linux/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c

1210 lines
33 KiB

drm: Replace drm_framebuffer plane size functions with its equivalents The functions drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} do exactly the same job of its equivalents drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} from drm_fourcc. The only reason to have these functions on drm_framebuffer would be if they would added a abstraction layer to call it just passing a drm_framebuffer pointer and the desired plane index, which is not the case, where these functions actually implements just part of it. In the actual implementation, every call to both drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} should pass some drm_framebuffer attribute, which is the same as calling the drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} functions. The drm_format_info_pane_{width,height} functions are much more consistent in both its implementation and its location on code. The kind of calculation that they do is intrinsically derivated from the drm_format_info struct and has not to do with drm_framebuffer, except by the potential motivation described above, which is still not a good justification to have drm_framebuffer functions to calculate it. So, replace each drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} call to drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} and remove them. Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos@disroot.org> Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230926141519.9315-3-gcarlos@disroot.org
2023-09-26 11:15:19 -03:00
drm/fourcc: Add char_per_block, block_w and block_h in drm_format_info For some pixel formats .cpp structure in drm_format info it's not enough to describe the peculiarities of the pixel layout, for example tiled formats or packed formats at bit level. What's implemented here is to add three new members to drm_format_info that could describe such formats: - char_per_block[3] - block_w[3] - block_h[3] char_per_block will be put in a union alongside cpp, for transparent compatibility with the existing format descriptions. Regarding, block_w and block_h they are intended to be used through their equivalent getters drm_format_info_block_width / drm_format_info_block_height, the reason of the getters is to abstract the fact that for normal formats block_w and block_h will be unset/0, but the methods will be returning 1. Additionally, convenience function drm_format_info_min_pitch had been added that computes the minimum required pitch for a given pixel format and buffer width. Using that the following drm core functions had been updated to generically handle both block and non-block formats: - drm_fb_cma_get_gem_addr: for block formats it will just return the beginning of the block. - framebuffer_check: Use the newly added drm_format_info_min_pitch. - drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs: Use the newly added drm_format_info_min_pitch. - In places where is not expecting to handle block formats, like fbdev helpers I just added some warnings in case the block width/height are greater than 1. Changes since v3: - Add helper function for computing the minimum required pitch. - Improve/cleanup documentation Changes since v8: - Fixed build on 32bits arm architectures, with: - return DIV_ROUND_UP((u64)buffer_width * info->char_per_block[plane], + return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)buffer_width * info->char_per_block[plane], Reviewed-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru-cosmin.gheorghe@arm.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181101170055.5433-1-alexandru-cosmin.gheorghe@arm.com
2018-11-01 17:02:05 +00:00
drm/fourcc: Add char_per_block, block_w and block_h in drm_format_info For some pixel formats .cpp structure in drm_format info it's not enough to describe the peculiarities of the pixel layout, for example tiled formats or packed formats at bit level. What's implemented here is to add three new members to drm_format_info that could describe such formats: - char_per_block[3] - block_w[3] - block_h[3] char_per_block will be put in a union alongside cpp, for transparent compatibility with the existing format descriptions. Regarding, block_w and block_h they are intended to be used through their equivalent getters drm_format_info_block_width / drm_format_info_block_height, the reason of the getters is to abstract the fact that for normal formats block_w and block_h will be unset/0, but the methods will be returning 1. Additionally, convenience function drm_format_info_min_pitch had been added that computes the minimum required pitch for a given pixel format and buffer width. Using that the following drm core functions had been updated to generically handle both block and non-block formats: - drm_fb_cma_get_gem_addr: for block formats it will just return the beginning of the block. - framebuffer_check: Use the newly added drm_format_info_min_pitch. - drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs: Use the newly added drm_format_info_min_pitch. - In places where is not expecting to handle block formats, like fbdev helpers I just added some warnings in case the block width/height are greater than 1. Changes since v3: - Add helper function for computing the minimum required pitch. - Improve/cleanup documentation Changes since v8: - Fixed build on 32bits arm architectures, with: - return DIV_ROUND_UP((u64)buffer_width * info->char_per_block[plane], + return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)buffer_width * info->char_per_block[plane], Reviewed-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru-cosmin.gheorghe@arm.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181101170055.5433-1-alexandru-cosmin.gheorghe@arm.com
2018-11-01 17:02:05 +00:00
drm: Nuke modifier[1-3] It has been suggested that having per-plane modifiers is making life more difficult for userspace, so let's just retire modifier[1-3] and use modifier[0] to apply to the entire framebuffer. Obviosuly this means that if individual planes need different tiling layouts and whatnot we will need a new modifier for each combination of planes with different tiling layouts. For a bit of extra backwards compatilbilty the kernel will allow non-zero modifier[1+] but it require that they will match modifier[0]. This in case there's existing userspace out there that sets modifier[1+] to something non-zero with planar formats. Mostly a cocci job, with a bit of manual stuff mixed in. @@ struct drm_framebuffer *fb; expression E; @@ - fb->modifier[E] + fb->modifier @@ struct drm_framebuffer fb; expression E; @@ - fb.modifier[E] + fb.modifier Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg@gmail.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net> Cc: dczaplejewicz@collabora.co.uk Suggested-by: Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479295996-26246-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2016-11-16 13:33:16 +02:00
drm: Nuke modifier[1-3] It has been suggested that having per-plane modifiers is making life more difficult for userspace, so let's just retire modifier[1-3] and use modifier[0] to apply to the entire framebuffer. Obviosuly this means that if individual planes need different tiling layouts and whatnot we will need a new modifier for each combination of planes with different tiling layouts. For a bit of extra backwards compatilbilty the kernel will allow non-zero modifier[1+] but it require that they will match modifier[0]. This in case there's existing userspace out there that sets modifier[1+] to something non-zero with planar formats. Mostly a cocci job, with a bit of manual stuff mixed in. @@ struct drm_framebuffer *fb; expression E; @@ - fb->modifier[E] + fb->modifier @@ struct drm_framebuffer fb; expression E; @@ - fb.modifier[E] + fb.modifier Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg@gmail.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net> Cc: dczaplejewicz@collabora.co.uk Suggested-by: Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479295996-26246-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2016-11-16 13:33:16 +02:00
drm: replace strcpy() with strscpy() To prevent errors from occurring when the src string is longer than the dst string in strcpy(), we should use strscpy() instead. This approach also facilitates future extensions to the task comm. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241007144911.27693-8-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matus Jokay <matus.jokay@stuba.sk> Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Cc: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-10-07 22:49:11 +08:00
drm: Replace drm_framebuffer plane size functions with its equivalents The functions drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} do exactly the same job of its equivalents drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} from drm_fourcc. The only reason to have these functions on drm_framebuffer would be if they would added a abstraction layer to call it just passing a drm_framebuffer pointer and the desired plane index, which is not the case, where these functions actually implements just part of it. In the actual implementation, every call to both drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} should pass some drm_framebuffer attribute, which is the same as calling the drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} functions. The drm_format_info_pane_{width,height} functions are much more consistent in both its implementation and its location on code. The kind of calculation that they do is intrinsically derivated from the drm_format_info struct and has not to do with drm_framebuffer, except by the potential motivation described above, which is still not a good justification to have drm_framebuffer functions to calculate it. So, replace each drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} call to drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} and remove them. Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos@disroot.org> Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230926141519.9315-3-gcarlos@disroot.org
2023-09-26 11:15:19 -03:00