linux/fs/jffs2/file.c

336 lines
9.5 KiB

fs: rename current get acl method The current way of setting and getting posix acls through the generic xattr interface is error prone and type unsafe. The vfs needs to interpret and fixup posix acls before storing or reporting it to userspace. Various hacks exist to make this work. The code is hard to understand and difficult to maintain in it's current form. Instead of making this work by hacking posix acls through xattr handlers we are building a dedicated posix acl api around the get and set inode operations. This removes a lot of hackiness and makes the codepaths easier to maintain. A lot of background can be found in [1]. The current inode operation for getting posix acls takes an inode argument but various filesystems (e.g., 9p, cifs, overlayfs) need access to the dentry. In contrast to the ->set_acl() inode operation we cannot simply extend ->get_acl() to take a dentry argument. The ->get_acl() inode operation is called from: acl_permission_check() -> check_acl() -> get_acl() which is part of generic_permission() which in turn is part of inode_permission(). Both generic_permission() and inode_permission() are called in the ->permission() handler of various filesystems (e.g., overlayfs). So simply passing a dentry argument to ->get_acl() would amount to also having to pass a dentry argument to ->permission(). We should avoid this unnecessary change. So instead of extending the existing inode operation rename it from ->get_acl() to ->get_inode_acl() and add a ->get_acl() method later that passes a dentry argument and which filesystems that need access to the dentry can implement instead of ->get_inode_acl(). Filesystems like cifs which allow setting and getting posix acls but not using them for permission checking during lookup can simply not implement ->get_inode_acl(). This is intended to be a non-functional change. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220801145520.1532837-1-brauner@kernel.org [1] Suggested-by/Inspired-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
2022-09-22 17:17:00 +02:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
jffs2: correct logic when creating a hole in jffs2_write_begin Bug description and fix: 1. Write data to a file, say all 1s from offset 0 to 16. 2. Truncate the file to a smaller size, say 8 bytes. 3. Write new bytes (say 2s) from an offset past the original size of the file, say at offset 20, for 4 bytes. This is supposed to create a "hole" in the file, meaning that the bytes from offset 8 (where it was truncated above) up to the new write at offset 20, should all be 0s (zeros). 4. Flush all caches using "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (or unmount and remount) the f/s. 5. Check the content of the file. It is wrong. The 1s that used to be between bytes 9 and 16, before the truncation, have REAPPEARED (they should be 0s). We wrote a script and helper C program to reproduce the bug (reproduce_jffs2_write_begin_issue.sh, write_file.c, and Makefile). We can make them available to anyone. The above example is shown when writing a small file within the same first page. But the bug happens for larger files, as long as steps 1, 2, and 3 above all happen within the same page. The problem was traced to the jffs2_write_begin code, where it goes into an 'if' statement intended to handle writes past the current EOF (i.e., writes that may create a hole). The code computes a 'pageofs' that is the floor of the write position (pos), aligned to the page size boundary. In other words, 'pageofs' will never be larger than 'pos'. The code then sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->isize to the size of max(current inode size, pageofs) but that is wrong: the new file size should be the 'pos', which is larger than both the current inode size and pageofs. Similarly, the code incorrectly sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->dsize to the difference between the pageofs minus current inode size; instead it should be the current pos minus the current inode size. Finally, inode->i_size was also set incorrectly. The patch below fixes this bug. The bug was discovered using a new tool for finding f/s bugs using model checking, called MCFS (Model Checking File Systems). Signed-off-by: Yifei Liu <yifeliu@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Manish Adkar <madkar@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2022-08-03 15:53:12 +00:00
jffs2: correct logic when creating a hole in jffs2_write_begin Bug description and fix: 1. Write data to a file, say all 1s from offset 0 to 16. 2. Truncate the file to a smaller size, say 8 bytes. 3. Write new bytes (say 2s) from an offset past the original size of the file, say at offset 20, for 4 bytes. This is supposed to create a "hole" in the file, meaning that the bytes from offset 8 (where it was truncated above) up to the new write at offset 20, should all be 0s (zeros). 4. Flush all caches using "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (or unmount and remount) the f/s. 5. Check the content of the file. It is wrong. The 1s that used to be between bytes 9 and 16, before the truncation, have REAPPEARED (they should be 0s). We wrote a script and helper C program to reproduce the bug (reproduce_jffs2_write_begin_issue.sh, write_file.c, and Makefile). We can make them available to anyone. The above example is shown when writing a small file within the same first page. But the bug happens for larger files, as long as steps 1, 2, and 3 above all happen within the same page. The problem was traced to the jffs2_write_begin code, where it goes into an 'if' statement intended to handle writes past the current EOF (i.e., writes that may create a hole). The code computes a 'pageofs' that is the floor of the write position (pos), aligned to the page size boundary. In other words, 'pageofs' will never be larger than 'pos'. The code then sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->isize to the size of max(current inode size, pageofs) but that is wrong: the new file size should be the 'pos', which is larger than both the current inode size and pageofs. Similarly, the code incorrectly sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->dsize to the difference between the pageofs minus current inode size; instead it should be the current pos minus the current inode size. Finally, inode->i_size was also set incorrectly. The patch below fixes this bug. The bug was discovered using a new tool for finding f/s bugs using model checking, called MCFS (Model Checking File Systems). Signed-off-by: Yifei Liu <yifeliu@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Manish Adkar <madkar@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2022-08-03 15:53:12 +00:00
jffs2: correct logic when creating a hole in jffs2_write_begin Bug description and fix: 1. Write data to a file, say all 1s from offset 0 to 16. 2. Truncate the file to a smaller size, say 8 bytes. 3. Write new bytes (say 2s) from an offset past the original size of the file, say at offset 20, for 4 bytes. This is supposed to create a "hole" in the file, meaning that the bytes from offset 8 (where it was truncated above) up to the new write at offset 20, should all be 0s (zeros). 4. Flush all caches using "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (or unmount and remount) the f/s. 5. Check the content of the file. It is wrong. The 1s that used to be between bytes 9 and 16, before the truncation, have REAPPEARED (they should be 0s). We wrote a script and helper C program to reproduce the bug (reproduce_jffs2_write_begin_issue.sh, write_file.c, and Makefile). We can make them available to anyone. The above example is shown when writing a small file within the same first page. But the bug happens for larger files, as long as steps 1, 2, and 3 above all happen within the same page. The problem was traced to the jffs2_write_begin code, where it goes into an 'if' statement intended to handle writes past the current EOF (i.e., writes that may create a hole). The code computes a 'pageofs' that is the floor of the write position (pos), aligned to the page size boundary. In other words, 'pageofs' will never be larger than 'pos'. The code then sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->isize to the size of max(current inode size, pageofs) but that is wrong: the new file size should be the 'pos', which is larger than both the current inode size and pageofs. Similarly, the code incorrectly sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->dsize to the difference between the pageofs minus current inode size; instead it should be the current pos minus the current inode size. Finally, inode->i_size was also set incorrectly. The patch below fixes this bug. The bug was discovered using a new tool for finding f/s bugs using model checking, called MCFS (Model Checking File Systems). Signed-off-by: Yifei Liu <yifeliu@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Manish Adkar <madkar@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2022-08-03 15:53:12 +00:00
jffs2: correct logic when creating a hole in jffs2_write_begin Bug description and fix: 1. Write data to a file, say all 1s from offset 0 to 16. 2. Truncate the file to a smaller size, say 8 bytes. 3. Write new bytes (say 2s) from an offset past the original size of the file, say at offset 20, for 4 bytes. This is supposed to create a "hole" in the file, meaning that the bytes from offset 8 (where it was truncated above) up to the new write at offset 20, should all be 0s (zeros). 4. Flush all caches using "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (or unmount and remount) the f/s. 5. Check the content of the file. It is wrong. The 1s that used to be between bytes 9 and 16, before the truncation, have REAPPEARED (they should be 0s). We wrote a script and helper C program to reproduce the bug (reproduce_jffs2_write_begin_issue.sh, write_file.c, and Makefile). We can make them available to anyone. The above example is shown when writing a small file within the same first page. But the bug happens for larger files, as long as steps 1, 2, and 3 above all happen within the same page. The problem was traced to the jffs2_write_begin code, where it goes into an 'if' statement intended to handle writes past the current EOF (i.e., writes that may create a hole). The code computes a 'pageofs' that is the floor of the write position (pos), aligned to the page size boundary. In other words, 'pageofs' will never be larger than 'pos'. The code then sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->isize to the size of max(current inode size, pageofs) but that is wrong: the new file size should be the 'pos', which is larger than both the current inode size and pageofs. Similarly, the code incorrectly sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->dsize to the difference between the pageofs minus current inode size; instead it should be the current pos minus the current inode size. Finally, inode->i_size was also set incorrectly. The patch below fixes this bug. The bug was discovered using a new tool for finding f/s bugs using model checking, called MCFS (Model Checking File Systems). Signed-off-by: Yifei Liu <yifeliu@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Manish Adkar <madkar@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2022-08-03 15:53:12 +00:00
jffs2: correct logic when creating a hole in jffs2_write_begin Bug description and fix: 1. Write data to a file, say all 1s from offset 0 to 16. 2. Truncate the file to a smaller size, say 8 bytes. 3. Write new bytes (say 2s) from an offset past the original size of the file, say at offset 20, for 4 bytes. This is supposed to create a "hole" in the file, meaning that the bytes from offset 8 (where it was truncated above) up to the new write at offset 20, should all be 0s (zeros). 4. Flush all caches using "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (or unmount and remount) the f/s. 5. Check the content of the file. It is wrong. The 1s that used to be between bytes 9 and 16, before the truncation, have REAPPEARED (they should be 0s). We wrote a script and helper C program to reproduce the bug (reproduce_jffs2_write_begin_issue.sh, write_file.c, and Makefile). We can make them available to anyone. The above example is shown when writing a small file within the same first page. But the bug happens for larger files, as long as steps 1, 2, and 3 above all happen within the same page. The problem was traced to the jffs2_write_begin code, where it goes into an 'if' statement intended to handle writes past the current EOF (i.e., writes that may create a hole). The code computes a 'pageofs' that is the floor of the write position (pos), aligned to the page size boundary. In other words, 'pageofs' will never be larger than 'pos'. The code then sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->isize to the size of max(current inode size, pageofs) but that is wrong: the new file size should be the 'pos', which is larger than both the current inode size and pageofs. Similarly, the code incorrectly sets the internal jffs2_raw_inode->dsize to the difference between the pageofs minus current inode size; instead it should be the current pos minus the current inode size. Finally, inode->i_size was also set incorrectly. The patch below fixes this bug. The bug was discovered using a new tool for finding f/s bugs using model checking, called MCFS (Model Checking File Systems). Signed-off-by: Yifei Liu <yifeliu@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Manish Adkar <madkar@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2022-08-03 15:53:12 +00:00
mm: introduce memdesc_flags_t Patch series "Add and use memdesc_flags_t". At some point struct page will be separated from struct slab and struct folio. This is a step towards that by introducing a type for the 'flags' word of all three structures. This gives us a certain amount of type safety by establishing that some of these unsigned longs are different from other unsigned longs in that they contain things like node ID, section number and zone number in the upper bits. That lets us have functions that can be easily called by anyone who has a slab, folio or page (but not easily by anyone else) to get the node or zone. There's going to be some unusual merge problems with this as some odd bits of the kernel decide they want to print out the flags value or something similar by writing page->flags and now they'll need to write page->flags.f instead. That's most of the churn here. Maybe we should be removing these things from the debug output? This patch (of 11): Wrap the unsigned long flags in a typedef. In upcoming patches, this will provide a strong hint that you can't just pass a random unsigned long to functions which take this as an argument. [willy@infradead.org: s/flags/flags.f/ in several architectures] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aKMgPRLD-WnkPxYm@casper.infradead.org [nicola.vetrini@gmail.com: mips: fix compilation error] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYvkpmqGr6wjBNHY=dRp71PLCoi2341JxOudi60yqaeUdg@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250825214245.1838158-1-nicola.vetrini@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250805172307.1302730-1-willy@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250805172307.1302730-2-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-08-05 18:22:51 +01:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm: introduce memdesc_flags_t Patch series "Add and use memdesc_flags_t". At some point struct page will be separated from struct slab and struct folio. This is a step towards that by introducing a type for the 'flags' word of all three structures. This gives us a certain amount of type safety by establishing that some of these unsigned longs are different from other unsigned longs in that they contain things like node ID, section number and zone number in the upper bits. That lets us have functions that can be easily called by anyone who has a slab, folio or page (but not easily by anyone else) to get the node or zone. There's going to be some unusual merge problems with this as some odd bits of the kernel decide they want to print out the flags value or something similar by writing page->flags and now they'll need to write page->flags.f instead. That's most of the churn here. Maybe we should be removing these things from the debug output? This patch (of 11): Wrap the unsigned long flags in a typedef. In upcoming patches, this will provide a strong hint that you can't just pass a random unsigned long to functions which take this as an argument. [willy@infradead.org: s/flags/flags.f/ in several architectures] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aKMgPRLD-WnkPxYm@casper.infradead.org [nicola.vetrini@gmail.com: mips: fix compilation error] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYvkpmqGr6wjBNHY=dRp71PLCoi2341JxOudi60yqaeUdg@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250825214245.1838158-1-nicola.vetrini@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250805172307.1302730-1-willy@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250805172307.1302730-2-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-08-05 18:22:51 +01:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00