linux/include/net/codel_impl.h

269 lines
8.3 KiB

fq_codel: generalise ce_threshold marking for subset of traffic Commit e72aeb9ee0e3 ("fq_codel: implement L4S style ce_threshold_ect1 marking") expanded the ce_threshold feature of FQ-CoDel so it can be applied to a subset of the traffic, using the ECT(1) bit of the ECN field as the classifier. However, hard-coding ECT(1) as the only classifier for this feature seems limiting, so let's expand it to be more general. To this end, change the parameter from a ce_threshold_ect1 boolean, to a one-byte selector/mask pair (ce_threshold_{selector,mask}) which is applied to the whole diffserv/ECN field in the IP header. This makes it possible to classify packets by any value in either the ECN field or the diffserv field. In particular, setting a selector of INET_ECN_ECT_1 and a mask of INET_ECN_MASK corresponds to the functionality before this patch, and a mask of ~INET_ECN_MASK allows using the selector as a straight-forward match against a diffserv code point: # apply ce_threshold to ECT(1) traffic tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root fq_codel ce_threshold 1ms ce_threshold_selector 0x1/0x3 # apply ce_threshold to ECN-capable traffic marked as diffserv AF22 tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root fq_codel ce_threshold 1ms ce_threshold_selector 0x50/0xfc Regardless of the selector chosen, the normal rules for ECN-marking of packets still apply, i.e., the flow must still declare itself ECN-capable by setting one of the bits in the ECN field to get marked at all. v2: - Add tc usage examples to patch description Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019174709.69081-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-19 19:47:09 +02:00
fq_codel: implement L4S style ce_threshold_ect1 marking Add TCA_FQ_CODEL_CE_THRESHOLD_ECT1 boolean option to select Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput (L4S) style marking, along with ce_threshold. If enabled, only packets with ECT(1) can be transformed to CE if their sojourn time is above the ce_threshold. Note that this new option does not change rules for codel law. In particular, if TCA_FQ_CODEL_ECN is left enabled (this is the default when fq_codel qdisc is created), ECT(0) packets can still get CE if codel law (as governed by limit/target) decides so. Section 4.3.b of current draft [1] states: b. A scheduler with per-flow queues such as FQ-CoDel or FQ-PIE can be used for L4S. For instance within each queue of an FQ-CoDel system, as well as a CoDel AQM, there is typically also ECN marking at an immediate (unsmoothed) shallow threshold to support use in data centres (see Sec.5.2.7 of [RFC8290]). This can be modified so that the shallow threshold is solely applied to ECT(1) packets. Then if there is a flow of non-ECN or ECT(0) packets in the per-flow-queue, the Classic AQM (e.g. CoDel) is applied; while if there is a flow of ECT(1) packets in the queue, the shallower (typically sub-millisecond) threshold is applied. Tested: tc qd replace dev eth1 root fq_codel ce_threshold_ect1 50usec netperf ... -t TCP_STREAM -- K dctcp tc -s -d qd sh dev eth1 qdisc fq_codel 8022: root refcnt 32 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 9212 target 5ms ce_threshold_ect1 49us interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64 Sent 14388596616 bytes 9543449 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 152013) backlog 0b 0p requeues 152013 maxpacket 68130 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 95678 ecn_mark 0 ce_mark 7639 new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 [1] L4S current draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-l4s-arch Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Cc: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Cc: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-14 10:59:18 -07:00
fq_codel: generalise ce_threshold marking for subset of traffic Commit e72aeb9ee0e3 ("fq_codel: implement L4S style ce_threshold_ect1 marking") expanded the ce_threshold feature of FQ-CoDel so it can be applied to a subset of the traffic, using the ECT(1) bit of the ECN field as the classifier. However, hard-coding ECT(1) as the only classifier for this feature seems limiting, so let's expand it to be more general. To this end, change the parameter from a ce_threshold_ect1 boolean, to a one-byte selector/mask pair (ce_threshold_{selector,mask}) which is applied to the whole diffserv/ECN field in the IP header. This makes it possible to classify packets by any value in either the ECN field or the diffserv field. In particular, setting a selector of INET_ECN_ECT_1 and a mask of INET_ECN_MASK corresponds to the functionality before this patch, and a mask of ~INET_ECN_MASK allows using the selector as a straight-forward match against a diffserv code point: # apply ce_threshold to ECT(1) traffic tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root fq_codel ce_threshold 1ms ce_threshold_selector 0x1/0x3 # apply ce_threshold to ECN-capable traffic marked as diffserv AF22 tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root fq_codel ce_threshold 1ms ce_threshold_selector 0x50/0xfc Regardless of the selector chosen, the normal rules for ECN-marking of packets still apply, i.e., the flow must still declare itself ECN-capable by setting one of the bits in the ECN field to get marked at all. v2: - Add tc usage examples to patch description Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019174709.69081-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-19 19:47:09 +02:00
fq_codel: implement L4S style ce_threshold_ect1 marking Add TCA_FQ_CODEL_CE_THRESHOLD_ECT1 boolean option to select Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput (L4S) style marking, along with ce_threshold. If enabled, only packets with ECT(1) can be transformed to CE if their sojourn time is above the ce_threshold. Note that this new option does not change rules for codel law. In particular, if TCA_FQ_CODEL_ECN is left enabled (this is the default when fq_codel qdisc is created), ECT(0) packets can still get CE if codel law (as governed by limit/target) decides so. Section 4.3.b of current draft [1] states: b. A scheduler with per-flow queues such as FQ-CoDel or FQ-PIE can be used for L4S. For instance within each queue of an FQ-CoDel system, as well as a CoDel AQM, there is typically also ECN marking at an immediate (unsmoothed) shallow threshold to support use in data centres (see Sec.5.2.7 of [RFC8290]). This can be modified so that the shallow threshold is solely applied to ECT(1) packets. Then if there is a flow of non-ECN or ECT(0) packets in the per-flow-queue, the Classic AQM (e.g. CoDel) is applied; while if there is a flow of ECT(1) packets in the queue, the shallower (typically sub-millisecond) threshold is applied. Tested: tc qd replace dev eth1 root fq_codel ce_threshold_ect1 50usec netperf ... -t TCP_STREAM -- K dctcp tc -s -d qd sh dev eth1 qdisc fq_codel 8022: root refcnt 32 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 9212 target 5ms ce_threshold_ect1 49us interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64 Sent 14388596616 bytes 9543449 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 152013) backlog 0b 0p requeues 152013 maxpacket 68130 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 95678 ecn_mark 0 ce_mark 7639 new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 [1] L4S current draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-l4s-arch Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Cc: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Cc: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-14 10:59:18 -07:00
fq_codel: generalise ce_threshold marking for subset of traffic Commit e72aeb9ee0e3 ("fq_codel: implement L4S style ce_threshold_ect1 marking") expanded the ce_threshold feature of FQ-CoDel so it can be applied to a subset of the traffic, using the ECT(1) bit of the ECN field as the classifier. However, hard-coding ECT(1) as the only classifier for this feature seems limiting, so let's expand it to be more general. To this end, change the parameter from a ce_threshold_ect1 boolean, to a one-byte selector/mask pair (ce_threshold_{selector,mask}) which is applied to the whole diffserv/ECN field in the IP header. This makes it possible to classify packets by any value in either the ECN field or the diffserv field. In particular, setting a selector of INET_ECN_ECT_1 and a mask of INET_ECN_MASK corresponds to the functionality before this patch, and a mask of ~INET_ECN_MASK allows using the selector as a straight-forward match against a diffserv code point: # apply ce_threshold to ECT(1) traffic tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root fq_codel ce_threshold 1ms ce_threshold_selector 0x1/0x3 # apply ce_threshold to ECN-capable traffic marked as diffserv AF22 tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root fq_codel ce_threshold 1ms ce_threshold_selector 0x50/0xfc Regardless of the selector chosen, the normal rules for ECN-marking of packets still apply, i.e., the flow must still declare itself ECN-capable by setting one of the bits in the ECN field to get marked at all. v2: - Add tc usage examples to patch description Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019174709.69081-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-19 19:47:09 +02:00
fq_codel: implement L4S style ce_threshold_ect1 marking Add TCA_FQ_CODEL_CE_THRESHOLD_ECT1 boolean option to select Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput (L4S) style marking, along with ce_threshold. If enabled, only packets with ECT(1) can be transformed to CE if their sojourn time is above the ce_threshold. Note that this new option does not change rules for codel law. In particular, if TCA_FQ_CODEL_ECN is left enabled (this is the default when fq_codel qdisc is created), ECT(0) packets can still get CE if codel law (as governed by limit/target) decides so. Section 4.3.b of current draft [1] states: b. A scheduler with per-flow queues such as FQ-CoDel or FQ-PIE can be used for L4S. For instance within each queue of an FQ-CoDel system, as well as a CoDel AQM, there is typically also ECN marking at an immediate (unsmoothed) shallow threshold to support use in data centres (see Sec.5.2.7 of [RFC8290]). This can be modified so that the shallow threshold is solely applied to ECT(1) packets. Then if there is a flow of non-ECN or ECT(0) packets in the per-flow-queue, the Classic AQM (e.g. CoDel) is applied; while if there is a flow of ECT(1) packets in the queue, the shallower (typically sub-millisecond) threshold is applied. Tested: tc qd replace dev eth1 root fq_codel ce_threshold_ect1 50usec netperf ... -t TCP_STREAM -- K dctcp tc -s -d qd sh dev eth1 qdisc fq_codel 8022: root refcnt 32 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 9212 target 5ms ce_threshold_ect1 49us interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64 Sent 14388596616 bytes 9543449 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 152013) backlog 0b 0p requeues 152013 maxpacket 68130 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 95678 ecn_mark 0 ce_mark 7639 new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 [1] L4S current draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-l4s-arch Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Cc: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Cc: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-14 10:59:18 -07:00