linux/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c

1456 lines
35 KiB

fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse-uring: fix race between registration and connection abortion This fixes this race: - thread a: io_uring_enter -> register sqe -> fuse_uring_create_ring_ent -> allocate ent but doesn't grab queue_ref yet - thread b: fuse_conn_destroy() -> fuse_chan_abort() -> fuse_uring_abort() is a no-op due to queue ref being 0 - thread a: grabs the queue_ref, queue_ref is now 1, rest of fuse_uring_do_register() logic executes - thread b: fuse_chan_abort() returns, fuse_chan_wait_aborted() now runs and calls "wait_event(ring->stop_waitq, atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) == 0);" The abort/unmount thread will hang indefinitely in unkillable state as nothing will decrement queue_refs or wake stop_waitq, and the ring, queue, and ent are leaked. Fix this by checking fch->connected under fch->lock after the created ent has grabbed a ref count on the queue. This ensures that in the scenario above, it is guaranteed that we either release the queue ref and wake up stop_waitq (in case fuse_chan_wait_aborted() is already waiting) in fuse_uring_do_register() when we detect !fch->connected, or if the connection is aborted after the check, it is guaranteed that the async teardown worker will be running in the background cleaning up ents and decrementing the ent's ref on the queue, which will unblock the eventual queue and ring teardown. Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 12:21:47 -07:00
fuse-uring: fix race between registration and connection abortion This fixes this race: - thread a: io_uring_enter -> register sqe -> fuse_uring_create_ring_ent -> allocate ent but doesn't grab queue_ref yet - thread b: fuse_conn_destroy() -> fuse_chan_abort() -> fuse_uring_abort() is a no-op due to queue ref being 0 - thread a: grabs the queue_ref, queue_ref is now 1, rest of fuse_uring_do_register() logic executes - thread b: fuse_chan_abort() returns, fuse_chan_wait_aborted() now runs and calls "wait_event(ring->stop_waitq, atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) == 0);" The abort/unmount thread will hang indefinitely in unkillable state as nothing will decrement queue_refs or wake stop_waitq, and the ring, queue, and ent are leaked. Fix this by checking fch->connected under fch->lock after the created ent has grabbed a ref count on the queue. This ensures that in the scenario above, it is guaranteed that we either release the queue ref and wake up stop_waitq (in case fuse_chan_wait_aborted() is already waiting) in fuse_uring_do_register() when we detect !fch->connected, or if the connection is aborted after the check, it is guaranteed that the async teardown worker will be running in the background cleaning up ents and decrementing the ent's ref on the queue, which will unblock the eventual queue and ring teardown. Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 12:21:47 -07:00
fuse-uring: fix race between registration and connection abortion This fixes this race: - thread a: io_uring_enter -> register sqe -> fuse_uring_create_ring_ent -> allocate ent but doesn't grab queue_ref yet - thread b: fuse_conn_destroy() -> fuse_chan_abort() -> fuse_uring_abort() is a no-op due to queue ref being 0 - thread a: grabs the queue_ref, queue_ref is now 1, rest of fuse_uring_do_register() logic executes - thread b: fuse_chan_abort() returns, fuse_chan_wait_aborted() now runs and calls "wait_event(ring->stop_waitq, atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) == 0);" The abort/unmount thread will hang indefinitely in unkillable state as nothing will decrement queue_refs or wake stop_waitq, and the ring, queue, and ent are leaked. Fix this by checking fch->connected under fch->lock after the created ent has grabbed a ref count on the queue. This ensures that in the scenario above, it is guaranteed that we either release the queue ref and wake up stop_waitq (in case fuse_chan_wait_aborted() is already waiting) in fuse_uring_do_register() when we detect !fch->connected, or if the connection is aborted after the check, it is guaranteed that the async teardown worker will be running in the background cleaning up ents and decrementing the ent's ref on the queue, which will unblock the eventual queue and ring teardown. Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 12:21:47 -07:00
fuse-uring: fix race between registration and connection abortion This fixes this race: - thread a: io_uring_enter -> register sqe -> fuse_uring_create_ring_ent -> allocate ent but doesn't grab queue_ref yet - thread b: fuse_conn_destroy() -> fuse_chan_abort() -> fuse_uring_abort() is a no-op due to queue ref being 0 - thread a: grabs the queue_ref, queue_ref is now 1, rest of fuse_uring_do_register() logic executes - thread b: fuse_chan_abort() returns, fuse_chan_wait_aborted() now runs and calls "wait_event(ring->stop_waitq, atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) == 0);" The abort/unmount thread will hang indefinitely in unkillable state as nothing will decrement queue_refs or wake stop_waitq, and the ring, queue, and ent are leaked. Fix this by checking fch->connected under fch->lock after the created ent has grabbed a ref count on the queue. This ensures that in the scenario above, it is guaranteed that we either release the queue ref and wake up stop_waitq (in case fuse_chan_wait_aborted() is already waiting) in fuse_uring_do_register() when we detect !fch->connected, or if the connection is aborted after the check, it is guaranteed that the async teardown worker will be running in the background cleaning up ents and decrementing the ent's ref on the queue, which will unblock the eventual queue and ring teardown. Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 12:21:47 -07:00
fuse-uring: fix race between registration and connection abortion This fixes this race: - thread a: io_uring_enter -> register sqe -> fuse_uring_create_ring_ent -> allocate ent but doesn't grab queue_ref yet - thread b: fuse_conn_destroy() -> fuse_chan_abort() -> fuse_uring_abort() is a no-op due to queue ref being 0 - thread a: grabs the queue_ref, queue_ref is now 1, rest of fuse_uring_do_register() logic executes - thread b: fuse_chan_abort() returns, fuse_chan_wait_aborted() now runs and calls "wait_event(ring->stop_waitq, atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) == 0);" The abort/unmount thread will hang indefinitely in unkillable state as nothing will decrement queue_refs or wake stop_waitq, and the ring, queue, and ent are leaked. Fix this by checking fch->connected under fch->lock after the created ent has grabbed a ref count on the queue. This ensures that in the scenario above, it is guaranteed that we either release the queue ref and wake up stop_waitq (in case fuse_chan_wait_aborted() is already waiting) in fuse_uring_do_register() when we detect !fch->connected, or if the connection is aborted after the check, it is guaranteed that the async teardown worker will be running in the background cleaning up ents and decrementing the ent's ref on the queue, which will unblock the eventual queue and ring teardown. Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 12:21:47 -07:00
fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries On teardown struct file_operations::uring_cmd requests need to be completed by calling io_uring_cmd_done(). Not completing all ring entries would result in busy io-uring tasks giving warning messages in intervals and unreleased struct file. Additionally the fuse connection and with that the ring can only get released when all io-uring commands are completed. Completion is done with ring entries that are a) in waiting state for new fuse requests - io_uring_cmd_done is needed b) already in userspace - io_uring_cmd_done through teardown is not needed, the request can just get released. If fuse server is still active and commits such a ring entry, fuse_uring_cmd() already checks if the connection is active and then complete the io-uring itself with -ENOTCONN. I.e. special handling is not needed. This scheme is basically represented by the ring entry state FRRS_WAIT and FRRS_USERSPACE. Entries in state: - FRRS_INIT: No action needed, do not contribute to ring->queue_refs yet - All other states: Are currently processed by other tasks, async teardown is needed and it has to wait for the two states above. It could be also solved without an async teardown task, but would require additional if conditions in hot code paths. Also in my personal opinion the code looks cleaner with async teardown. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> # io_uring Reviewed-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2025-01-20 02:29:04 +01:00
fuse-uring: fix race between registration and connection abortion This fixes this race: - thread a: io_uring_enter -> register sqe -> fuse_uring_create_ring_ent -> allocate ent but doesn't grab queue_ref yet - thread b: fuse_conn_destroy() -> fuse_chan_abort() -> fuse_uring_abort() is a no-op due to queue ref being 0 - thread a: grabs the queue_ref, queue_ref is now 1, rest of fuse_uring_do_register() logic executes - thread b: fuse_chan_abort() returns, fuse_chan_wait_aborted() now runs and calls "wait_event(ring->stop_waitq, atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) == 0);" The abort/unmount thread will hang indefinitely in unkillable state as nothing will decrement queue_refs or wake stop_waitq, and the ring, queue, and ent are leaked. Fix this by checking fch->connected under fch->lock after the created ent has grabbed a ref count on the queue. This ensures that in the scenario above, it is guaranteed that we either release the queue ref and wake up stop_waitq (in case fuse_chan_wait_aborted() is already waiting) in fuse_uring_do_register() when we detect !fch->connected, or if the connection is aborted after the check, it is guaranteed that the async teardown worker will be running in the background cleaning up ents and decrementing the ent's ref on the queue, which will unblock the eventual queue and ring teardown. Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 12:21:47 -07:00
fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING, PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context), fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns -ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd; it never discharges the ring entry's owning reference to the fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at dispatch time. fuse_uring_send_in_task() tw.cancel == true err = -ECANCELED fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags) ent->state = FRRS_USERSPACE list_move(&ent->list, &queue->ent_in_userspace) ent->cmd = NULL io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED) /* ent->fuse_req still set, req still hashed */ The fuse_req stays linked on fpq->processing[hash] and fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc->num_background is never decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for fuse_abort_conn() to clean up. Ending the req but still routing the entry through fuse_uring_send() is not enough: that leaves a req-less entry on ent_in_userspace, and ent_list_request_expired() dereferences ent->fuse_req unconditionally on the head of that list, which would then NULL-deref. Fix the cancel branch to release the entry directly. Remove it from the queue, complete the io_uring cmd, end the fuse_req, free the entry, and drop its queue_refs (waking the teardown waiter if it was the last). Fixes: c2c9af9a0b13 ("fuse: Allow to queue fg requests through io-uring") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Assisted-by: kres (claude-opus-4-7) Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 17:28:55 -07:00
fuse-uring: end fuse_req on io-uring cancel task work When io_uring delivers task work with tw.cancel set (PF_EXITING, PF_KTHREAD fallback, or percpu_ref_is_dying on the ring context), fuse_uring_send_in_task() takes the cancel branch, assigns -ECANCELED, and falls through to fuse_uring_send(). That path only flips the entry to FRRS_USERSPACE and completes the io_uring cmd; it never discharges the ring entry's owning reference to the fuse_req that fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent() handed it at dispatch time. fuse_uring_send_in_task() tw.cancel == true err = -ECANCELED fuse_uring_send(ent, cmd, err, issue_flags) ent->state = FRRS_USERSPACE list_move(&ent->list, &queue->ent_in_userspace) ent->cmd = NULL io_uring_cmd_done(-ECANCELED) /* ent->fuse_req still set, req still hashed */ The fuse_req stays linked on fpq->processing[hash] and fuse_request_end() is never invoked. The originating syscall thread blocks in D-state in request_wait_answer() until fuse_abort_conn() runs, which can be the entire connection lifetime. For FR_BACKGROUND requests fc->num_background is never decremented either, so repeated cancels inflate the counter until max_background is hit and all later background ops stall. tw.cancel does not imply a connection abort (e.g. a single io_uring worker thread exits while the fuse connection stays up), so this cannot be left for fuse_abort_conn() to clean up. Ending the req but still routing the entry through fuse_uring_send() is not enough: that leaves a req-less entry on ent_in_userspace, and ent_list_request_expired() dereferences ent->fuse_req unconditionally on the head of that list, which would then NULL-deref. Fix the cancel branch to release the entry directly. Remove it from the queue, complete the io_uring cmd, end the fuse_req, free the entry, and drop its queue_refs (waking the teardown waiter if it was the last). Fixes: c2c9af9a0b13 ("fuse: Allow to queue fg requests through io-uring") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Assisted-by: kres (claude-opus-4-7) Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2026-06-08 17:28:55 -07:00