License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 15:07:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-26 16:09:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-14 12:45:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-04 16:27:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 09:53:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-17 09:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 19:29:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-25 10:33:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-25 10:33:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-25 10:33:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-17 09:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 19:29:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-17 09:32:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 16:43:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 08:44:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-17 09:32:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 19:29:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 19:29:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-19 12:17:01 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-03 10:30:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-05 08:04:13 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-03 10:30:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-24 11:01:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-24 11:01:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-24 11:01:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-03 10:30:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-24 11:01:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-30 15:27:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
workqueue: clean up WORK_* constant types, clarify masking
commit afa4bb778e48d79e4a642ed41e3b4e0de7489a6c upstream.
Dave Airlie reports that gcc-13.1.1 has started complaining about some
of the workqueue code in 32-bit arm builds:
kernel/workqueue.c: In function ‘get_work_pwq’:
kernel/workqueue.c:713:24: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
713 | return (void *)(data & WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK);
| ^
[ ... a couple of other cases ... ]
and while it's not immediately clear exactly why gcc started complaining
about it now, I suspect it's some C23-induced enum type handlign fixup in
gcc-13 is the cause.
Whatever the reason for starting to complain, the code and data types
are indeed disgusting enough that the complaint is warranted.
The wq code ends up creating various "helper constants" (like that
WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK) using an enum type, which is all kinds of
confused. The mask needs to be 'unsigned long', not some unspecified
enum type.
To make matters worse, the actual "mask and cast to a pointer" is
repeated a couple of times, and the cast isn't even always done to the
right pointer, but - as the error case above - to a 'void *' with then
the compiler finishing the job.
That's now how we roll in the kernel.
So create the masks using the proper types rather than some ambiguous
enumeration, and use a nice helper that actually does the type
conversion in one well-defined place.
Incidentally, this magically makes clang generate better code. That,
admittedly, is really just a sign of clang having been seriously
confused before, and cleaning up the typing unconfuses the compiler too.
Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPM=9twNnV4zMCvrPkw3H-ajZOH-01JVh_kDrxdPYQErz8ZTdA@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-06-23 12:08:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 09:53:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-01 18:01:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-01 18:01:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 09:53:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-06 18:04:53 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-08 09:38:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-14 12:45:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-28 10:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-01 11:23:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-10-28 10:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-28 10:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-02 16:56:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-14 12:45:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-23 12:43:43 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-23 09:40:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-20 15:57:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-20 15:57:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-23 14:20:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-23 14:20:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 09:53:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-23 12:09:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 09:53:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ]
All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the
functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for
a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the
locking scenario of function B such as in the following model:
long A(void *arg)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
long B(void *arg)
{
}
void launchA(void)
{
work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL);
}
void launchB(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock.
However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking
inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as
belonging to the same locking class.
The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x83/0x4e0
work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9:
#0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500
#1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call Trace:
rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe6/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK
Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-24 17:07:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-09 02:34:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ]
All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the
functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for
a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the
locking scenario of function B such as in the following model:
long A(void *arg)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
long B(void *arg)
{
}
void launchA(void)
{
work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL);
}
void launchB(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock.
However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking
inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as
belonging to the same locking class.
The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x83/0x4e0
work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9:
#0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500
#1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call Trace:
rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe6/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK
Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-24 17:07:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-07 10:24:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ]
All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the
functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for
a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the
locking scenario of function B such as in the following model:
long A(void *arg)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
long B(void *arg)
{
}
void launchA(void)
{
work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL);
}
void launchB(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock.
However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking
inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as
belonging to the same locking class.
The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x83/0x4e0
work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9:
#0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500
#1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call Trace:
rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe6/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK
Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-24 17:07:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-07 10:24:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ]
All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the
functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for
a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the
locking scenario of function B such as in the following model:
long A(void *arg)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
long B(void *arg)
{
}
void launchA(void)
{
work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL);
}
void launchB(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock.
However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking
inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as
belonging to the same locking class.
The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x83/0x4e0
work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9:
#0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500
#1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call Trace:
rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe6/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK
Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-24 17:07:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 17:29:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 17:29:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-16 01:09:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ]
All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the
functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for
a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the
locking scenario of function B such as in the following model:
long A(void *arg)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
long B(void *arg)
{
}
void launchA(void)
{
work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL);
}
void launchB(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock.
However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking
inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as
belonging to the same locking class.
The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x83/0x4e0
work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9:
#0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500
#1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call Trace:
rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe6/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK
Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-24 17:07:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-22 18:48:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-22 18:48:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-12 12:52:23 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-08 00:27:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-14 12:45:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-13 17:52:02 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-15 14:13:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-10 16:51:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-28 10:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-10 16:51:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-16 09:25:31 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-11 15:12:27 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-24 21:37:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-18 00:04:55 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-08 16:45:40 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-31 08:01:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-08 16:45:40 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 05:59:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-03 01:18:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-24 14:22:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:54:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 16:42:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-08 10:39:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-21 09:52:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-24 17:12:54 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 16:42:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 10:03:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-21 09:52:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-24 17:12:54 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-20 14:51:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 15:11:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-14 15:00:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 15:11:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-28 10:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 15:11:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-13 12:02:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 23:39:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-16 10:17:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 15:11:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-16 09:25:31 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-08-13 17:52:02 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-16 10:17:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-23 08:36:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-16 10:17:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 05:59:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 05:59:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 05:59:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-05 21:40:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-30 17:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-03 10:30:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-23 21:28:39 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-22 10:39:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-03 10:30:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-09 02:34:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-03 10:30:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-14 12:45:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-09 02:34:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-13 15:03:15 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-05 18:01:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 14:55:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-16 10:36:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 09:47:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-16 10:36:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-21 13:18:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-16 10:36:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-09 02:34:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-14 12:45:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-11 10:38:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 17:41:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:29:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-30 15:27:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-20 14:09:00 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-18 08:47:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-13 16:51:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 19:39:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-13 16:51:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 19:39:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-13 16:51:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-20 14:41:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-13 16:51:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-05 13:39:10 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:29:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-05 13:39:10 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-12 22:07:28 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-05 13:39:10 +11:00
|
|
|
|
workqueue: Provide one lock class key per work_on_cpu() callsite
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed077036f053981f5eea0b5b43e7c5b39ff ]
All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the
functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for
a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the
locking scenario of function B such as in the following model:
long A(void *arg)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
long B(void *arg)
{
}
void launchA(void)
{
work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL);
}
void launchB(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex);
work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock.
However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking
inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as
belonging to the same locking class.
The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x83/0x4e0
work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0
rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0
rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
kthread+0xe6/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9:
#0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500
#1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call Trace:
rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200
? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
_cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20
work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20
process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500
worker_thread+0x173/0x330
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe6/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK
Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-24 17:07:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-05 13:39:10 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-13 12:32:28 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 10:07:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-12 11:30:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
workqueue: implement lockup detector
Workqueue stalls can happen from a variety of usage bugs such as
missing WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag or concurrency managed work item
indefinitely staying RUNNING. These stalls can be extremely difficult
to hunt down because the usual warning mechanisms can't detect
workqueue stalls and the internal state is pretty opaque.
To alleviate the situation, this patch implements workqueue lockup
detector. It periodically monitors all worker_pools periodically and,
if any pool failed to make forward progress longer than the threshold
duration, triggers warning and dumps workqueue state as follows.
BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 31s!
Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
workqueue events: flags=0x0
pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=17/256
pending: monkey_wrench_fn, e1000_watchdog, cache_reap, vmstat_shepherd, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, cgroup_release_agent
workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x80
pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=2/256
pending: check_lifetime, neigh_periodic_work
workqueue cgroup_pidlist_destroy: flags=0x0
pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/1
pending: cgroup_pidlist_destroy_work_fn
...
The detection mechanism is controller through kernel parameter
workqueue.watchdog_thresh and can be updated at runtime through the
sysfs module parameter file.
v2: Decoupled from softlockup control knobs.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2015-12-08 11:28:04 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-13 17:16:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-23 15:28:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-16 15:49:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|