2019-06-04 10:11:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-28 15:33:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:18:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-06-28 12:52:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-21 12:35:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-24 07:15:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 22:54:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-28 07:21:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-25 17:13:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-19 14:52:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-17 08:42:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-26 09:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-24 22:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-10 15:02:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-31 11:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-28 15:33:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-13 14:14:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 16:14:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-26 13:48:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-28 14:38:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-24 22:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-21 20:23:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 00:04:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-26 17:10:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 00:04:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-09 16:15:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
MMC core learns about SPI
Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode.
- Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling
and protocols, not just the native versions.
- Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued,
including requests from the new lock/unlock code.
- Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI
return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this
affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others.
- Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably:
* OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR
* APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue
Those changes required some new and updated primitives:
- Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one
request that wasn't previously needed:
* mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only
* mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm)
* mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode
- Updated internal routines:
* Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native();
it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data.
* Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data()
helper for command-and-data access
* Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is
unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead.
- Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper
- Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use
those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI
The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected
to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO.
All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 09:11:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-02 14:01:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
MMC core learns about SPI
Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode.
- Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling
and protocols, not just the native versions.
- Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued,
including requests from the new lock/unlock code.
- Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI
return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this
affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others.
- Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably:
* OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR
* APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue
Those changes required some new and updated primitives:
- Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one
request that wasn't previously needed:
* mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only
* mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm)
* mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode
- Updated internal routines:
* Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native();
it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data.
* Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data()
helper for command-and-data access
* Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is
unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead.
- Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper
- Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use
those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI
The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected
to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO.
All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 09:11:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-13 09:32:20 +10:30
|
|
|
|
MMC core learns about SPI
Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode.
- Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling
and protocols, not just the native versions.
- Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued,
including requests from the new lock/unlock code.
- Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI
return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this
affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others.
- Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably:
* OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR
* APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue
Those changes required some new and updated primitives:
- Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one
request that wasn't previously needed:
* mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only
* mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm)
* mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode
- Updated internal routines:
* Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native();
it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data.
* Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data()
helper for command-and-data access
* Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is
unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead.
- Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper
- Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use
those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI
The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected
to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO.
All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 09:11:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards simultaneously
The mmc workqueue is an ordered workqueue, allowing only one work to
execute per given time. As this workqueue is used for card detection, the
conseqeunce is that cards will be detected one by one waiting for each
other.
Moreover, most of the time spent during card initialization is waiting for
the card's internal firmware to be ready. From a CPU perspective this
typically means waiting for a completion variable to be kicked via an
IRQ-handler or waiting for a sleep timer to finish.
This behaviour of detecting/initializing cards is sub-optimal, especially
for SOCs having several controllers/cards.
Let's convert to use the system_freezable_wq for the mmc detect works.
This enables several works to be executed simultaneously and thus also
cards to be detected like so.
Tests on UX500, which holds two eMMC cards and an SD-card (actually also
an SDIO card, currently not detected), shows a significant improved
behaviour due to this change.
Before this change, both the eMMC cards waited for the SD card to be
initialized as its detect work entered the workqueue first. In some cases,
depending on the characteristic of the SD-card, they got delayed 1-1.5 s.
Additionally for the second eMMC, it needed to wait for the first eMMC to
be initialized which added another 120-190 ms.
Converting to the system_freezable_wq, removed these delays and made both
the eMMC cards available far earlier in the boot sequence.
Selecting the system_freezable_wq, in favour of for example the system_wq,
is because we need card detection mechanism to be disabled once userspace
are frozen during system PM. Currently the mmc core deal with this via PM
notifiers, but following patches may utilize the behaviour of the
system_freezable_wq, to simplify the use of the PM notifiers.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
2015-12-01 10:35:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-19 14:52:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-22 19:21:34 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2011-08-19 14:52:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-09 20:44:02 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-19 14:52:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 13:51:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 13:51:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 18:22:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:22 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-24 17:00:31 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-17 10:56:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 17:37:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:22 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-30 17:37:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:22 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMC core learns about SPI
Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode.
- Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling
and protocols, not just the native versions.
- Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued,
including requests from the new lock/unlock code.
- Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI
return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this
affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others.
- Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably:
* OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR
* APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue
Those changes required some new and updated primitives:
- Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one
request that wasn't previously needed:
* mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only
* mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm)
* mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode
- Updated internal routines:
* Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native();
it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data.
* Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data()
helper for command-and-data access
* Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is
unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead.
- Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper
- Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use
those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI
The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected
to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO.
All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 09:11:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-31 11:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 10:40:31 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-19 14:52:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-24 07:15:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-01 07:14:10 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-24 21:46:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 10:40:31 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-22 17:30:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-23 17:38:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-22 17:30:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-04-23 17:38:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-22 17:30:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-31 11:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-10 15:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-07 14:13:10 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-24 21:46:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-07 14:06:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-24 21:46:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-19 15:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-01 07:14:09 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-02 15:26:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-19 15:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-29 01:09:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-02 15:26:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-19 15:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:42 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-01 14:55:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 14:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-18 18:53:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-06 19:02:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:41:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-05 15:52:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:41:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:41:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:41:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-10-03 15:33:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-18 15:41:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-03 15:33:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-03 15:33:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-10-03 15:33:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-18 18:53:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-02 14:01:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 21:17:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-26 20:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 21:17:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-03 10:47:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-03 10:47:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-26 20:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 21:17:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-03 10:47:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-11-03 10:47:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-29 15:41:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-11 20:22:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-11 20:22:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-01 18:55:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer
A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag
MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests
that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the
upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by
calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then
automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper
layer to send a STOP command if it is required.
For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller
sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact
not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling
mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported.
For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller
again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does
not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data
lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the
normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again.
Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started,
mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if
the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either
mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called.
The implementation consists primarily of a new completion
mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for
further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done().
When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will
automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do
anything special.
Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without
calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls
mmc_command_done().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-19 20:51:18 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-08-09 13:23:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-11 20:22:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-24 19:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-07 14:11:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-24 19:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-02 11:12:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-01-05 00:44:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-24 19:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-26 12:37:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-12 04:58:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-26 12:37:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-12 04:58:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-04 06:57:32 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 10:07:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-03 17:32:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-03 09:44:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-20 10:33:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-03 09:44:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-20 10:33:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-03 09:44:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-11 14:28:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-07 15:57:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-27 12:15:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-11 20:28:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-27 12:15:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-27 12:15:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-30 16:21:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-09 09:11:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-29 09:17:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-09 09:11:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-29 09:17:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-09 09:11:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-29 09:17:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-29 09:17:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-27 12:15:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-31 11:40:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-02 14:02:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-02 14:02:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-02 14:02:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-02 14:02:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 15:36:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-02 14:02:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 18:22:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-18 12:07:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 18:22:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 09:27:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-04 06:57:32 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 18:22:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-24 22:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-24 22:46:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-23 23:00:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:40:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-10 15:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:40:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-30 06:16:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-24 17:16:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:13 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-30 06:16:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-24 17:16:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:40:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-30 06:16:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-27 23:23:52 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 09:44:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-27 23:23:52 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 19:40:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-13 11:17:18 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-06 14:46:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-10 15:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:13 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-06 14:46:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-06 14:12:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-26 09:56:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-06 14:46:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 16:14:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-06 14:46:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 22:54:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-30 11:07:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-16 12:06:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-16 11:28:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-18 18:53:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-16 11:28:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-02 19:43:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-16 11:28:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-16 11:28:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 09:37:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-16 11:28:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-25 11:12:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 21:24:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-25 11:29:03 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-25 10:25:01 +01:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure
Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart
from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host
Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec
doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I
modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default.
Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support
SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the
corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2
is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch
procedure described below.
Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R
to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also
need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA.
This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities
register of the Host Controller.
If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the
signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch
the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage
switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the
Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to
set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which
if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is
successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the
initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the
same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V
signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with
MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling
voltage before we actually start initializing the card.
Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card,
on mmp2 in SDMA mode.
Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 12:18:57 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-12-19 20:51:18 +09:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure
Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart
from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host
Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec
doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I
modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default.
Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support
SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the
corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2
is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch
procedure described below.
Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R
to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also
need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA.
This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities
register of the Host Controller.
If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the
signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch
the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage
switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the
Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to
set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which
if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is
successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the
initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the
same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V
signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with
MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling
voltage before we actually start initializing the card.
Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card,
on mmp2 in SDMA mode.
Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 12:18:57 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-12 14:56:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure
Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart
from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host
Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec
doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I
modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default.
Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support
SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the
corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2
is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch
procedure described below.
Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R
to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also
need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA.
This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities
register of the Host Controller.
If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the
signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch
the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage
switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the
Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to
set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which
if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is
successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the
initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the
same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V
signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with
MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling
voltage before we actually start initializing the card.
Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card,
on mmp2 in SDMA mode.
Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 12:18:57 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-10 13:59:36 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-25 11:29:03 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure
Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart
from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host
Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec
doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I
modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default.
Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support
SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the
corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2
is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch
procedure described below.
Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R
to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also
need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA.
This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities
register of the Host Controller.
If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the
signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch
the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage
switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the
Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to
set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which
if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is
successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the
initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the
same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V
signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with
MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling
voltage before we actually start initializing the card.
Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card,
on mmp2 in SDMA mode.
Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 12:18:57 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 15:36:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:28 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure
Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart
from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host
Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec
doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I
modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default.
Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support
SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the
corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2
is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch
procedure described below.
Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R
to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also
need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA.
This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities
register of the Host Controller.
If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the
signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch
the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage
switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the
Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to
set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which
if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is
successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the
initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the
same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V
signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with
MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling
voltage before we actually start initializing the card.
Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card,
on mmp2 in SDMA mode.
Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 12:18:57 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-05 12:18:59 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-06 14:12:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-06 14:12:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-12-14 14:57:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 14:36:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-09 16:15:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-28 14:38:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 14:36:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-06 14:46:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 21:24:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: reset signal voltage on power up
Add a call to mmc_set_signal_voltage() to set signal voltage to 3.3v in
mmc_power_up so that we do not need to touch signal voltage setting in
mmc/sd/sdio init functions and rescan function.
For mmc/sd cards, when doing a suspend/resume cycle, consider the unsafe
resume case, the card will lose its power and when powered on again, we
will set signal voltage to 3.3v in mmc_power_up before its resume function
gets called, which will re-init the card.
And for sdio cards, when doing a suspend/resume cycle, consider the unsafe
resume case, the card will either lose its power or not depending on if it
wants to wakeup the host. If power is not maintained, it is the same case as
mmc/sd cards. If power is maintained, mmc_power_up will not be called and
the card's signal voltage will remain at the last setting.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2012-07-10 16:55:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-19 18:38:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: add tunable delay waiting for power to be stable
The hard-coded 10ms delay in mmc_power_up came from
commit 79bccc5aefb4 ("mmc: increase power up delay"), which said "The TI
controller on Toshiba Tecra M5 needs more time to power up or the cards
will init incorrectly or not at all." But it's too engineering solution
for a special board but force all platforms to wait for that long time,
especially painful for mmc_power_up for eMMC when booting.
However, it's added since 2009, and we can't tell if other platforms
benefit from it. But in practise, the modern hardware are most likely to
have a stable power supply with 1ms after setting it for no matter PMIC
or discrete power. And more importnatly, most regulators implement the
callback of ->set_voltage_time_sel() for regulator core to wait for
specific period of time for the power supply to be stable, which means
once regulator_set_voltage_* return, the power should reach the the
minimum voltage that works for initialization. Of course, if there
are some other ways for host to power the card, we should allow them
to argue a suitable delay as well.
With this patch, we could assign the delay from firmware, or we could
assigne it via ->set_ios() callback from host drivers.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2018-05-08 09:04:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-02 16:01:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-06 09:37:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-09 08:32:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-04 18:22:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-19 18:38:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: add tunable delay waiting for power to be stable
The hard-coded 10ms delay in mmc_power_up came from
commit 79bccc5aefb4 ("mmc: increase power up delay"), which said "The TI
controller on Toshiba Tecra M5 needs more time to power up or the cards
will init incorrectly or not at all." But it's too engineering solution
for a special board but force all platforms to wait for that long time,
especially painful for mmc_power_up for eMMC when booting.
However, it's added since 2009, and we can't tell if other platforms
benefit from it. But in practise, the modern hardware are most likely to
have a stable power supply with 1ms after setting it for no matter PMIC
or discrete power. And more importnatly, most regulators implement the
callback of ->set_voltage_time_sel() for regulator core to wait for
specific period of time for the power supply to be stable, which means
once regulator_set_voltage_* return, the power should reach the the
minimum voltage that works for initialization. Of course, if there
are some other ways for host to power the card, we should allow them
to argue a suitable delay as well.
With this patch, we could assign the delay from firmware, or we could
assigne it via ->set_ios() callback from host drivers.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2018-05-08 09:04:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 14:08:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-09 16:15:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-28 14:38:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-05 14:36:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-06 14:46:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-18 15:23:48 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-09-07 10:22:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 14:36:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 14:36:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-28 15:08:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 14:08:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Drop reference counting of the bus_ops
When the mmc_rescan work is enabled for execution (host->rescan_disable),
it's the only instance per mmc host that is allowed to set/clear the
host->bus_ops pointer.
Besides the mmc_rescan work, there are a couple of scenarios when the
host->bus_ops pointer may be accessed. Typically, those can be described as
as below:
*)
Upper mmc driver layers (like the mmc block device driver or an SDIO
functional driver) needs to execute a host->bus_ops callback. This can be
considered as safe without having to use some special locking mechanism,
because they operate on top of the struct mmc_card. As long as there is a
card to operate upon, the mmc core guarantees that there is a host->bus_ops
assigned as well. Note that, upper layer mmc drivers are of course
responsible to clean up from themselves from their ->remove() callbacks,
otherwise things would fall apart anyways.
**)
Via the mmc host instance, we may need to force a removal of an inserted
mmc card. This happens when a mmc host driver gets unbind, for example. In
this case, we protect the host->bus_ops pointer from concurrent accesses,
by disabling the mmc_rescan work upfront (host->rescan_disable). See
mmc_stop_host() for example.
This said, it seems like the reference counting of the host->bus_ops
pointer at some point have become superfluous. As this is an old mechanism
of the mmc core, it a bit difficult to digest the history of when that
could have happened. However, let's drop the reference counting to avoid
unnecessary code-paths and lockings.
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212131610.236843-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
2021-02-12 14:16:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Re-work HW reset for SDIO cards
It have turned out that it's not a good idea to unconditionally do a power
cycle and then to re-initialize the SDIO card, as currently done through
mmc_hw_reset() -> mmc_sdio_hw_reset(). This because there may be multiple
SDIO func drivers probed, who also shares the same SDIO card.
To address these scenarios, one may be tempted to use a notification
mechanism, as to allow the core to inform each of the probed func drivers,
about an ongoing HW reset. However, supporting such an operation from the
func driver point of view, may not be entirely trivial.
Therefore, let's use a more simplistic approach to solve the problem, by
instead forcing the card to be removed and re-detected, via scheduling a
rescan-work. In this way, we can rely on existing infrastructure, as the
func driver's ->remove() and ->probe() callbacks, becomes invoked to deal
with the cleanup and the re-initialization.
This solution may be considered as rather heavy, especially if a func
driver doesn't share its card with other func drivers. To address this,
let's keep the current immediate HW reset option as well, but run it only
when there is one func driver probed for the card.
Finally, to allow the caller of mmc_hw_reset(), to understand if the reset
is being asynchronously managed from a scheduled work, it returns 1
(propagated from mmc_sdio_hw_reset()). If the HW reset is executed
successfully and synchronously it returns 0, which maintains the existing
behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2019-10-17 15:25:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-20 11:02:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-29 12:23:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-20 11:02:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-29 12:23:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-20 11:02:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-08 17:53:01 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-07-11 20:22:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-08 17:53:01 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-20 11:02:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-03 09:08:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: resolve divded by zero panic
With one special SD card, below divide by zero error observed:
...
[ 2.144300] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 2.148860] Modules linked in:
[ 2.151898]
[ 2.152685] Set up 4031 stolen pages starting at 0x0001f000, GTT offset 0K
[ 2.157330] Set up 0 CI stolen pages starting at 0x00000000, GTT offset 131072K
[ 2.167581] Pid: 5, comm: kworker/u:0 Not tainted 3.0.8-138216-g974a2ab #1
[ 2.169506] [drm] PSB GTT mem manager ready, tt_start 4031, tt_size 28737 pages
[ 2.169906] [drm] SGX core id = 0x00000000
[ 2.169920] [drm] SGX core rev major = 0x00, minor = 0x00
[ 2.169934] [drm] SGX core rev maintenance = 0x00, designer = 0x00
[ 2.197370] Intel Corporation Medfield/iCDKB
[ 2.201716] EIP: 0060:[<c1697ca6>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1
[ 2.207198] EIP is at mmc_init_erase+0x76/0x150
[ 2.211704] EAX: 00002000 EBX: dcd1b400 ECX: 00002000 EDX: 00000000
[ 2.217957] ESI: 00000000 EDI: dcd5c800 EBP: dd867e84 ESP: dd867e7c
[ 2.224214] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
[ 2.229605] Process kworker/u:0 (pid: 5, ti=dd866000 task=dd868000 task.ti=dd866000)
[ 2.237325] Stack:
[ 2.239322] dcd1b400 00000000 dd867eb0 c16a06da c1ab7c44 dd995aa8 00000003 00000000
[ 2.247054] 00000000 00000000 dcd5c800 00000000 dcd1b400 dd867ef8 c16a1012 c1698b00
[ 2.254785] 00000029 00000001 c194eb80 dcd5c9ec dd867e00 c1239b00 00000000 00000000
[ 2.262519] Call Trace:
[ 2.264975] [<c16a06da>] mmc_sd_setup_card+0x1da/0x4f0
[ 2.270183] [<c16a1012>] mmc_sd_init_card+0x192/0xc40
[ 2.275304] [<c1698b00>] ? __mmc_claim_host+0x160/0x160
[ 2.280610] [<c1239b00>] ? __schedule_bug+0x50/0x80
[ 2.285556] [<c16a1b89>] mmc_attach_sd+0xc9/0x230
[ 2.290333] [<c169b6ef>] mmc_rescan+0x25f/0x2c0
[ 2.294943] [<c1274223>] process_one_work+0x103/0x400
[ 2.300065] [<c12670fd>] ? mod_timer+0x1ad/0x3c0
[ 2.304756] [<c169b490>] ? mmc_suspend_host+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 2.310056] [<c127502d>] worker_thread+0x12d/0x4a0
[ 2.314921] [<c18fcfbd>] ? preempt_schedule+0x2d/0x50
[ 2.320047] [<c1274f00[ 2.323976] ---[ end trace 5398ec2720494438 ]---
...
So, seems this bad SD card does not set valid value in related SSR / CSD register fields.
And then the driver will set card->erase_size to 0.
Then it triggered this divided by zero error when calculate card->pref_erase.
Submit this patch to fix the issue.
Signed-off-by: Yunpeng Gao <yunpeng.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2014-08-14 18:29:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: resolve divded by zero panic
With one special SD card, below divide by zero error observed:
...
[ 2.144300] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 2.148860] Modules linked in:
[ 2.151898]
[ 2.152685] Set up 4031 stolen pages starting at 0x0001f000, GTT offset 0K
[ 2.157330] Set up 0 CI stolen pages starting at 0x00000000, GTT offset 131072K
[ 2.167581] Pid: 5, comm: kworker/u:0 Not tainted 3.0.8-138216-g974a2ab #1
[ 2.169506] [drm] PSB GTT mem manager ready, tt_start 4031, tt_size 28737 pages
[ 2.169906] [drm] SGX core id = 0x00000000
[ 2.169920] [drm] SGX core rev major = 0x00, minor = 0x00
[ 2.169934] [drm] SGX core rev maintenance = 0x00, designer = 0x00
[ 2.197370] Intel Corporation Medfield/iCDKB
[ 2.201716] EIP: 0060:[<c1697ca6>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1
[ 2.207198] EIP is at mmc_init_erase+0x76/0x150
[ 2.211704] EAX: 00002000 EBX: dcd1b400 ECX: 00002000 EDX: 00000000
[ 2.217957] ESI: 00000000 EDI: dcd5c800 EBP: dd867e84 ESP: dd867e7c
[ 2.224214] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
[ 2.229605] Process kworker/u:0 (pid: 5, ti=dd866000 task=dd868000 task.ti=dd866000)
[ 2.237325] Stack:
[ 2.239322] dcd1b400 00000000 dd867eb0 c16a06da c1ab7c44 dd995aa8 00000003 00000000
[ 2.247054] 00000000 00000000 dcd5c800 00000000 dcd1b400 dd867ef8 c16a1012 c1698b00
[ 2.254785] 00000029 00000001 c194eb80 dcd5c9ec dd867e00 c1239b00 00000000 00000000
[ 2.262519] Call Trace:
[ 2.264975] [<c16a06da>] mmc_sd_setup_card+0x1da/0x4f0
[ 2.270183] [<c16a1012>] mmc_sd_init_card+0x192/0xc40
[ 2.275304] [<c1698b00>] ? __mmc_claim_host+0x160/0x160
[ 2.280610] [<c1239b00>] ? __schedule_bug+0x50/0x80
[ 2.285556] [<c16a1b89>] mmc_attach_sd+0xc9/0x230
[ 2.290333] [<c169b6ef>] mmc_rescan+0x25f/0x2c0
[ 2.294943] [<c1274223>] process_one_work+0x103/0x400
[ 2.300065] [<c12670fd>] ? mod_timer+0x1ad/0x3c0
[ 2.304756] [<c169b490>] ? mmc_suspend_host+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 2.310056] [<c127502d>] worker_thread+0x12d/0x4a0
[ 2.314921] [<c18fcfbd>] ? preempt_schedule+0x2d/0x50
[ 2.320047] [<c1274f00[ 2.323976] ---[ end trace 5398ec2720494438 ]---
...
So, seems this bad SD card does not set valid value in related SSR / CSD register fields.
And then the driver will set card->erase_size to 0.
Then it triggered this divided by zero error when calculate card->pref_erase.
Submit this patch to fix the issue.
Signed-off-by: Yunpeng Gao <yunpeng.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2014-08-14 18:29:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-17 14:42:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-05 14:45:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-02 11:12:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-02 11:12:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-02 11:12:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-02 10:56:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-26 17:10:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-11 16:13:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-19 20:51:18 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 18:12:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:16 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:44 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-11 11:44:09 +05:30
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:15 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:44 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-11 11:44:09 +05:30
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:15 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 18:12:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-11 11:44:09 +05:30
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 09:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 18:12:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-16 09:31:41 -06:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 13:10:16 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-26 17:10:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-08 13:28:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-26 17:10:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-26 17:10:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-17 14:42:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 10:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-17 14:42:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-08 13:28:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-12 13:08:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-18 09:34:04 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-14 14:15:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-05 14:45:48 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-14 14:15:48 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-18 13:18:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-06 08:11:43 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations
SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4
cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are
all variants of the basic erase command.
SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been
added.
"erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For
MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that
"erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the
minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512
if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise.
SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and
including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may
be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons:
1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card
wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but
erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the
same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a
several minutes.
2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress.
3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful.
Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by
the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several
minutes for large areas.
"erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD
where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good
chunk size for erasing large areas.
For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card
specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card.
For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by
the card.
"preferred_erase_size" is in bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-11 14:17:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 00:04:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 00:04:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 00:04:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 16:48:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 11:43:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-01 00:18:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-01 00:18:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 00:04:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-28 17:16:02 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-24 13:41:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-24 13:20:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-19 20:51:18 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-24 13:20:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-21 09:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-24 13:20:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-08 23:52:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 23:54:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 23:54:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-12 15:38:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 13:24:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Re-work HW reset for SDIO cards
It have turned out that it's not a good idea to unconditionally do a power
cycle and then to re-initialize the SDIO card, as currently done through
mmc_hw_reset() -> mmc_sdio_hw_reset(). This because there may be multiple
SDIO func drivers probed, who also shares the same SDIO card.
To address these scenarios, one may be tempted to use a notification
mechanism, as to allow the core to inform each of the probed func drivers,
about an ongoing HW reset. However, supporting such an operation from the
func driver point of view, may not be entirely trivial.
Therefore, let's use a more simplistic approach to solve the problem, by
instead forcing the card to be removed and re-detected, via scheduling a
rescan-work. In this way, we can rely on existing infrastructure, as the
func driver's ->remove() and ->probe() callbacks, becomes invoked to deal
with the cleanup and the re-initialization.
This solution may be considered as rather heavy, especially if a func
driver doesn't share its card with other func drivers. To address this,
let's keep the current immediate HW reset option as well, but run it only
when there is one func driver probed for the card.
Finally, to allow the caller of mmc_hw_reset(), to understand if the reset
is being asynchronously managed from a scheduled work, it returns 1
(propagated from mmc_sdio_hw_reset()). If the HW reset is executed
successfully and synchronously it returns 0, which maintains the existing
behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2019-10-17 15:25:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 13:24:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-01 16:04:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-12 15:38:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 13:42:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-08 10:00:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 13:42:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 14:15:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 13:42:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-19 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-19 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 14:36:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-13 23:12:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-29 16:42:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-13 23:12:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-25 15:39:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-13 23:12:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-25 15:39:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Initial support for SD express card/host
In the SD specification v7.10 the SD express card has been added. This new
type of removable SD card, can be managed via a PCIe/NVMe based interface,
while also allowing backwards compatibility towards the legacy SD
interface.
To keep the backwards compatibility, it's required to start the
initialization through the legacy SD interface. If it turns out that the
mmc host and the SD card, both supports the PCIe/NVMe interface, then a
switch should be allowed.
Therefore, let's introduce some basic support for this type of SD cards to
the mmc core. The mmc host, should set MMC_CAP2_SD_EXP if it supports this
interface and MMC_CAP2_SD_EXP_1_2V, if also 1.2V is supported, as to inform
the core about it.
To deal with the switch to the PCIe/NVMe interface, the mmc host is
required to implement a new host ops, ->init_sd_express(). Based on the
initial communication between the host and the card, host->ios.timing is
set to either MMC_TIMING_SD_EXP or MMC_TIMING_SD_EXP_1_2V, depending on if
1.2V is supported or not. In this way, the mmc host can check these values
in its ->init_sd_express() ops, to know how to proceed with the handover.
Note that, to manage card insert/removal, the mmc core sticks with using
the ->get_cd() callback, which means it's the host's responsibility to make
sure it provides valid data, even if the card may be managed by PCIe/NVMe
at the moment. As long as the card seems to be present, the mmc core keeps
the card powered on.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Rui Feng <rui_feng@realsil.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1603936636-3126-1-git-send-email-rui_feng@realsil.com.cn
2020-10-29 09:57:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-25 15:39:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-21 15:12:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-01 15:45:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Initial support for SD express card/host
In the SD specification v7.10 the SD express card has been added. This new
type of removable SD card, can be managed via a PCIe/NVMe based interface,
while also allowing backwards compatibility towards the legacy SD
interface.
To keep the backwards compatibility, it's required to start the
initialization through the legacy SD interface. If it turns out that the
mmc host and the SD card, both supports the PCIe/NVMe interface, then a
switch should be allowed.
Therefore, let's introduce some basic support for this type of SD cards to
the mmc core. The mmc host, should set MMC_CAP2_SD_EXP if it supports this
interface and MMC_CAP2_SD_EXP_1_2V, if also 1.2V is supported, as to inform
the core about it.
To deal with the switch to the PCIe/NVMe interface, the mmc host is
required to implement a new host ops, ->init_sd_express(). Based on the
initial communication between the host and the card, host->ios.timing is
set to either MMC_TIMING_SD_EXP or MMC_TIMING_SD_EXP_1_2V, depending on if
1.2V is supported or not. In this way, the mmc host can check these values
in its ->init_sd_express() ops, to know how to proceed with the handover.
Note that, to manage card insert/removal, the mmc core sticks with using
the ->get_cd() callback, which means it's the host's responsibility to make
sure it provides valid data, even if the card may be managed by PCIe/NVMe
at the moment. As long as the card seems to be present, the mmc core keeps
the card powered on.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Rui Feng <rui_feng@realsil.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1603936636-3126-1-git-send-email-rui_feng@realsil.com.cn
2020-10-29 09:57:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-28 15:29:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 08:52:57 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:21:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-18 11:02:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-18 11:02:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-20 11:02:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-06 10:42:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-20 03:45:35 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-30 14:00:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-30 14:00:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-06 09:37:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: fix all hangs related to mmc/sd card insert/removal during suspend/resume
If you don't use CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME, as soon as you attempt to
suspend, the card will be removed, therefore this patch doesn't change the
behavior of this option.
However the removal will be done by pm notifier, which runs while
userspace is still not frozen and thus can freely use del_gendisk, without
the risk of deadlock which would happen otherwise.
Card detect workqueue is now disabled while userspace is frozen, Therefore
if you do use CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME, and remove the card during
suspend, the removal will be detected as soon as userspace is unfrozen,
again at the moment it is safe to call del_gendisk.
Tested with and without CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME with suspend and hibernate.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up function prototype]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix CONFIG_PM-n linkage, small cleanups]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-10 18:01:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: fix all hangs related to mmc/sd card insert/removal during suspend/resume
If you don't use CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME, as soon as you attempt to
suspend, the card will be removed, therefore this patch doesn't change the
behavior of this option.
However the removal will be done by pm notifier, which runs while
userspace is still not frozen and thus can freely use del_gendisk, without
the risk of deadlock which would happen otherwise.
Card detect workqueue is now disabled while userspace is frozen, Therefore
if you do use CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME, and remove the card during
suspend, the removal will be detected as soon as userspace is unfrozen,
again at the moment it is safe to call del_gendisk.
Tested with and without CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME with suspend and hibernate.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up function prototype]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix CONFIG_PM-n linkage, small cleanups]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-10 18:01:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-23 13:40:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 08:52:57 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-23 13:40:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:08:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:08:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:08:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:08:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:08:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-10 15:54:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Drop reference counting of the bus_ops
When the mmc_rescan work is enabled for execution (host->rescan_disable),
it's the only instance per mmc host that is allowed to set/clear the
host->bus_ops pointer.
Besides the mmc_rescan work, there are a couple of scenarios when the
host->bus_ops pointer may be accessed. Typically, those can be described as
as below:
*)
Upper mmc driver layers (like the mmc block device driver or an SDIO
functional driver) needs to execute a host->bus_ops callback. This can be
considered as safe without having to use some special locking mechanism,
because they operate on top of the struct mmc_card. As long as there is a
card to operate upon, the mmc core guarantees that there is a host->bus_ops
assigned as well. Note that, upper layer mmc drivers are of course
responsible to clean up from themselves from their ->remove() callbacks,
otherwise things would fall apart anyways.
**)
Via the mmc host instance, we may need to force a removal of an inserted
mmc card. This happens when a mmc host driver gets unbind, for example. In
this case, we protect the host->bus_ops pointer from concurrent accesses,
by disabling the mmc_rescan work upfront (host->rescan_disable). See
mmc_stop_host() for example.
This said, it seems like the reference counting of the host->bus_ops
pointer at some point have become superfluous. As this is an old mechanism
of the mmc core, it a bit difficult to digest the history of when that
could have happened. However, let's drop the reference counting to avoid
unnecessary code-paths and lockings.
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212131610.236843-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
2021-02-12 14:16:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-31 17:51:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 16:22:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-31 17:51:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Drop reference counting of the bus_ops
When the mmc_rescan work is enabled for execution (host->rescan_disable),
it's the only instance per mmc host that is allowed to set/clear the
host->bus_ops pointer.
Besides the mmc_rescan work, there are a couple of scenarios when the
host->bus_ops pointer may be accessed. Typically, those can be described as
as below:
*)
Upper mmc driver layers (like the mmc block device driver or an SDIO
functional driver) needs to execute a host->bus_ops callback. This can be
considered as safe without having to use some special locking mechanism,
because they operate on top of the struct mmc_card. As long as there is a
card to operate upon, the mmc core guarantees that there is a host->bus_ops
assigned as well. Note that, upper layer mmc drivers are of course
responsible to clean up from themselves from their ->remove() callbacks,
otherwise things would fall apart anyways.
**)
Via the mmc host instance, we may need to force a removal of an inserted
mmc card. This happens when a mmc host driver gets unbind, for example. In
this case, we protect the host->bus_ops pointer from concurrent accesses,
by disabling the mmc_rescan work upfront (host->rescan_disable). See
mmc_stop_host() for example.
This said, it seems like the reference counting of the host->bus_ops
pointer at some point have become superfluous. As this is an old mechanism
of the mmc core, it a bit difficult to digest the history of when that
could have happened. However, let's drop the reference counting to avoid
unnecessary code-paths and lockings.
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212131610.236843-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
2021-02-12 14:16:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-31 17:51:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-05 16:08:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-29 08:52:57 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-05 14:34:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-09 16:15:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-31 17:51:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-09 16:15:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-31 17:51:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Initial support for SD express card/host
In the SD specification v7.10 the SD express card has been added. This new
type of removable SD card, can be managed via a PCIe/NVMe based interface,
while also allowing backwards compatibility towards the legacy SD
interface.
To keep the backwards compatibility, it's required to start the
initialization through the legacy SD interface. If it turns out that the
mmc host and the SD card, both supports the PCIe/NVMe interface, then a
switch should be allowed.
Therefore, let's introduce some basic support for this type of SD cards to
the mmc core. The mmc host, should set MMC_CAP2_SD_EXP if it supports this
interface and MMC_CAP2_SD_EXP_1_2V, if also 1.2V is supported, as to inform
the core about it.
To deal with the switch to the PCIe/NVMe interface, the mmc host is
required to implement a new host ops, ->init_sd_express(). Based on the
initial communication between the host and the card, host->ios.timing is
set to either MMC_TIMING_SD_EXP or MMC_TIMING_SD_EXP_1_2V, depending on if
1.2V is supported or not. In this way, the mmc host can check these values
in its ->init_sd_express() ops, to know how to proceed with the handover.
Note that, to manage card insert/removal, the mmc core sticks with using
the ->get_cd() callback, which means it's the host's responsibility to make
sure it provides valid data, even if the card may be managed by PCIe/NVMe
at the moment. As long as the card seems to be present, the mmc core keeps
the card powered on.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Rui Feng <rui_feng@realsil.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1603936636-3126-1-git-send-email-rui_feng@realsil.com.cn
2020-10-29 09:57:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Prepare to support SD UHS-II cards
The SD UHS-II interface was introduced to the SD spec v4.00 several years
ago. The interface is fundamentally different from an electrical and a
protocol point of view, comparing to the legacy SD interface.
However, the legacy SD protocol is supported through a specific transport
layer (SD-TRAN) defined in the UHS-II addendum of the spec. This allows the
SD card to be managed in a very similar way as a legacy SD card, hence a
lot of code can be re-used to support these new types of cards through the
mmc subsystem.
Moreover, an SD card that supports the UHS-II interface shall also be
backwards compatible with the legacy SD interface, which allows a UHS-II
card to be inserted into a legacy slot. As a matter of fact, this is
already supported by mmc subsystem as of today.
To prepare to add support for UHS-II, this change puts the basic foundation
in the mmc core in place, allowing it to be more easily reviewed before
subsequent changes implements the actual support.
Basically, the approach here adds a new UHS-II bus_ops type and adds a
separate initialization path for the UHS-II card. The intent is to avoid us
from sprinkling the legacy initialization path, but also to simplify
implementation of the UHS-II specific bits.
At this point, there is only one new host ops added to manage the various
ios settings needed for UHS-II. Additional host ops that are needed, are
being added from subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913102836.6144-3-victorshihgli@gmail.com
2024-09-13 18:28:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-06 09:37:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-02 11:54:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-12 17:18:59 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-06 09:37:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-27 23:23:52 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2023-03-21 19:01:01 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-27 23:23:52 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-03 10:36:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-17 18:17:15 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:06:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Prepare to support SD UHS-II cards
The SD UHS-II interface was introduced to the SD spec v4.00 several years
ago. The interface is fundamentally different from an electrical and a
protocol point of view, comparing to the legacy SD interface.
However, the legacy SD protocol is supported through a specific transport
layer (SD-TRAN) defined in the UHS-II addendum of the spec. This allows the
SD card to be managed in a very similar way as a legacy SD card, hence a
lot of code can be re-used to support these new types of cards through the
mmc subsystem.
Moreover, an SD card that supports the UHS-II interface shall also be
backwards compatible with the legacy SD interface, which allows a UHS-II
card to be inserted into a legacy slot. As a matter of fact, this is
already supported by mmc subsystem as of today.
To prepare to add support for UHS-II, this change puts the basic foundation
in the mmc core in place, allowing it to be more easily reviewed before
subsequent changes implements the actual support.
Basically, the approach here adds a new UHS-II bus_ops type and adds a
separate initialization path for the UHS-II card. The intent is to avoid us
from sprinkling the legacy initialization path, but also to simplify
implementation of the UHS-II specific bits.
At this point, there is only one new host ops added to manage the various
ios settings needed for UHS-II. Additional host ops that are needed, are
being added from subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913102836.6144-3-victorshihgli@gmail.com
2024-09-13 18:28:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-02 11:54:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-14 10:17:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-11 14:41:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Prepare to support SD UHS-II cards
The SD UHS-II interface was introduced to the SD spec v4.00 several years
ago. The interface is fundamentally different from an electrical and a
protocol point of view, comparing to the legacy SD interface.
However, the legacy SD protocol is supported through a specific transport
layer (SD-TRAN) defined in the UHS-II addendum of the spec. This allows the
SD card to be managed in a very similar way as a legacy SD card, hence a
lot of code can be re-used to support these new types of cards through the
mmc subsystem.
Moreover, an SD card that supports the UHS-II interface shall also be
backwards compatible with the legacy SD interface, which allows a UHS-II
card to be inserted into a legacy slot. As a matter of fact, this is
already supported by mmc subsystem as of today.
To prepare to add support for UHS-II, this change puts the basic foundation
in the mmc core in place, allowing it to be more easily reviewed before
subsequent changes implements the actual support.
Basically, the approach here adds a new UHS-II bus_ops type and adds a
separate initialization path for the UHS-II card. The intent is to avoid us
from sprinkling the legacy initialization path, but also to simplify
implementation of the UHS-II specific bits.
At this point, there is only one new host ops added to manage the various
ios settings needed for UHS-II. Additional host ops that are needed, are
being added from subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913102836.6144-3-victorshihgli@gmail.com
2024-09-13 18:28:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Don't power off the card when starting the host
The MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP was invented to avoid running the power up
sequence, mmc_power_up(), during ->probe() of the mmc host driver, but
instead defer this to the mmc detect work. This is especially useful for
those hosts that suffers from a long initialization time, as this time
would otherwise add up to the total boot time.
However, due to the introduction of runtime PM of mmc host devices in the
mmc core, this behaviour changed a bit. More precisely, it caused the mmc
core to runtime resume the host device during ->probe() of the host driver.
In cases like the rtsx_usb_sdmmc, runtime resuming the device may be costly
and thus affecting the total boot time.
To improve this behaviour when using MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP, let's
postpone also calling mmc_power_off() when starting the host. This change
allows the mmc core to avoid runtime resuming the device, as it don't need
to claim the host for that execution path.
Cc: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-10-13 13:37:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-12 14:36:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Don't power off the card when starting the host
The MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP was invented to avoid running the power up
sequence, mmc_power_up(), during ->probe() of the mmc host driver, but
instead defer this to the mmc detect work. This is especially useful for
those hosts that suffers from a long initialization time, as this time
would otherwise add up to the total boot time.
However, due to the introduction of runtime PM of mmc host devices in the
mmc core, this behaviour changed a bit. More precisely, it caused the mmc
core to runtime resume the host device during ->probe() of the host driver.
In cases like the rtsx_usb_sdmmc, runtime resuming the device may be costly
and thus affecting the total boot time.
To improve this behaviour when using MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP, let's
postpone also calling mmc_power_off() when starting the host. This change
allows the mmc core to avoid runtime resuming the device, as it don't need
to claim the host for that execution path.
Cc: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-10-13 13:37:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-11 14:41:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-10 15:02:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-30 14:00:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-03 15:15:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-11-25 13:24:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-13 15:07:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-27 14:51:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-10 15:02:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-13 15:07:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-11 20:43:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-14 10:17:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 17:32:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-03 15:15:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-11 20:43:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-05 13:43:31 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Drop reference counting of the bus_ops
When the mmc_rescan work is enabled for execution (host->rescan_disable),
it's the only instance per mmc host that is allowed to set/clear the
host->bus_ops pointer.
Besides the mmc_rescan work, there are a couple of scenarios when the
host->bus_ops pointer may be accessed. Typically, those can be described as
as below:
*)
Upper mmc driver layers (like the mmc block device driver or an SDIO
functional driver) needs to execute a host->bus_ops callback. This can be
considered as safe without having to use some special locking mechanism,
because they operate on top of the struct mmc_card. As long as there is a
card to operate upon, the mmc core guarantees that there is a host->bus_ops
assigned as well. Note that, upper layer mmc drivers are of course
responsible to clean up from themselves from their ->remove() callbacks,
otherwise things would fall apart anyways.
**)
Via the mmc host instance, we may need to force a removal of an inserted
mmc card. This happens when a mmc host driver gets unbind, for example. In
this case, we protect the host->bus_ops pointer from concurrent accesses,
by disabling the mmc_rescan work upfront (host->rescan_disable). See
mmc_stop_host() for example.
This said, it seems like the reference counting of the host->bus_ops
pointer at some point have become superfluous. As this is an old mechanism
of the mmc core, it a bit difficult to digest the history of when that
could have happened. However, let's drop the reference counting to avoid
unnecessary code-paths and lockings.
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212131610.236843-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
2021-02-12 14:16:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-04 15:28:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-10 17:03:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-21 14:08:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:44:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-31 00:11:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-11 14:41:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-11 14:41:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-26 13:48:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards simultaneously
The mmc workqueue is an ordered workqueue, allowing only one work to
execute per given time. As this workqueue is used for card detection, the
conseqeunce is that cards will be detected one by one waiting for each
other.
Moreover, most of the time spent during card initialization is waiting for
the card's internal firmware to be ready. From a CPU perspective this
typically means waiting for a completion variable to be kicked via an
IRQ-handler or waiting for a sleep timer to finish.
This behaviour of detecting/initializing cards is sub-optimal, especially
for SOCs having several controllers/cards.
Let's convert to use the system_freezable_wq for the mmc detect works.
This enables several works to be executed simultaneously and thus also
cards to be detected like so.
Tests on UX500, which holds two eMMC cards and an SD-card (actually also
an SDIO card, currently not detected), shows a significant improved
behaviour due to this change.
Before this change, both the eMMC cards waited for the SD card to be
initialized as its detect work entered the workqueue first. In some cases,
depending on the characteristic of the SD-card, they got delayed 1-1.5 s.
Additionally for the second eMMC, it needed to wait for the first eMMC to
be initialized which added another 120-190 ms.
Converting to the system_freezable_wq, removed these delays and made both
the eMMC cards available far earlier in the boot sequence.
Selecting the system_freezable_wq, in favour of for example the system_wq,
is because we need card detection mechanism to be disabled once userspace
are frozen during system PM. Currently the mmc core deal with this via PM
notifiers, but following patches may utilize the behaviour of the
system_freezable_wq, to simplify the use of the PM notifiers.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
2015-12-01 10:35:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-26 13:48:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-26 13:48:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-16 02:07:53 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-19 14:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-11 08:50:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
