kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-08 18:57:22 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/include/drm/drm_exec.h

189 lines
5.6 KiB
Raw Normal View History

drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: use unique instead of local label GCC forbids to jump to labels in loop conditions and a new clang check stumbled over this. So instead using a local label inside the loop condition use an unique label outside of it. Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1890 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20219106060208f0c2f5d096eb3aed7b712f5067 Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230731123625.3766-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2023-07-31 14:36:24 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec, drm/xe: Avoid abusing the drm_exec retry pointer The xe driver was using the drm_exec retry pointer directly to restart the locking loop after out-of-memory errors. This is relying on undocumented behaviour. Instead add a drm_exec_retry() macro that can be used in this situation, and that also warns if the struct drm_exec is not newly (re-)initialized. Use that macro in xe. v2: - Only allow if the drm_exec context is newly initialized. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:15 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec, drm/gpuvm: Prefer u32 over uint32_t The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm. Prefer u32 in new code and update drm/exec and drm/gpuvm accordingly. Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240119090557.6360-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2024-01-19 10:05:57 +01:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first mutex of a given class locked in a sequence. This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked while other mutexes of the same class remain locked and then its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will incorrectly assume that memory is freed with a held lock in there. For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed object lock last. v2: - Fix a typo (Danilo Krummrich) - Reword the commit message a bit. - Add a Fixes: tag Related lock alloc tracking warning: [ 322.660067] ========================= [ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed! [ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N [ 322.660078] ------------------------- [ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there! [ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981: [ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660135] stack backtrace: [ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 [ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 322.660152] Call Trace: [ 322.660155] <TASK> [ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0 [ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160 [ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290 [ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40 [ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140 [ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm] [ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60 [ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit] [ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0 [ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 [ 322.660358] </TASK> [ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230906095039.3320-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2023-09-06 11:50:39 +02:00
drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Nobody makes any use of it. Possible internal future users can instead use the _index variable. External users shouldn't use it since the array it's pointing into is internal drm_exec state. v2: - Use a unique id for the loop variable (Christian) Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6 Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:13 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Nobody makes any use of it. Possible internal future users can instead use the _index variable. External users shouldn't use it since the array it's pointing into is internal drm_exec state. v2: - Use a unique id for the loop variable (Christian) Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6 Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:13 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first mutex of a given class locked in a sequence. This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked while other mutexes of the same class remain locked and then its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will incorrectly assume that memory is freed with a held lock in there. For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed object lock last. v2: - Fix a typo (Danilo Krummrich) - Reword the commit message a bit. - Add a Fixes: tag Related lock alloc tracking warning: [ 322.660067] ========================= [ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed! [ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N [ 322.660078] ------------------------- [ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there! [ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981: [ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660135] stack backtrace: [ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 [ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 322.660152] Call Trace: [ 322.660155] <TASK> [ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0 [ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160 [ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290 [ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40 [ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140 [ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm] [ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60 [ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit] [ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0 [ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 [ 322.660358] </TASK> [ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230906095039.3320-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2023-09-06 11:50:39 +02:00
drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Nobody makes any use of it. Possible internal future users can instead use the _index variable. External users shouldn't use it since the array it's pointing into is internal drm_exec state. v2: - Use a unique id for the loop variable (Christian) Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6 Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:13 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first mutex of a given class locked in a sequence. This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked while other mutexes of the same class remain locked and then its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will incorrectly assume that memory is freed with a held lock in there. For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed object lock last. v2: - Fix a typo (Danilo Krummrich) - Reword the commit message a bit. - Add a Fixes: tag Related lock alloc tracking warning: [ 322.660067] ========================= [ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed! [ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N [ 322.660078] ------------------------- [ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there! [ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981: [ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660135] stack backtrace: [ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 [ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 322.660152] Call Trace: [ 322.660155] <TASK> [ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0 [ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160 [ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290 [ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40 [ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140 [ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm] [ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60 [ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit] [ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0 [ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 [ 322.660358] </TASK> [ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230906095039.3320-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2023-09-06 11:50:39 +02:00
drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Nobody makes any use of it. Possible internal future users can instead use the _index variable. External users shouldn't use it since the array it's pointing into is internal drm_exec state. v2: - Use a unique id for the loop variable (Christian) Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6 Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:13 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first mutex of a given class locked in a sequence. This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked while other mutexes of the same class remain locked and then its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will incorrectly assume that memory is freed with a held lock in there. For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed object lock last. v2: - Fix a typo (Danilo Krummrich) - Reword the commit message a bit. - Add a Fixes: tag Related lock alloc tracking warning: [ 322.660067] ========================= [ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed! [ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N [ 322.660078] ------------------------- [ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there! [ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981: [ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec] [ 322.660135] stack backtrace: [ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 [ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 322.660152] Call Trace: [ 322.660155] <TASK> [ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0 [ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160 [ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290 [ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec] [ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test] [ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40 [ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140 [ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm] [ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60 [ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit] [ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit] [ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0 [ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 [ 322.660358] </TASK> [ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230906095039.3320-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2023-09-06 11:50:39 +02:00
drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Nobody makes any use of it. Possible internal future users can instead use the _index variable. External users shouldn't use it since the array it's pointing into is internal drm_exec state. v2: - Use a unique id for the loop variable (Christian) Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6 Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:13 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: avoid indirect goto The drm_exec component uses a variable with scope limited to the for() and an indirect goto to allow instantiating multiple macros in the same function. This unfortunately doesn't work well with certain compilers when the indirect goto can't be lowered to a direct jump. Switch the indirect goto to a direct goto, the drawback is that we now can't use the dma_exec_until_all_locked() macro in the same function multiple times. The is currently only one user of this and only as a hacky workaround which is about to be removed. So document that the __label__ statement should be used when the macro is used multiple times and fix the tests and the only use case where that is necessary. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 9920249a5288 ("drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606231854.7LeCtlLe-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606232356.gwHMAJAW-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606240753.kYjobJVl-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606241110.iUga5vVw-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031446.1PWG18mN-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031837.HSmBj8pr-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607040159.GopyEswS-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260704084133.122053-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2026-07-04 10:41:33 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec: use unique instead of local label GCC forbids to jump to labels in loop conditions and a new clang check stumbled over this. So instead using a local label inside the loop condition use an unique label outside of it. Fixes: 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1890 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20219106060208f0c2f5d096eb3aed7b712f5067 Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230731123625.3766-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2023-07-31 14:36:24 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: avoid indirect goto The drm_exec component uses a variable with scope limited to the for() and an indirect goto to allow instantiating multiple macros in the same function. This unfortunately doesn't work well with certain compilers when the indirect goto can't be lowered to a direct jump. Switch the indirect goto to a direct goto, the drawback is that we now can't use the dma_exec_until_all_locked() macro in the same function multiple times. The is currently only one user of this and only as a hacky workaround which is about to be removed. So document that the __label__ statement should be used when the macro is used multiple times and fix the tests and the only use case where that is necessary. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 9920249a5288 ("drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606231854.7LeCtlLe-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606232356.gwHMAJAW-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606240753.kYjobJVl-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606241110.iUga5vVw-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031446.1PWG18mN-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031837.HSmBj8pr-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607040159.GopyEswS-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260704084133.122053-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2026-07-04 10:41:33 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: avoid indirect goto The drm_exec component uses a variable with scope limited to the for() and an indirect goto to allow instantiating multiple macros in the same function. This unfortunately doesn't work well with certain compilers when the indirect goto can't be lowered to a direct jump. Switch the indirect goto to a direct goto, the drawback is that we now can't use the dma_exec_until_all_locked() macro in the same function multiple times. The is currently only one user of this and only as a hacky workaround which is about to be removed. So document that the __label__ statement should be used when the macro is used multiple times and fix the tests and the only use case where that is necessary. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 9920249a5288 ("drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606231854.7LeCtlLe-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606232356.gwHMAJAW-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606240753.kYjobJVl-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606241110.iUga5vVw-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031446.1PWG18mN-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031837.HSmBj8pr-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607040159.GopyEswS-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260704084133.122053-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2026-07-04 10:41:33 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: avoid indirect goto The drm_exec component uses a variable with scope limited to the for() and an indirect goto to allow instantiating multiple macros in the same function. This unfortunately doesn't work well with certain compilers when the indirect goto can't be lowered to a direct jump. Switch the indirect goto to a direct goto, the drawback is that we now can't use the dma_exec_until_all_locked() macro in the same function multiple times. The is currently only one user of this and only as a hacky workaround which is about to be removed. So document that the __label__ statement should be used when the macro is used multiple times and fix the tests and the only use case where that is necessary. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 9920249a5288 ("drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606231854.7LeCtlLe-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606232356.gwHMAJAW-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606240753.kYjobJVl-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606241110.iUga5vVw-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031446.1PWG18mN-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031837.HSmBj8pr-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607040159.GopyEswS-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260704084133.122053-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2026-07-04 10:41:33 +02:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00
drm/exec, drm/xe: Avoid abusing the drm_exec retry pointer The xe driver was using the drm_exec retry pointer directly to restart the locking loop after out-of-memory errors. This is relying on undocumented behaviour. Instead add a drm_exec_retry() macro that can be used in this situation, and that also warns if the struct drm_exec is not newly (re-)initialized. Use that macro in xe. v2: - Only allow if the drm_exec context is newly initialized. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:15 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: avoid indirect goto The drm_exec component uses a variable with scope limited to the for() and an indirect goto to allow instantiating multiple macros in the same function. This unfortunately doesn't work well with certain compilers when the indirect goto can't be lowered to a direct jump. Switch the indirect goto to a direct goto, the drawback is that we now can't use the dma_exec_until_all_locked() macro in the same function multiple times. The is currently only one user of this and only as a hacky workaround which is about to be removed. So document that the __label__ statement should be used when the macro is used multiple times and fix the tests and the only use case where that is necessary. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 9920249a5288 ("drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606231854.7LeCtlLe-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606232356.gwHMAJAW-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606240753.kYjobJVl-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606241110.iUga5vVw-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031446.1PWG18mN-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031837.HSmBj8pr-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607040159.GopyEswS-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260704084133.122053-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2026-07-04 10:41:33 +02:00
drm/exec, drm/xe: Avoid abusing the drm_exec retry pointer The xe driver was using the drm_exec retry pointer directly to restart the locking loop after out-of-memory errors. This is relying on undocumented behaviour. Instead add a drm_exec_retry() macro that can be used in this situation, and that also warns if the struct drm_exec is not newly (re-)initialized. Use that macro in xe. v2: - Only allow if the drm_exec context is newly initialized. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:15 +02:00
drm/drm_exec: avoid indirect goto The drm_exec component uses a variable with scope limited to the for() and an indirect goto to allow instantiating multiple macros in the same function. This unfortunately doesn't work well with certain compilers when the indirect goto can't be lowered to a direct jump. Switch the indirect goto to a direct goto, the drawback is that we now can't use the dma_exec_until_all_locked() macro in the same function multiple times. The is currently only one user of this and only as a hacky workaround which is about to be removed. So document that the __label__ statement should be used when the macro is used multiple times and fix the tests and the only use case where that is necessary. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 9920249a5288 ("drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606231854.7LeCtlLe-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606232356.gwHMAJAW-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606240753.kYjobJVl-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606241110.iUga5vVw-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031446.1PWG18mN-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607031837.HSmBj8pr-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607040159.GopyEswS-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260704084133.122053-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
2026-07-04 10:41:33 +02:00
drm/exec, drm/xe: Avoid abusing the drm_exec retry pointer The xe driver was using the drm_exec retry pointer directly to restart the locking loop after out-of-memory errors. This is relying on undocumented behaviour. Instead add a drm_exec_retry() macro that can be used in this situation, and that also warns if the struct drm_exec is not newly (re-)initialized. Use that macro in xe. v2: - Only allow if the drm_exec context is newly initialized. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:15 +02:00
drm/exec, drm/xe, drm/amdgpu: Add an accessor for struct drm_exec::ticket Drivers were accessing this drm_exec member directly. While that may seem harmless, it will require action if the drm_exec utility is made a subclass of a dma-resv transaction utility as outlined in the cover-letter. Provide an accessor, drm_exec_ticket() to avoid that. v2: - Fix amdgpu compile error (Intel CI) - Update the commit message. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520101616.41284-5-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2026-05-20 12:16:16 +02:00
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next Kickstart 6.9 development cycle. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:20:23 +01:00
drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7 This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers which is similar to the existing TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace it in the long term. The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking overhead is unnecessary and measurable. v3: drop duplicate tracking, radeon is really the only one needing that. v4: fixes issues pointed out by Danilo, some typos in comments and a helper for lock arrays of GEM objects. v5: some suggestions by Boris Brezillon, especially just use one retry macro, drop loop in prepare_array, use flags instead of bool v6: minor changes suggested by Thomas, Boris and Danilo v7: minor typos pointed out by checkpatch.pl fixed Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230711133122.3710-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
2022-04-07 08:17:51 +02:00