2019-05-19 15:51:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-11 16:53:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-20 18:35:53 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:42:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:39 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-13 19:34:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-14 23:46:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-14 23:46:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-14 23:46:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-14 23:46:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-27 02:54:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
lib/plist: add plist_requeue
Add plist_requeue(), which moves the specified plist_node after all other
same-priority plist_nodes in the list. This is essentially an optimized
plist_del() followed by plist_add().
This is needed by swap, which (with the next patch in this set) uses a
plist of available swap devices. When a swap device (either a swap
partition or swap file) are added to the system with swapon(), the device
is added to a plist, ordered by the swap device's priority. When swap
needs to allocate a page from one of the swap devices, it takes the page
from the first swap device on the plist, which is the highest priority
swap device. The swap device is left in the plist until all its pages are
used, and then removed from the plist when it becomes full.
However, as described in man 2 swapon, swap must allocate pages from swap
devices with the same priority in round-robin order; to do this, on each
swap page allocation, swap uses a page from the first swap device in the
plist, and then calls plist_requeue() to move that swap device entry to
after any other same-priority swap devices. The next swap page allocation
will again use a page from the first swap device in the plist and requeue
it, and so on, resulting in round-robin usage of equal-priority swap
devices.
Also add plist_test_requeue() test function, for use by plist_test() to
test plist_requeue() function.
Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijieut@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-04 16:09:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lib/plist.c: add shortcut for plist_requeue()
In the operation of plist_requeue(), "node" is deleted from the list
before queueing it back to the list again, which involves looping to find
the tail of same-prio entries.
If "node" is the head of same-prio entries which means its prio_list is on
the priority list, then "node_next" can be retrieve immediately by the
next entry of prio_list, instead of looping nodes on node_list.
The shortcut implementation can benefit plist_requeue() running the below
test, and the test result is shown in the following table.
One can observe from the test result that when the number of nodes of
same-prio entries is smaller, then the probability of hitting the shortcut
can be bigger, thus the benefit can be more significant.
While it tends to behave almost the same for long same-prio entries, since
the probability of taking the shortcut is much smaller.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Test size | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800 | 1000 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| new_plist_requeue | 271521| 1007913| 2148033| 4346792| 12200940|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| old_plist_requeue | 301395| 1105544| 2488301| 4632980| 12217275|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The test is done on x86_64 architecture with v6.9 kernel and
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz.
Test script( executed in kernel module mode ):
int init_module(void)
{
unsigned int test_data[test_size];
/* Split the list into 10 different priority
* , when test_size is larger, the number of
* nodes within each priority is larger.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) {
test_data[i] = i % 10;
}
ktime_t start, end, time_elapsed = 0;
plist_head_init(&test_head_local);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node_local); i++) {
plist_node_init(test_node_local + i, 0);
test_node_local[i].prio = test_data[i];
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node_local); i++) {
if (plist_node_empty(test_node_local + i)) {
plist_add(test_node_local + i, &test_head_local);
}
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node_local); i += 1) {
start = ktime_get();
plist_requeue(test_node_local + i, &test_head_local);
end = ktime_get();
time_elapsed += (end - start);
}
pr_info("plist_requeue() elapsed time : %lld, size %d\n", time_elapsed, test_size);
return 0;
}
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment and code layout]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250119062408.77638-1-richard120310@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Cc: Ching-Chun (Jim) Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-01-19 14:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lib/plist: add plist_requeue
Add plist_requeue(), which moves the specified plist_node after all other
same-priority plist_nodes in the list. This is essentially an optimized
plist_del() followed by plist_add().
This is needed by swap, which (with the next patch in this set) uses a
plist of available swap devices. When a swap device (either a swap
partition or swap file) are added to the system with swapon(), the device
is added to a plist, ordered by the swap device's priority. When swap
needs to allocate a page from one of the swap devices, it takes the page
from the first swap device on the plist, which is the highest priority
swap device. The swap device is left in the plist until all its pages are
used, and then removed from the plist when it becomes full.
However, as described in man 2 swapon, swap must allocate pages from swap
devices with the same priority in round-robin order; to do this, on each
swap page allocation, swap uses a page from the first swap device in the
plist, and then calls plist_requeue() to move that swap device entry to
after any other same-priority swap devices. The next swap page allocation
will again use a page from the first swap device in the plist and requeue
it, and so on, resulting in round-robin usage of equal-priority swap
devices.
Also add plist_test_requeue() test function, for use by plist_test() to
test plist_requeue() function.
Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijieut@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-04 16:09:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lib/plist.c: add shortcut for plist_requeue()
In the operation of plist_requeue(), "node" is deleted from the list
before queueing it back to the list again, which involves looping to find
the tail of same-prio entries.
If "node" is the head of same-prio entries which means its prio_list is on
the priority list, then "node_next" can be retrieve immediately by the
next entry of prio_list, instead of looping nodes on node_list.
The shortcut implementation can benefit plist_requeue() running the below
test, and the test result is shown in the following table.
One can observe from the test result that when the number of nodes of
same-prio entries is smaller, then the probability of hitting the shortcut
can be bigger, thus the benefit can be more significant.
While it tends to behave almost the same for long same-prio entries, since
the probability of taking the shortcut is much smaller.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Test size | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800 | 1000 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| new_plist_requeue | 271521| 1007913| 2148033| 4346792| 12200940|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| old_plist_requeue | 301395| 1105544| 2488301| 4632980| 12217275|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The test is done on x86_64 architecture with v6.9 kernel and
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz.
Test script( executed in kernel module mode ):
int init_module(void)
{
unsigned int test_data[test_size];
/* Split the list into 10 different priority
* , when test_size is larger, the number of
* nodes within each priority is larger.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) {
test_data[i] = i % 10;
}
ktime_t start, end, time_elapsed = 0;
plist_head_init(&test_head_local);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node_local); i++) {
plist_node_init(test_node_local + i, 0);
test_node_local[i].prio = test_data[i];
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node_local); i++) {
if (plist_node_empty(test_node_local + i)) {
plist_add(test_node_local + i, &test_head_local);
}
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node_local); i += 1) {
start = ktime_get();
plist_requeue(test_node_local + i, &test_head_local);
end = ktime_get();
time_elapsed += (end - start);
}
pr_info("plist_requeue() elapsed time : %lld, size %d\n", time_elapsed, test_size);
return 0;
}
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment and code layout]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250119062408.77638-1-richard120310@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Cc: Ching-Chun (Jim) Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-01-19 14:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
lib/plist: add plist_requeue
Add plist_requeue(), which moves the specified plist_node after all other
same-priority plist_nodes in the list. This is essentially an optimized
plist_del() followed by plist_add().
This is needed by swap, which (with the next patch in this set) uses a
plist of available swap devices. When a swap device (either a swap
partition or swap file) are added to the system with swapon(), the device
is added to a plist, ordered by the swap device's priority. When swap
needs to allocate a page from one of the swap devices, it takes the page
from the first swap device on the plist, which is the highest priority
swap device. The swap device is left in the plist until all its pages are
used, and then removed from the plist when it becomes full.
However, as described in man 2 swapon, swap must allocate pages from swap
devices with the same priority in round-robin order; to do this, on each
swap page allocation, swap uses a page from the first swap device in the
plist, and then calls plist_requeue() to move that swap device entry to
after any other same-priority swap devices. The next swap page allocation
will again use a page from the first swap device in the plist and requeue
it, and so on, resulting in round-robin usage of equal-priority swap
devices.
Also add plist_test_requeue() test function, for use by plist_test() to
test plist_requeue() function.
Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijieut@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-04 16:09:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:42:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-01 16:36:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lib/plist: add plist_requeue
Add plist_requeue(), which moves the specified plist_node after all other
same-priority plist_nodes in the list. This is essentially an optimized
plist_del() followed by plist_add().
This is needed by swap, which (with the next patch in this set) uses a
plist of available swap devices. When a swap device (either a swap
partition or swap file) are added to the system with swapon(), the device
is added to a plist, ordered by the swap device's priority. When swap
needs to allocate a page from one of the swap devices, it takes the page
from the first swap device on the plist, which is the highest priority
swap device. The swap device is left in the plist until all its pages are
used, and then removed from the plist when it becomes full.
However, as described in man 2 swapon, swap must allocate pages from swap
devices with the same priority in round-robin order; to do this, on each
swap page allocation, swap uses a page from the first swap device in the
plist, and then calls plist_requeue() to move that swap device entry to
after any other same-priority swap devices. The next swap page allocation
will again use a page from the first swap device in the plist and requeue
it, and so on, resulting in round-robin usage of equal-priority swap
devices.
Also add plist_test_requeue() test function, for use by plist_test() to
test plist_requeue() function.
Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijieut@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-04 16:09:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-04 16:11:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-07 17:27:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lib/plist: add plist_requeue
Add plist_requeue(), which moves the specified plist_node after all other
same-priority plist_nodes in the list. This is essentially an optimized
plist_del() followed by plist_add().
This is needed by swap, which (with the next patch in this set) uses a
plist of available swap devices. When a swap device (either a swap
partition or swap file) are added to the system with swapon(), the device
is added to a plist, ordered by the swap device's priority. When swap
needs to allocate a page from one of the swap devices, it takes the page
from the first swap device on the plist, which is the highest priority
swap device. The swap device is left in the plist until all its pages are
used, and then removed from the plist when it becomes full.
However, as described in man 2 swapon, swap must allocate pages from swap
devices with the same priority in round-robin order; to do this, on each
swap page allocation, swap uses a page from the first swap device in the
plist, and then calls plist_requeue() to move that swap device entry to
after any other same-priority swap devices. The next swap page allocation
will again use a page from the first swap device in the plist and requeue
it, and so on, resulting in round-robin usage of equal-priority swap
devices.
Also add plist_test_requeue() test function, for use by plist_test() to
test plist_requeue() function.
Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijieut@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-04 16:09:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-04 16:11:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-06-14 23:46:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 17:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
