kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-16 22:39:48 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/fs/dlm/lock.c

5014 lines
121 KiB
Raw Normal View History

[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: fix ordering of bast and cast When both blocking and completion callbacks are queued for lock, the dlm would always deliver the completion callback (cast) first. In some cases the blocking callback (bast) is queued before the cast, though, and should be delivered first. This patch keeps track of the order in which they were queued and delivers them in that order. This patch also keeps track of the granted mode in the last cast and eliminates the following bast if the bast mode is compatible with the preceding cast mode. This happens when a remotely mastered lock is demoted, e.g. EX->NL, in which case the local node queues a cast immediately after sending the demote message. In this way a cast can be queued for a mode, e.g. NL, that makes an in-transit bast extraneous. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:08:18 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add orphan purging code (1/2) Add code for purging orphan locks. A process can also purge all of its own non-orphan locks by passing a pid of zero. Code already exists for processes to create persistent locks that become orphans when the process exits, but the complimentary capability for another process to then purge these orphans has been missing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-30 15:02:40 -05:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: make dlm_print_rsb() static dlm_print_rsb() can now become static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-13 23:29:38 +02:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dump rsb and locks on assert Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-18 11:54:25 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] canceling deadlocked lock Add a function that can be used through libdlm by a system daemon to cancel another process's deadlocked lock. A completion ast with EDEADLK is returned to the process waiting for the lock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 08:46:00 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: fix ordering of bast and cast When both blocking and completion callbacks are queued for lock, the dlm would always deliver the completion callback (cast) first. In some cases the blocking callback (bast) is queued before the cast, though, and should be delivered first. This patch keeps track of the order in which they were queued and delivers them in that order. This patch also keeps track of the granted mode in the last cast and eliminates the following bast if the bast mode is compatible with the preceding cast mode. This happens when a remotely mastered lock is demoted, e.g. EX->NL, in which case the local node queues a cast immediately after sending the demote message. In this way a cast can be queued for a mode, e.g. NL, that makes an in-transit bast extraneous. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:08:18 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: add time stamp of blocking callback Record the time the latest blocking callback was queued for a lock. This will be used for debugging in combination with lock queue timestamp changes in the previous patch. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:47:29 -06:00
dlm: use bastmode in debugfs output The bast mode that appears in the debugfs output should be useful on both master and process nodes. lkb_highbast is currently printed, and is only useful on the master node. lkb_bastmode is only useful on the process node. This patch sets lkb_bastmode on the master node as well, and uses that value in the debugfs print. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-25 12:20:57 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use bastmode in debugfs output The bast mode that appears in the debugfs output should be useful on both master and process nodes. lkb_highbast is currently printed, and is only useful on the master node. lkb_bastmode is only useful on the process node. This patch sets lkb_bastmode on the master node as well, and uses that value in the debugfs print. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-25 12:20:57 -06:00
dlm: improve how bast mode handling The lkb bastmode value is set in the context of processing the lock, and read by the dlm_astd thread. Because it's accessed in these two separate contexts, the writing/reading ought to be done under a lock. This is simple to do by setting it and reading it when the lkb is added to and removed from dlm_astd's callback list which is properly locked. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 11:55:46 -06:00
dlm: use bastmode in debugfs output The bast mode that appears in the debugfs output should be useful on both master and process nodes. lkb_highbast is currently printed, and is only useful on the master node. lkb_bastmode is only useful on the process node. This patch sets lkb_bastmode on the master node as well, and uses that value in the debugfs print. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-25 12:20:57 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: fix uninitialized variable for search_rsb_list callers gcc 4.3.0 correctly emits the following warning. search_rsb_list does not *r_ret if no dlm_rsb is found and _search_rsb may pass the uninitialized value upstream on the error path when both calls to search_rsb_list return non-zero error. The fix sets *r_ret to NULL on search_rsb_list's not-found path. Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-06-30 19:59:14 +03:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: Fix uninitialised variable warning in lock.c CC [M] fs/dlm/lock.o fs/dlm/lock.c: In function ‘find_rsb’: fs/dlm/lock.c:438: warning: ‘r’ may be used uninitialized in this function Since r is used on the error path to set r_ret, set it to NULL. Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-06-15 08:26:48 +01:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: make find_rsb() fail gracefully when namelen is too large We *can* get there from receive_request() and dlm_recover_master_copy() with namelen too large if incoming request is invalid; BUG() from DLM_ASSERT() in allocate_rsb() is a bit excessive reaction to that and in case of dlm_recover_master_copy() we would actually oops before that while calculating hash of up to 64Kb worth of data - with data actually being 64 _bytes_ in kmalloc()'ed struct. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 23:22:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: make find_rsb() fail gracefully when namelen is too large We *can* get there from receive_request() and dlm_recover_master_copy() with namelen too large if incoming request is invalid; BUG() from DLM_ASSERT() in allocate_rsb() is a bit excessive reaction to that and in case of dlm_recover_master_copy() we would actually oops before that while calculating hash of up to 64Kb worth of data - with data actually being 64 _bytes_ in kmalloc()'ed struct. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 23:22:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dump rsb and locks on assert Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-18 11:54:25 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dump rsb and locks on assert Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-18 11:54:25 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix leaking user locks User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were never being removed from a process's list of locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-18 11:24:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] change lkid format A lock id is a uint32 and is used as an opaque reference to the lock. For userland apps, the lkid is passed up, through libdlm, as the return value from a write() on the dlm device. This created a problem when the high bit was 1, making the lkid look like an error. This is fixed by changing how the lkid is composed. The low 16 bits identified the hash bucket for the lock and the high 16 bits were a per-bucket counter (which eventually hit 0x8000 causing the problem). These are simply swapped around; the number of hash table buckets is far below 0x8000, making all lkid's positive when viewed as signed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 12:12:55 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] change lkid format A lock id is a uint32 and is used as an opaque reference to the lock. For userland apps, the lkid is passed up, through libdlm, as the return value from a write() on the dlm device. This created a problem when the high bit was 1, making the lkid look like an error. This is fixed by changing how the lkid is composed. The low 16 bits identified the hash bucket for the lock and the high 16 bits were a per-bucket counter (which eventually hit 0x8000 causing the problem). These are simply swapped around; the number of hash table buckets is far below 0x8000, making all lkid's positive when viewed as signed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 12:12:55 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] change lkid format A lock id is a uint32 and is used as an opaque reference to the lock. For userland apps, the lkid is passed up, through libdlm, as the return value from a write() on the dlm device. This created a problem when the high bit was 1, making the lkid look like an error. This is fixed by changing how the lkid is composed. The low 16 bits identified the hash bucket for the lock and the high 16 bits were a per-bucket counter (which eventually hit 0x8000 causing the problem). These are simply swapped around; the number of hash table buckets is far below 0x8000, making all lkid's positive when viewed as signed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 12:12:55 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] change lkid format A lock id is a uint32 and is used as an opaque reference to the lock. For userland apps, the lkid is passed up, through libdlm, as the return value from a write() on the dlm device. This created a problem when the high bit was 1, making the lkid look like an error. This is fixed by changing how the lkid is composed. The low 16 bits identified the hash bucket for the lock and the high 16 bits were a per-bucket counter (which eventually hit 0x8000 causing the problem). These are simply swapped around; the number of hash table buckets is far below 0x8000, making all lkid's positive when viewed as signed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 12:12:55 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: cleanup remove unused code Smatch complains because "lkb" is never NULL. Looking at it, the original code actually adds the new element to the end of the list fine, so we can just get rid of the if condition. This code is four years old and no one has complained so it must work. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-03-22 15:03:54 +03:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] can miss clearing resend flag A long, complicated sequence of events, beginning with the RESEND flag not being cleared on an lkb, can result in an unlock never completing. - lkb on waiters list for remote lookup - the remote node is both the dir node and the master node, so it optimizes the lookup into a request and sends a request reply back - the request reply is saved on the requestqueue to be processed after recovery - recovery runs dlm_recover_waiters_pre() which sets RESEND flag so the lookup will be resent after recovery - end of recovery: process_requestqueue takes saved request reply which removes the lkb off the waitesr list, _without_ clearing the RESEND flag - end of recovery: dlm_recover_waiters_post() doesn't do anything with the now completed lookup lkb (would usually clear RESEND) - later, the node unmounts, unlocks this lkb that still has RESEND flag set - the lkb is on the waiters list again, now for unlock, when recovery occurs, dlm_recover_waiters_pre() shows the lkb for unlock with RESEND set, doesn't do anything since the master still exists - end of recovery: dlm_recover_waiters_post() takes this lkb off the waiters list because it has the RESEND flag set, then reports an error because unlocks are never supposed to be handled in recover_waiters_post(). - later, the unlock reply is received, doesn't find the lkb on the waiters list because recover_waiters_post() has wrongly removed it. - the unlock operation has been lost, and we're left with a stray granted lock - unmount spins waiting for the unlock to complete The visible evidence of this problem will be a node where gfs umount is spinning, the dlm waiters list will be empty, and the dlm locks list will show a granted lock. The fix is simply to clear the RESEND flag when taking an lkb off the waiters list. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-24 10:21:33 -06:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] can miss clearing resend flag A long, complicated sequence of events, beginning with the RESEND flag not being cleared on an lkb, can result in an unlock never completing. - lkb on waiters list for remote lookup - the remote node is both the dir node and the master node, so it optimizes the lookup into a request and sends a request reply back - the request reply is saved on the requestqueue to be processed after recovery - recovery runs dlm_recover_waiters_pre() which sets RESEND flag so the lookup will be resent after recovery - end of recovery: process_requestqueue takes saved request reply which removes the lkb off the waitesr list, _without_ clearing the RESEND flag - end of recovery: dlm_recover_waiters_post() doesn't do anything with the now completed lookup lkb (would usually clear RESEND) - later, the node unmounts, unlocks this lkb that still has RESEND flag set - the lkb is on the waiters list again, now for unlock, when recovery occurs, dlm_recover_waiters_pre() shows the lkb for unlock with RESEND set, doesn't do anything since the master still exists - end of recovery: dlm_recover_waiters_post() takes this lkb off the waiters list because it has the RESEND flag set, then reports an error because unlocks are never supposed to be handled in recover_waiters_post(). - later, the unlock reply is received, doesn't find the lkb on the waiters list because recover_waiters_post() has wrongly removed it. - the unlock operation has been lost, and we're left with a stray granted lock - unmount spins waiting for the unlock to complete The visible evidence of this problem will be a node where gfs umount is spinning, the dlm waiters list will be empty, and the dlm locks list will show a granted lock. The fix is simply to clear the RESEND flag when taking an lkb off the waiters list. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-24 10:21:33 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] rename dlm_config_info fields Add a "ci_" prefix to the fields in the dlm_config_info struct so that we can use macros to add configfs functions to access them (in a later patch). No functional changes in this patch, just naming changes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-09 09:41:48 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] timeout fixes Various fixes related to the new timeout feature: - add_timeout() missed setting TIMEWARN flag on lkb's when the TIMEOUT flag was already set - clear_proc_locks should remove a dead process's locks from the timeout list - the end-of-life calculation for user locks needs to consider that ETIMEDOUT is equivalent to -DLM_ECANCEL - make initial default timewarn_cs config value visible in configfs - change bit position of TIMEOUT_CANCEL flag so it's not copied to a remote master node - set timestamp on remote lkb's so a lock dump will display the time they've been waiting Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 08:44:23 -05:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] Compile fix A one liner fix which got missed from the earlier patches. Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@ubuntu.com> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 11:14:21 +01:00
[DLM] fix compile breakage In the rush to get the previous patch set sent, a compilation bug I fixed shortly before sending somehow got clobbered, probably by a missed quilt refresh or something. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 16:02:57 -05:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
dlm: change lock time stamping Use ktime instead of jiffies for timestamping lkb's. Also stamp the time on every lkb whenever it's added to a resource queue, instead of just stamping locks subject to timeouts. This will allow us to use timestamps more widely for debugging all locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-12-09 14:12:21 -06:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: fix overflows when copying from ->m_extra to lvb Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-26 00:02:29 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Remove range locks from the DLM This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-23 09:56:38 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Remove range locks from the DLM This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-23 09:56:38 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dump rsb and locks on assert Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-18 11:54:25 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
dlm: fix basts for granted CW waiting PR/CW The fix in commit 3650925893469ccb03dbcc6a440c5d363350f591 was addressing the case of a granted PR lock with waiting PR and CW locks. It's a special case that requires forcing a CW bast. However, that forced CW bast was incorrectly applying to a second condition where the granted lock was CW. So, the holder of a CW lock could receive an extraneous CW bast instead of a PR bast. This fix narrows the original special case to what was intended. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-05-20 12:18:10 -05:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: limit dir lookup loop In a rare case we may need to repeat a local resource directory lookup due to a race with removing the rsb and removing the resdir record. We'll never need to do more than a single additional lookup, though, so the infinite loop around the lookup can be removed. In addition to being unnecessary, the infinite loop is dangerous since some other unknown condition may appear causing the loop to never break. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 10:37:39 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dump rsb and locks on assert Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-18 11:54:25 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: limit dir lookup loop In a rare case we may need to repeat a local resource directory lookup due to a race with removing the rsb and removing the resdir record. We'll never need to do more than a single additional lookup, though, so the infinite loop around the lookup can be removed. In addition to being unnecessary, the infinite loop is dangerous since some other unknown condition may appear causing the loop to never break. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 10:37:39 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: limit dir lookup loop In a rare case we may need to repeat a local resource directory lookup due to a race with removing the rsb and removing the resdir record. We'll never need to do more than a single additional lookup, though, so the infinite loop around the lookup can be removed. In addition to being unnecessary, the infinite loop is dangerous since some other unknown condition may appear causing the loop to never break. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 10:37:39 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: another call to confirm_master in receive_request_reply When a failed request (EBADR or ENOTBLK) is unlocked/canceled instead of retried, there may be other lkb's waiting on the rsb_lookup list for it to complete. A call to confirm_master() is needed to move on to the next waiting lkb since the current one won't be retried. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-08 15:37:47 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: save master info after failed no-queue request When a NOQUEUE request fails, the rsb res_master field is unnecessarily reset to -1, instead of leaving the valid master setting in place. We want to save the looked-up master values while the rsb is on the "toss list" so that another lookup can be avoided if the rsb is soon reused. The fix is to simply leave res_master value alone. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-21 11:25:42 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: clear defunct cancel state When a conversion completes successfully and finds that a cancel of the convert is still in progress (which is now a moot point), preemptively clear the state associated with outstanding cancel. That state could cause a subsequent conversion to be ignored. Also, improve the consistency and content of error and debug messages in this area. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-28 14:37:54 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: reject normal unlock when lock is waiting for lookup Non-forced unlocks should be rejected if the lock is waiting on the rsb_lookup list for another lock to establish the master node. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 10:30:45 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: reject normal unlock when lock is waiting for lookup Non-forced unlocks should be rejected if the lock is waiting on the rsb_lookup list for another lock to establish the master node. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 10:30:45 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: ignore cancel on granted lock Return immediately from dlm_unlock(CANCEL) if the lock is granted and not being converted; there's nothing to cancel. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-02-27 15:23:28 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue before the CW lock). The logic simply compared the numerical values of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher valued PR mode. We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-08-07 09:44:48 -05:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[GFS2/DLM] Fix trailing whitespace As per Andrew Morton's request, removed trailing whitespace. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-25 09:26:04 -04:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Remove range locks from the DLM This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-23 09:56:38 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Remove range locks from the DLM This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-23 09:56:38 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
[DLM] Remove range locks from the DLM This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-23 09:56:38 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] split create_message function This splits the current create_message() function into two parts so that later patches can call the new lower-level _create_message() function when they don't have an rsb struct. No functional change in this patch. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 09:06:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: always use GFP_NOFS Replace all GFP_KERNEL and ls_allocation with GFP_NOFS. ls_allocation would be GFP_KERNEL for userland lockspaces and GFP_NOFS for file system lockspaces. It was discovered that any lockspaces on the system can affect all others by triggering memory reclaim in the file system which could in turn call back into the dlm to acquire locks, deadlocking dlm threads that were shared by all lockspaces, like dlm_recv. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-11-30 16:34:43 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] split create_message function This splits the current create_message() function into two parts so that later patches can call the new lower-level _create_message() function when they don't have an rsb struct. No functional change in this patch. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 09:06:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] split create_message function This splits the current create_message() function into two parts so that later patches can call the new lower-level _create_message() function when they don't have an rsb struct. No functional change in this patch. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-02 09:06:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix send_args() lvb copying The send_args() function is used to copy parameters into a message for a number different message types. Only some of those types are set up beforehand (in create_message) to include space for sending lvb data. send_args was wrongly copying the lvb for all message types as long as the lock had an lvb. This means that the lvb data was being written past the end of the message into unknown space. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:38:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix send_args() lvb copying The send_args() function is used to copy parameters into a message for a number different message types. Only some of those types are set up beforehand (in create_message) to include space for sending lvb data. send_args was wrongly copying the lvb for all message types as long as the lock had an lvb. This means that the lvb data was being written past the end of the message into unknown space. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:38:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix send_args() lvb copying The send_args() function is used to copy parameters into a message for a number different message types. Only some of those types are set up beforehand (in create_message) to include space for sending lvb data. send_args was wrongly copying the lvb for all message types as long as the lock had an lvb. This means that the lvb data was being written past the end of the message into unknown space. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:38:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] down conversion clearing flags The down-conversion optimization was resulting in the lkb flags being cleared because the stub message reply had no flags value set. Copy the current flags into the stub message so they'll be copied back into the lkb as part of processing the fake reply. Also add an assertion to catch this error more directly if it exists elsewhere. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-23 16:07:31 -04:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] clear sbflags on lock master RH BZ 211622 The ALTMODE flag can be set in the lock master's copy of the lock but never cleared, so ALTMODE will also be returned in a subsequent conversion of the lock when it shouldn't be. This results in lock_dlm incorrectly switching to the alternate lock mode when returning the result to gfs which then asserts when it sees the wrong lock state. The fix is to propagate the cleared sbflags value to the master node when the lock is requested. QA's d_rwrandirectlarge test triggers this bug very quickly. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-10 14:16:27 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: fix overflows when copying from ->m_extra to lvb Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-26 00:02:29 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix receive_request() lvb copying LVB's are not sent as part of new requests, but the code receiving the request was copying data into the lvb anyway. The space in the message where it mistakenly thought the lvb lived actually contained the resource name, so it wound up incorrectly copying this name data into the lvb. Fix is to just create the lvb, not copy junk into it. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:39:20 -06:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] fix receive_request() lvb copying LVB's are not sent as part of new requests, but the code receiving the request was copying data into the lvb anyway. The space in the message where it mistakenly thought the lvb lived actually contained the resource name, so it wound up incorrectly copying this name data into the lvb. Fix is to just create the lvb, not copy junk into it. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:39:20 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: send reply before bast When the lock master processes a successful operation (request, convert, cancel, or unlock), it will process the effects of the change before sending the reply for the operation. The "effects" of the operation are: - blocking callbacks (basts) for any newly granted locks - waiting or converting locks that can now be granted The cast is queued on the local node when the reply from the lock master is received. This means that a lock holder can receive a bast for a lock mode that is doesn't yet know has been granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2010-02-24 11:59:23 -06:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add orphan purging code (1/2) Add code for purging orphan locks. A process can also purge all of its own non-orphan locks by passing a pid of zero. Code already exists for processes to create persistent locks that become orphans when the process exits, but the complimentary capability for another process to then purge these orphans has been missing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-30 15:02:40 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: another call to confirm_master in receive_request_reply When a failed request (EBADR or ENOTBLK) is unlocked/canceled instead of retried, there may be other lkb's waiting on the rsb_lookup list for it to complete. A call to confirm_master() is needed to move on to the next waiting lkb since the current one won't be retried. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-08 15:37:47 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add lock timeouts and warnings [2/6] New features: lock timeouts and time warnings. If the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag is set, then the request/conversion will be canceled after waiting the specified number of centiseconds (specified per lock). This feature is only available for locks requested through libdlm (can be enabled for kernel dlm users if there's a use for it.) If the new DLM_LSFL_TIMEWARN flag is set when creating the lockspace, then a warning message will be sent to userspace (using genetlink) after a request/conversion has been waiting for a given number of centiseconds (configurable per node). The time warnings will be used in the future to do deadlock detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:59:31 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix mode munging There are flags to enable two specialized features in the dlm: 1. CONVDEADLK causes the dlm to resolve conversion deadlocks internally by changing the granted mode of locks to NL. 2. ALTPR/ALTCW cause the dlm to change the requested mode of locks to PR or CW to grant them if the normal requested mode can't be granted. GFS direct i/o exercises both of these features, especially when mixed with buffered i/o. The dlm has problems with them. The first problem is on the master node. If it demotes a lock as a part of converting it, the actual step of converting the lock isn't being done after the demotion, the lock is just left sitting on the granted queue with a granted mode of NL. I think the mistaken assumption was that the call to grant_pending_locks() would grant it, but that function naturally doesn't look at locks on the granted queue. The second problem is on the process node. If the master either demotes or gives an altmode, the munging of the gr/rq modes is never done in the process copy of the lock, leaving the master/process copies out of sync. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-04-19 10:30:41 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] timeout fixes Various fixes related to the new timeout feature: - add_timeout() missed setting TIMEWARN flag on lkb's when the TIMEOUT flag was already set - clear_proc_locks should remove a dead process's locks from the timeout list - the end-of-life calculation for user locks needs to consider that ETIMEDOUT is equivalent to -DLM_ECANCEL - make initial default timewarn_cs config value visible in configfs - change bit position of TIMEOUT_CANCEL flag so it's not copied to a remote master node - set timestamp on remote lkb's so a lock dump will display the time they've been waiting Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 08:44:23 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: reject messages from non-members Messages from nodes that are no longer members of the lockspace should be ignored. When nodes are removed from the lockspace, recovery can sometimes complete quickly enough that messages arrive from a removed node after recovery has completed. When processed, these messages would often cause an error message, and could in some cases change some state, causing problems. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-08 16:24:00 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] add orphan purging code (1/2) Add code for purging orphan locks. A process can also purge all of its own non-orphan locks by passing a pid of zero. Code already exists for processes to create persistent locks that become orphans when the process exits, but the complimentary capability for another process to then purge these orphans has been missing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-30 15:02:40 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: use proper C for dlm/requestqueue stuff (and fix alignment bug) a) don't cast the pointer to dlm_header *, we use it as dlm_message * anyway. b) we copy the message into a queue element, then pass the pointer to copy to dlm_receive_message_saved(); declare it properly to make sure that we have the right alignment. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:28:28 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: change error message to debug The invalid lockspace messages are normal and can appear relatively often. They should be suppressed without debugging enabled. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-16 11:03:41 -06:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
dlm: dlm_process_incoming_buffer() fixes * check that length is large enough to cover the non-variable part of message or rcom resp. (after checking that it's large enough to cover the header, of course). * kill more pointless casts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 00:58:46 -05:00
[DLM] block dlm_recv in recovery transition Introduce a per-lockspace rwsem that's held in read mode by dlm_recv threads while working in the dlm. This allows dlm_recv activity to be suspended when the lockspace transitions to, from and between recovery cycles. The specific bug prompting this change is one where an in-progress recovery cycle is aborted by a new recovery cycle. While dlm_recv was processing a recovery message, the recovery cycle was aborted and dlm_recoverd began cleaning up. dlm_recv decremented recover_locks_count on an rsb after dlm_recoverd had reset it to zero. This is fixed by suspending dlm_recv (taking write lock on the rwsem) before aborting the current recovery. The transitions to/from normal and recovery modes are simplified by using this new ability to block dlm_recv. The switch from normal to recovery mode means dlm_recv goes from processing locking messages, to saving them for later, and vice versa. Races are avoided by blocking dlm_recv when setting the flag that switches between modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-09-27 15:53:38 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix lost flags in stub replies When the dlm fakes an unlock/cancel reply from a failed node using a stub message struct, it wasn't setting the flags in the stub message. So, in the process of receiving the fake message the lkb flags would be updated and cleared from the zero flags in the message. The problem observed in tests was the loss of the USER flag which caused the dlm to think a user lock was a kernel lock and subsequently fail an assertion checking the validity of the ast/callback field. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:40:26 -06:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: recover locks waiting for overlap replies When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation, but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters. Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping unlock/cancel ops. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-07 16:15:05 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: recover locks waiting for overlap replies When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation, but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters. Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping unlock/cancel ops. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-07 16:15:05 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: recover locks waiting for overlap replies When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation, but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters. Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping unlock/cancel ops. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-07 16:15:05 -06:00
[DLM] fix lost flags in stub replies When the dlm fakes an unlock/cancel reply from a failed node using a stub message struct, it wasn't setting the flags in the stub message. So, in the process of receiving the fake message the lkb flags would be updated and cleared from the zero flags in the message. The problem observed in tests was the loss of the USER flag which caused the dlm to think a user lock was a kernel lock and subsequently fail an assertion checking the validity of the ast/callback field. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:40:26 -06:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
dlm: recover locks waiting for overlap replies When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation, but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters. Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping unlock/cancel ops. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-07 16:15:05 -06:00
[DLM] fix lost flags in stub replies When the dlm fakes an unlock/cancel reply from a failed node using a stub message struct, it wasn't setting the flags in the stub message. So, in the process of receiving the fake message the lkb flags would be updated and cleared from the zero flags in the message. The problem observed in tests was the loss of the USER flag which caused the dlm to think a user lock was a kernel lock and subsequently fail an assertion checking the validity of the ast/callback field. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:40:26 -06:00
dlm: validate messages before processing There was some hit and miss validation of messages that has now been cleaned up and unified. Before processing a message, the new validate_message() function checks that the lkb is the appropriate type, process-copy or master-copy, and that the message is from the correct nodeid for the the given lkb. Other checks and assertions on the lkb type and nodeid have been removed. The assertions were particularly bad since they would panic the machine instead of just ignoring the bad message. Although other recent patches have made processing old message unlikely, it still may be possible for an old message to be processed and caught by these checks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-09 09:59:41 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: recover locks waiting for overlap replies When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation, but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters. Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping unlock/cancel ops. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-07 16:15:05 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] schedule during long loop through locks The loop through all waiting locks in recover_waiters can potentially be long, so we should schedule explicitly. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-25 14:05:09 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch level Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20 08:47:07 +00:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlock The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-01-07 16:50:41 -06:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix loop in grant_after_purge The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set. The loop was quitting the current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are no more. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-25 13:59:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix loop in grant_after_purge The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set. The loop was quitting the current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are no more. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-25 13:59:48 -05:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
[DLM] fix loop in grant_after_purge The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set. The loop was quitting the current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are no more. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-25 13:59:48 -05:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix grant_after_purge softlockup In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-02 13:34:03 -04:00
[DLM] fix loop in grant_after_purge The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set. The loop was quitting the current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are no more. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-25 13:59:48 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: verify that places expecting rcom_lock have packet long enough Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 19:55:09 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: receive_rcom_lock_args() overflow check Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 20:22:22 -05:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: verify that places expecting rcom_lock have packet long enough Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 19:55:09 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: verify that places expecting rcom_lock have packet long enough Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 19:55:09 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix resend rcom lock There's a chance the new master of resource hasn't learned it's the new master before another node sends it a lock during recovery. The node sending the lock needs to resend if this happens. - A sends a master lookup for resource R to C - B sends a master lookup for resource R to C - C receives A's lookup, assigns A to be master of R and sends a reply back to A - C receives B's lookup and sends a reply back to B saying that A is the master - B receives lookup reply from C and sends its lock for R to A - A receives lock from B, doesn't think it's the master of R and sends an error back to B - A receives lookup reply from C and becomes master of R - B gets error back from A and resends its lock back to A (this resending is what this patch does) - A receives lock from B, it now sees it's the master of R and takes the lock Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:36:37 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
dlm: do not byteswap rcom_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-25 02:08:26 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] fix resend rcom lock There's a chance the new master of resource hasn't learned it's the new master before another node sends it a lock during recovery. The node sending the lock needs to resend if this happens. - A sends a master lookup for resource R to C - B sends a master lookup for resource R to C - C receives A's lookup, assigns A to be master of R and sends a reply back to A - C receives B's lookup and sends a reply back to B saying that A is the master - B receives lookup reply from C and sends its lock for R to A - A receives lock from B, doesn't think it's the master of R and sends an error back to B - A receives lookup reply from C and becomes master of R - B gets error back from A and resends its lock back to A (this resending is what this patch does) - A receives lock from B, it now sees it's the master of R and takes the lock Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-13 10:36:37 -06:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] Pass in lockspace to lkb put function In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-02-28 11:16:37 -05:00
[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVM This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18 09:30:29 +00:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: always use GFP_NOFS Replace all GFP_KERNEL and ls_allocation with GFP_NOFS. ls_allocation would be GFP_KERNEL for userland lockspaces and GFP_NOFS for file system lockspaces. It was discovered that any lockspaces on the system can affect all others by triggering memory reclaim in the file system which could in turn call back into the dlm to acquire locks, deadlocking dlm threads that were shared by all lockspaces, like dlm_recv. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-11-30 16:34:43 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functions The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-11-07 09:06:49 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: eliminate astparam type casting Put lkb_astparam in a union with a dlm_user_args pointer to eliminate a lot of type casting. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 23:27:04 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: always use GFP_NOFS Replace all GFP_KERNEL and ls_allocation with GFP_NOFS. ls_allocation would be GFP_KERNEL for userland lockspaces and GFP_NOFS for file system lockspaces. It was discovered that any lockspaces on the system can affect all others by triggering memory reclaim in the file system which could in turn call back into the dlm to acquire locks, deadlocking dlm threads that were shared by all lockspaces, like dlm_recv. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2009-11-30 16:34:43 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] preserve lksb address in user conversions This patch fixes bz#203444 where the LKSB was lost during userland conversion operations Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-23 09:49:31 +01:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm_device interface changes [3/6] Change the user/kernel device interface used by libdlm: - Add ability for userspace to check the version of the interface. libdlm can now adapt to different versions of the kernel interface. - Increase the size of the flags passed in a lock request so all possible flags can be used from userspace. - Add an opaque "xid" value for each lock. This "transaction id" will be used later to associate locks with each other during deadlock detection. - Add a "timeout" value for each lock. This is used along with the DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT flag. Also, remove a fragment of unused code in device_read(). This patch requires updating libdlm which is backward compatible with older kernels. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:00:32 -05:00
dlm: proper types for asts and basts Use proper types for ast and bast functions, and use consistent type for ast param. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 00:35:45 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] cancel in conversion deadlock [4/6] When conversion deadlock is detected, cancel the conversion and return EDEADLK to the application. This is a new default behavior where before the dlm would allow the deadlock to exist indefinately. The DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT flag can now be used in a conversion to prevent the dlm from performing conversion deadlock detection/cancelation on it. The DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK flag can continue to be used as before to tell the dlm to demote the granted mode of the lock being converted if it gets into a conversion deadlock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 09:01:26 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: eliminate astparam type casting Put lkb_astparam in a union with a dlm_user_args pointer to eliminate a lot of type casting. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 23:27:04 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] don't overwrite castparam if it's NULL If the castaddr passed to the userland API is NULL then don't overwrite the existing castparam. This allows a different thread to cancel a lock request and the CANCEL AST gets delivered to the original thread. bz#306391 (for RHEL4) refers. Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-10-01 15:28:42 +01:00
[DLM] fix userland unlock This patch fixes the userland DLM unlock code so that it correctly returns the address of the userland lock status block in its completion AST. It fixes bug #201348 Patrick Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-08 10:34:40 -04:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: eliminate astparam type casting Put lkb_astparam in a union with a dlm_user_args pointer to eliminate a lot of type casting. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 23:27:04 -06:00
[DLM] don't overwrite castparam if it's NULL If the castaddr passed to the userland API is NULL then don't overwrite the existing castparam. This allows a different thread to cancel a lock request and the CANCEL AST gets delivered to the original thread. bz#306391 (for RHEL4) refers. Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-10-01 15:28:42 +01:00
[DLM] down conversion clearing flags Oh, and here's (hopefully) the last of these ua_tmp patches. I think I've caught all the paths now. Sorry it didn't make the last one. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-23 10:24:03 +01:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] canceling deadlocked lock Add a function that can be used through libdlm by a system daemon to cancel another process's deadlocked lock. A completion ast with EDEADLK is returned to the process waiting for the lock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 08:46:00 -05:00
dlm: eliminate astparam type casting Put lkb_astparam in a union with a dlm_user_args pointer to eliminate a lot of type casting. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 23:27:04 -06:00
[DLM] canceling deadlocked lock Add a function that can be used through libdlm by a system daemon to cancel another process's deadlocked lock. A completion ast with EDEADLK is returned to the process waiting for the lock. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 08:46:00 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: eliminate astparam type casting Put lkb_astparam in a union with a dlm_user_args pointer to eliminate a lot of type casting. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 23:27:04 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
dlm: eliminate astparam type casting Put lkb_astparam in a union with a dlm_user_args pointer to eliminate a lot of type casting. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-06 23:27:04 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] timeout fixes Various fixes related to the new timeout feature: - add_timeout() missed setting TIMEWARN flag on lkb's when the TIMEOUT flag was already set - clear_proc_locks should remove a dead process's locks from the timeout list - the end-of-life calculation for user locks needs to consider that ETIMEDOUT is equivalent to -DLM_ECANCEL - make initial default timewarn_cs config value visible in configfs - change bit position of TIMEOUT_CANCEL flag so it's not copied to a remote master node - set timestamp on remote lkb's so a lock dump will display the time they've been waiting Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-29 08:44:23 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
[DLM] overlapping cancel and unlock Full cancel and force-unlock support. In the past, cancel and force-unlock wouldn't work if there was another operation in progress on the lock. Now, both cancel and unlock-force can overlap an operation on a lock, meaning there may be 2 or 3 operations in progress on a lock in parallel. This support is important not only because cancel and force-unlock are explicit operations that an app can use, but both are used implicitly when a process exits while holding locks. Summary of changes: - add-to and remove-from waiters functions were rewritten to handle situations with more than one remote operation outstanding on a lock - validate_unlock_args detects when an overlapping cancel/unlock-force can be sent and when it needs to be delayed until a request/lookup reply is received - processing request/lookup replies detects when cancel/unlock-force occured during the op, and carries out the delayed cancel/unlock-force - manipulation of the "waiters" (remote operation) state of a lock moved under the standard rsb mutex that protects all the other lock state - the two recovery routines related to locks on the waiters list changed according to the way lkb's are now locked before accessing waiters state - waiters recovery detects when lkb's being recovered have overlapping cancel/unlock-force, and may not recover such locks - revert_lock (cancel) returns a value to distinguish cases where it did nothing vs cases where it actually did a cancel; the cancel completion ast should only be done when cancel did something - orphaned locks put on new list so they can be found later for purging - cancel must be called on a lock when making it an orphan - flag user locks (ENDOFLIFE) at the end of their useful life (to the application) so we can return an error for any further cancel/unlock-force - we weren't setting COMP/BAST ast flags if one was already set, so we'd lose either a completion or blocking ast - clear an unread bast on a lock that's become unlocked Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-28 09:56:46 -05:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
dlm: clear ast_type when removing from astqueue The lkb_ast_type field indicates whether the lkb is on the astqueue list. When clearing locks for a process, lkb's were being removed from the astqueue list without clearing the field. If release_lockspace then happened immediately afterward, it could try to remove the lkb from the list a second time. Appears when process calls libdlm dlm_release_lockspace() which first closes the ls dev triggering clear_proc_locks, and then removes the ls (a write to control dev) causing release_lockspace(). Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-07 15:55:18 -06:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
[DLM] add orphan purging code (1/2) Add code for purging orphan locks. A process can also purge all of its own non-orphan locks by passing a pid of zero. Code already exists for processes to create persistent locks that become orphans when the process exits, but the complimentary capability for another process to then purge these orphans has been missing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-30 15:02:40 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] add orphan purging code (1/2) Add code for purging orphan locks. A process can also purge all of its own non-orphan locks by passing a pid of zero. Code already exists for processes to create persistent locks that become orphans when the process exits, but the complimentary capability for another process to then purge these orphans has been missing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-30 15:02:40 -05:00
[DLM] block scand during recovery [1/6] Don't let dlm_scand run during recovery since it may try to do a resource directory removal while the directory nodes are changing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-05-18 08:58:15 -05:00
[DLM] add orphan purging code (1/2) Add code for purging orphan locks. A process can also purge all of its own non-orphan locks by passing a pid of zero. Code already exists for processes to create persistent locks that become orphans when the process exits, but the complimentary capability for another process to then purge these orphans has been missing. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-03-30 15:02:40 -05:00