2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 20:36:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-06 13:30:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-18 22:00:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-02 17:47:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-25 11:52:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-08 16:56:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-23 11:33:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-05-06 13:30:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-08 16:56:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-23 11:33:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-08 16:56:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-06 13:30:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-23 09:04:35 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
io_uring: move struct io_kiocb from task_struct to io_uring_task
Rather than store the task_struct itself in struct io_kiocb, store
the io_uring specific task_struct. The life times are the same in terms
of io_uring, and this avoids doing some dereferences through the
task_struct. For the hot path of putting local task references, we can
deref req->tctx instead, which we'll need anyway in that function
regardless of whether it's local or remote references.
This is mostly straight forward, except the original task PF_EXITING
check needs a bit of tweaking. task_work is _always_ run from the
originating task, except in the fallback case, where it's run from a
kernel thread. Replace the potentially racy (in case of fallback work)
checks for req->task->flags with current->flags. It's either the still
the original task, in which case PF_EXITING will be sane, or it has
PF_KTHREAD set, in which case it's fallback work. Both cases should
prevent moving forward with the given request.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-11-03 10:23:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-09-18 10:21:14 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring: move struct io_kiocb from task_struct to io_uring_task
Rather than store the task_struct itself in struct io_kiocb, store
the io_uring specific task_struct. The life times are the same in terms
of io_uring, and this avoids doing some dereferences through the
task_struct. For the hot path of putting local task references, we can
deref req->tctx instead, which we'll need anyway in that function
regardless of whether it's local or remote references.
This is mostly straight forward, except the original task PF_EXITING
check needs a bit of tweaking. task_work is _always_ run from the
originating task, except in the fallback case, where it's run from a
kernel thread. Replace the potentially racy (in case of fallback work)
checks for req->task->flags with current->flags. It's either the still
the original task, in which case PF_EXITING will be sane, or it has
PF_KTHREAD set, in which case it's fallback work. Both cases should
prevent moving forward with the given request.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-11-03 10:23:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-16 19:25:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-05 11:39:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-23 09:34:08 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-01-04 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-05 11:39:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-01-04 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-23 09:34:08 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-08 14:48:33 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:58:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-01-23 07:34:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 15:46:14 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-05 11:39:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-19 15:21:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 09:11:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-03 10:22:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-24 12:16:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring: move struct io_kiocb from task_struct to io_uring_task
Rather than store the task_struct itself in struct io_kiocb, store
the io_uring specific task_struct. The life times are the same in terms
of io_uring, and this avoids doing some dereferences through the
task_struct. For the hot path of putting local task references, we can
deref req->tctx instead, which we'll need anyway in that function
regardless of whether it's local or remote references.
This is mostly straight forward, except the original task PF_EXITING
check needs a bit of tweaking. task_work is _always_ run from the
originating task, except in the fallback case, where it's run from a
kernel thread. Replace the potentially racy (in case of fallback work)
checks for req->task->flags with current->flags. It's either the still
the original task, in which case PF_EXITING will be sane, or it has
PF_KTHREAD set, in which case it's fallback work. Both cases should
prevent moving forward with the given request.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-11-03 10:23:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-03 10:22:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-02 17:47:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-02 17:47:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now)
raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock:
ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094:
#0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0
#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0
#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180
#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180
#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
Call trace:
show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
__dump_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
dump_stack+0x14/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8
lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0
eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180
io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108
io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430
__io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270
io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288
io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388
io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550
process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0
worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80
kthread+0x24c/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside
the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the
raw timeout spinlock.
Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock,
split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work
for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-25 08:57:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|