kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-04 19:54:59 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs

688 lines
25 KiB
Raw Normal View History

rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add examples This adds two examples of how to use the workqueue. The first example shows how to use it when you only have one `work_struct` field, and the second example shows how to use it when you have multiple `work_struct` fields. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:07 +00:00
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from the correct modules. It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't think we can do anything about that. There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness improvement. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com [ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:58:37 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add examples This adds two examples of how to use the workqueue. The first example shows how to use it when you only have one `work_struct` field, and the second example shows how to use it when you have multiple `work_struct` fields. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:07 +00:00
rust: init: update `init` module to take allocation flags This is the last component in the conversion for allocators to take allocation flags as parameters. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-10-wedsonaf@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-27 22:36:02 -03:00
rust: workqueue: add examples This adds two examples of how to use the workqueue. The first example shows how to use it when you only have one `work_struct` field, and the second example shows how to use it when you have multiple `work_struct` fields. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:07 +00:00
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from the correct modules. It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't think we can do anything about that. There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness improvement. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com [ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:58:37 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add examples This adds two examples of how to use the workqueue. The first example shows how to use it when you only have one `work_struct` field, and the second example shows how to use it when you have multiple `work_struct` fields. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:07 +00:00
rust: init: update `init` module to take allocation flags This is the last component in the conversion for allocators to take allocation flags as parameters. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-10-wedsonaf@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-27 22:36:02 -03:00
rust: workqueue: add examples This adds two examples of how to use the workqueue. The first example shows how to use it when you only have one `work_struct` field, and the second example shows how to use it when you have multiple `work_struct` fields. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:07 +00:00
rust: support `srctree`-relative links Some of our links use relative paths in order to point to files in the source tree, e.g.: //! C header: [`include/linux/printk.h`](../../../../include/linux/printk.h) /// [`struct mutex`]: ../../../../include/linux/mutex.h These are problematic because they are hard to maintain and do not support `O=` builds. Instead, provide support for `srctree`-relative links, e.g.: //! C header: [`include/linux/printk.h`](srctree/include/linux/printk.h) /// [`struct mutex`]: srctree/include/linux/mutex.h The links are fixed after `rustdoc` generation to be based on the absolute path to the source tree. Essentially, this is the automatic version of Tomonori's fix [1], suggested by Gary [2]. Suggested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reported-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026.204058.2167744626131849993.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com [1] Fixes: 48fadf440075 ("docs: Move rustdoc output, cross-reference it") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231026154525.6d14b495@eugeo/ [2] Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215235428.243211-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2023-12-16 00:54:28 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: kernel: remove usage of `allocator_api` unstable feature With the adoption of `BoxExt` and `VecExt`, we don't need the functions provided by this feature (namely the methods prefixed with `try_` and different allocator per collection instance). We do need `AllocError`, but we define our own as it is a trivial empty struct. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-11-wedsonaf@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-27 22:36:03 -03:00
rust: kernel: remove redundant imports Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports. In the upcoming 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports [1], e.g.: error: the item `bindings` is imported redundantly --> rust/kernel/print.rs:38:9 | 38 | use crate::bindings; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the item `bindings` is already defined by prelude Most cases are `use crate::bindings`, plus a few other items like `Box`. Thus clean them up. Note that, in the `bindings` case, the message "defined by prelude" above means the extern prelude, i.e. the `--extern` flags we pass. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117772 [1] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401212303.537355-3-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-04-01 23:23:02 +02:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from the correct modules. It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't think we can do anything about that. There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness improvement. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com [ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:58:37 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: kernel: mark code fragments in docs with backticks Fix places where comments include code fragments that are not enclosed in backticks. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-8-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:30 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
workqueue: rust: sync with `WORK_CPU_UNBOUND` change Commit e563d0a7cdc1 ("workqueue: Break up enum definitions and give names to the types") gives a name to the `enum` where `WORK_CPU_UNBOUND` was defined, so `bindgen` changes its output from e.g.: pub type _bindgen_ty_10 = core::ffi::c_uint; pub const WORK_CPU_UNBOUND: _bindgen_ty_10 = 64; to e.g.: pub type wq_misc_consts = core::ffi::c_uint; pub const wq_misc_consts_WORK_CPU_UNBOUND: wq_misc_consts = 64; Thus update Rust's side to match the change (which requires a slight reformat of the code), fixing the build error. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72=9PZ89bCAVX0ZV4cqrYSLoZWyn-d_K4KpBMHjwUMdC3A@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: e563d0a7cdc1 ("workqueue: Break up enum definitions and give names to the types") Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-02-01 20:06:20 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: init: update `init` module to take allocation flags This is the last component in the conversion for allocators to take allocation flags as parameters. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328013603.206764-10-wedsonaf@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-27 22:36:02 -03:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: kernel: fix multiple typos in documentation Fixes multiple trivial typos in documentation and comments of the kernel crate. allocator: - Fix a trivial list item alignment issue in the last SAFETY comment of `krealloc_aligned`. init: - Replace 'type' with 'trait' in the doc comments of the `PinInit` and `Init` traits. - Add colons before starting lists. - Add spaces between the type and equal sign to respect the code formatting rules in example code. - End a sentence with a full stop instead of a colon. ioctl: - Replace 'an' with 'a' where appropriate. str: - Replace 'Return' with 'Returns' in the doc comment of `bytes_written` as the text describes what the function does. sync/lock: - Fix a trivial list item alignment issue in the Safety section of the `Backend` trait's description. sync/lock/spinlock: - The code in this module operates on spinlocks, not mutexes. Thus, replace 'mutex' with 'spinlock' in the SAFETY comment of `unlock`. workqueue: - Replace "wont" with "won't" in the doc comment of `__enqueue`. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-1-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:23 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings Define basic low-level bindings to a kernel workqueue. The API defined here can only be used unsafely. Later commits will provide safe wrappers. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:02 +00:00
rust: workqueue: define built-in queues We provide these methods because it lets us access these queues from Rust without using unsafe code. These methods return `&'static Queue`. References annotated with the 'static lifetime are used when the referent will stay alive forever. That is ok for these queues because they are global variables and cannot be destroyed. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:03 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add `#[pin_data]` to `Work` The previous two patches made it possible to add `#[pin_data]` on structs with default generic parameter values. This patch makes `Work` use `#[pin_data]` and removes an invocation of `pin_init_from_closure`. This function is intended as a low level manual escape hatch, so it is better to rely on the safe `pin_init!` macro. Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240309155243.482334-3-benno.lossin@proton.me Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-09 15:54:52 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add `#[pin_data]` to `Work` The previous two patches made it possible to add `#[pin_data]` on structs with default generic parameter values. This patch makes `Work` use `#[pin_data]` and removes an invocation of `pin_init_from_closure`. This function is intended as a low level manual escape hatch, so it is better to rely on the safe `pin_init!` macro. Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240309155243.482334-3-benno.lossin@proton.me Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-09 15:54:52 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add `#[pin_data]` to `Work` The previous two patches made it possible to add `#[pin_data]` on structs with default generic parameter values. This patch makes `Work` use `#[pin_data]` and removes an invocation of `pin_init_from_closure`. This function is intended as a low level manual escape hatch, so it is better to rely on the safe `pin_init!` macro. Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240309155243.482334-3-benno.lossin@proton.me Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-03-09 15:54:52 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from the correct modules. It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't think we can do anything about that. There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness improvement. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com [ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:58:37 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: mark code fragments in docs with backticks Fix places where comments include code fragments that are not enclosed in backticks. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-8-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:30 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: mark code fragments in docs with backticks Fix places where comments include code fragments that are not enclosed in backticks. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-8-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:30 +01:00
rust: kernel: add doclinks Add doclinks to existing documentation. Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-doc-fixes-v3-v3-10-0c8af94ed7de@valentinobst.de Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 21:23:32 +01:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from the correct modules. It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't think we can do anything about that. There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness improvement. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com [ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:58:37 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more generics Make the impl_has_work macro compatible with more complex generics such as lifetimes and const generic arguments. Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ME0P282MB4890A180B99490CC65EF64FDCCEB2@ME0P282MB4890.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077 [ Wrapped message to 72 columns. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-05-23 00:08:46 +08:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more generics Make the impl_has_work macro compatible with more complex generics such as lifetimes and const generic arguments. Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ME0P282MB4890A180B99490CC65EF64FDCCEB2@ME0P282MB4890.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077 [ Wrapped message to 72 columns. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-05-23 00:08:46 +08:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more generics Make the impl_has_work macro compatible with more complex generics such as lifetimes and const generic arguments. Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ME0P282MB4890A180B99490CC65EF64FDCCEB2@ME0P282MB4890.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077 [ Wrapped message to 72 columns. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-05-23 00:08:46 +08:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more generics Make the impl_has_work macro compatible with more complex generics such as lifetimes and const generic arguments. Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ME0P282MB4890A180B99490CC65EF64FDCCEB2@ME0P282MB4890.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077 [ Wrapped message to 72 columns. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-05-23 00:08:46 +08:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more generics Make the impl_has_work macro compatible with more complex generics such as lifetimes and const generic arguments. Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ME0P282MB4890A180B99490CC65EF64FDCCEB2@ME0P282MB4890.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077 [ Wrapped message to 72 columns. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-05-23 00:08:46 +08:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from the correct modules. It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't think we can do anything about that. There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness improvement. Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com [ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-01-29 14:58:37 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields The main challenge with defining `work_struct` fields is making sure that the function pointer stored in the `work_struct` is appropriate for the work item type it is embedded in. It needs to know the offset of the `work_struct` field being used (even if there are several!) so that it can do a `container_of`, and it needs to know the type of the work item so that it can call into the right user-provided code. All of this needs to happen in a way that provides a safe API to the user, so that users of the workqueue cannot mix up the function pointers. There are three important pieces that are relevant when doing this: * The pointer type. * The work item struct. This is what the pointer points at. * The `work_struct` field. This is a field of the work item struct. This patch introduces a separate trait for each piece. The pointer type is given a `WorkItemPointer` trait, which pointer types need to implement to be usable with the workqueue. This trait will be implemented for `Arc` and `Box` in a later patch in this patchset. Implementing this trait is unsafe because this is where the `container_of` operation happens, but user-code will not need to implement it themselves. The work item struct should then implement the `WorkItem` trait. This trait is where user-code specifies what they want to happen when a work item is executed. It also specifies what the correct pointer type is. Finally, to make the work item struct know the offset of its `work_struct` field, we use a trait called `HasWork<T, ID>`. If a type implements this trait, then the type declares that, at the given offset, there is a field of type `Work<T, ID>`. The trait is marked unsafe because the OFFSET constant must be correct, but we provide an `impl_has_work!` macro that can safely implement `HasWork<T>` on a type. The macro expands to something that only compiles if the specified field really has the type `Work<T>`. It is used like this: ``` struct MyWorkItem { work_field: Work<MyWorkItem, 1>, } impl_has_work! { impl HasWork<MyWorkItem, 1> for MyWorkItem { self.work_field } } ``` Note that since the `Work` type is annotated with an id, you can have several `work_struct` fields by using a different id for each one. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:04 +00:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more generics Make the impl_has_work macro compatible with more complex generics such as lifetimes and const generic arguments. Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ME0P282MB4890A180B99490CC65EF64FDCCEB2@ME0P282MB4890.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077 [ Wrapped message to 72 columns. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-05-23 00:08:46 +08:00
rust: workqueue: add `try_spawn` helper method This adds a convenience method that lets you spawn a closure for execution on a workqueue. This will be the most convenient way to use workqueues, but it is fallible because it needs to allocate memory. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:06 +00:00
rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe` blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1]. Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0, Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2]. Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already. Thus enable the lint now. We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for new contributors. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-04 22:43:32 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: enable `clippy::unnecessary_safety_comment` lint In Rust 1.67.0, Clippy added the `unnecessary_safety_comment` lint [1], which is the "inverse" of `undocumented_unsafe_blocks`: it finds places where safe code has a `// SAFETY` comment attached. The lint currently finds 3 places where we had such mistakes, thus it seems already quite useful. Thus clean those and enable it. Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/unnecessary_safety_comment [1] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-6-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-04 22:43:33 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe` blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1]. Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0, Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2]. Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already. Thus enable the lint now. We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for new contributors. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-04 22:43:32 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe` blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1]. Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0, Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2]. Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already. Thus enable the lint now. We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for new contributors. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-04 22:43:32 +02:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: enable `clippy::unnecessary_safety_comment` lint In Rust 1.67.0, Clippy added the `unnecessary_safety_comment` lint [1], which is the "inverse" of `undocumented_unsafe_blocks`: it finds places where safe code has a `// SAFETY` comment attached. The lint currently finds 3 places where we had such mistakes, thus it seems already quite useful. Thus clean those and enable it. Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/unnecessary_safety_comment [1] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-6-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-04 22:43:33 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe` blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1]. Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0, Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2]. Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already. Thus enable the lint now. We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for new contributors. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-04 22:43:32 +02:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: treewide: switch to our kernel `Box` type Now that we got the kernel `Box` type in place, convert all existing `Box` users to make use of it. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-13-dakr@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 17:41:16 +02:00
rust: workqueue: implement `WorkItemPointer` for pointer types This implements the `WorkItemPointer` trait for the pointer types that you are likely to use the workqueue with. The `Arc` type is for reference counted objects, and the `Pin<Box<T>>` type is for objects where the caller has exclusive ownership of the object. Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:05 +00:00
rust: workqueue: define built-in queues We provide these methods because it lets us access these queues from Rust without using unsafe code. These methods return `&'static Queue`. References annotated with the 'static lifetime are used when the referent will stay alive forever. That is ok for these queues because they are global variables and cannot be destroyed. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@metaspace.dk> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-08-28 10:48:03 +00:00