kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-08 18:57:22 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh

248 lines
7.2 KiB
Raw Normal View History

perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests: Skip branch stack sampling test if brstack_bench symbol is missing The test "Check branch stack sampling" depends on finding symbol brstack_bench (and several others) in perf, and fails if perf has been stripped and no debug object is available. In that case, skip the test instead. Example: Before: $ strip tools/perf/perf $ tools/perf/perf buildid-cache -p `realpath tools/perf/perf` $ tools/perf/perf test -v 'branch stack sampling' 112: Check branch stack sampling : --- start --- test child forked, pid 123741 Testing user branch stack sampling + grep -E -m1 ^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL/.*$ /tmp/__perf_test.program.5Dz1U/perf.script + cleanup + rm -rf /tmp/__perf_test.program.5Dz1U test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- Check branch stack sampling: FAILED! After: $ tools/perf/perf test -v 'branch stack sampling' 112: Check branch stack sampling : --- start --- test child forked, pid 125157 perf does not have symbol 'brstack_bench' perf is missing symbols - skipping test test child finished with -2 ---- end ---- Check branch stack sampling: Skip Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231123075848.9652-7-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2023-11-23 09:58:46 +02:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests powerpc: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter Commit b55878c90ab92a24 ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling") added test for branch stack sampling. There is a sanity check in the beginning to skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling. Snippet <<>> skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling perf record -b -o- -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2 <<>> But the testcase also uses branch sample types: save_type, any. if any platform doesn't support the branch filters used in the test, the testcase will fail. In powerpc, currently mutliple branch filters are not supported and hence this test fails in powerpc. Fix the sanity check to look at the support for branch filters used in this test before proceeding with the test. Fixes: b55878c90ab92a24 ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling") Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921145255.20972-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-09-21 20:22:54 +05:30
perf test: Fix skipping branch stack sampling test Commit f4a2aade6809c657 ("perf tests powerpc: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter") added a skip if certain branch options aren't available. But the change added both -b (--branch-any) and --branch-filter options at the same time, which will always result in a failure on any platform because the arguments can't be used together. Fix this by removing -b (--branch-any) and leaving --branch-filter which already specifies 'any'. Also add warning messages to the test and perf tool. Output on x86 before this fix: $ sudo ./perf test branch 108: Check branch stack sampling : Skip After: $ sudo ./perf test branch 108: Check branch stack sampling : Ok Fixes: f4a2aade6809c657 ("perf tests powerpc: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter") Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Tested-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028121913.745307-1-james.clark@arm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-10-28 13:19:13 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests: Skip branch stack sampling test if brstack_bench symbol is missing The test "Check branch stack sampling" depends on finding symbol brstack_bench (and several others) in perf, and fails if perf has been stripped and no debug object is available. In that case, skip the test instead. Example: Before: $ strip tools/perf/perf $ tools/perf/perf buildid-cache -p `realpath tools/perf/perf` $ tools/perf/perf test -v 'branch stack sampling' 112: Check branch stack sampling : --- start --- test child forked, pid 123741 Testing user branch stack sampling + grep -E -m1 ^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL/.*$ /tmp/__perf_test.program.5Dz1U/perf.script + cleanup + rm -rf /tmp/__perf_test.program.5Dz1U test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- Check branch stack sampling: FAILED! After: $ tools/perf/perf test -v 'branch stack sampling' 112: Check branch stack sampling : --- start --- test child forked, pid 125157 perf does not have symbol 'brstack_bench' perf is missing symbols - skipping test test child finished with -2 ---- end ---- Check branch stack sampling: Skip Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231123075848.9652-7-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2023-11-23 09:58:46 +02:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Replace brstack test workload So that it can get rid of requirement of a compiler. Also rename the symbols to match with the perf test workload. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Acked-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116233854.1596378-11-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-11-16 15:38:52 -08:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE BRBE emits IRQ and ERET branches for branching and returning from trapped instructions. Add a test that loops on a trapped instruction (MRS - Read special register) for this. Extend the expected 'any_call' branches to include FAULT_DATA and FAULT_INST as these are emitted by BRBE. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Co-developed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:51 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Refactor brstack test check_branches() will be used by other tests in a later commit so make it a function. And the any_call filters are duplicated and will also be extended in a later commit, so move them to a variable. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:49 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Refactor brstack test check_branches() will be used by other tests in a later commit so make it a function. And the any_call filters are duplicated and will also be extended in a later commit, so move them to a variable. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:49 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Replace brstack test workload So that it can get rid of requirement of a compiler. Also rename the symbols to match with the perf test workload. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Acked-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116233854.1596378-11-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-11-16 15:38:52 -08:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Refactor brstack test check_branches() will be used by other tests in a later commit so make it a function. And the any_call filters are duplicated and will also be extended in a later commit, so move them to a variable. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:49 +01:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE BRBE emits IRQ and ERET branches for branching and returning from trapped instructions. Add a test that loops on a trapped instruction (MRS - Read special register) for this. Extend the expected 'any_call' branches to include FAULT_DATA and FAULT_INST as these are emitted by BRBE. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Co-developed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:51 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE BRBE emits IRQ and ERET branches for branching and returning from trapped instructions. Add a test that loops on a trapped instruction (MRS - Read special register) for this. Extend the expected 'any_call' branches to include FAULT_DATA and FAULT_INST as these are emitted by BRBE. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Co-developed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:51 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE BRBE emits IRQ and ERET branches for branching and returning from trapped instructions. Add a test that loops on a trapped instruction (MRS - Read special register) for this. Extend the expected 'any_call' branches to include FAULT_DATA and FAULT_INST as these are emitted by BRBE. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Co-developed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:51 +01:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests test_brstack.sh: Fix all POSIX sh warnings Fix all the POSIX sh warnings in perf shell test test_brstack.sh Warnings fixed : * In POSIX sh, using lower/mixed case for signal names is undefined. Correcting that in this script. * In POSIX sh, 'local' is undefined. local is supported in many shells, but it's not in POSIX. In POSIX sh, you can adopt some convention to avoid accidentally overwriting variables names, e.g. prefixing with the function name, that is what I have done here. Signed-off-by: Geetika <geetika@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230613164145.50488-14-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2023-06-13 22:11:41 +05:30
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests test_brstack.sh: Fix all POSIX sh warnings Fix all the POSIX sh warnings in perf shell test test_brstack.sh Warnings fixed : * In POSIX sh, using lower/mixed case for signal names is undefined. Correcting that in this script. * In POSIX sh, 'local' is undefined. local is supported in many shells, but it's not in POSIX. In POSIX sh, you can adopt some convention to avoid accidentally overwriting variables names, e.g. prefixing with the function name, that is what I have done here. Signed-off-by: Geetika <geetika@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230613164145.50488-14-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2023-06-13 22:11:41 +05:30
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Fixes for check branch stack sampling When filtering branch stack samples on user events they sample in user land but may have come from the kernel. Aarch64 avoids leaking the kernel address for kaslr reasons but other platforms, for now, don't. Be more permissive in allowing kernel addresses in the source of user branch stacks. When filtering branch stack samples on kernel events they sample in kernel land but may have come from user land. Avoid the target being a user address but allow the source to be in user land. Aarch64 may not leak the user land addresses (making them 0) but other platforms do. As the kernel address sampling implies privelege, just allow this. Increase the duration of the system call sampling test to make the likelihood of sampling a system call higher (increased from 1000 to 8000 loops - a number found through experimentation on an Intel Tigerlake laptop), also make the period of the event a prime number. Put unneeded perf record output into a temporary file so that the test output isn't cluttered. More clearly state which test is running and the pass, fail or skipped result of the test. These changes make the test on an Intel tigerlake laptop reliably pass rather than reliably fail. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2026-04-08 17:02:16 -07:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Add syscall and address tests to brstack test Test that SYSCALL type branches are emitted from the expected 'getppid' symbol. Test that when only 'k' is used, sources addresses are all in the kernel. Test that no kernel addresses leak by checking for them in the 'u' test. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:50 +01:00
perf test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE BRBE emits IRQ and ERET branches for branching and returning from trapped instructions. Add a test that loops on a trapped instruction (MRS - Read special register) for this. Extend the expected 'any_call' branches to include FAULT_DATA and FAULT_INST as these are emitted by BRBE. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Co-developed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:51 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Refactor brstack test check_branches() will be used by other tests in a later commit so make it a function. And the any_call filters are duplicated and will also be extended in a later commit, so move them to a variable. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:49 +01:00
perf test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE BRBE emits IRQ and ERET branches for branching and returning from trapped instructions. Add a test that loops on a trapped instruction (MRS - Read special register) for this. Extend the expected 'any_call' branches to include FAULT_DATA and FAULT_INST as these are emitted by BRBE. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Co-developed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:51 +01:00
perf test: Refactor brstack test check_branches() will be used by other tests in a later commit so make it a function. And the any_call filters are duplicated and will also be extended in a later commit, so move them to a variable. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:49 +01:00
perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the expected branch types, and filters behave as expected. Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705150511.473919-2-german.gomez@arm.com Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 16:05:11 +01:00
perf test: Refactor brstack test check_branches() will be used by other tests in a later commit so make it a function. And the any_call filters are duplicated and will also be extended in a later commit, so move them to a variable. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-08-13 14:38:49 +01:00
perf tests: Harden branch stack sampling test On continuous testing the perf script output can be empty, or nearly empty, causing tr/grep to exit and due to "set -e" the test traps and fails. Add some empty file handling that sets the test to skip and make grep and other text rewriting failures non-fatal by adding "|| true". Committer testing: root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor root@number:~# perf test "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvv "Check branch stack sampling" 104: Check branch stack sampling: --- start --- test child forked, pid 396047 142d22-142da0 l brstack_bench perf does have symbol 'brstack_bench' Testing user branch stack sampling Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,CALL|SYSCALL) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_ret,RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (call,cond,CALL|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (any_call,cond,CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|SYSCALL|COND) Testing branch stack filtering permutation (cond,any_call,any_ret,COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET) ---- end(0) ---- 104: Check branch stack sampling : Ok root@number:~# Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161639.34446-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2025-03-18 09:16:39 -07:00