kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-18 19:12:56 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/lib/list_debug.c

100 lines
2.6 KiB
Raw Normal View History

[PATCH] Debug variants of linked list macros Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 01:59:00 -07:00
lib: reduce the use of module.h wherever possible For files only using THIS_MODULE and/or EXPORT_SYMBOL, map them onto including export.h -- or if the file isn't even using those, then just delete the include. Fix up any implicit include dependencies that were being masked by module.h along the way. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-11-16 21:29:17 -05:00
[PATCH] Debug variants of linked list macros Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 01:59:00 -07:00
bug.h: add include of it to various implicit C users With bug.h currently living right in linux/kernel.h there are files that use BUG_ON and friends but are not including the header explicitly. Fix them up so we can remove the presence in kernel.h file. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-01-20 18:35:53 -05:00
lib: fix implicit users of kernel.h for TAINT_WARN A pending header cleanup will cause this to show up as: lib/average.c:38: error: 'TAINT_WARN' undeclared (first use in this function) lib/list_debug.c:24: error: 'TAINT_WARN' undeclared (first use in this function) and TAINT_WARN comes from include/linux/kernel.h file. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-01-20 18:46:49 -05:00
rcu: List-debug variants of rcu list routines. * Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers just like __list_add does. * Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking at deletion time. Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up, but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something ever does corrupt those lists. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-03-14 22:17:39 -04:00
[PATCH] Debug variants of linked list macros Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 01:59:00 -07:00
list debugging: use WARN() instead of BUG() Arjan noted that the list_head debugging is BUG'ing when it detects corruption. By causing the box to panic immediately, we're possibly losing some bug reports. Changing this to a WARN() should mean we at the least start seeing reports collected at kerneloops.org Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:45:55 -07:00
list_debug: WARN for adding something already in the list We were bitten by this at one point and added an additional sanity test for DEBUG_LIST. You can't validly add a list_head to a list where either prev or next is the same as the thing you're adding. Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-05-29 15:07:31 -07:00
[PATCH] Debug variants of linked list macros Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 01:59:00 -07:00
Expand CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST to several other list operations When list debugging is enabled, we aim to readably show list corruption errors, and the basic list_add/list_del operations end up having extra debugging code in them to do some basic validation of the list entries. However, "list_del_init()" and "list_move[_tail]()" ended up avoiding the debug code due to how they were written. This fixes that. So the _next_ time we have list_move() problems with stale list entries, we'll hopefully have an easier time finding them.. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-18 11:32:28 -08:00
[PATCH] Debug variants of linked list macros Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 01:59:00 -07:00
Expand CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST to several other list operations When list debugging is enabled, we aim to readably show list corruption errors, and the basic list_add/list_del operations end up having extra debugging code in them to do some basic validation of the list entries. However, "list_del_init()" and "list_move[_tail]()" ended up avoiding the debug code due to how they were written. This fixes that. So the _next_ time we have list_move() problems with stale list entries, we'll hopefully have an easier time finding them.. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-18 11:32:28 -08:00
[PATCH] Debug variants of linked list macros Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 01:59:00 -07:00
rcu: List-debug variants of rcu list routines. * Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers just like __list_add does. * Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking at deletion time. Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up, but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something ever does corrupt those lists. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-03-14 22:17:39 -04:00
rcu: Fix broken strings in RCU's source code. Although the C language allows you to break strings across lines, doing this makes it hard for people to find the Linux kernel code corresponding to a given console message. This commit therefore fixes broken strings throughout RCU's source code. Suggested-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-05-17 15:12:45 -07:00
rcu: List-debug variants of rcu list routines. * Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers just like __list_add does. * Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking at deletion time. Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up, but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something ever does corrupt those lists. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-03-14 22:17:39 -04:00
rcu: Fix broken strings in RCU's source code. Although the C language allows you to break strings across lines, doing this makes it hard for people to find the Linux kernel code corresponding to a given console message. This commit therefore fixes broken strings throughout RCU's source code. Suggested-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-05-17 15:12:45 -07:00
rcu: List-debug variants of rcu list routines. * Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers just like __list_add does. * Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking at deletion time. Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up, but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something ever does corrupt those lists. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-03-14 22:17:39 -04:00