kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-02 19:05:42 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h

64 lines
1.4 KiB
Raw Normal View History

x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:26:29 -07:00
x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring This is the 1st patch in the series. Here the aim was to avoid any significant changes, logically-wise. So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make microcode_{intel,amd}.c more about arch-specific details and less about policies like make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu (no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no more microcode_mutex here). All in all, more line have been deleted than added. 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-20 00:22:26 +02:00
x86: moved microcode.c to microcode_intel.c Combine both generic and arch-specific parts of microcode into a single module (arch-specific parts are config-dependent). Also while we are at it, move arch-specific parts from microcode.h into their respective arch-specific .c files. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23 12:08:44 +02:00
x86: major refactoring Refactored code by introducing a two-module solution. There is one general module in which vendor specific modules can hook into. However, that is exclusive, there is only one vendor specific module allowed at a time. A CPU vendor check makes sure only the correct module for the underlying system gets called. Functinally in terms of patch loading itself there are no changes. This refactoring provides a basis for future implementations of other vendors' patch loaders. Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-28 18:44:21 +02:00
x86, microcode rework, v2 this is a rework of the microcode splitup in tip/x86/microcode (1) I think this new interface is cleaner (look at the changes in 'struct microcode_ops' in microcode.h); (2) it's -64 lines of code; Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 23:27:52 +02:00
x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring This is the 1st patch in the series. Here the aim was to avoid any significant changes, logically-wise. So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make microcode_{intel,amd}.c more about arch-specific details and less about policies like make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu (no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no more microcode_mutex here). All in all, more line have been deleted than added. 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-20 00:22:26 +02:00
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 23:48:27 +02:00
x86: first step of refactoring, introducing microcode_ops Refactoring with the goal of having one general module and separate vendor specific modules that hook into the general one. Microcode_ops is a function pointer structure in which vendor specific modules will enter all functions that differ between vendors and that need to be accessed from the general module. Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-28 18:44:20 +02:00
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 23:48:27 +02:00
x86, microcode rework, v2 this is a rework of the microcode splitup in tip/x86/microcode (1) I think this new interface is cleaner (look at the changes in 'struct microcode_ops' in microcode.h); (2) it's -64 lines of code; Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 23:27:52 +02:00
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 23:48:27 +02:00
x86, microcode rework, v2 this is a rework of the microcode splitup in tip/x86/microcode (1) I think this new interface is cleaner (look at the changes in 'struct microcode_ops' in microcode.h); (2) it's -64 lines of code; Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 23:27:52 +02:00
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 23:48:27 +02:00
x86: first step of refactoring, introducing microcode_ops Refactoring with the goal of having one general module and separate vendor specific modules that hook into the general one. Microcode_ops is a function pointer structure in which vendor specific modules will enter all functions that differ between vendors and that need to be accessed from the general module. Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-28 18:44:20 +02:00
x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring This is the 1st patch in the series. Here the aim was to avoid any significant changes, logically-wise. So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make microcode_{intel,amd}.c more about arch-specific details and less about policies like make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu (no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no more microcode_mutex here). All in all, more line have been deleted than added. 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-20 00:22:26 +02:00
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 23:48:27 +02:00
x86: move per CPU microcode structure declaration to header file This structure will be later used by other modules as well and needs therfore to be moved out to a header file. Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-28 18:44:15 +02:00
x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring This is the 1st patch in the series. Here the aim was to avoid any significant changes, logically-wise. So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make microcode_{intel,amd}.c more about arch-specific details and less about policies like make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu (no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no more microcode_mutex here). All in all, more line have been deleted than added. 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-20 00:22:26 +02:00
x86: moved microcode.c to microcode_intel.c Combine both generic and arch-specific parts of microcode into a single module (arch-specific parts are config-dependent). Also while we are at it, move arch-specific parts from microcode.h into their respective arch-specific .c files. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23 12:08:44 +02:00
x86, microcode, AMD: Cleanup code a bit get_ucode_data is a memcpy() wrapper which always returns 0. Move it into the header and make it an inline. Remove all code checking its return value and turn it into a void. There should be no functionality change resulting from this patch. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
2010-11-01 23:36:53 +01:00
x86: moved microcode.c to microcode_intel.c Combine both generic and arch-specific parts of microcode into a single module (arch-specific parts are config-dependent). Also while we are at it, move arch-specific parts from microcode.h into their respective arch-specific .c files. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23 12:08:44 +02:00
x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:26:29 -07:00