2020-11-23 15:15:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 10:01:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-12 19:52:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 11:09:18 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 14:27:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-24 11:20:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-14 16:39:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 14:19:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-23 12:04:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 12:42:19 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 13:22:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 14:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 12:42:19 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:30:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 13:22:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 12:42:19 +05:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: properly report the used arch for --json, or '' if not known
Before, kunit.py always printed "arch": "UM" in its json output, but...
1. With `kunit.py parse`, we could be parsing output from anywhere, so
we can't say that.
2. Capitalizing it is probably wrong, as it's `ARCH=um`
3. Commit 87c9c1631788 ("kunit: tool: add support for QEMU") made it so
kunit.py could knowingly run a different arch, yet we'd still always
claim "UM".
This patch addresses all of those. E.g.
1.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse .kunit/test.log --json | grep -o '"arch.*' | sort -u
"arch": "",
2.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json | ...
"arch": "um",
3.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json --arch=x86_64 | ...
"arch": "x86_64",
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-02-24 11:20:36 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-24 11:20:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-11 14:50:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 13:22:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-24 11:20:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 11:09:18 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-19 19:24:01 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-11 14:50:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 11:09:18 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-11 14:50:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-09 13:49:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-24 11:20:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-11 14:50:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-11 14:50:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-30 15:20:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-07-30 11:16:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-05 16:51:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-30 10:54:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-05 16:51:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-05 16:51:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 14:27:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 11:09:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-24 11:20:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 14:27:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 11:09:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-18 11:09:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 14:27:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-14 11:26:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-30 15:20:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-22 09:39:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 12:50:14 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-02 08:09:48 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 12:50:14 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 13:22:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-01 12:55:14 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-22 14:52:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: make --kunitconfig repeatable, blindly concat
It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig
be repeatable [1][2].
This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g.
$ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
or equivalently:
$ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice.
And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more
config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML
coverage [2], variants of tests [3].
There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple
--kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]).
Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be
incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case
where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values,
but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be
potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better.
Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you
either have to do to specify the current build_dir
> --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config
or
> --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config
each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir,
doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc.
Example with conflicting values:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin <<EOF
> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n
> CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> EOF
> ...
> kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig:
> CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> vs from /dev/stdin
> CONFIG_KUNIT=m
>
> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y
> vs from /dev/stdin
> # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-08 01:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-05 18:30:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 14:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 14:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 14:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 14:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 10:01:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-05 16:08:53 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-14 14:03:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-05 16:08:53 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-15 09:08:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30 15:20:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-09 13:49:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-07-30 11:16:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 14:27:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-21 11:55:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 13:23:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 10:01:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 13:22:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 13:22:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 10:01:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-16 12:47:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
kunit: tool: Add command line interface to filter and report attributes
Add ability to kunit.py to filter attributes and report a list of tests
including attributes without running tests.
Add flag "--filter" to input filters on test attributes. Tests will be
filtered out if they do not match all inputted filters.
Example: --filter speed=slow (This filter would run only the tests that are
marked as slow)
Filters have operations: <, >, <=, >=, !=, and =. But note that the
characters < and > are often interpreted by the shell, so they may need to
be quoted or escaped.
Example: --filter "speed>slow" or --filter speed\>slow (This filter would
run only the tests that have the speed faster than slow.
Additionally, multiple filters can be used.
Example: --filter "speed=slow, module!=example" (This filter would run
only the tests that have the speed slow and are not in the "example"
module)
Note if the user wants to skip filtered tests instead of not
running/showing them use the "--filter_action=skip" flag instead.
Expose the output of kunit.action=list option with flag "--list_tests" to
output a list of tests. Additionally, add flag "--list_tests_attr" to
output a list of tests and their attributes. These flags are useful to see
tests and test attributes without needing to run tests.
Example of the output of "--list_tests_attr":
example
example.test_1
example.test_2
# example.test_2.speed: slow
This output includes a suite, example, with two test cases, test_1 and
test_2. And in this instance test_2 has been marked as slow.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 21:25:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 22:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-16 15:06:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 21:27:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-23 12:04:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-22 09:39:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 14:27:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-22 02:27:17 +05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 02:02:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
