linux/io_uring/timeout.c

704 lines
18 KiB

io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00
io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock Chase reports that their tester complaints about a locking context mismatch: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Not tainted ----------------------------- syz.1.25198/182604 is trying to lock: ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] ffff88805e66a358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by syz.1.25198/182604: #0: ffff88802b7d48c0 (&acct->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0x2d/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1049 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 182604 Comm: syz.1.25198 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-gf137f14b7ccb-dirty #9 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xd0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x883/0x3c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline] io_match_task_safe io_uring/io_uring.c:218 [inline] io_match_task_safe+0x187/0x250 io_uring/io_uring.c:204 io_acct_cancel_pending_work+0xb8/0x6b0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1052 io_wq_cancel_pending_work io_uring/io-wq.c:1074 [inline] io_wq_cancel_cb+0xb0/0x390 io_uring/io-wq.c:1112 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x15e/0xd70 io_uring/io_uring.c:3062 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ec/0x8c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3140 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:20 [inline] do_exit+0x494/0x27a0 kernel/exit.c:894 do_group_exit+0xb3/0x250 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x1d77/0x1ef0 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5b0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f which is because io_uring has ctx->timeout_lock nesting inside the io-wq acct lock, the latter of which is used from inside the scheduler and hence is a raw spinlock, while the former is a "normal" spinlock and can hence be sleeping on PREEMPT_RT. Change ctx->timeout_lock to be a raw spinlock to solve this nesting dependency on PREEMPT_RT=y. Reported-by: chase xd <sl1589472800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-17 08:21:46 -07:00
io_uring/timeout: flush timeouts outside of the timeout lock syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f35624 ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-12-30 14:15:17 -07:00