kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-10 20:48:12 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h

171 lines
4 KiB
Raw Normal View History

arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: Update 'unwinder howto' Implementing a new unwinder is a bit more involved than writing a couple of helpers, so let's not lure the reader into a false sense of comfort. Instead, let's point out what they should call into, and what sort of parameter they need to provide. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-7-maz@kernel.org
2022-07-27 15:29:06 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h Add brief description on how to use stacktrace/common.h to implement a stack unwinder. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-7-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:39 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: fix kerneldoc comments Many of the comment blocks in the arm64 stacktrace code are *almost* kerneldoc, but not quite. Convert them to kerneldoc, as was presumably originally intended. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-2-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:38 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: rework stack boundary discovery In subsequent patches we'll want to acquire the stack boundaries ahead-of-time, and we'll need to be able to acquire the relevant stack_info regardless of whether we have an object the happens to be on the stack. This patch replaces the on_XXX_stack() helpers with stackinfo_get_XXX() helpers, with the caller being responsible for the checking whether an object is on a relevant stack. For the moment this is moved into the on_accessible_stack() functions, making these slightly larger; subsequent patches will remove the on_accessible_stack() functions and simplify the logic. The on_irq_stack() and on_task_stack() helpers are kept as these are used by IRQ entry sequences and stackleak respectively. As they're only used as predicates, the stack_info pointer parameter is removed in both cases. As the on_accessible_stack() functions are always passed a non-NULL info pointer, these now update info unconditionally. When updating the type to STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN, the low/high bounds are also modified, but as these will not be consumed this should have no adverse affect. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-7-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:43 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: add stackinfo_on_stack() helper Factor the core predicate out of on_stack() into a helper which can be used on a pre-populated stack_info. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-6-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:42 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: factor out kernel unwind state On arm64 we share some unwinding code between the regular kernel unwinder and the KVM hyp unwinder. Some of this common code only matters to the regular unwinder, e.g. the `kr_cur` and `task` fields in the common struct unwind_state. We're likely to add more state which only matters for regular kernel unwinding (or only for hyp unwinding). In preparation for such changes, this patch factors out the kernel-specific state into a new struct kunwind_state, and updates the kernel unwind code accordingly. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231124110511.2795958-2-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2023-11-24 11:05:10 +00:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: fix kerneldoc comments Many of the comment blocks in the arm64 stacktrace code are *almost* kerneldoc, but not quite. Convert them to kerneldoc, as was presumably originally intended. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-2-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:38 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions Having multiple versions of on_accessible_stack() (one per unwinder) makes it very hard to reason about what is used where due to the complexity of the various includes, the forward declarations, and the reliance on everything being 'inline'. Instead, move the code back where it should be. Each unwinder implements: - on_accessible_stack() as well as the helpers it depends on, - unwind()/unwind_next(), as they pass on_accessible_stack as a parameter to unwind_next_common() (which is the only common code here) This hardly results in any duplication, and makes it much easier to reason about the code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-4-maz@kernel.org
2022-07-27 15:29:03 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: fix kerneldoc comments Many of the comment blocks in the arm64 stacktrace code are *almost* kerneldoc, but not quite. Convert them to kerneldoc, as was presumably originally intended. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-2-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:38 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions Having multiple versions of on_accessible_stack() (one per unwinder) makes it very hard to reason about what is used where due to the complexity of the various includes, the forward declarations, and the reliance on everything being 'inline'. Instead, move the code back where it should be. Each unwinder implements: - on_accessible_stack() as well as the helpers it depends on, - unwind()/unwind_next(), as they pass on_accessible_stack as a parameter to unwind_next_common() (which is the only common code here) This hardly results in any duplication, and makes it much easier to reason about the code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-4-maz@kernel.org
2022-07-27 15:29:03 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions Having multiple versions of on_accessible_stack() (one per unwinder) makes it very hard to reason about what is used where due to the complexity of the various includes, the forward declarations, and the reliance on everything being 'inline'. Instead, move the code back where it should be. Each unwinder implements: - on_accessible_stack() as well as the helpers it depends on, - unwind()/unwind_next(), as they pass on_accessible_stack as a parameter to unwind_next_common() (which is the only common code here) This hardly results in any duplication, and makes it much easier to reason about the code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-4-maz@kernel.org
2022-07-27 15:29:03 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: rename unwind_next_common() -> unwind_next_frame_record() The unwind_next_common() function unwinds a single frame record. There are other unwind steps (e.g. unwinding through trampolines) which are handled in the regular kernel unwinder, and in future there may be other common unwind helpers. Clarify the purpose of unwind_next_common() by renaming it to unwind_next_frame_record(). At the same time, add commentary, and delete the redundant comment at the top of asm/stacktrace/common.h. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-4-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:40 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track hyp stacks in unwinder's address space Currently unwind_next_frame_record() has an optional callback to convert the address space of the FP. This is necessary for the NVHE unwinder, which tracks the stacks in the hyp VA space, but accesses the frame records in the kernel VA space. This is a bit unfortunate since it clutters unwind_next_frame_record(), which will get in the way of future rework. Instead, this patch changes the NVHE unwinder to track the stacks in the kernel's VA space and translate to FP prior to calling unwind_next_frame_record(). This removes the need for the translate_fp() callback, as all unwinders consistently track stacks in the native address space of the unwinder. At the same time, this patch consolidates the generation of the stack addresses behind the stackinfo_get_*() helpers. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:46 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack unwinder, later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-4-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:36 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: use a common struct frame_record Currently the signal handling code has its own struct frame_record, the definition of struct pt_regs open-codes a frame record as an array, and the kernel unwinder hard-codes frame record offsets. Move to a common struct frame_record that can be used throughout the kernel. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-6-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:33 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: track hyp stacks in unwinder's address space Currently unwind_next_frame_record() has an optional callback to convert the address space of the FP. This is necessary for the NVHE unwinder, which tracks the stacks in the hyp VA space, but accesses the frame records in the kernel VA space. This is a bit unfortunate since it clutters unwind_next_frame_record(), which will get in the way of future rework. Instead, this patch changes the NVHE unwinder to track the stacks in the kernel's VA space and translate to FP prior to calling unwind_next_frame_record(). This removes the need for the translate_fp() callback, as all unwinders consistently track stacks in the native address space of the unwinder. At the same time, this patch consolidates the generation of the stack addresses behind the stackinfo_get_*() helpers. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:46 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack unwinder, later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-4-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:36 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack() When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and* to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care about one type of object which does not overlap other objects. In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record). To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries. As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack(). There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:37 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack unwinder, later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-4-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:36 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must track the prior FP values. This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and visited stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2022-09-01 14:06:45 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack unwinder, later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-4-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:36 -07:00
arm64: use a common struct frame_record Currently the signal handling code has its own struct frame_record, the definition of struct pt_regs open-codes a frame record as an array, and the kernel unwinder hard-codes frame record offsets. Move to a common struct frame_record that can be used throughout the kernel. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-6-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-10-17 10:25:33 +01:00
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack unwinder, later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-4-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:36 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind() Move unwind() to stacktrace/common.h, and as a result the kernel unwind_next() to asm/stacktrace.h. This allow reusing unwind() in the implementation of the nVHE HYP stack unwinder, later in the series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-6-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:38 -07:00
arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code In order to reuse the arm64 stack unwinding logic for the nVHE hypervisor stack, move the common code to a shared header (arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h). The nVHE hypervisor cannot safely link against kernel code, so we make use of the shared header to avoid duplicated logic later in this series. Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-2-kaleshsingh@google.com
2022-07-26 00:37:34 -07:00