linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c

1317 lines
36 KiB

PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Change the PM core's behavior related to power domains in such a way that, if a power domain is defined for a given device, its callbacks will be executed instead of and not in addition to the device subsystem's PM callbacks. The idea behind the initial implementation of power domains handling by the PM core was that power domain callbacks would be executed in addition to subsystem callbacks, so that it would be possible to extend the subsystem callbacks by using power domains. It turns out, however, that this wouldn't be really convenient in some important situations. For example, there are systems in which power can only be removed from entire power domains. On those systems it is not desirable to execute device drivers' PM callbacks until it is known that power is going to be removed from the devices in question, which means that they should be executed by power domain callbacks rather then by subsystem (e.g. bus type) PM callbacks, because subsystems generally have no information about what devices belong to which power domain. Thus, for instance, if the bus type in question is the platform bus type, its PM callbacks generally should not be called in addition to power domain callbacks, because they run device drivers' callbacks unconditionally if defined. While in principle the default subsystem PM callbacks, or a subset of them, may be replaced with different functions, it doesn't seem correct to do so, because that would change the subsystem's behavior with respect to all devices in the system, regardless of whether or not they belong to any power domains. Thus, the only remaining option is to make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-04-29 00:35:50 +02:00
PM: Make system-wide PM and runtime PM treat subsystems consistently The code handling system-wide power transitions (eg. suspend-to-RAM) can in theory execute callbacks provided by the device's bus type, device type and class in each phase of the power transition. In turn, the runtime PM core code only calls one of those callbacks at a time, preferring bus type callbacks to device type or class callbacks and device type callbacks to class callbacks. It seems reasonable to make them both behave in the same way in that respect. Moreover, even though a device may belong to two subsystems (eg. bus type and device class) simultaneously, in practice power management callbacks for system-wide power transitions are always provided by only one of them (ie. if the bus type callbacks are defined, the device class ones are not and vice versa). Thus it is possible to modify the code handling system-wide power transitions so that it follows the core runtime PM code (ie. treats the subsystem callbacks as mutually exclusive). On the other hand, the core runtime PM code will choose to execute, for example, a runtime suspend callback provided by the device type even if the bus type's struct dev_pm_ops object exists, but the runtime_suspend pointer in it happens to be NULL. This is confusing, because it may lead to the execution of callbacks from different subsystems during different operations (eg. the bus type suspend callback may be executed during runtime suspend of the device, while the device type callback will be executed during system suspend). Make all of the power management code treat subsystem callbacks in a consistent way, such that: (1) If the device's type is defined (eg. dev->type is not NULL) and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->type->pm will be used. (2) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL, but the device's class is defined (eg. dev->class is not NULL) and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->class->pm will be used. (3) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL and dev->class is NULL or dev->class->pm is NULL, the callbacks from dev->bus->pm will be used provided that both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are not NULL. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Reasoning-sounds-sane-to: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-02-18 23:20:21 +01:00
PM / Runtime: Use device PM QoS constraints (v2) Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1). Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level .runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used by the core code when the device's parent is suspended). Introduce a new helper function, pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended device. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-12-01 00:01:31 +01:00
PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Change the PM core's behavior related to power domains in such a way that, if a power domain is defined for a given device, its callbacks will be executed instead of and not in addition to the device subsystem's PM callbacks. The idea behind the initial implementation of power domains handling by the PM core was that power domain callbacks would be executed in addition to subsystem callbacks, so that it would be possible to extend the subsystem callbacks by using power domains. It turns out, however, that this wouldn't be really convenient in some important situations. For example, there are systems in which power can only be removed from entire power domains. On those systems it is not desirable to execute device drivers' PM callbacks until it is known that power is going to be removed from the devices in question, which means that they should be executed by power domain callbacks rather then by subsystem (e.g. bus type) PM callbacks, because subsystems generally have no information about what devices belong to which power domain. Thus, for instance, if the bus type in question is the platform bus type, its PM callbacks generally should not be called in addition to power domain callbacks, because they run device drivers' callbacks unconditionally if defined. While in principle the default subsystem PM callbacks, or a subset of them, may be replaced with different functions, it doesn't seem correct to do so, because that would change the subsystem's behavior with respect to all devices in the system, regardless of whether or not they belong to any power domains. Thus, the only remaining option is to make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-04-29 00:35:50 +02:00
PM: Make system-wide PM and runtime PM treat subsystems consistently The code handling system-wide power transitions (eg. suspend-to-RAM) can in theory execute callbacks provided by the device's bus type, device type and class in each phase of the power transition. In turn, the runtime PM core code only calls one of those callbacks at a time, preferring bus type callbacks to device type or class callbacks and device type callbacks to class callbacks. It seems reasonable to make them both behave in the same way in that respect. Moreover, even though a device may belong to two subsystems (eg. bus type and device class) simultaneously, in practice power management callbacks for system-wide power transitions are always provided by only one of them (ie. if the bus type callbacks are defined, the device class ones are not and vice versa). Thus it is possible to modify the code handling system-wide power transitions so that it follows the core runtime PM code (ie. treats the subsystem callbacks as mutually exclusive). On the other hand, the core runtime PM code will choose to execute, for example, a runtime suspend callback provided by the device type even if the bus type's struct dev_pm_ops object exists, but the runtime_suspend pointer in it happens to be NULL. This is confusing, because it may lead to the execution of callbacks from different subsystems during different operations (eg. the bus type suspend callback may be executed during runtime suspend of the device, while the device type callback will be executed during system suspend). Make all of the power management code treat subsystem callbacks in a consistent way, such that: (1) If the device's type is defined (eg. dev->type is not NULL) and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->type->pm will be used. (2) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL, but the device's class is defined (eg. dev->class is not NULL) and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->class->pm will be used. (3) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL and dev->class is NULL or dev->class->pm is NULL, the callbacks from dev->bus->pm will be used provided that both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are not NULL. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Reasoning-sounds-sane-to: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-02-18 23:20:21 +01:00
PM / Runtime: Use device PM QoS constraints (v2) Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1). Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level .runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used by the core code when the device's parent is suspended). Introduce a new helper function, pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended device. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-12-01 00:01:31 +01:00
PM / Runtime: Use device PM QoS constraints (v2) Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1). Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level .runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used by the core code when the device's parent is suspended). Introduce a new helper function, pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended device. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-12-01 00:01:31 +01:00
PM / Runtime: Use device PM QoS constraints (v2) Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1). Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level .runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used by the core code when the device's parent is suspended). Introduce a new helper function, pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended device. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-12-01 00:01:31 +01:00
PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Change the PM core's behavior related to power domains in such a way that, if a power domain is defined for a given device, its callbacks will be executed instead of and not in addition to the device subsystem's PM callbacks. The idea behind the initial implementation of power domains handling by the PM core was that power domain callbacks would be executed in addition to subsystem callbacks, so that it would be possible to extend the subsystem callbacks by using power domains. It turns out, however, that this wouldn't be really convenient in some important situations. For example, there are systems in which power can only be removed from entire power domains. On those systems it is not desirable to execute device drivers' PM callbacks until it is known that power is going to be removed from the devices in question, which means that they should be executed by power domain callbacks rather then by subsystem (e.g. bus type) PM callbacks, because subsystems generally have no information about what devices belong to which power domain. Thus, for instance, if the bus type in question is the platform bus type, its PM callbacks generally should not be called in addition to power domain callbacks, because they run device drivers' callbacks unconditionally if defined. While in principle the default subsystem PM callbacks, or a subset of them, may be replaced with different functions, it doesn't seem correct to do so, because that would change the subsystem's behavior with respect to all devices in the system, regardless of whether or not they belong to any power domains. Thus, the only remaining option is to make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem callbacks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-04-29 00:35:50 +02:00
PM: Make system-wide PM and runtime PM treat subsystems consistently The code handling system-wide power transitions (eg. suspend-to-RAM) can in theory execute callbacks provided by the device's bus type, device type and class in each phase of the power transition. In turn, the runtime PM core code only calls one of those callbacks at a time, preferring bus type callbacks to device type or class callbacks and device type callbacks to class callbacks. It seems reasonable to make them both behave in the same way in that respect. Moreover, even though a device may belong to two subsystems (eg. bus type and device class) simultaneously, in practice power management callbacks for system-wide power transitions are always provided by only one of them (ie. if the bus type callbacks are defined, the device class ones are not and vice versa). Thus it is possible to modify the code handling system-wide power transitions so that it follows the core runtime PM code (ie. treats the subsystem callbacks as mutually exclusive). On the other hand, the core runtime PM code will choose to execute, for example, a runtime suspend callback provided by the device type even if the bus type's struct dev_pm_ops object exists, but the runtime_suspend pointer in it happens to be NULL. This is confusing, because it may lead to the execution of callbacks from different subsystems during different operations (eg. the bus type suspend callback may be executed during runtime suspend of the device, while the device type callback will be executed during system suspend). Make all of the power management code treat subsystem callbacks in a consistent way, such that: (1) If the device's type is defined (eg. dev->type is not NULL) and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->type->pm will be used. (2) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL, but the device's class is defined (eg. dev->class is not NULL) and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->class->pm will be used. (3) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL and dev->class is NULL or dev->class->pm is NULL, the callbacks from dev->bus->pm will be used provided that both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are not NULL. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Reasoning-sounds-sane-to: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-02-18 23:20:21 +01:00