linux/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c

1644 lines
42 KiB

drm/amdgpu: Modify the contiguous flags behaviour Now we have two flags for contiguous VRAM buffer allocation. If the application request for AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS, it would set the ttm place TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS flag in the buffer's placement function. This patch will change the default behaviour of the two flags. When we set AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS - This means contiguous is not mandatory. - we will try to allocate the contiguous buffer. Say if the allocation fails, we fallback to allocate the individual pages. When we setTTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS - This means contiguous allocation is mandatory. - we are setting this in amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted() before bo validation and check this flag in the vram manager file. - if this is set, we should allocate the buffer pages contiguously. the allocation fails, we return -ENOSPC. v2: - keep the mem_flags and bo->flags check as is(Christian) - place the TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS flag setting into the amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted function placement range iteration loop(Christian) - rename find_pages with amdgpu_vram_mgr_calculate_pages_per_block (Christian) - Keep the kernel BO allocation as is(Christain) - If BO pin vram allocation failed, we need to return -ENOSPC as RDMA cannot work with scattered VRAM pages(Philip) v3(Christian): - keep contiguous flag handling outside of pages_per_block calculation - remove the hacky implementation in contiguous flag error handling code v4(Christian): - use any variable and return value for non-contiguous fallback v5: rebase to amd-staging-drm-next branch Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2024-04-25 21:05:55 +05:30
drm/amdgpu: Modify the contiguous flags behaviour Now we have two flags for contiguous VRAM buffer allocation. If the application request for AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS, it would set the ttm place TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS flag in the buffer's placement function. This patch will change the default behaviour of the two flags. When we set AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS - This means contiguous is not mandatory. - we will try to allocate the contiguous buffer. Say if the allocation fails, we fallback to allocate the individual pages. When we setTTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS - This means contiguous allocation is mandatory. - we are setting this in amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted() before bo validation and check this flag in the vram manager file. - if this is set, we should allocate the buffer pages contiguously. the allocation fails, we return -ENOSPC. v2: - keep the mem_flags and bo->flags check as is(Christian) - place the TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS flag setting into the amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted function placement range iteration loop(Christian) - rename find_pages with amdgpu_vram_mgr_calculate_pages_per_block (Christian) - Keep the kernel BO allocation as is(Christain) - If BO pin vram allocation failed, we need to return -ENOSPC as RDMA cannot work with scattered VRAM pages(Philip) v3(Christian): - keep contiguous flag handling outside of pages_per_block calculation - remove the hacky implementation in contiguous flag error handling code v4(Christian): - use any variable and return value for non-contiguous fallback v5: rebase to amd-staging-drm-next branch Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2024-04-25 21:05:55 +05:30
dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fence I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA operations to make room. A consensus was reached in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it remains a good thing! (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch) v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke. v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel coccinelle script: @@ @@ - struct fence + struct dma_fence @@ @@ - struct fence_ops + struct dma_fence_ops @@ @@ - struct fence_cb + struct dma_fence_cb @@ @@ - struct fence_array + struct dma_fence_array @@ @@ - enum fence_flag_bits + enum dma_fence_flag_bits @@ @@ ( - fence_init + dma_fence_init | - fence_release + dma_fence_release | - fence_free + dma_fence_free | - fence_get + dma_fence_get | - fence_get_rcu + dma_fence_get_rcu | - fence_put + dma_fence_put | - fence_signal + dma_fence_signal | - fence_signal_locked + dma_fence_signal_locked | - fence_default_wait + dma_fence_default_wait | - fence_add_callback + dma_fence_add_callback | - fence_remove_callback + dma_fence_remove_callback | - fence_enable_sw_signaling + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling | - fence_is_signaled_locked + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked | - fence_is_signaled + dma_fence_is_signaled | - fence_is_later + dma_fence_is_later | - fence_later + dma_fence_later | - fence_wait_timeout + dma_fence_wait_timeout | - fence_wait_any_timeout + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout | - fence_wait + dma_fence_wait | - fence_context_alloc + dma_fence_context_alloc | - fence_array_create + dma_fence_array_create | - to_fence_array + to_dma_fence_array | - fence_is_array + dma_fence_is_array | - trace_fence_emit + trace_dma_fence_emit | - FENCE_TRACE + DMA_FENCE_TRACE | - FENCE_WARN + DMA_FENCE_WARN | - FENCE_ERR + DMA_FENCE_ERR ) ( ... ) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-25 13:00:45 +01:00
dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fence I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA operations to make room. A consensus was reached in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it remains a good thing! (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch) v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke. v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel coccinelle script: @@ @@ - struct fence + struct dma_fence @@ @@ - struct fence_ops + struct dma_fence_ops @@ @@ - struct fence_cb + struct dma_fence_cb @@ @@ - struct fence_array + struct dma_fence_array @@ @@ - enum fence_flag_bits + enum dma_fence_flag_bits @@ @@ ( - fence_init + dma_fence_init | - fence_release + dma_fence_release | - fence_free + dma_fence_free | - fence_get + dma_fence_get | - fence_get_rcu + dma_fence_get_rcu | - fence_put + dma_fence_put | - fence_signal + dma_fence_signal | - fence_signal_locked + dma_fence_signal_locked | - fence_default_wait + dma_fence_default_wait | - fence_add_callback + dma_fence_add_callback | - fence_remove_callback + dma_fence_remove_callback | - fence_enable_sw_signaling + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling | - fence_is_signaled_locked + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked | - fence_is_signaled + dma_fence_is_signaled | - fence_is_later + dma_fence_is_later | - fence_later + dma_fence_later | - fence_wait_timeout + dma_fence_wait_timeout | - fence_wait_any_timeout + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout | - fence_wait + dma_fence_wait | - fence_context_alloc + dma_fence_context_alloc | - fence_array_create + dma_fence_array_create | - to_fence_array + to_dma_fence_array | - fence_is_array + dma_fence_is_array | - trace_fence_emit + trace_dma_fence_emit | - FENCE_TRACE + DMA_FENCE_TRACE | - FENCE_WARN + DMA_FENCE_WARN | - FENCE_ERR + DMA_FENCE_ERR ) ( ... ) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-25 13:00:45 +01:00
drm/amdgpu: Modify the contiguous flags behaviour Now we have two flags for contiguous VRAM buffer allocation. If the application request for AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS, it would set the ttm place TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS flag in the buffer's placement function. This patch will change the default behaviour of the two flags. When we set AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS - This means contiguous is not mandatory. - we will try to allocate the contiguous buffer. Say if the allocation fails, we fallback to allocate the individual pages. When we setTTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS - This means contiguous allocation is mandatory. - we are setting this in amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted() before bo validation and check this flag in the vram manager file. - if this is set, we should allocate the buffer pages contiguously. the allocation fails, we return -ENOSPC. v2: - keep the mem_flags and bo->flags check as is(Christian) - place the TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS flag setting into the amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted function placement range iteration loop(Christian) - rename find_pages with amdgpu_vram_mgr_calculate_pages_per_block (Christian) - Keep the kernel BO allocation as is(Christain) - If BO pin vram allocation failed, we need to return -ENOSPC as RDMA cannot work with scattered VRAM pages(Philip) v3(Christian): - keep contiguous flag handling outside of pages_per_block calculation - remove the hacky implementation in contiguous flag error handling code v4(Christian): - use any variable and return value for non-contiguous fallback v5: rebase to amd-staging-drm-next branch Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2024-04-25 21:05:55 +05:30
drm/amdgpu: Fix recursive locking warning Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10 GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation locks. [ +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted [ +0.000004] -------------------------------------------- [ +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock: [ +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000203] but task is already holding lock: [ +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000017] other info that might help us debug this: [ +0.000002] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ +0.000003] CPU0 [ +0.000002] ---- [ +0.000002] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000004] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000003] *** DEADLOCK *** [ +0.000002] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822: [ +0.000003] #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000232] #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000241] #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000236] #3: ffffb2b35606fd28 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000235] #4: ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000015] #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at: drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm] [ +0.000038] #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000195] stack backtrace: [ +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 [ +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02 08/29/2018 [ +0.000003] Call Trace: [ +0.000003] dump_stack+0x6d/0x89 [ +0.000010] __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90 [ +0.000009] lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0 [ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060 [ +0.000007] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000005] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000185] ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm] [ +0.000010] amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu] [ +0.000229] ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu] [ +0.000190] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000234] kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000218] kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000006] ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0 [ +0.000007] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0 [ +0.000007] do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70 [ +0.000004] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317 [ +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX: 00007fbff90a7317 [ +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fbcc402d880 [ +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c0184b18 [ +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15: 00007fbcc402d820 Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2022-02-03 21:18:21 -05:00
drm-misc-next for 5.4: UAPI Changes: Cross-subsystem Changes: Core Changes: - dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper, relax reservation_object_add_shared_fence, remove reservation_object seq number (and then restored) - dma-fence: Shrinkage of the dma_fence structure, Merge dma_fence_signal and dma_fence_signal_locked, Store the timestamp in struct dma_fence in a union with cb_list Driver Changes: - More dt-bindings YAML conversions - More removal of drmP.h includes - dw-hdmi: Support get_eld and various i2s improvements - gm12u320: Few fixes - meson: Global cleanup - panfrost: Few refactors, Support for GPU heap allocations - sun4i: Support for DDC enable GPIO - New panels: TI nspire, NEC NL8048HL11, LG Philips LB035Q02, Sharp LS037V7DW01, Sony ACX565AKM, Toppoly TD028TTEC1 Toppoly TD043MTEA1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXVqvpwAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xa3RAQDzAnt5zeesAxX4XhRJzHoCEwj2PJj9Re6xMJ9PlcfcvwD+OS+bcB6jfiXV Ug9IBd/DqjlmD9G9MxFxfSV946rksAw= =8uv4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'drm-misc-next-2019-08-19' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc into drm-next drm-misc-next for 5.4: UAPI Changes: Cross-subsystem Changes: Core Changes: - dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper, relax reservation_object_add_shared_fence, remove reservation_object seq number (and then restored) - dma-fence: Shrinkage of the dma_fence structure, Merge dma_fence_signal and dma_fence_signal_locked, Store the timestamp in struct dma_fence in a union with cb_list Driver Changes: - More dt-bindings YAML conversions - More removal of drmP.h includes - dw-hdmi: Support get_eld and various i2s improvements - gm12u320: Few fixes - meson: Global cleanup - panfrost: Few refactors, Support for GPU heap allocations - sun4i: Support for DDC enable GPIO - New panels: TI nspire, NEC NL8048HL11, LG Philips LB035Q02, Sharp LS037V7DW01, Sony ACX565AKM, Toppoly TD028TTEC1 Toppoly TD043MTEA1 Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> [airlied: fixup dma_resv rename fallout] From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190819141923.7l2adietcr2pioct@flea
2019-08-21 15:38:43 +10:00
dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fence I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA operations to make room. A consensus was reached in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it remains a good thing! (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch) v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke. v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel coccinelle script: @@ @@ - struct fence + struct dma_fence @@ @@ - struct fence_ops + struct dma_fence_ops @@ @@ - struct fence_cb + struct dma_fence_cb @@ @@ - struct fence_array + struct dma_fence_array @@ @@ - enum fence_flag_bits + enum dma_fence_flag_bits @@ @@ ( - fence_init + dma_fence_init | - fence_release + dma_fence_release | - fence_free + dma_fence_free | - fence_get + dma_fence_get | - fence_get_rcu + dma_fence_get_rcu | - fence_put + dma_fence_put | - fence_signal + dma_fence_signal | - fence_signal_locked + dma_fence_signal_locked | - fence_default_wait + dma_fence_default_wait | - fence_add_callback + dma_fence_add_callback | - fence_remove_callback + dma_fence_remove_callback | - fence_enable_sw_signaling + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling | - fence_is_signaled_locked + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked | - fence_is_signaled + dma_fence_is_signaled | - fence_is_later + dma_fence_is_later | - fence_later + dma_fence_later | - fence_wait_timeout + dma_fence_wait_timeout | - fence_wait_any_timeout + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout | - fence_wait + dma_fence_wait | - fence_context_alloc + dma_fence_context_alloc | - fence_array_create + dma_fence_array_create | - to_fence_array + to_dma_fence_array | - fence_is_array + dma_fence_is_array | - trace_fence_emit + trace_dma_fence_emit | - FENCE_TRACE + DMA_FENCE_TRACE | - FENCE_WARN + DMA_FENCE_WARN | - FENCE_ERR + DMA_FENCE_ERR ) ( ... ) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-25 13:00:45 +01:00