kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-22 19:14:51 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/kernel/irq_work.c

327 lines
7.7 KiB
Raw Normal View History

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-19 13:08:55 +01:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
treewide: Remove old email address There were still a number of references to my old Red Hat email address in the kernel source. Remove these while keeping the Red Hat copyright notices intact. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-11-16 11:08:45 +01:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: fix compile failure on MIPS from system.h split Builds of the MIPS platform ip32_defconfig fails as of commit 0195c00244dc ("Merge tag 'split-asm_system_h ...") because MIPS xchg() macro uses BUILD_BUG_ON and it was moved in commit b81947c646bf ("Disintegrate asm/system.h for MIPS"). The root cause is that the system.h split wasn't tested on a baseline with commit 6c03438edeb5 ("kernel.h: doesn't explicitly use bug.h, so don't include it.") Since this file uses BUG code in several other places besides the xchg call, simply make the inclusion explicit. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-04-01 16:38:37 -04:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
kernel: Map most files to use export.h instead of module.h The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else. Revector them onto the isolated export header for faster compile times. Nothing to see here but a whole lot of instances of: -#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/export.h> This commit is only changing the kernel dir; next targets will probably be mm, fs, the arch dirs, etc. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-05-23 14:51:41 -04:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
kernel: fix two implicit header assumptions in irq_work.c Up until now, this file was getting percpu.h because nearly every file was implicitly getting module.h (and all its sub-includes). But we want to clean that up, so call out percpu.h explicitly. Otherwise we'll get things like this on an ARM build: kernel/irq_work.c:48: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'irq_work_list' kernel/irq_work.c:48: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_PER_CPU' The same thing was happening for builds on ARM for asm/processor.h kernel/irq_work.c: In function 'irq_work_sync': kernel/irq_work.c:166: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax' Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-07-18 13:03:04 -04:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: fix compile failure on tile from missing include Building with IRQ_WORK configured results in kernel/irq_work.c: In function ‘irq_work_run’: kernel/irq_work.c:110: error: implicit declaration of function ‘irqs_disabled’ The appropriate header just needs to be included. Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-04-11 12:21:39 -04:00
irq_work: Make self-IPIs optable On irq work initialization, let the user choose to define it as "lazy" or not. "Lazy" means that we don't want to send an IPI (provided the arch can anyway) when we enqueue this work but we rather prefer to wait for the next timer tick to execute our work if possible. This is going to be a benefit for non-urgent enqueuers (like printk in the future) that may prefer not to raise an IPI storm in case of frequent enqueuing on short periods of time. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-10-19 16:43:41 -04:00
irq_work: Flush work on CPU_DYING In order not to offline a CPU with pending irq works, flush the queue from CPU_DYING. The notifier is called by stop_machine on the CPU that is going down. The code will not be called from irq context (so things like get_irq_regs() wont work) but I'm not sure what the requirements are for irq_work in that regard (Peter?). But irqs are disabled and the CPU is about to go offline. Might as well flush the work. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2012-11-15 11:34:21 -05:00
irq_work: Implement remote queueing irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user. The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI. Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add noticeable overhead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-08 01:37:48 +02:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
kernel: fix two implicit header assumptions in irq_work.c Up until now, this file was getting percpu.h because nearly every file was implicitly getting module.h (and all its sub-includes). But we want to clean that up, so call out percpu.h explicitly. Otherwise we'll get things like this on an ARM build: kernel/irq_work.c:48: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'irq_work_list' kernel/irq_work.c:48: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_PER_CPU' The same thing was happening for builds on ARM for asm/processor.h kernel/irq_work.c: In function 'irq_work_sync': kernel/irq_work.c:166: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax' Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-07-18 13:03:04 -04:00
irq_work: record irq_work_queue() call stack Add the irq_work_queue() call stack into the KASAN auxiliary stack in order to improve KASAN reports. this will let us know where the irq work be queued. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331063202.28770-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-29 23:00:52 -07:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() IPIs sent to remote CPUs via irq_work_queue_on() are now covered by trace_ipi_send_cpumask(), add another instance of the tracepoint to cover self-IPIs. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307143558.294354-5-vschneid@redhat.com
2023-03-07 14:35:55 +00:00
irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI. We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending. Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists, one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-23 18:10:21 +02:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Use llist in the struct irq_work logic Use llist in irq_work instead of the lock-less linked list implementation in irq_work to avoid the code duplication. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-08 14:00:46 +08:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() memory ordering When irq_work_claim() finds IRQ_WORK_PENDING flag already set, we just return and don't raise a new IPI. We expect the destination to see and handle our latest updades thanks to the pairing atomic_xchg() in irq_work_run_list(). But cmpxchg() doesn't guarantee a full memory barrier upon failure. So it's possible that the destination misses our latest updates. So use atomic_fetch_or() instead that is unconditionally fully ordered and also performs exactly what we want here and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108160858.31665-3-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-11-08 17:08:56 +01:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Cleanup Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-15 11:51:29 +02:00
irq_work: Fix racy check on work pending flag Work claiming wants to be SMP-safe. And by the time we try to claim a work, if it is already executing concurrently on another CPU, we want to succeed the claiming and queue the work again because the other CPU may have missed the data we wanted to handle in our work if it's about to complete there. This scenario is summarized below: CPU 1 CPU 2 ----- ----- (flags = 0) cmpxchg(flags, 0, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] xchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY) (flags = 2) func() if (flags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING) (not true) cmpxchg(flags, flags, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] cmpxchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY, 0); (fail, pending on CPU 2) This state machine is synchronized using [cmp]xchg() on the flags. As such, the early IRQ_WORK_PENDING check in CPU 2 above is racy. By the time we check it, we may be dealing with a stale value because we aren't using an atomic accessor. As a result, CPU 2 may "see" that the work is still pending on another CPU while it may be actually completing the work function exection already, leaving our data unprocessed. To fix this, we start by speculating about the value we wish to be in the work->flags but we only make any conclusion after the value returned by the cmpxchg() call that either claims the work or let the current owner handle the pending work for us. Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
2012-10-27 15:21:36 +02:00
irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() memory ordering When irq_work_claim() finds IRQ_WORK_PENDING flag already set, we just return and don't raise a new IPI. We expect the destination to see and handle our latest updades thanks to the pairing atomic_xchg() in irq_work_run_list(). But cmpxchg() doesn't guarantee a full memory barrier upon failure. So it's possible that the destination misses our latest updates. So use atomic_fetch_or() instead that is unconditionally fully ordered and also performs exactly what we want here and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108160858.31665-3-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-11-08 17:08:56 +01:00
irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() Trade one atomic op for a full memory barrier. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-18 22:28:37 +02:00
irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() memory ordering When irq_work_claim() finds IRQ_WORK_PENDING flag already set, we just return and don't raise a new IPI. We expect the destination to see and handle our latest updades thanks to the pairing atomic_xchg() in irq_work_run_list(). But cmpxchg() doesn't guarantee a full memory barrier upon failure. So it's possible that the destination misses our latest updates. So use atomic_fetch_or() instead that is unconditionally fully ordered and also performs exactly what we want here and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108160858.31665-3-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-11-08 17:08:56 +01:00
irq_work: Fix racy check on work pending flag Work claiming wants to be SMP-safe. And by the time we try to claim a work, if it is already executing concurrently on another CPU, we want to succeed the claiming and queue the work again because the other CPU may have missed the data we wanted to handle in our work if it's about to complete there. This scenario is summarized below: CPU 1 CPU 2 ----- ----- (flags = 0) cmpxchg(flags, 0, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] xchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY) (flags = 2) func() if (flags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING) (not true) cmpxchg(flags, flags, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] cmpxchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY, 0); (fail, pending on CPU 2) This state machine is synchronized using [cmp]xchg() on the flags. As such, the early IRQ_WORK_PENDING check in CPU 2 above is racy. By the time we check it, we may be dealing with a stale value because we aren't using an atomic accessor. As a result, CPU 2 may "see" that the work is still pending on another CPU while it may be actually completing the work function exection already, leaving our data unprocessed. To fix this, we start by speculating about the value we wish to be in the work->flags but we only make any conclusion after the value returned by the cmpxchg() call that either claims the work or let the current owner handle the pending work for us. Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
2012-10-27 15:21:36 +02:00
irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() memory ordering When irq_work_claim() finds IRQ_WORK_PENDING flag already set, we just return and don't raise a new IPI. We expect the destination to see and handle our latest updades thanks to the pairing atomic_xchg() in irq_work_run_list(). But cmpxchg() doesn't guarantee a full memory barrier upon failure. So it's possible that the destination misses our latest updates. So use atomic_fetch_or() instead that is unconditionally fully ordered and also performs exactly what we want here and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108160858.31665-3-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-11-08 17:08:56 +01:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() IPIs sent to remote CPUs via irq_work_queue_on() are now covered by trace_ipi_send_cpumask(), add another instance of the tracepoint to cover self-IPIs. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307143558.294354-5-vschneid@redhat.com
2023-03-07 14:35:55 +00:00
trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpu() Because copying cpumasks around when targeting a single CPU is a bit daft... Tested-and-reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230322103004.GA571242%40hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-03-22 11:28:36 +01:00
irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() IPIs sent to remote CPUs via irq_work_queue_on() are now covered by trace_ipi_send_cpumask(), add another instance of the tracepoint to cover self-IPIs. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307143558.294354-5-vschneid@redhat.com
2023-03-07 14:35:55 +00:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Implement remote queueing irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user. The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI. Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add noticeable overhead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-08 01:37:48 +02:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() IPIs sent to remote CPUs via irq_work_queue_on() are now covered by trace_ipi_send_cpumask(), add another instance of the tracepoint to cover self-IPIs. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307143558.294354-5-vschneid@redhat.com
2023-03-07 14:35:55 +00:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Implement remote queueing irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user. The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI. Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add noticeable overhead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-08 01:37:48 +02:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Implement remote queueing irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user. The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI. Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add noticeable overhead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-08 01:37:48 +02:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Map irq_work_on_queue() to irq_work_on() in !SMP Commit 478850160636 ("irq_work: Implement remote queueing") provides irq_work_on_queue() only for SMP builds. However, providing it simplifies code that submits irq_work to lists of CPUs, eliminating the !SMP special cases. This commit therefore maps irq_work_on_queue() to irq_work_on() in !SMP builds, but validating the specified CPU. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-08-18 10:59:16 -07:00
irq_work: Implement remote queueing irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user. The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI. Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add noticeable overhead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-08 01:37:48 +02:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Implement remote queueing irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user. The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI. Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add noticeable overhead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-08 01:37:48 +02:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Remove return value from the irq_work_queue() function As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue(), so it is better to just make it void. Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> [ Fix stale comments, remove now unnecessary __irq_work_queue() intermediate function ] Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359925703-24304-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-02-03 22:08:23 +01:00
perf/x86: Warn to early_printk() in case irq_work is too slow On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:45:16AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > The reason I coded this up was that NMIs were firing off so fast that > nothing else was getting a chance to run. With this patch, at least the > printk() would come out and I'd have some idea what was going on. It will start spewing to early_printk() (which is a lot nicer to use from NMI context too) when it fails to queue the IRQ-work because its already enqueued. It does have the false-positive for when two CPUs trigger the warn concurrently, but that should be rare and some extra clutter on the early printk shouldn't be a problem. Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: dzickus@redhat.com Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Fixes: 6a02ad66b2c4 ("perf/x86: Push the duration-logging printk() to IRQ context") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140211150116.GO27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-02-11 16:01:16 +01:00
irq_work: Remove return value from the irq_work_queue() function As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue(), so it is better to just make it void. Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> [ Fix stale comments, remove now unnecessary __irq_work_queue() intermediate function ] Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359925703-24304-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-02-03 22:08:23 +01:00
kasan: make kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() the default behaviour kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() was introduced to record a stack trace without allocating memory in the process. It has been added to callers which were invoked while a raw_spinlock_t was held. More and more callers were identified and changed over time. Is it a good thing to have this while functions try their best to do a locklessly setup? The only downside of having kasan_record_aux_stack() not allocate any memory is that we end up without a stacktrace if stackdepot runs out of memory and at the same stacktrace was not recorded before To quote Marco Elver from https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANpmjNPmQYJ7pv1N3cuU8cP18u7PP_uoZD8YxwZd4jtbof9nVQ@mail.gmail.com/ | I'd be in favor, it simplifies things. And stack depot should be | able to replenish its pool sufficiently in the "non-aux" cases | i.e. regular allocations. Worst case we fail to record some | aux stacks, but I think that's only really bad if there's a bug | around one of these allocations. In general the probabilities | of this being a regression are extremely small [...] Make the kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() behaviour default as kasan_record_aux_stack(). [bigeasy@linutronix.de: dressed the diff as patch] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241122155451.Mb2pmeyJ@linutronix.de Fixes: 7cb3007ce2da ("kasan: generic: introduce kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc()") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reported-by: syzbot+39f85d612b7c20d8db48@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67275485.050a0220.3c8d68.0a37.GAE@google.com Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-22 16:54:51 +01:00
irq_work: record irq_work_queue() call stack Add the irq_work_queue() call stack into the KASAN auxiliary stack in order to improve KASAN reports. this will let us know where the irq work be queued. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331063202.28770-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-29 23:00:52 -07:00
irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics The irq work queue is a per cpu object and it is sufficient for synchronization if per cpu atomics are used. Doing so simplifies the code and reduces the overhead of the code. Before: christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o text data bss dec hex filename 451 8 1 460 1cc kernel/irq_work.o After: christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o text data bss dec hex filename 438 8 1 447 1bf kernel/irq_work.o Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
2010-12-14 10:28:45 -06:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Cleanup Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-15 11:51:29 +02:00
irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI. We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending. Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists, one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-23 18:10:21 +02:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Make self-IPIs optable On irq work initialization, let the user choose to define it as "lazy" or not. "Lazy" means that we don't want to send an IPI (provided the arch can anyway) when we enqueue this work but we rather prefer to wait for the next timer tick to execute our work if possible. This is going to be a benefit for non-urgent enqueuers (like printk in the future) that may prefer not to raise an IPI storm in case of frequent enqueuing on short periods of time. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-10-19 16:43:41 -04:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics The irq work queue is a per cpu object and it is sufficient for synchronization if per cpu atomics are used. Doing so simplifies the code and reduces the overhead of the code. Before: christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o text data bss dec hex filename 451 8 1 460 1cc kernel/irq_work.o After: christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o text data bss dec hex filename 438 8 1 447 1bf kernel/irq_work.o Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
2010-12-14 10:28:45 -06:00
perf/x86: Warn to early_printk() in case irq_work is too slow On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:45:16AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > The reason I coded this up was that NMIs were firing off so fast that > nothing else was getting a chance to run. With this patch, at least the > printk() would come out and I'd have some idea what was going on. It will start spewing to early_printk() (which is a lot nicer to use from NMI context too) when it fails to queue the IRQ-work because its already enqueued. It does have the false-positive for when two CPUs trigger the warn concurrently, but that should be rare and some extra clutter on the early printk shouldn't be a problem. Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: dzickus@redhat.com Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Fixes: 6a02ad66b2c4 ("perf/x86: Push the duration-logging printk() to IRQ context") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140211150116.GO27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-02-11 16:01:16 +01:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when queueing work on the local CPU The QEMU PowerPC/PSeries machine model was not expecting a self-IPI, and it may be a bit surprising thing to do, so have irq_work_queue_on do local queueing when target is the current CPU. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409093403.20994-1-npiggin@gmail.com [ Simplified the preprocessor comments. Fixed unbalanced curly brackets pointed out by Thomas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-09 19:34:03 +10:00
irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-11-07 21:03:07 +01:00
irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI. We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending. Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists, one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-23 18:10:21 +02:00
irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-11-07 21:03:07 +01:00
time: Replace __get_cpu_var uses Convert uses of __get_cpu_var for creating a address from a percpu offset to this_cpu_ptr. The two cases where get_cpu_var is used to actually access a percpu variable are changed to use this_cpu_read/raw_cpu_read. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2014-08-17 12:30:25 -05:00
irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt The nohz full kick, which restarts the tick when any resource depend on it, can't be executed anywhere given the operation it does on timers. If it is called from the scheduler or timers code, chances are that we run into a deadlock. This is why we run the nohz full kick from an irq work. That way we make sure that the kick runs on a virgin context. However if that's the case when irq work runs in its own dedicated self-ipi, things are different for the big bunch of archs that don't support the self triggered way. In order to support them, irq works are also handled by the timer interrupt as fallback. Now when irq works run on the timer interrupt, the context isn't blank. More precisely, they can run in the context of the hrtimer that runs the tick. But the nohz kick cancels and restarts this hrtimer and cancelling an hrtimer from itself isn't allowed. This is why we run in an endless loop: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 2 CPU: 2 PID: 7538 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Not tainted 3.16.0+ #34 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write normal_work_helper [btrfs] ffff880244c06c88 000000001b486fe1 ffff880244c06bf0 ffffffff8a7f1e37 ffffffff8ac52a18 ffff880244c06c78 ffffffff8a7ef928 0000000000000010 ffff880244c06c88 ffff880244c06c20 000000001b486fe1 0000000000000000 Call Trace: <NMI[<ffffffff8a7f1e37>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a [<ffffffff8a7ef928>] panic+0xd4/0x207 [<ffffffff8a1450e8>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0x118/0x120 [<ffffffff8a186b0e>] __perf_event_overflow+0xae/0x350 [<ffffffff8a184f80>] ? perf_event_task_disable+0xa0/0xa0 [<ffffffff8a01a4cf>] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0xbf/0x150 [<ffffffff8a187934>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff8a020386>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x206/0x410 [<ffffffff8a01937b>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2b/0x50 [<ffffffff8a007b72>] nmi_handle+0xd2/0x390 [<ffffffff8a007aa5>] ? nmi_handle+0x5/0x390 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a008062>] default_do_nmi+0x72/0x1c0 [<ffffffff8a008268>] do_nmi+0xb8/0x100 [<ffffffff8a7ff66a>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 <<EOE><IRQ[<ffffffff8a0ccd2f>] lock_acquired+0xaf/0x450 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fc678>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x90 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f7723>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x33/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8a0f78ea>] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30 [<ffffffff8a109237>] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90 [<ffffffff8a10a213>] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc3/0x100 [<ffffffff8a10a25e>] nohz_full_kick_work_func+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff8a17c884>] irq_work_run_list+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff8a17c8da>] irq_work_run+0x2a/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f700b>] update_process_times+0x5b/0x70 [<ffffffff8a109005>] tick_sched_handle.isra.21+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff8a109b81>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60 [<ffffffff8a0f7aa2>] __run_hrtimer+0x72/0x470 [<ffffffff8a109b40>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0xb0/0xb0 [<ffffffff8a0f8707>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x117/0x270 [<ffffffff8a034357>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x60 [<ffffffff8a80010f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fe52f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 To fix this we force non-lazy irq works to run on irq work self-IPIs when available. That ability of the arch to trigger irq work self IPIs is available with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(). Reported-by: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-08-16 18:37:19 +02:00
irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-11-07 21:03:07 +01:00
irq_work: Warn if there's still work on cpu_down If we are in nohz and there's still irq_work to be done when the idle task is about to go offline, give a nasty warning. Everything should have been flushed from the CPU_DYING notifier already. Further attempts to enqueue an irq_work are buggy because irqs are disabled by __cpu_disable(). The best we can do is to report the issue to the user. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2012-11-15 12:52:44 -05:00
irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-11-07 21:03:07 +01:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() Trade one atomic op for a full memory barrier. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-18 22:28:37 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() Trade one atomic op for a full memory barrier. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-18 22:28:37 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() Trade one atomic op for a full memory barrier. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-18 22:28:37 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() Trade one atomic op for a full memory barrier. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-18 22:28:37 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() Trade one atomic op for a full memory barrier. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-18 22:28:37 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Cleanup Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-15 11:51:29 +02:00
irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no IRQ support. irq_work() triggers instantly an interrupt if supported by the architecture. Otherwise the work will be processed on the next timer tick. In worst case irq_work_sync() could spin up to a jiffy. irq_work_sync() is usually used in tear down context which is fully preemptible. Based on review irq_work_sync() is invoked from preemptible context and there is one waiter at a time. This qualifies it to use rcuwait for synchronisation. Let irq_work_sync() synchronize with rcuwait if the architecture processes irqwork via the timer tick. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-06 13:18:50 +02:00
irq_work: Also rcuwait for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ on PREEMPT_RT On PREEMPT_RT most items are processed as LAZY via softirq context. Avoid to spin-wait for them because irq_work_sync() could have higher priority and not allow the irq-work to be completed. Wait additionally for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ irq_work items on PREEMPT_RT. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-06 13:18:52 +02:00
irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no IRQ support. irq_work() triggers instantly an interrupt if supported by the architecture. Otherwise the work will be processed on the next timer tick. In worst case irq_work_sync() could spin up to a jiffy. irq_work_sync() is usually used in tear down context which is fully preemptible. Based on review irq_work_sync() is invoked from preemptible context and there is one waiter at a time. This qualifies it to use rcuwait for synchronisation. Let irq_work_sync() synchronize with rcuwait if the architecture processes irqwork via the timer tick. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-06 13:18:50 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI. We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending. Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists, one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-23 18:10:21 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq/work: Use llist_for_each_entry_safe The llist_for_each_entry() loop in irq_work_run_list() is unsafe because once the works PENDING bit is cleared it can be requeued on another CPU. Use llist_for_each_entry_safe() instead. Fixes: 16c0890dc66d ("irq/work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API") Reported-by:Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/151027307351.14762.4611888896020658384@mail.alporthouse.com
2017-11-12 13:02:51 +01:00
irq_work: Use llist in the struct irq_work logic Use llist in irq_work instead of the lock-less linked list implementation in irq_work to avoid the code duplication. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-08 14:00:46 +08:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Make self-IPIs optable On irq work initialization, let the user choose to define it as "lazy" or not. "Lazy" means that we don't want to send an IPI (provided the arch can anyway) when we enqueue this work but we rather prefer to wait for the next timer tick to execute our work if possible. This is going to be a benefit for non-urgent enqueuers (like printk in the future) that may prefer not to raise an IPI storm in case of frequent enqueuing on short periods of time. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2012-10-19 16:43:41 -04:00
irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI. We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending. Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists, one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-23 18:10:21 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI. We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending. Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not. So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists, one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-05-23 18:10:21 +02:00
irq_work: Cleanup Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-15 11:51:29 +02:00
irq_work, smp: Allow irq_work on call_single_queue Currently irq_work_queue_on() will issue an unconditional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() and has the handler do irq_work_run(). This is unfortunate in that it makes the IPI handler look at a second cacheline and it misses the opportunity to avoid the IPI. Instead note that struct irq_work and struct __call_single_data are very similar in layout, so use a few bits in the flags word to encode a type and stick the irq_work on the call_single_queue list. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526161908.011635912@infradead.org
2020-05-26 18:11:02 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Flush work on CPU_DYING In order not to offline a CPU with pending irq works, flush the queue from CPU_DYING. The notifier is called by stop_machine on the CPU that is going down. The code will not be called from irq context (so things like get_irq_regs() wont work) but I'm not sure what the requirements are for irq_work in that regard (Peter?). But irqs are disabled and the CPU is about to go offline. Might as well flush the work. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2012-11-15 11:34:21 -05:00
irq_work: Remove BUG_ON in irq_work_run() Because of a collision with 8d056c48e486 ("CPU hotplug, smp: flush any pending IPI callbacks before CPU offline"), which ends up calling hotplug_cfd()->flush_smp_call_function_queue()->irq_work_run(), which is not from IRQ context. And since that already calls irq_work_run() from the hotplug path, remove our entire hotplug handling. Reported-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-busatzs2gvz4v62258agipuf@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-06-25 07:13:07 +02:00
irq_work: Flush work on CPU_DYING In order not to offline a CPU with pending irq works, flush the queue from CPU_DYING. The notifier is called by stop_machine on the CPU that is going down. The code will not be called from irq context (so things like get_irq_regs() wont work) but I'm not sure what the requirements are for irq_work in that regard (Peter?). But irqs are disabled and the CPU is about to go offline. Might as well flush the work. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2012-11-15 11:34:21 -05:00
time: Replace __get_cpu_var uses Convert uses of __get_cpu_var for creating a address from a percpu offset to this_cpu_ptr. The two cases where get_cpu_var is used to actually access a percpu variable are changed to use this_cpu_read/raw_cpu_read. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2014-08-17 12:30:25 -05:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Flush work on CPU_DYING In order not to offline a CPU with pending irq works, flush the queue from CPU_DYING. The notifier is called by stop_machine on the CPU that is going down. The code will not be called from irq context (so things like get_irq_regs() wont work) but I'm not sure what the requirements are for irq_work in that regard (Peter?). But irqs are disabled and the CPU is about to go offline. Might as well flush the work. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2012-11-15 11:34:21 -05:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt The nohz full kick, which restarts the tick when any resource depend on it, can't be executed anywhere given the operation it does on timers. If it is called from the scheduler or timers code, chances are that we run into a deadlock. This is why we run the nohz full kick from an irq work. That way we make sure that the kick runs on a virgin context. However if that's the case when irq work runs in its own dedicated self-ipi, things are different for the big bunch of archs that don't support the self triggered way. In order to support them, irq works are also handled by the timer interrupt as fallback. Now when irq works run on the timer interrupt, the context isn't blank. More precisely, they can run in the context of the hrtimer that runs the tick. But the nohz kick cancels and restarts this hrtimer and cancelling an hrtimer from itself isn't allowed. This is why we run in an endless loop: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 2 CPU: 2 PID: 7538 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Not tainted 3.16.0+ #34 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write normal_work_helper [btrfs] ffff880244c06c88 000000001b486fe1 ffff880244c06bf0 ffffffff8a7f1e37 ffffffff8ac52a18 ffff880244c06c78 ffffffff8a7ef928 0000000000000010 ffff880244c06c88 ffff880244c06c20 000000001b486fe1 0000000000000000 Call Trace: <NMI[<ffffffff8a7f1e37>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a [<ffffffff8a7ef928>] panic+0xd4/0x207 [<ffffffff8a1450e8>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0x118/0x120 [<ffffffff8a186b0e>] __perf_event_overflow+0xae/0x350 [<ffffffff8a184f80>] ? perf_event_task_disable+0xa0/0xa0 [<ffffffff8a01a4cf>] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0xbf/0x150 [<ffffffff8a187934>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff8a020386>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x206/0x410 [<ffffffff8a01937b>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2b/0x50 [<ffffffff8a007b72>] nmi_handle+0xd2/0x390 [<ffffffff8a007aa5>] ? nmi_handle+0x5/0x390 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a008062>] default_do_nmi+0x72/0x1c0 [<ffffffff8a008268>] do_nmi+0xb8/0x100 [<ffffffff8a7ff66a>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 <<EOE><IRQ[<ffffffff8a0ccd2f>] lock_acquired+0xaf/0x450 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fc678>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x90 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f7723>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x33/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8a0f78ea>] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30 [<ffffffff8a109237>] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90 [<ffffffff8a10a213>] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc3/0x100 [<ffffffff8a10a25e>] nohz_full_kick_work_func+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff8a17c884>] irq_work_run_list+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff8a17c8da>] irq_work_run+0x2a/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f700b>] update_process_times+0x5b/0x70 [<ffffffff8a109005>] tick_sched_handle.isra.21+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff8a109b81>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60 [<ffffffff8a0f7aa2>] __run_hrtimer+0x72/0x470 [<ffffffff8a109b40>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0xb0/0xb0 [<ffffffff8a0f8707>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x117/0x270 [<ffffffff8a034357>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x60 [<ffffffff8a80010f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fe52f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 To fix this we force non-lazy irq works to run on irq work self-IPIs when available. That ability of the arch to trigger irq work self IPIs is available with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(). Reported-by: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-08-16 18:37:19 +02:00
percpu: Convert remaining __get_cpu_var uses in 3.18-rcX During the 3.18 merge period additional __get_cpu_var uses were added. The patch converts these to this_cpu_ptr(). Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2014-10-27 10:49:45 -05:00
irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt The nohz full kick, which restarts the tick when any resource depend on it, can't be executed anywhere given the operation it does on timers. If it is called from the scheduler or timers code, chances are that we run into a deadlock. This is why we run the nohz full kick from an irq work. That way we make sure that the kick runs on a virgin context. However if that's the case when irq work runs in its own dedicated self-ipi, things are different for the big bunch of archs that don't support the self triggered way. In order to support them, irq works are also handled by the timer interrupt as fallback. Now when irq works run on the timer interrupt, the context isn't blank. More precisely, they can run in the context of the hrtimer that runs the tick. But the nohz kick cancels and restarts this hrtimer and cancelling an hrtimer from itself isn't allowed. This is why we run in an endless loop: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 2 CPU: 2 PID: 7538 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Not tainted 3.16.0+ #34 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write normal_work_helper [btrfs] ffff880244c06c88 000000001b486fe1 ffff880244c06bf0 ffffffff8a7f1e37 ffffffff8ac52a18 ffff880244c06c78 ffffffff8a7ef928 0000000000000010 ffff880244c06c88 ffff880244c06c20 000000001b486fe1 0000000000000000 Call Trace: <NMI[<ffffffff8a7f1e37>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a [<ffffffff8a7ef928>] panic+0xd4/0x207 [<ffffffff8a1450e8>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0x118/0x120 [<ffffffff8a186b0e>] __perf_event_overflow+0xae/0x350 [<ffffffff8a184f80>] ? perf_event_task_disable+0xa0/0xa0 [<ffffffff8a01a4cf>] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0xbf/0x150 [<ffffffff8a187934>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff8a020386>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x206/0x410 [<ffffffff8a01937b>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2b/0x50 [<ffffffff8a007b72>] nmi_handle+0xd2/0x390 [<ffffffff8a007aa5>] ? nmi_handle+0x5/0x390 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a008062>] default_do_nmi+0x72/0x1c0 [<ffffffff8a008268>] do_nmi+0xb8/0x100 [<ffffffff8a7ff66a>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 <<EOE><IRQ[<ffffffff8a0ccd2f>] lock_acquired+0xaf/0x450 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fc678>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x90 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f7723>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x33/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8a0f78ea>] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30 [<ffffffff8a109237>] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90 [<ffffffff8a10a213>] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc3/0x100 [<ffffffff8a10a25e>] nohz_full_kick_work_func+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff8a17c884>] irq_work_run_list+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff8a17c8da>] irq_work_run+0x2a/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f700b>] update_process_times+0x5b/0x70 [<ffffffff8a109005>] tick_sched_handle.isra.21+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff8a109b81>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60 [<ffffffff8a0f7aa2>] __run_hrtimer+0x72/0x470 [<ffffffff8a109b40>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0xb0/0xb0 [<ffffffff8a0f8707>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x117/0x270 [<ffffffff8a034357>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x60 [<ffffffff8a80010f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fe52f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 To fix this we force non-lazy irq works to run on irq work self-IPIs when available. That ability of the arch to trigger irq work self IPIs is available with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(). Reported-by: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-08-16 18:37:19 +02:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00
irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt The nohz full kick, which restarts the tick when any resource depend on it, can't be executed anywhere given the operation it does on timers. If it is called from the scheduler or timers code, chances are that we run into a deadlock. This is why we run the nohz full kick from an irq work. That way we make sure that the kick runs on a virgin context. However if that's the case when irq work runs in its own dedicated self-ipi, things are different for the big bunch of archs that don't support the self triggered way. In order to support them, irq works are also handled by the timer interrupt as fallback. Now when irq works run on the timer interrupt, the context isn't blank. More precisely, they can run in the context of the hrtimer that runs the tick. But the nohz kick cancels and restarts this hrtimer and cancelling an hrtimer from itself isn't allowed. This is why we run in an endless loop: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 2 CPU: 2 PID: 7538 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Not tainted 3.16.0+ #34 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write normal_work_helper [btrfs] ffff880244c06c88 000000001b486fe1 ffff880244c06bf0 ffffffff8a7f1e37 ffffffff8ac52a18 ffff880244c06c78 ffffffff8a7ef928 0000000000000010 ffff880244c06c88 ffff880244c06c20 000000001b486fe1 0000000000000000 Call Trace: <NMI[<ffffffff8a7f1e37>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a [<ffffffff8a7ef928>] panic+0xd4/0x207 [<ffffffff8a1450e8>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0x118/0x120 [<ffffffff8a186b0e>] __perf_event_overflow+0xae/0x350 [<ffffffff8a184f80>] ? perf_event_task_disable+0xa0/0xa0 [<ffffffff8a01a4cf>] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0xbf/0x150 [<ffffffff8a187934>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff8a020386>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x206/0x410 [<ffffffff8a01937b>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2b/0x50 [<ffffffff8a007b72>] nmi_handle+0xd2/0x390 [<ffffffff8a007aa5>] ? nmi_handle+0x5/0x390 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a008062>] default_do_nmi+0x72/0x1c0 [<ffffffff8a008268>] do_nmi+0xb8/0x100 [<ffffffff8a7ff66a>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0 <<EOE><IRQ[<ffffffff8a0ccd2f>] lock_acquired+0xaf/0x450 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fc678>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x90 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f7723>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x33/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8a0f78ea>] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30 [<ffffffff8a109237>] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90 [<ffffffff8a10a213>] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc3/0x100 [<ffffffff8a10a25e>] nohz_full_kick_work_func+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff8a17c884>] irq_work_run_list+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff8a17c8da>] irq_work_run+0x2a/0x50 [<ffffffff8a0f700b>] update_process_times+0x5b/0x70 [<ffffffff8a109005>] tick_sched_handle.isra.21+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff8a109b81>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60 [<ffffffff8a0f7aa2>] __run_hrtimer+0x72/0x470 [<ffffffff8a109b40>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0xb0/0xb0 [<ffffffff8a0f8707>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x117/0x270 [<ffffffff8a034357>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x60 [<ffffffff8a80010f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff8a7fe52f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 To fix this we force non-lazy irq works to run on irq work self-IPIs when available. That ability of the arch to trigger irq work self IPIs is available with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(). Reported-by: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
2014-08-16 18:37:19 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Use llist in the struct irq_work logic Use llist in irq_work instead of the lock-less linked list implementation in irq_work to avoid the code duplication. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-08 14:00:46 +08:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Use lockdep to assert IRQs are disabled/enabled Use lockdep to check that IRQs are enabled or disabled as expected. This way the sanity check only shows overhead when concurrency correctness debug code is enabled. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509980490-4285-11-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-06 16:01:26 +01:00
irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no IRQ support. irq_work() triggers instantly an interrupt if supported by the architecture. Otherwise the work will be processed on the next timer tick. In worst case irq_work_sync() could spin up to a jiffy. irq_work_sync() is usually used in tear down context which is fully preemptible. Based on review irq_work_sync() is invoked from preemptible context and there is one waiter at a time. This qualifies it to use rcuwait for synchronisation. Let irq_work_sync() synchronize with rcuwait if the architecture processes irqwork via the timer tick. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-06 13:18:50 +02:00
irq_work: Also rcuwait for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ on PREEMPT_RT On PREEMPT_RT most items are processed as LAZY via softirq context. Avoid to spin-wait for them because irq_work_sync() could have higher priority and not allow the irq-work to be completed. Wait additionally for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ irq_work items on PREEMPT_RT. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-06 13:18:52 +02:00
irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no IRQ support. irq_work() triggers instantly an interrupt if supported by the architecture. Otherwise the work will be processed on the next timer tick. In worst case irq_work_sync() could spin up to a jiffy. irq_work_sync() is usually used in tear down context which is fully preemptible. Based on review irq_work_sync() is invoked from preemptible context and there is one waiter at a time. This qualifies it to use rcuwait for synchronisation. Let irq_work_sync() synchronize with rcuwait if the architecture processes irqwork via the timer tick. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006111852.1514359-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-06 13:18:50 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Cleanup Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-06-15 11:51:29 +02:00
irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-10-14 14:01:34 +08:00
irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT The irq_work callback is invoked in hard IRQ context. By default all callbacks are scheduled for invocation right away (given supported by the architecture) except for the ones marked IRQ_WORK_LAZY which are delayed until the next timer-tick. While looking over the callbacks, some of them may acquire locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t) which are transformed into sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired in hard IRQ context. Changing the locks into locks which could be acquired in this context will lead to other problems such as increased latencies if everything in the chain has IRQ-off locks. This will not solve all the issues as one callback has been noticed which invoked kref_put() and its callback invokes kfree() and this can not be invoked in hardirq context. Some callbacks are required to be invoked in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT to work properly. This includes for instance the NO_HZ callback which needs to be able to observe the idle context. The callbacks which require to be run in hardirq have already been marked. Use this information to split the callbacks onto the two lists on PREEMPT_RT: - lazy_list Work items which are not marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. Callbacks on this list will be invoked from a per-CPU thread. The handler here may acquire sleeping locks such as spinlock_t and invoke kfree(). - raised_list Work items which are marked with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ will be added to this list. They will be invoked in hardirq context and must not acquire any sleeping locks. The wake up of the per-CPU thread occurs from irq_work handler/ hardirq context. The thread runs with lowest RT priority to ensure it runs before any SCHED_OTHER tasks do. [bigeasy: melt tglx's irq_work_tick_soft() which splits irq_work_tick() into a hard and soft variant. Collected fixes over time from Steven Rostedt and Mike Galbraith. Move to per-CPU threads instead of softirq as suggested by PeterZ.] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211007092646.uhshe3ut2wkrcfzv@linutronix.de
2021-10-07 11:26:46 +02:00