linux/net/devlink/netlink_gen.h

152 lines
7.8 KiB

devlink: Fix excessive stack usage in rate TC bandwidth parsing The devlink_nl_rate_tc_bw_parse function uses a large stack array for devlink attributes, which triggers a warning about excessive stack usage: net/devlink/rate.c: In function 'devlink_nl_rate_tc_bw_parse': net/devlink/rate.c:382:1: error: the frame size of 1648 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] Introduce a separate attribute set specifically for rate TC bandwidth parsing that only contains the two attributes actually used: index and bandwidth. This reduces the stack array from DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX entries to just 2 entries, solving the stack usage issue. Update devlink selftest to use the new 'index' and 'bw' attribute names consistent with the YAML spec. Example usage with ynl with the new spec: ./tools/net/ynl/cli.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/devlink.yaml \ --do rate-set --json '{ "bus-name": "pci", "dev-name": "0000:08:00.0", "port-index": 1, "rate-tc-bws": [ {"index": 0, "bw": 50}, {"index": 1, "bw": 50}, {"index": 2, "bw": 0}, {"index": 3, "bw": 0}, {"index": 4, "bw": 0}, {"index": 5, "bw": 0}, {"index": 6, "bw": 0}, {"index": 7, "bw": 0} ] }' ./tools/net/ynl/cli.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/devlink.yaml \ --do rate-get --json '{ "bus-name": "pci", "dev-name": "0000:08:00.0", "port-index": 1 }' output for rate-get: {'bus-name': 'pci', 'dev-name': '0000:08:00.0', 'port-index': 1, 'rate-tc-bws': [{'bw': 50, 'index': 0}, {'bw': 50, 'index': 1}, {'bw': 0, 'index': 2}, {'bw': 0, 'index': 3}, {'bw': 0, 'index': 4}, {'bw': 0, 'index': 5}, {'bw': 0, 'index': 6}, {'bw': 0, 'index': 7}], 'rate-tx-max': 0, 'rate-tx-priority': 0, 'rate-tx-share': 0, 'rate-tx-weight': 0, 'rate-type': 'leaf'} Fixes: 566e8f108fc7 ("devlink: Extend devlink rate API with traffic classes bandwidth management") Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250708160652.1810573-1-arnd@kernel.org/ Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507171943.W7DJcs6Y-lkp@intel.com/ Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1753175609-330621-1-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2025-07-22 12:13:29 +03:00
devlink: Acquire device lock during reload command Device drivers register with devlink from their probe routines (under the device lock) by acquiring the devlink instance lock and calling devl_register(). Drivers that support a devlink reload usually implement the reload_{down, up}() operations in a similar fashion to their remove and probe routines, respectively. However, while the remove and probe routines are invoked with the device lock held, the reload operations are only invoked with the devlink instance lock held. It is therefore impossible for drivers to acquire the device lock from their reload operations, as this would result in lock inversion. The motivating use case for invoking the reload operations with the device lock held is in mlxsw which needs to trigger a PCI reset as part of the reload. The driver cannot call pci_reset_function() as this function acquires the device lock. Instead, it needs to call __pci_reset_function_locked which expects the device lock to be held. To that end, adjust devlink to always acquire the device lock before the devlink instance lock when performing a reload. Do that when reload is explicitly triggered by user space by specifying the 'DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEV_LOCK' flag in the pre_doit and post_doit operations of the reload command. A previous patch already handled the case where reload is invoked as part of netns dismantle. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-11-15 13:17:14 +01:00