kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-13 07:31:07 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c

497 lines
12 KiB
Raw Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441 Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-01 10:08:55 +02:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-20 15:10:04 -06:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency With commit e948bc8fbee0 (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms) the cpufreq was not honouring the delay passed via ACPI (PCCT). Due to which on ARM based platforms using CPPC the cpufreq governor tries to change the frequency of CPUs faster than expected. This leads to continuous error messages like the following. " ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 " Earlier (without above commit) the default transition delay was taken form the value passed from PCCT. Use the same value provided by PCCT to set the transition_delay_us. Fixes: e948bc8fbee0 (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms) Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-23 03:30:31 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-20 15:10:04 -06:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-20 15:10:04 -06:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / cppc: Work around for Hisilicon CPPC cpufreq Hisilicon chips do not support delivered performance counter register and reference performance counter register. But the platform can calculate the real performance using its own method. We reuse the desired performance register to store the real performance calculated by the platform. After the platform finished the frequency adjust, it gets the real performance and writes it into desired performance register. Os can use it to calculate the real frequency. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [ rjw: Drop unnecessary braces ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-17 11:54:15 +08:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-20 15:10:04 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-04 12:14:52 -06:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculation The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC. The correct calculation is desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz And cppc_cpufreq_set_target() returns if desired_perf is exactly the same with the old perf. Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-13 10:33:35 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-04 12:14:52 -06:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculation The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC. The correct calculation is desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz And cppc_cpufreq_set_target() returns if desired_perf is exactly the same with the old perf. Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-13 10:33:35 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us Add support to specify platform specific transition_delay_us instead of using the transition delay derived from PCC. With commit 3d41386d556d (cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency) we are setting transition_delay_us directly and not applying the LATENCY_MULTIPLIER. Because of that, on Qualcomm Centriq we can end up with a very high rate of frequency change requests when using the schedutil governor (default rate_limit_us=10 compared to an earlier value of 10000). The PCC subspace describes the rate at which the platform can accept commands on the CPPC's PCC channel. This includes read and write command on the PCC channel that can be used for reasons other than frequency transitions. Moreover the same PCC subspace can be used by multiple freq domains and deriving transition_delay_us from it as we do now can be sub-optimal. Moreover if a platform does not use PCC for desired_perf register then there is no way to compute the transition latency or the delay_us. CPPC does not have a standard defined mechanism to get the transition rate or the latency at the moment. Given the above limitations, it is simpler to have a platform specific transition_delay_us and rely on PCC derived value only if a platform specific value is not available. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Fixes: 3d41386d556d (cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-27 11:35:27 -06:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-04 12:14:52 -06:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-20 15:10:04 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Initialize policy->min to lowest nonlinear performance Description of Lowest Perfomance in ACPI 6.1 specification states: "Lowest Performance is the absolute lowest performance level of the platform. Selecting a performance level lower than the lowest nonlinear performance level may actually cause an efficiency penalty, but should reduce the instantaneous power consumption of the processor. In traditional terms, this represents the T-state range of performance levels." Set the default value of policy->min to Lowest Nonlinear Performance to avoid any potential efficiency penalty. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-11 16:39:44 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-04 12:14:52 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Initialize policy->min to lowest nonlinear performance Description of Lowest Perfomance in ACPI 6.1 specification states: "Lowest Performance is the absolute lowest performance level of the platform. Selecting a performance level lower than the lowest nonlinear performance level may actually cause an efficiency penalty, but should reduce the instantaneous power consumption of the processor. In traditional terms, this represents the T-state range of performance levels." Set the default value of policy->min to Lowest Nonlinear Performance to avoid any potential efficiency penalty. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-11 16:39:44 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-04 12:14:52 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Initialize policy->min to lowest nonlinear performance Description of Lowest Perfomance in ACPI 6.1 specification states: "Lowest Performance is the absolute lowest performance level of the platform. Selecting a performance level lower than the lowest nonlinear performance level may actually cause an efficiency penalty, but should reduce the instantaneous power consumption of the processor. In traditional terms, this represents the T-state range of performance levels." Set the default value of policy->min to Lowest Nonlinear Performance to avoid any potential efficiency penalty. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-11 16:39:44 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us Add support to specify platform specific transition_delay_us instead of using the transition delay derived from PCC. With commit 3d41386d556d (cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency) we are setting transition_delay_us directly and not applying the LATENCY_MULTIPLIER. Because of that, on Qualcomm Centriq we can end up with a very high rate of frequency change requests when using the schedutil governor (default rate_limit_us=10 compared to an earlier value of 10000). The PCC subspace describes the rate at which the platform can accept commands on the CPPC's PCC channel. This includes read and write command on the PCC channel that can be used for reasons other than frequency transitions. Moreover the same PCC subspace can be used by multiple freq domains and deriving transition_delay_us from it as we do now can be sub-optimal. Moreover if a platform does not use PCC for desired_perf register then there is no way to compute the transition latency or the delay_us. CPPC does not have a standard defined mechanism to get the transition rate or the latency at the moment. Given the above limitations, it is simpler to have a platform specific transition_delay_us and rely on PCC derived value only if a platform specific value is not available. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Fixes: 3d41386d556d (cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-27 11:35:27 -06:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Initialize and check CPUFreq CPU co-ord type correctly The CPU policy struct indicates the co-ordination type for all CPUs of a common freq domain. Initialize it correctly using the CPU specific data gathered from CPPC ACPI lib via acpi_get_psd_map(). The PSD object is optional, so the cpu->shared_type can also be 0. So instead of assuming any value other than SW_ANY(0xFD) is unsupported, explictly check if shared_type is SW_ALL and then bail. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-19 10:40:07 -05:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Initialize shared perf capabilities of CPUs When multiple CPUs are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online CPU will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. Let's take cpu0 and cpu1 as an example. When cpu0 is offline, policy->cpu will be shifted to cpu1. cpu1's perf capabilities should be initialized. Otherwise, perf capabilities are 0s and speed change can not take effect. This patch copies perf capabilities of the first online CPU to other shared CPUs when policy shared type is CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-06 10:43:49 +08:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Initialize shared perf capabilities of CPUs When multiple CPUs are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online CPU will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. Let's take cpu0 and cpu1 as an example. When cpu0 is offline, policy->cpu will be shifted to cpu1. cpu1's perf capabilities should be initialized. Otherwise, perf capabilities are 0s and speed change can not take effect. This patch copies perf capabilities of the first online CPU to other shared CPUs when policy shared type is CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-06 10:43:49 +08:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-04 12:14:52 -06:00
cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-07-20 15:10:04 -06:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Add cpuinfo_cur_freq support for CPPC Per Section 8.4.7.1.3 of ACPI 6.2, the platform provides performance feedback via set of performance counters. To determine the actual performance level delivered over time, OSPM may read a set of performance counters from the Reference Performance Counter Register and the Delivered Performance Counter Register. OSPM calculates the delivered performance over a given time period by taking a beginning and ending snapshot of both the reference and delivered performance counters, and calculating: delivered_perf = reference_perf X (delta of delivered_perf counter / delta of reference_perf counter). Implement the above and hook this up to the cpufreq->get method. Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-11 23:07:55 -07:00
cpufreq / cppc: Work around for Hisilicon CPPC cpufreq Hisilicon chips do not support delivered performance counter register and reference performance counter register. But the platform can calculate the real performance using its own method. We reuse the desired performance register to store the real performance calculated by the platform. After the platform finished the frequency adjust, it gets the real performance and writes it into desired performance register. Os can use it to calculate the real frequency. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [ rjw: Drop unnecessary braces ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-17 11:54:15 +08:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Add cpuinfo_cur_freq support for CPPC Per Section 8.4.7.1.3 of ACPI 6.2, the platform provides performance feedback via set of performance counters. To determine the actual performance level delivered over time, OSPM may read a set of performance counters from the Reference Performance Counter Register and the Delivered Performance Counter Register. OSPM calculates the delivered performance over a given time period by taking a beginning and ending snapshot of both the reference and delivered performance counters, and calculating: delivered_perf = reference_perf X (delta of delivered_perf counter / delta of reference_perf counter). Implement the above and hook this up to the cpufreq->get method. Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-11 23:07:55 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Add cpuinfo_cur_freq support for CPPC Per Section 8.4.7.1.3 of ACPI 6.2, the platform provides performance feedback via set of performance counters. To determine the actual performance level delivered over time, OSPM may read a set of performance counters from the Reference Performance Counter Register and the Delivered Performance Counter Register. OSPM calculates the delivered performance over a given time period by taking a beginning and ending snapshot of both the reference and delivered performance counters, and calculating: delivered_perf = reference_perf X (delta of delivered_perf counter / delta of reference_perf counter). Implement the above and hook this up to the cpufreq->get method. Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-11 23:07:55 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
treewide: kzalloc() -> kcalloc() The kzalloc() function has a 2-factor argument form, kcalloc(). This patch replaces cases of: kzalloc(a * b, gfp) with: kcalloc(a * b, gfp) as well as handling cases of: kzalloc(a * b * c, gfp) with: kzalloc(array3_size(a, b, c), gfp) as it's slightly less ugly than: kzalloc_array(array_size(a, b), c, gfp) This does, however, attempt to ignore constant size factors like: kzalloc(4 * 1024, gfp) though any constants defined via macros get caught up in the conversion. Any factors with a sizeof() of "unsigned char", "char", and "u8" were dropped, since they're redundant. The Coccinelle script used for this was: // Fix redundant parens around sizeof(). @@ type TYPE; expression THING, E; @@ ( kzalloc( - (sizeof(TYPE)) * E + sizeof(TYPE) * E , ...) | kzalloc( - (sizeof(THING)) * E + sizeof(THING) * E , ...) ) // Drop single-byte sizes and redundant parens. @@ expression COUNT; typedef u8; typedef __u8; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(u8) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(__u8) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(char) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(unsigned char) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(u8) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(__u8) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(char) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(unsigned char) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) ) // 2-factor product with sizeof(type/expression) and identifier or constant. @@ type TYPE; expression THING; identifier COUNT_ID; constant COUNT_CONST; @@ ( - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT_ID) + COUNT_ID, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT_ID + COUNT_ID, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT_CONST) + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT_CONST + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT_ID) + COUNT_ID, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT_ID + COUNT_ID, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT_CONST) + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT_CONST + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(THING) , ...) ) // 2-factor product, only identifiers. @@ identifier SIZE, COUNT; @@ - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - SIZE * COUNT + COUNT, SIZE , ...) // 3-factor product with 1 sizeof(type) or sizeof(expression), with // redundant parens removed. @@ expression THING; identifier STRIDE, COUNT; type TYPE; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT) * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT) * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT) * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT) * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) ) // 3-factor product with 2 sizeof(variable), with redundant parens removed. @@ expression THING1, THING2; identifier COUNT; type TYPE1, TYPE2; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(TYPE2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(TYPE2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(TYPE2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING1) * sizeof(THING2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(THING1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(THING1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) ) // 3-factor product, only identifiers, with redundant parens removed. @@ identifier STRIDE, SIZE, COUNT; @@ ( kzalloc( - (COUNT) * STRIDE * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * (STRIDE) * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * STRIDE * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * (STRIDE) * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * (STRIDE) * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * STRIDE * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * (STRIDE) * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * STRIDE * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) ) // Any remaining multi-factor products, first at least 3-factor products, // when they're not all constants... @@ expression E1, E2, E3; constant C1, C2, C3; @@ ( kzalloc(C1 * C2 * C3, ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * E2 * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * (E2) * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * (E2) * (E3) + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - E1 * E2 * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) ) // And then all remaining 2 factors products when they're not all constants, // keeping sizeof() as the second factor argument. @@ expression THING, E1, E2; type TYPE; constant C1, C2, C3; @@ ( kzalloc(sizeof(THING) * C2, ...) | kzalloc(sizeof(TYPE) * C2, ...) | kzalloc(C1 * C2 * C3, ...) | kzalloc(C1 * C2, ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (E2) + E2, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * E2 + E2, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (E2) + E2, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * E2 + E2, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - (E1) * E2 + E1, E2 , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - (E1) * (E2) + E1, E2 , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - E1 * E2 + E1, E2 , ...) ) Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2018-06-12 14:03:40 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / cppc: Work around for Hisilicon CPPC cpufreq Hisilicon chips do not support delivered performance counter register and reference performance counter register. But the platform can calculate the real performance using its own method. We reuse the desired performance register to store the real performance calculated by the platform. After the platform finished the frequency adjust, it gets the real performance and writes it into desired performance register. Os can use it to calculate the real frequency. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [ rjw: Drop unnecessary braces ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-17 11:54:15 +08:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: cppc_cpufreq: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init() failure path Kmemleak reported the below leak. When cppc_cpufreq_init went into failure path, the cpu mask is not freed. After fix, this report is gone. And to avaoid potential NULL pointer reference, check the cpu value first. unreferenced object 0xffff800fd5ea4880 (size 128): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294939510 (age 668.680s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .... ........... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffff0000082c4ae4>] __kmalloc_node+0x278/0x634 [<ffff0000088f4a74>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x28/0x60 [<ffff0000088f4af0>] zalloc_cpumask_var+0x14/0x1c [<ffff000008d20254>] cppc_cpufreq_init+0xd0/0x19c [<ffff000008083828>] do_one_initcall+0xec/0x15c [<ffff000008cd1018>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x2a4 [<ffff0000089099b0>] kernel_init+0x18/0x10c [<ffff000008084d50>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-05 13:40:38 +08:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq: ACPI / CPPC: Add module support for cppc_cpufreq driver Add a function to cleanup at module exit and export appropriate GPL string to enable moduler support for the cppc_cpufreq driver. Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-14 20:45:53 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-01 13:37:11 -07:00
cpufreq: ACPI / CPPC: Add module support for cppc_cpufreq driver Add a function to cleanup at module exit and export appropriate GPL string to enable moduler support for the cppc_cpufreq driver. Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-14 20:45:53 -04:00
ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-02 10:04:01 -04:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for cppc_cpufreq driver MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is added so that CPPC cpufreq module can be automatically loaded when we have a acpi processor device with "ACPI0007" hid. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-14 12:00:23 -06:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Mark acpi_ids as used Clang warns: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:431:36: warning: variable 'cppc_acpi_ids' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] static const struct acpi_device_id cppc_acpi_ids[] = { ^ 1 warning generated. Mark the definition as used so that Clang understands we don't want this warning while not inhibiting Clang's dead code elimination from removing the unreferenced internal symbol when moving the data it contains to the globally available symbol via MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE. $ nm -S drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.o | grep acpi | tail -1 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 R __mod_acpi__cppc_acpi_ids_device_table Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-10-02 15:34:57 -07:00
cpufreq / CPPC: Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for cppc_cpufreq driver MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is added so that CPPC cpufreq module can be automatically loaded when we have a acpi processor device with "ACPI0007" hid. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-14 12:00:23 -06:00