linux/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c

552 lines
14 KiB

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 15:07:57 +01:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix generic/523 test-case failure The xfstests' test-case generic/523 fails to execute correctly: FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.15.0-rc4+ #8 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 1 16:43:22 PDT 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/523 - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//generic/523.out.bad) The test-case expects to have '/' in the xattr name. However, HFS+ unicode logic makes conversion of '/' into ':'. In HFS+, a filename can contain '/' because ':' is the separator. The slash is a valid filename character on macOS. But on Linux, / is the path separator and it cannot appear in a filename component. But xattr name can contain any of these symbols. It means that this unicode logic conversion doesn't need to be executed for the case of xattr name. This patch adds distinguishing the regular and xattr names. If we have a regular name, then this conversion of special symbols will be executed. Otherwise, the conversion is skipped for the case of xattr names. sudo ./check -g auto FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 7.0.0-rc1+ #24 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Mar 20 12:36:49 PDT 2026 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch <skipped> generic/523 33s ... 25s <skipped> Closes: https://github.com/hfs-linux-kernel/hfs-linux-kernel/issues/178 cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260324003949.417048-2-slava@dubeyko.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-03-23 17:39:50 -07:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix generic/523 test-case failure The xfstests' test-case generic/523 fails to execute correctly: FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.15.0-rc4+ #8 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 1 16:43:22 PDT 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/523 - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//generic/523.out.bad) The test-case expects to have '/' in the xattr name. However, HFS+ unicode logic makes conversion of '/' into ':'. In HFS+, a filename can contain '/' because ':' is the separator. The slash is a valid filename character on macOS. But on Linux, / is the path separator and it cannot appear in a filename component. But xattr name can contain any of these symbols. It means that this unicode logic conversion doesn't need to be executed for the case of xattr name. This patch adds distinguishing the regular and xattr names. If we have a regular name, then this conversion of special symbols will be executed. Otherwise, the conversion is skipped for the case of xattr names. sudo ./check -g auto FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 7.0.0-rc1+ #24 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Mar 20 12:36:49 PDT 2026 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch <skipped> generic/523 33s ... 25s <skipped> Closes: https://github.com/hfs-linux-kernel/hfs-linux-kernel/issues/178 cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260324003949.417048-2-slava@dubeyko.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-03-23 17:39:50 -07:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size Syzbot reported a KMSAN uninit-value issue in hfsplus_strcasecmp(). The root cause is that hfs_brec_read() doesn't validate that the on-disk record size matches the expected size for the record type being read. When mounting a corrupted filesystem, hfs_brec_read() may read less data than expected. For example, when reading a catalog thread record, the debug output showed: HFSPLUS_BREC_READ: rec_len=520, fd->entrylength=26 HFSPLUS_BREC_READ: WARNING - entrylength (26) < rec_len (520) - PARTIAL READ! hfs_brec_read() only validates that entrylength is not greater than the buffer size, but doesn't check if it's less than expected. It successfully reads 26 bytes into a 520-byte structure and returns success, leaving 494 bytes uninitialized. This uninitialized data in tmp.thread.nodeName then gets copied by hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() and used by hfsplus_strcasecmp(), triggering the KMSAN warning when the uninitialized bytes are used as array indices in case_fold(). Fix by introducing hfsplus_brec_read_cat() wrapper that: 1. Calls hfs_brec_read() to read the data 2. Validates the record size based on the type field: - Fixed size for folder and file records - Variable size for thread records (depends on string length) 3. Returns -EIO if size doesn't match expected For thread records, check against HFSPLUS_MIN_THREAD_SZ before reading nodeName.length to avoid reading uninitialized data at call sites that don't zero-initialize the entry structure. Also initialize the tmp variable in hfsplus_find_cat() as defensive programming to ensure no uninitialized data even if validation is bypassed. Reported-by: syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d80abb5b890d39261e72 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Tested-by: syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Tested-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Suggested-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260120051114.1281285-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260121063109.1830263-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260212014233.2422046-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v3] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260214002100.436125-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v4] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260221061626.15853-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v5] Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260307010302.41547-1-kartikey406@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-03-07 06:33:02 +05:30
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size Syzbot reported a KMSAN uninit-value issue in hfsplus_strcasecmp(). The root cause is that hfs_brec_read() doesn't validate that the on-disk record size matches the expected size for the record type being read. When mounting a corrupted filesystem, hfs_brec_read() may read less data than expected. For example, when reading a catalog thread record, the debug output showed: HFSPLUS_BREC_READ: rec_len=520, fd->entrylength=26 HFSPLUS_BREC_READ: WARNING - entrylength (26) < rec_len (520) - PARTIAL READ! hfs_brec_read() only validates that entrylength is not greater than the buffer size, but doesn't check if it's less than expected. It successfully reads 26 bytes into a 520-byte structure and returns success, leaving 494 bytes uninitialized. This uninitialized data in tmp.thread.nodeName then gets copied by hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() and used by hfsplus_strcasecmp(), triggering the KMSAN warning when the uninitialized bytes are used as array indices in case_fold(). Fix by introducing hfsplus_brec_read_cat() wrapper that: 1. Calls hfs_brec_read() to read the data 2. Validates the record size based on the type field: - Fixed size for folder and file records - Variable size for thread records (depends on string length) 3. Returns -EIO if size doesn't match expected For thread records, check against HFSPLUS_MIN_THREAD_SZ before reading nodeName.length to avoid reading uninitialized data at call sites that don't zero-initialize the entry structure. Also initialize the tmp variable in hfsplus_find_cat() as defensive programming to ensure no uninitialized data even if validation is bypassed. Reported-by: syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d80abb5b890d39261e72 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Tested-by: syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Tested-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Suggested-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260120051114.1281285-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260121063109.1830263-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260212014233.2422046-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v3] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260214002100.436125-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v4] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260221061626.15853-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v5] Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260307010302.41547-1-kartikey406@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-03-07 06:33:02 +05:30
hfsplus: fix Buffer overflow with a corrupted image When an hfsplus image gets corrupted it might happen that the catalog namelength field gets b0rked. If we mount such an image the memcpy() in hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() writes more than the 255 that fit in the name field. Depending on the size of the overwritten data, we either only get memory corruption or also trigger an oops like this: [ 221.628020] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c82b0000 [ 221.629066] IP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] *pde = 0ea29163 *pte = 082b0160 [ 221.629066] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 221.629066] Modules linked in: [ 221.629066] [ 221.629066] Pid: 4845, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00123-gd3ee1b4-dirty #28) [ 221.629066] EIP: 0060:[<c022d4b1>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 221.629066] EIP is at hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00016210 ECX: 000042c2 EDX: 00000002 [ 221.629066] ESI: c82d70ca EDI: c82b0000 EBP: c82d1bcc ESP: c82d199c [ 221.629066] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 221.629066] Process mount (pid: 4845, ti=c82d1000 task=c8224060 task.ti=c82d1000) [ 221.629066] Stack: c080b3c4 c82aa8f8 c82d19c2 00016210 c080b3be c82d1bd4 c82aa8f0 00000300 [ 221.629066] 01000000 750008b1 74006e00 74006900 65006c00 c82d6400 c013bd35 c8224060 [ 221.629066] 00000036 00000046 c82d19f0 00000082 c8224548 c8224060 00000036 c0d653cc [ 221.629066] Call Trace: [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c01302d2>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109e32>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c013553d>] ? down+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013da5d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x43/0x5a [ 221.629066] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c06abec8>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 [ 221.629066] [<c013555c>] ? down+0x2b/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c022aa68>] ? hfsplus_iget+0xa0/0x154 [ 221.629066] [<c022b0b9>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x280/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c041c9e4>] ? string+0x2b/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c041cd16>] ? vsnprintf+0x2e9/0x512 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c01354d3>] ? up+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c041cfb7>] ? snprintf+0x1b/0x1d [ 221.629066] [<c01ba466>] ? disk_name+0x25/0x67 [ 221.629066] [<c0183960>] ? get_sb_bdev+0xcd/0x10b [ 221.629066] [<c016ad92>] ? kstrdup+0x2a/0x4c [ 221.629066] [<c022a7b3>] ? hfsplus_get_sb+0x13/0x15 [ 221.629066] [<c022ae39>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x0/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0183583>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 [ 221.629066] [<c0183602>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xba [ 221.629066] [<c01960d4>] ? do_new_mount+0x46/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c0196277>] ? do_mount+0x175/0x193 [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c01663b2>] ? __get_free_pages+0x1e/0x24 [ 221.629066] [<c06ac07b>] ? lock_kernel+0x19/0x8c [ 221.629066] [<c01962e6>] ? sys_mount+0x51/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01962f9>] ? sys_mount+0x64/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 [ 221.629066] ======================= [ 221.629066] Code: 89 c2 c1 e2 08 c1 e8 08 09 c2 8b 85 e8 fd ff ff 66 89 50 06 89 c7 53 83 c7 08 56 57 68 c4 b3 80 c0 e8 8c 5c ef ff 89 d9 c1 e9 02 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 83 c3 06 8b 95 e8 fd ff ff 0f [ 221.629066] EIP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 SS:ESP 0068:c82d199c [ 221.629066] ---[ end trace e417a1d67f0d0066 ]--- Since hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() returns void and only has one callsite, the check is performed at the callsite. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-15 22:04:08 -07:00
hfsplus: fix Buffer overflow with a corrupted image When an hfsplus image gets corrupted it might happen that the catalog namelength field gets b0rked. If we mount such an image the memcpy() in hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() writes more than the 255 that fit in the name field. Depending on the size of the overwritten data, we either only get memory corruption or also trigger an oops like this: [ 221.628020] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c82b0000 [ 221.629066] IP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] *pde = 0ea29163 *pte = 082b0160 [ 221.629066] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 221.629066] Modules linked in: [ 221.629066] [ 221.629066] Pid: 4845, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00123-gd3ee1b4-dirty #28) [ 221.629066] EIP: 0060:[<c022d4b1>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 221.629066] EIP is at hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00016210 ECX: 000042c2 EDX: 00000002 [ 221.629066] ESI: c82d70ca EDI: c82b0000 EBP: c82d1bcc ESP: c82d199c [ 221.629066] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 221.629066] Process mount (pid: 4845, ti=c82d1000 task=c8224060 task.ti=c82d1000) [ 221.629066] Stack: c080b3c4 c82aa8f8 c82d19c2 00016210 c080b3be c82d1bd4 c82aa8f0 00000300 [ 221.629066] 01000000 750008b1 74006e00 74006900 65006c00 c82d6400 c013bd35 c8224060 [ 221.629066] 00000036 00000046 c82d19f0 00000082 c8224548 c8224060 00000036 c0d653cc [ 221.629066] Call Trace: [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c01302d2>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109e32>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c013553d>] ? down+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013da5d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x43/0x5a [ 221.629066] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c06abec8>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 [ 221.629066] [<c013555c>] ? down+0x2b/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c022aa68>] ? hfsplus_iget+0xa0/0x154 [ 221.629066] [<c022b0b9>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x280/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c041c9e4>] ? string+0x2b/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c041cd16>] ? vsnprintf+0x2e9/0x512 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c01354d3>] ? up+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c041cfb7>] ? snprintf+0x1b/0x1d [ 221.629066] [<c01ba466>] ? disk_name+0x25/0x67 [ 221.629066] [<c0183960>] ? get_sb_bdev+0xcd/0x10b [ 221.629066] [<c016ad92>] ? kstrdup+0x2a/0x4c [ 221.629066] [<c022a7b3>] ? hfsplus_get_sb+0x13/0x15 [ 221.629066] [<c022ae39>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x0/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0183583>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 [ 221.629066] [<c0183602>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xba [ 221.629066] [<c01960d4>] ? do_new_mount+0x46/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c0196277>] ? do_mount+0x175/0x193 [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c01663b2>] ? __get_free_pages+0x1e/0x24 [ 221.629066] [<c06ac07b>] ? lock_kernel+0x19/0x8c [ 221.629066] [<c01962e6>] ? sys_mount+0x51/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01962f9>] ? sys_mount+0x64/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 [ 221.629066] ======================= [ 221.629066] Code: 89 c2 c1 e2 08 c1 e8 08 09 c2 8b 85 e8 fd ff ff 66 89 50 06 89 c7 53 83 c7 08 56 57 68 c4 b3 80 c0 e8 8c 5c ef ff 89 d9 c1 e9 02 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 83 c3 06 8b 95 e8 fd ff ff 0f [ 221.629066] EIP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 SS:ESP 0068:c82d199c [ 221.629066] ---[ end trace e417a1d67f0d0066 ]--- Since hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() returns void and only has one callsite, the check is performed at the callsite. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-15 22:04:08 -07:00
hfs/hfsplus: rework debug output subsystem Currently, HFS/HFS+ has very obsolete and inconvenient debug output subsystem. Also, the code is duplicated in HFS and HFS+ driver. This patch introduces linux/hfs_common.h for gathering common declarations, inline functions, and common short methods. Currently, this file contains only hfs_dbg() function that employs pr_debug() with the goal to print a debug-level messages conditionally. So, now, it is possible to enable the debug output by means of: echo 'file extent.c +p' > /proc/dynamic_debug/control echo 'func hfsplus_evict_inode +p' > /proc/dynamic_debug/control And debug output looks like this: hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/catalog.c:228 hfs_cat_delete(): delete_cat: 00,48 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:484 hfs_file_truncate(): truncate: 48, 409600 -> 0 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:212 hfs_dump_extent(): hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:214 hfs_dump_extent(): 78:4 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:214 hfs_dump_extent(): 0:0 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:214 hfs_dump_extent(): 0:0 v4 Debug messages have been reworked and information about new HFS/HFS+ shared declarations file has been added to MAINTAINERS file. v5 Yangtao Li suggested to clean up debug output and fix several typos. Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2025-09-24 16:24:41 -07:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix potential Allocation File corruption after fsync The generic/348 test-case has revealed the issue of HFS+ volume corruption after simulated power failure: FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.15.0-rc4+ #8 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 1 16:43:22 PDT 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/348 _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop51 is inconsistent (see xfstests-dev/results//generic/348.full for details) The fsck tool complains about Allocation File (block bitmap) corruption as a result of such event. The generic/348 creates a symlink, fsync its parent directory, power fail and mount again the filesystem. Currently, HFS+ logic has several flags HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY. If inode operation modified the Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, or Allocation File, then inode is marked as dirty and one of the mentioned flags has been set. When hfsplus_file_fsync() has been called, then this set of flags is checked and dirty b-tree or/and block bitmap is flushed. However, block bitmap can be modified during file's content allocation. It means that if we call hfsplus_file_fsync() for directory, then we never flush the modified Allocation File in such case because such inode cannot receive HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flag. Moreover, this inode-centric model is not good at all because Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, and Allocation File represent the whole state of file system metadata. This inode-centric policy is the main reason of the issue. This patch saves the whole approach of using HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, and HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flags. But Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, and Allocation File have associated inodes. And namely these inodes become the mechanism of checking the dirty state of metadata. The hfsplus_file_fsync() method checks the dirtiness of file system metadata by testing HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, and HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flags of Catalog File's, Extents Overflow File's, Attributes File's, or Allocation File's inodes. As a result, even if we call hfsplus_file_fsync() for parent folder, then dirty Allocation File will be flushed anyway. Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260220220152.152721-1-slava@dubeyko.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-02-20 14:01:53 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfs/hfsplus: rework debug output subsystem Currently, HFS/HFS+ has very obsolete and inconvenient debug output subsystem. Also, the code is duplicated in HFS and HFS+ driver. This patch introduces linux/hfs_common.h for gathering common declarations, inline functions, and common short methods. Currently, this file contains only hfs_dbg() function that employs pr_debug() with the goal to print a debug-level messages conditionally. So, now, it is possible to enable the debug output by means of: echo 'file extent.c +p' > /proc/dynamic_debug/control echo 'func hfsplus_evict_inode +p' > /proc/dynamic_debug/control And debug output looks like this: hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/catalog.c:228 hfs_cat_delete(): delete_cat: 00,48 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:484 hfs_file_truncate(): truncate: 48, 409600 -> 0 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:212 hfs_dump_extent(): hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:214 hfs_dump_extent(): 78:4 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:214 hfs_dump_extent(): 0:0 hfs: pid 5831:fs/hfs/extent.c:214 hfs_dump_extent(): 0:0 v4 Debug messages have been reworked and information about new HFS/HFS+ shared declarations file has been added to MAINTAINERS file. v5 Yangtao Li suggested to clean up debug output and fix several typos. Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2025-09-24 16:24:41 -07:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix potential Allocation File corruption after fsync The generic/348 test-case has revealed the issue of HFS+ volume corruption after simulated power failure: FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.15.0-rc4+ #8 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 1 16:43:22 PDT 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/348 _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop51 is inconsistent (see xfstests-dev/results//generic/348.full for details) The fsck tool complains about Allocation File (block bitmap) corruption as a result of such event. The generic/348 creates a symlink, fsync its parent directory, power fail and mount again the filesystem. Currently, HFS+ logic has several flags HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY. If inode operation modified the Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, or Allocation File, then inode is marked as dirty and one of the mentioned flags has been set. When hfsplus_file_fsync() has been called, then this set of flags is checked and dirty b-tree or/and block bitmap is flushed. However, block bitmap can be modified during file's content allocation. It means that if we call hfsplus_file_fsync() for directory, then we never flush the modified Allocation File in such case because such inode cannot receive HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flag. Moreover, this inode-centric model is not good at all because Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, and Allocation File represent the whole state of file system metadata. This inode-centric policy is the main reason of the issue. This patch saves the whole approach of using HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, and HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flags. But Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, and Allocation File have associated inodes. And namely these inodes become the mechanism of checking the dirty state of metadata. The hfsplus_file_fsync() method checks the dirtiness of file system metadata by testing HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, and HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flags of Catalog File's, Extents Overflow File's, Attributes File's, or Allocation File's inodes. As a result, even if we call hfsplus_file_fsync() for parent folder, then dirty Allocation File will be flushed anyway. Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260220220152.152721-1-slava@dubeyko.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-02-20 14:01:53 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-18 16:17:12 -08:00
hfsplus: fix potential Allocation File corruption after fsync The generic/348 test-case has revealed the issue of HFS+ volume corruption after simulated power failure: FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.15.0-rc4+ #8 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 1 16:43:22 PDT 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/348 _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop51 is inconsistent (see xfstests-dev/results//generic/348.full for details) The fsck tool complains about Allocation File (block bitmap) corruption as a result of such event. The generic/348 creates a symlink, fsync its parent directory, power fail and mount again the filesystem. Currently, HFS+ logic has several flags HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY. If inode operation modified the Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, or Allocation File, then inode is marked as dirty and one of the mentioned flags has been set. When hfsplus_file_fsync() has been called, then this set of flags is checked and dirty b-tree or/and block bitmap is flushed. However, block bitmap can be modified during file's content allocation. It means that if we call hfsplus_file_fsync() for directory, then we never flush the modified Allocation File in such case because such inode cannot receive HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flag. Moreover, this inode-centric model is not good at all because Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, and Allocation File represent the whole state of file system metadata. This inode-centric policy is the main reason of the issue. This patch saves the whole approach of using HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, and HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flags. But Catalog File, Extents Overflow File, Attributes File, and Allocation File have associated inodes. And namely these inodes become the mechanism of checking the dirty state of metadata. The hfsplus_file_fsync() method checks the dirtiness of file system metadata by testing HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_EXT_DIRTY, HFSPLUS_I_ATTR_DIRTY, and HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY flags of Catalog File's, Extents Overflow File's, Attributes File's, or Allocation File's inodes. As a result, even if we call hfsplus_file_fsync() for parent folder, then dirty Allocation File will be flushed anyway. Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260220220152.152721-1-slava@dubeyko.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
2026-02-20 14:01:53 -08:00