Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
2025-08-15 17:32:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-04-03 16:05:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-03-03 11:14:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-12 14:18:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-04 13:54:28 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-24 13:31:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-01-31 12:55:55 +09:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-01-21 19:04:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-12 09:42:25 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-01-31 12:55:55 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-12 14:18:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-12 14:18:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-12 09:42:25 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-01-31 12:55:55 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-12 14:18:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
exfat: improve performance of exfat_free_cluster when using dirsync mount option
There are stressful update of cluster allocation bitmap when using
dirsync mount option which is doing sync buffer on every cluster bit
clearing. This could result in performance degradation when deleting
big size file.
Fix to update only when the bitmap buffer index is changed would make
less disk access, improving performance especially for truncate operation.
Testing with Samsung 256GB sdcard, mounted with dirsync option
(mount -t exfat /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 /temp/mount -o dirsync)
Remove 4GB file, blktrace result.
[Before] : 39 secs.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 32775, 16387KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 32775, 16387KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 2 Timer unplugs: 0
[After] : 1 sec.
Total (blktrace):
Reads Queued: 0, 0KiB Writes Queued: 13, 6KiB
Read Dispatches: 0, 0KiB Write Dispatches: 13, 6KiB
Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
Reads Completed: 0, 0KiB Writes Completed: 13, 6KiB
Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
IO unplugs: 1 Timer unplugs: 0
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
2021-02-01 10:02:46 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-01-31 12:55:55 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 13:39:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-03-17 10:53:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-12 12:26:47 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 10:01:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-12 12:26:47 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-12 12:26:47 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-12 12:26:47 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-21 16:42:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-12 12:26:47 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 09:05:08 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-10 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-26 10:39:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-24 13:31:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-04 13:54:28 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-09 17:44:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-06 18:25:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 09:05:08 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-12 09:42:25 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-10 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-10 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 09:05:08 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 09:05:08 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-10 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-10 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-02 14:05:20 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-14 20:12:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-03-18 17:00:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-02 15:21:37 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|