2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-11 14:22:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:23:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-08 15:02:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-07 17:01:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-04 15:35:08 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mm/page_alloc: fix incorrect isolation behavior by rechecking migratetype
Before describing bugs itself, I first explain definition of freepage.
1. pages on buddy list are counted as freepage.
2. pages on isolate migratetype buddy list are *not* counted as freepage.
3. pages on cma buddy list are counted as CMA freepage, too.
Now, I describe problems and related patch.
Patch 1: There is race conditions on getting pageblock migratetype that
it results in misplacement of freepages on buddy list, incorrect
freepage count and un-availability of freepage.
Patch 2: Freepages on pcp list could have stale cached information to
determine migratetype of buddy list to go. This causes misplacement of
freepages on buddy list and incorrect freepage count.
Patch 4: Merging between freepages on different migratetype of
pageblocks will cause freepages accouting problem. This patch fixes it.
Without patchset [3], above problem doesn't happens on my CMA allocation
test, because CMA reserved pages aren't used at all. So there is no
chance for above race.
With patchset [3], I did simple CMA allocation test and get below
result:
- Virtual machine, 4 cpus, 1024 MB memory, 256 MB CMA reservation
- run kernel build (make -j16) on background
- 30 times CMA allocation(8MB * 30 = 240MB) attempts in 5 sec interval
- Result: more than 5000 freepage count are missed
With patchset [3] and this patchset, I found that no freepage count are
missed so that I conclude that problems are solved.
On my simple memory offlining test, these problems also occur on that
environment, too.
This patch (of 4):
There are two paths to reach core free function of buddy allocator,
__free_one_page(), one is free_one_page()->__free_one_page() and the
other is free_hot_cold_page()->free_pcppages_bulk()->__free_one_page().
Each paths has race condition causing serious problems. At first, this
patch is focused on first type of freepath. And then, following patch
will solve the problem in second type of freepath.
In the first type of freepath, we got migratetype of freeing page
without holding the zone lock, so it could be racy. There are two cases
of this race.
1. pages are added to isolate buddy list after restoring orignal
migratetype
CPU1 CPU2
get migratetype => return MIGRATE_ISOLATE
call free_one_page() with MIGRATE_ISOLATE
grab the zone lock
unisolate pageblock
release the zone lock
grab the zone lock
call __free_one_page() with MIGRATE_ISOLATE
freepage go into isolate buddy list,
although pageblock is already unisolated
This may cause two problems. One is that we can't use this page anymore
until next isolation attempt of this pageblock, because freepage is on
isolate buddy list. The other is that freepage accouting could be wrong
due to merging between different buddy list. Freepages on isolate buddy
list aren't counted as freepage, but ones on normal buddy list are
counted as freepage. If merge happens, buddy freepage on normal buddy
list is inevitably moved to isolate buddy list without any consideration
of freepage accouting so it could be incorrect.
2. pages are added to normal buddy list while pageblock is isolated.
It is similar with above case.
This also may cause two problems. One is that we can't keep these
freepages from being allocated. Although this pageblock is isolated,
freepage would be added to normal buddy list so that it could be
allocated without any restriction. And the other problem is same as
case 1, that it, incorrect freepage accouting.
This race condition would be prevented by checking migratetype again
with holding the zone lock. Because it is somewhat heavy operation and
it isn't needed in common case, we want to avoid rechecking as much as
possible. So this patch introduce new variable, nr_isolate_pageblock in
struct zone to check if there is isolated pageblock. With this, we can
avoid to re-check migratetype in common case and do it only if there is
isolated pageblock or migratetype is MIGRATE_ISOLATE. This solve above
mentioned problems.
Changes from v3:
Add one more check in free_one_page() that checks whether migratetype is
MIGRATE_ISOLATE or not. Without this, abovementioned case 1 could happens.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-11-13 15:19:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-10 15:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-08 15:02:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:24:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-13 15:19:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-22 15:41:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-13 15:19:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-03 14:52:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-13 15:19:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-22 15:41:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-13 15:19:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-22 15:41:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-14 15:17:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-13 15:19:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:24:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-13 15:19:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-04 15:35:08 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mm/page_alloc: fix incorrect isolation behavior by rechecking migratetype
Before describing bugs itself, I first explain definition of freepage.
1. pages on buddy list are counted as freepage.
2. pages on isolate migratetype buddy list are *not* counted as freepage.
3. pages on cma buddy list are counted as CMA freepage, too.
Now, I describe problems and related patch.
Patch 1: There is race conditions on getting pageblock migratetype that
it results in misplacement of freepages on buddy list, incorrect
freepage count and un-availability of freepage.
Patch 2: Freepages on pcp list could have stale cached information to
determine migratetype of buddy list to go. This causes misplacement of
freepages on buddy list and incorrect freepage count.
Patch 4: Merging between freepages on different migratetype of
pageblocks will cause freepages accouting problem. This patch fixes it.
Without patchset [3], above problem doesn't happens on my CMA allocation
test, because CMA reserved pages aren't used at all. So there is no
chance for above race.
With patchset [3], I did simple CMA allocation test and get below
result:
- Virtual machine, 4 cpus, 1024 MB memory, 256 MB CMA reservation
- run kernel build (make -j16) on background
- 30 times CMA allocation(8MB * 30 = 240MB) attempts in 5 sec interval
- Result: more than 5000 freepage count are missed
With patchset [3] and this patchset, I found that no freepage count are
missed so that I conclude that problems are solved.
On my simple memory offlining test, these problems also occur on that
environment, too.
This patch (of 4):
There are two paths to reach core free function of buddy allocator,
__free_one_page(), one is free_one_page()->__free_one_page() and the
other is free_hot_cold_page()->free_pcppages_bulk()->__free_one_page().
Each paths has race condition causing serious problems. At first, this
patch is focused on first type of freepath. And then, following patch
will solve the problem in second type of freepath.
In the first type of freepath, we got migratetype of freeing page
without holding the zone lock, so it could be racy. There are two cases
of this race.
1. pages are added to isolate buddy list after restoring orignal
migratetype
CPU1 CPU2
get migratetype => return MIGRATE_ISOLATE
call free_one_page() with MIGRATE_ISOLATE
grab the zone lock
unisolate pageblock
release the zone lock
grab the zone lock
call __free_one_page() with MIGRATE_ISOLATE
freepage go into isolate buddy list,
although pageblock is already unisolated
This may cause two problems. One is that we can't use this page anymore
until next isolation attempt of this pageblock, because freepage is on
isolate buddy list. The other is that freepage accouting could be wrong
due to merging between different buddy list. Freepages on isolate buddy
list aren't counted as freepage, but ones on normal buddy list are
counted as freepage. If merge happens, buddy freepage on normal buddy
list is inevitably moved to isolate buddy list without any consideration
of freepage accouting so it could be incorrect.
2. pages are added to normal buddy list while pageblock is isolated.
It is similar with above case.
This also may cause two problems. One is that we can't keep these
freepages from being allocated. Although this pageblock is isolated,
freepage would be added to normal buddy list so that it could be
allocated without any restriction. And the other problem is same as
case 1, that it, incorrect freepage accouting.
This race condition would be prevented by checking migratetype again
with holding the zone lock. Because it is somewhat heavy operation and
it isn't needed in common case, we want to avoid rechecking as much as
possible. So this patch introduce new variable, nr_isolate_pageblock in
struct zone to check if there is isolated pageblock. With this, we can
avoid to re-check migratetype in common case and do it only if there is
isolated pageblock or migratetype is MIGRATE_ISOLATE. This solve above
mentioned problems.
Changes from v3:
Add one more check in free_one_page() that checks whether migratetype is
MIGRATE_ISOLATE or not. Without this, abovementioned case 1 could happens.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-11-13 15:19:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:23:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:23:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:24:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-26 15:23:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-31 16:43:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-03 15:06:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-03 15:06:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:22:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-14 16:59:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-03 15:06:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-03 15:06:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-15 16:57:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-03 14:52:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-03 15:06:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-01 14:31:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, page_isolation: remove bogus tests for isolated pages
The __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() is used to verify whether all
pages in pageblock were either successfully isolated, or are hwpoisoned.
Two of the possible state of pages, that are tested, are however bogus
and misleading.
Both tests rely on get_freepage_migratetype(page), which however has no
guarantees about pages on freelists. Specifically, it doesn't guarantee
that the migratetype returned by the function actually matches the
migratetype of the freelist that the page is on. Such guarantee is not
its purpose and would have negative impact on allocator performance.
The first test checks whether the freepage_migratetype equals
MIGRATE_ISOLATE, supposedly to catch races between page isolation and
allocator activity. These races should be fixed nowadays with
51bb1a4093 ("mm/page_alloc: add freepage on isolate pageblock to correct
buddy list") and related patches. As explained above, the check
wouldn't be able to catch them reliably anyway. For the same reason
false positives can happen, although they are harmless, as the
move_freepages() call would just move the page to the same freelist it's
already on. So removing the test is not a bug fix, just cleanup. After
this patch, we assume that all PageBuddy pages are on the correct
freelist and that the races were really fixed. A truly reliable
verification in the form of e.g. VM_BUG_ON() would be complicated and
is arguably not needed.
The second test (page_count(page) == 0 && get_freepage_migratetype(page)
== MIGRATE_ISOLATE) is probably supposed (the code comes from a big
memory isolation patch from 2007) to catch pages on MIGRATE_ISOLATE
pcplists. However, pcplists don't contain MIGRATE_ISOLATE freepages
nowadays, those are freed directly to free lists, so the check is
obsolete. Remove it as well.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Seungho Park <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-09-08 15:01:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mm, page_isolation: remove bogus tests for isolated pages
The __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() is used to verify whether all
pages in pageblock were either successfully isolated, or are hwpoisoned.
Two of the possible state of pages, that are tested, are however bogus
and misleading.
Both tests rely on get_freepage_migratetype(page), which however has no
guarantees about pages on freelists. Specifically, it doesn't guarantee
that the migratetype returned by the function actually matches the
migratetype of the freelist that the page is on. Such guarantee is not
its purpose and would have negative impact on allocator performance.
The first test checks whether the freepage_migratetype equals
MIGRATE_ISOLATE, supposedly to catch races between page isolation and
allocator activity. These races should be fixed nowadays with
51bb1a4093 ("mm/page_alloc: add freepage on isolate pageblock to correct
buddy list") and related patches. As explained above, the check
wouldn't be able to catch them reliably anyway. For the same reason
false positives can happen, although they are harmless, as the
move_freepages() call would just move the page to the same freelist it's
already on. So removing the test is not a bug fix, just cleanup. After
this patch, we assume that all PageBuddy pages are on the correct
freelist and that the races were really fixed. A truly reliable
verification in the form of e.g. VM_BUG_ON() would be complicated and
is arguably not needed.
The second test (page_count(page) == 0 && get_freepage_migratetype(page)
== MIGRATE_ISOLATE) is probably supposed (the code comes from a big
memory isolation patch from 2007) to catch pages on MIGRATE_ISOLATE
pcplists. However, pcplists don't contain MIGRATE_ISOLATE freepages
nowadays, those are freed directly to free lists, so the check is
obsolete. Remove it as well.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Seungho Park <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-09-08 15:01:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mm, page_isolation: remove bogus tests for isolated pages
The __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() is used to verify whether all
pages in pageblock were either successfully isolated, or are hwpoisoned.
Two of the possible state of pages, that are tested, are however bogus
and misleading.
Both tests rely on get_freepage_migratetype(page), which however has no
guarantees about pages on freelists. Specifically, it doesn't guarantee
that the migratetype returned by the function actually matches the
migratetype of the freelist that the page is on. Such guarantee is not
its purpose and would have negative impact on allocator performance.
The first test checks whether the freepage_migratetype equals
MIGRATE_ISOLATE, supposedly to catch races between page isolation and
allocator activity. These races should be fixed nowadays with
51bb1a4093 ("mm/page_alloc: add freepage on isolate pageblock to correct
buddy list") and related patches. As explained above, the check
wouldn't be able to catch them reliably anyway. For the same reason
false positives can happen, although they are harmless, as the
move_freepages() call would just move the page to the same freelist it's
already on. So removing the test is not a bug fix, just cleanup. After
this patch, we assume that all PageBuddy pages are on the correct
freelist and that the races were really fixed. A truly reliable
verification in the form of e.g. VM_BUG_ON() would be complicated and
is arguably not needed.
The second test (page_count(page) == 0 && get_freepage_migratetype(page)
== MIGRATE_ISOLATE) is probably supposed (the code comes from a big
memory isolation patch from 2007) to catch pages on MIGRATE_ISOLATE
pcplists. However, pcplists don't contain MIGRATE_ISOLATE freepages
nowadays, those are freed directly to free lists, so the check is
obsolete. Remove it as well.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Seungho Park <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-09-08 15:01:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-19 17:12:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
memory hotplug: missing zone->lock in test_pages_isolated()
__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() in mm/page_isolation.c has a comment
saying that the caller must hold zone->lock. But the only caller of that
function, test_pages_isolated(), does not hold zone->lock and the lock is
also not acquired anywhere before. This patch adds the missing zone->lock
to test_pages_isolated().
We reproducibly run into BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page)) in __offline_isolated_pages()
during memory hotplug stress test, see trace below. This patch fixes that
problem, it would be good if we could have it in 2.6.27.
kernel BUG at /home/autobuild/BUILD/linux-2.6.26-20080909/mm/page_alloc.c:4561!
illegal operation: 0001 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: dm_multipath sunrpc bonding qeth_l3 dm_mod qeth ccwgroup vmur
CPU: 1 Not tainted 2.6.26-29.x.20080909-s390default #1
Process memory_loop_all (pid: 10025, task: 2f444028, ksp: 2b10dd28)
Krnl PSW : 040c0000 801727ea (__offline_isolated_pages+0x18e/0x1c4)
R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0
Krnl GPRS: 00000000 7e27fc00 00000000 7e27fc00
00000000 00000400 00014000 7e27fc01
00606f00 7e27fc00 00013fe0 2b10dd28
00000005 80172662 801727b2 2b10dd28
Krnl Code: 801727de: 5810900c l %r1,12(%r9)
801727e2: a7f4ffb3 brc 15,80172748
801727e6: a7f40001 brc 15,801727e8
>801727ea: a7f4ffbc brc 15,80172762
801727ee: a7f40001 brc 15,801727f0
801727f2: a7f4ffaf brc 15,80172750
801727f6: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
801727f8: 0017 unknown
Call Trace:
([<0000000000172772>] __offline_isolated_pages+0x116/0x1c4)
[<00000000001953a2>] offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x22/0x34
[<000000000013164c>] walk_memory_resource+0xcc/0x11c
[<000000000019520e>] offline_pages+0x36a/0x498
[<00000000001004d6>] remove_memory+0x36/0x44
[<000000000028fb06>] memory_block_change_state+0x112/0x150
[<000000000028ffb8>] store_mem_state+0x90/0xe4
[<0000000000289c00>] sysdev_store+0x34/0x40
[<00000000001ee048>] sysfs_write_file+0xd0/0x178
[<000000000019b1a8>] vfs_write+0x74/0x118
[<000000000019b9ae>] sys_write+0x46/0x7c
[<000000000011160e>] sysc_do_restart+0x12/0x16
[<0000000077f3e8ca>] 0x77f3e8ca
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-02 14:50:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
memory hotplug: missing zone->lock in test_pages_isolated()
__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() in mm/page_isolation.c has a comment
saying that the caller must hold zone->lock. But the only caller of that
function, test_pages_isolated(), does not hold zone->lock and the lock is
also not acquired anywhere before. This patch adds the missing zone->lock
to test_pages_isolated().
We reproducibly run into BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page)) in __offline_isolated_pages()
during memory hotplug stress test, see trace below. This patch fixes that
problem, it would be good if we could have it in 2.6.27.
kernel BUG at /home/autobuild/BUILD/linux-2.6.26-20080909/mm/page_alloc.c:4561!
illegal operation: 0001 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: dm_multipath sunrpc bonding qeth_l3 dm_mod qeth ccwgroup vmur
CPU: 1 Not tainted 2.6.26-29.x.20080909-s390default #1
Process memory_loop_all (pid: 10025, task: 2f444028, ksp: 2b10dd28)
Krnl PSW : 040c0000 801727ea (__offline_isolated_pages+0x18e/0x1c4)
R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0
Krnl GPRS: 00000000 7e27fc00 00000000 7e27fc00
00000000 00000400 00014000 7e27fc01
00606f00 7e27fc00 00013fe0 2b10dd28
00000005 80172662 801727b2 2b10dd28
Krnl Code: 801727de: 5810900c l %r1,12(%r9)
801727e2: a7f4ffb3 brc 15,80172748
801727e6: a7f40001 brc 15,801727e8
>801727ea: a7f4ffbc brc 15,80172762
801727ee: a7f40001 brc 15,801727f0
801727f2: a7f4ffaf brc 15,80172750
801727f6: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
801727f8: 0017 unknown
Call Trace:
([<0000000000172772>] __offline_isolated_pages+0x116/0x1c4)
[<00000000001953a2>] offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x22/0x34
[<000000000013164c>] walk_memory_resource+0xcc/0x11c
[<000000000019520e>] offline_pages+0x36a/0x498
[<00000000001004d6>] remove_memory+0x36/0x44
[<000000000028fb06>] memory_block_change_state+0x112/0x150
[<000000000028ffb8>] store_mem_state+0x90/0xe4
[<0000000000289c00>] sysdev_store+0x34/0x40
[<00000000001ee048>] sysfs_write_file+0xd0/0x178
[<000000000019b1a8>] vfs_write+0x74/0x118
[<000000000019b9ae>] sys_write+0x46/0x7c
[<000000000011160e>] sysc_do_restart+0x12/0x16
[<0000000077f3e8ca>] 0x77f3e8ca
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-02 14:50:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-20 18:10:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-03 14:52:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-06 12:53:36 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-20 18:10:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-06 12:53:36 -08:00
|
|
|
|
memory hotplug: missing zone->lock in test_pages_isolated()
__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() in mm/page_isolation.c has a comment
saying that the caller must hold zone->lock. But the only caller of that
function, test_pages_isolated(), does not hold zone->lock and the lock is
also not acquired anywhere before. This patch adds the missing zone->lock
to test_pages_isolated().
We reproducibly run into BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page)) in __offline_isolated_pages()
during memory hotplug stress test, see trace below. This patch fixes that
problem, it would be good if we could have it in 2.6.27.
kernel BUG at /home/autobuild/BUILD/linux-2.6.26-20080909/mm/page_alloc.c:4561!
illegal operation: 0001 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: dm_multipath sunrpc bonding qeth_l3 dm_mod qeth ccwgroup vmur
CPU: 1 Not tainted 2.6.26-29.x.20080909-s390default #1
Process memory_loop_all (pid: 10025, task: 2f444028, ksp: 2b10dd28)
Krnl PSW : 040c0000 801727ea (__offline_isolated_pages+0x18e/0x1c4)
R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0
Krnl GPRS: 00000000 7e27fc00 00000000 7e27fc00
00000000 00000400 00014000 7e27fc01
00606f00 7e27fc00 00013fe0 2b10dd28
00000005 80172662 801727b2 2b10dd28
Krnl Code: 801727de: 5810900c l %r1,12(%r9)
801727e2: a7f4ffb3 brc 15,80172748
801727e6: a7f40001 brc 15,801727e8
>801727ea: a7f4ffbc brc 15,80172762
801727ee: a7f40001 brc 15,801727f0
801727f2: a7f4ffaf brc 15,80172750
801727f6: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
801727f8: 0017 unknown
Call Trace:
([<0000000000172772>] __offline_isolated_pages+0x116/0x1c4)
[<00000000001953a2>] offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x22/0x34
[<000000000013164c>] walk_memory_resource+0xcc/0x11c
[<000000000019520e>] offline_pages+0x36a/0x498
[<00000000001004d6>] remove_memory+0x36/0x44
[<000000000028fb06>] memory_block_change_state+0x112/0x150
[<000000000028ffb8>] store_mem_state+0x90/0xe4
[<0000000000289c00>] sysdev_store+0x34/0x40
[<00000000001ee048>] sysfs_write_file+0xd0/0x178
[<000000000019b1a8>] vfs_write+0x74/0x118
[<000000000019b9ae>] sys_write+0x46/0x7c
[<000000000011160e>] sysc_do_restart+0x12/0x16
[<0000000077f3e8ca>] 0x77f3e8ca
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-02 14:50:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-11 16:00:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
memory hotplug: missing zone->lock in test_pages_isolated()
__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() in mm/page_isolation.c has a comment
saying that the caller must hold zone->lock. But the only caller of that
function, test_pages_isolated(), does not hold zone->lock and the lock is
also not acquired anywhere before. This patch adds the missing zone->lock
to test_pages_isolated().
We reproducibly run into BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page)) in __offline_isolated_pages()
during memory hotplug stress test, see trace below. This patch fixes that
problem, it would be good if we could have it in 2.6.27.
kernel BUG at /home/autobuild/BUILD/linux-2.6.26-20080909/mm/page_alloc.c:4561!
illegal operation: 0001 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: dm_multipath sunrpc bonding qeth_l3 dm_mod qeth ccwgroup vmur
CPU: 1 Not tainted 2.6.26-29.x.20080909-s390default #1
Process memory_loop_all (pid: 10025, task: 2f444028, ksp: 2b10dd28)
Krnl PSW : 040c0000 801727ea (__offline_isolated_pages+0x18e/0x1c4)
R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0
Krnl GPRS: 00000000 7e27fc00 00000000 7e27fc00
00000000 00000400 00014000 7e27fc01
00606f00 7e27fc00 00013fe0 2b10dd28
00000005 80172662 801727b2 2b10dd28
Krnl Code: 801727de: 5810900c l %r1,12(%r9)
801727e2: a7f4ffb3 brc 15,80172748
801727e6: a7f40001 brc 15,801727e8
>801727ea: a7f4ffbc brc 15,80172762
801727ee: a7f40001 brc 15,801727f0
801727f2: a7f4ffaf brc 15,80172750
801727f6: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
801727f8: 0017 unknown
Call Trace:
([<0000000000172772>] __offline_isolated_pages+0x116/0x1c4)
[<00000000001953a2>] offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x22/0x34
[<000000000013164c>] walk_memory_resource+0xcc/0x11c
[<000000000019520e>] offline_pages+0x36a/0x498
[<00000000001004d6>] remove_memory+0x36/0x44
[<000000000028fb06>] memory_block_change_state+0x112/0x150
[<000000000028ffb8>] store_mem_state+0x90/0xe4
[<0000000000289c00>] sysdev_store+0x34/0x40
[<00000000001ee048>] sysfs_write_file+0xd0/0x178
[<000000000019b1a8>] vfs_write+0x74/0x118
[<000000000019b9ae>] sys_write+0x46/0x7c
[<000000000011160e>] sysc_do_restart+0x12/0x16
[<0000000077f3e8ca>] 0x77f3e8ca
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-02 14:50:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-14 15:18:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:26:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-11 14:22:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-19 17:10:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-11 14:22:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-19 17:10:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-11 14:22:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-08 16:32:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
