linux/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h

978 lines
24 KiB

Bluetooth: EFS: implement L2CAP config pending state Add L2CAP Config Pending state for EFS. Currently after receiving Config Response Pending respond with Config Response Success. ... > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 16 L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040 result 0 status 0 Connection successful > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 45 L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 33 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 0, MTo 0, MPS 1009) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 45 L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 33 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 0, MTo 0, MPS 498) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 47 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 4 clen 33 Pending MTU 672 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 2000, MTo 12000, MPS 498) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 47 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 4 clen 33 Pending MTU 672 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 2000, MTo 12000, MPS 498) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 14 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 0 Success < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 14 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 0 Success < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 510 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 506 ext_ctrl 0x00010000 fcs 0xebe0 [psm 4113] I-frame: Start (len 672) TxSeq 0 ReqSeq 0 ... Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
2011-10-17 14:35:32 +03:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end is coming in GCC-14, and we are getting ready to enable it globally. There are currently a couple of objects (`req` and `rsp`), in a couple of structures, that contain flexible structures (`struct l2cap_ecred_conn_req` and `struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp`), for example: struct l2cap_ecred_rsp_data { struct { struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp rsp; __le16 scid[L2CAP_ECRED_MAX_CID]; } __packed pdu; int count; }; in the struct above, `struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp` is a flexible structure: struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp { __le16 mtu; __le16 mps; __le16 credits; __le16 result; __le16 dcid[]; }; So, in order to avoid ending up with a flexible-array member in the middle of another structure, we use the `struct_group_tagged()` (and `__struct_group()` when the flexible structure is `__packed`) helper to separate the flexible array from the rest of the members in the flexible structure: struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp { struct_group_tagged(l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp_hdr, hdr, ... the rest of members ); __le16 dcid[]; }; With the change described above, we now declare objects of the type of the tagged struct, in this example `struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp_hdr`, without embedding flexible arrays in the middle of other structures: struct l2cap_ecred_rsp_data { struct { struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp_hdr rsp; __le16 scid[L2CAP_ECRED_MAX_CID]; } __packed pdu; int count; }; Also, when the flexible-array member needs to be accessed, we use `container_of()` to retrieve a pointer to the flexible structure. We also use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for a couple of on-stack definitions of a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member is known at compile-time. So, with these changes, fix the following warnings: net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:1260:45: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:3740:45: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4999:45: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7116:47: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/202 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-03-27 10:23:51 -06:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2020-05-13 12:15:56 -05:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end is coming in GCC-14, and we are getting ready to enable it globally. There are currently a couple of objects (`req` and `rsp`), in a couple of structures, that contain flexible structures (`struct l2cap_ecred_conn_req` and `struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp`), for example: struct l2cap_ecred_rsp_data { struct { struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp rsp; __le16 scid[L2CAP_ECRED_MAX_CID]; } __packed pdu; int count; }; in the struct above, `struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp` is a flexible structure: struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp { __le16 mtu; __le16 mps; __le16 credits; __le16 result; __le16 dcid[]; }; So, in order to avoid ending up with a flexible-array member in the middle of another structure, we use the `struct_group_tagged()` (and `__struct_group()` when the flexible structure is `__packed`) helper to separate the flexible array from the rest of the members in the flexible structure: struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp { struct_group_tagged(l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp_hdr, hdr, ... the rest of members ); __le16 dcid[]; }; With the change described above, we now declare objects of the type of the tagged struct, in this example `struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp_hdr`, without embedding flexible arrays in the middle of other structures: struct l2cap_ecred_rsp_data { struct { struct l2cap_ecred_conn_rsp_hdr rsp; __le16 scid[L2CAP_ECRED_MAX_CID]; } __packed pdu; int count; }; Also, when the flexible-array member needs to be accessed, we use `container_of()` to retrieve a pointer to the flexible structure. We also use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for a couple of on-stack definitions of a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member is known at compile-time. So, with these changes, fix the following warnings: net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:1260:45: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:3740:45: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4999:45: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7116:47: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/202 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-03-27 10:23:51 -06:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2020-05-13 12:15:56 -05:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2020-05-13 12:15:56 -05:00
2024-05-01 12:08:58 +02:00
Bluetooth: Ask upper layers for HCI disconnect reason Some of the qualification tests demand that in case of failures in L2CAP the HCI disconnect should indicate a reason why L2CAP fails. This is a bluntly layer violation since multiple L2CAP connections could be using the same ACL and thus forcing a disconnect reason is not a good idea. To comply with the Bluetooth test specification, the disconnect reason is now stored in the L2CAP connection structure and every time a new L2CAP channel is added it will set back to its default. So only in the case where the L2CAP channel with the disconnect reason is really the last one, it will propagated to the HCI layer. The HCI layer has been extended with a disconnect indication that allows it to ask upper layers for a disconnect reason. The upper layer must not support this callback and in that case it will nicely default to the existing behavior. If an upper layer like L2CAP can provide a disconnect reason that one will be used to disconnect the ACL or SCO link. No modification to the ACL disconnect timeout have been made. So in case of Linux to Linux connection the initiator will disconnect the ACL link before the acceptor side can signal the specific disconnect reason. That is perfectly fine since Linux doesn't make use of this value anyway. The L2CAP layer has a perfect valid error code for rejecting connection due to a security violation. It is unclear why the Bluetooth specification insists on having specific HCI disconnect reason. Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2009-02-12 14:02:50 +01:00
Bluetooth: l2cap: add l2cap_user sub-modules Several sub-modules like HIDP, rfcomm, ... need to track l2cap connections. The l2cap_conn->hcon->dev object is used as parent for sysfs devices so the sub-modules need to be notified when the hci_conn object is removed from sysfs. As submodules normally use the l2cap layer, the l2cap_user objects are registered there instead of on the underlying hci_conn object. This avoids any direct dependency on the HCI layer and lets the l2cap core handle any specifics. This patch introduces l2cap_user objects which contain a "probe" and "remove" callback. You can register them on any l2cap_conn object and if it is active, the "probe" callback will get called. Otherwise, an error is returned. The l2cap_conn object will call your "remove" callback directly before it is removed from user-space. This allows you to remove your submodules _before_ the parent l2cap_conn and hci_conn object is removed. At any time you can asynchronously unregister your l2cap_user object if your submodule vanishes before the l2cap_conn object does. There is no way around l2cap_user. If we want wire-protocols in the kernel, we always want the hci_conn object as parent in the sysfs tree. We cannot use a channel here since we might need multiple channels for a single protocol. But the problem is, we _must_ get notified when an l2cap_conn object is removed. We cannot use reference-counting for object-removal! This is not how it works. If a hardware is removed, we should immediately remove the object from sysfs. Any other behavior would be inconsistent with the rest of the system. Also note that device_del() might sleep, but it doesn't wait for user-space or block very long. It only _unlinks_ the object from sysfs and the whole device-tree. Everything else is handled by ref-counts! This is exactly what the other sub-modules must do: unlink their devices when the "remove" l2cap_user callback is called. They should not do any cleanup or synchronous shutdowns. Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-04-06 20:28:45 +02:00
2024-05-01 12:08:58 +02:00
2024-05-01 12:08:58 +02:00
Bluetooth: EFS: implement L2CAP config pending state Add L2CAP Config Pending state for EFS. Currently after receiving Config Response Pending respond with Config Response Success. ... > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 16 L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040 result 0 status 0 Connection successful > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 45 L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 33 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 0, MTo 0, MPS 1009) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 45 L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 33 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 0, MTo 0, MPS 498) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 47 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 4 clen 33 Pending MTU 672 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 2000, MTo 12000, MPS 498) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 47 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 4 clen 33 Pending MTU 672 RFC 0x03 (Enhanced Retransmission, TxWin 63, MaxTx 3, RTo 2000, MTo 12000, MPS 498) EFS (Id 0x01, SerType Best Effort, MaxSDU 0xffff, SDUitime 0xffffffff, AccLat 0xffffffff, FlushTO 0x0000ffff) > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 14 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 0 Success < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 14 L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 0 Success < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 510 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 506 ext_ctrl 0x00010000 fcs 0xebe0 [psm 4113] I-frame: Start (len 672) TxSeq 0 ReqSeq 0 ... Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
2011-10-17 14:35:32 +03:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free caused by l2cap_chan_put This fixes the following trace which is caused by hci_rx_work starting up *after* the final channel reference has been put() during sock_close() but *before* the references to the channel have been destroyed, so instead the code now rely on kref_get_unless_zero/l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero to prevent referencing a channel that is about to be destroyed. refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in refcount_dec_and_test+0x20/0xd0 Read of size 4 at addr ffffffc114f5bf18 by task kworker/u17:14/705 CPU: 4 PID: 705 Comm: kworker/u17:14 Tainted: G S W 4.14.234-00003-g1fb6d0bd49a4-dirty #28 Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM8150 V2 PM8150 Google Inc. MSM sm8150 Flame DVT (DT) Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x378 show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0x124/0x148 print_address_description+0x80/0x2e8 __kasan_report+0x168/0x188 kasan_report+0x10/0x18 __asan_load4+0x84/0x8c refcount_dec_and_test+0x20/0xd0 l2cap_chan_put+0x48/0x12c l2cap_recv_frame+0x4770/0x6550 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x44c/0x7a4 hci_acldata_packet+0x100/0x188 hci_rx_work+0x178/0x23c process_one_work+0x35c/0x95c worker_thread+0x4cc/0x960 kthread+0x1a8/0x1c4 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Tested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2022-07-21 09:10:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: Fix deadlocks with sock lock and L2CAP timers locks When cancelling a delayed work (timer) in L2CAP we can not sleep holding the sock mutex otherwise we might deadlock with an L2CAP timer handler. This is possible because RX/TX and L2CAP timers run in different workqueues. The scenario below illustrates the problem. Thus we are now avoiding to sleep on the timers locks. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239 ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/873 is trying to acquire lock: (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}: [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffff81052a6f>] wait_on_work+0x4f/0x160 [<ffffffff81052ca3>] __cancel_work_timer+0x73/0x80 [<ffffffff81052cbd>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffffa002f2ed>] l2cap_chan_connect+0x22d/0x470 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa002fb51>] l2cap_sock_connect+0xb1/0x140 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8130811b>] kernel_connect+0xb/0x10 [<ffffffffa00cf98a>] rfcomm_session_create+0x12a/0x1c0 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00cfbe7>] __rfcomm_dlc_open+0x1c7/0x240 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00d07c2>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0x42/0x70 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00d3b03>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x103/0x150 [rfcomm] [<ffffffff8130bd7e>] sys_connect+0xae/0xc0 [<ffffffff813368d2>] compat_sys_socketcall+0xb2/0x220 [<ffffffff813b2089>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x30 -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}: [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0 [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450 [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340 [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/873: #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 #1: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 stack backtrace: Pid: 873, comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813a0f6e>] print_circular_bug+0xd2/0xe3 [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0 [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ea30>] ? lock_release_nested+0x100/0x110 [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450 [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450 [<ffffffffa002ce70>] ? l2cap_security_cfm+0x4e0/0x4e0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340 [<ffffffff81052610>] ? manage_workers+0x110/0x110 [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff813af69d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff81057b20>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff813b1ef0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb Signed-off-by: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
2011-12-21 20:02:36 -02:00
Bluetooth: Fix deadlocks with sock lock and L2CAP timers locks When cancelling a delayed work (timer) in L2CAP we can not sleep holding the sock mutex otherwise we might deadlock with an L2CAP timer handler. This is possible because RX/TX and L2CAP timers run in different workqueues. The scenario below illustrates the problem. Thus we are now avoiding to sleep on the timers locks. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239 ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/873 is trying to acquire lock: (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}: [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffff81052a6f>] wait_on_work+0x4f/0x160 [<ffffffff81052ca3>] __cancel_work_timer+0x73/0x80 [<ffffffff81052cbd>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffffa002f2ed>] l2cap_chan_connect+0x22d/0x470 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa002fb51>] l2cap_sock_connect+0xb1/0x140 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8130811b>] kernel_connect+0xb/0x10 [<ffffffffa00cf98a>] rfcomm_session_create+0x12a/0x1c0 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00cfbe7>] __rfcomm_dlc_open+0x1c7/0x240 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00d07c2>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0x42/0x70 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00d3b03>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x103/0x150 [rfcomm] [<ffffffff8130bd7e>] sys_connect+0xae/0xc0 [<ffffffff813368d2>] compat_sys_socketcall+0xb2/0x220 [<ffffffff813b2089>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x30 -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}: [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0 [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450 [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340 [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/873: #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 #1: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 stack backtrace: Pid: 873, comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813a0f6e>] print_circular_bug+0xd2/0xe3 [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0 [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ea30>] ? lock_release_nested+0x100/0x110 [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450 [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450 [<ffffffffa002ce70>] ? l2cap_security_cfm+0x4e0/0x4e0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340 [<ffffffff81052610>] ? manage_workers+0x110/0x110 [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff813af69d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff81057b20>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff813b1ef0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb Signed-off-by: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
2011-12-21 20:02:36 -02:00
Bluetooth: Fix deadlocks with sock lock and L2CAP timers locks When cancelling a delayed work (timer) in L2CAP we can not sleep holding the sock mutex otherwise we might deadlock with an L2CAP timer handler. This is possible because RX/TX and L2CAP timers run in different workqueues. The scenario below illustrates the problem. Thus we are now avoiding to sleep on the timers locks. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239 ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/873 is trying to acquire lock: (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}: [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffff81052a6f>] wait_on_work+0x4f/0x160 [<ffffffff81052ca3>] __cancel_work_timer+0x73/0x80 [<ffffffff81052cbd>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffffa002f2ed>] l2cap_chan_connect+0x22d/0x470 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa002fb51>] l2cap_sock_connect+0xb1/0x140 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8130811b>] kernel_connect+0xb/0x10 [<ffffffffa00cf98a>] rfcomm_session_create+0x12a/0x1c0 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00cfbe7>] __rfcomm_dlc_open+0x1c7/0x240 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00d07c2>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0x42/0x70 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa00d3b03>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x103/0x150 [rfcomm] [<ffffffff8130bd7e>] sys_connect+0xae/0xc0 [<ffffffff813368d2>] compat_sys_socketcall+0xb2/0x220 [<ffffffff813b2089>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x30 -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}: [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0 [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450 [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340 [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/873: #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 #1: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450 stack backtrace: Pid: 873, comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813a0f6e>] print_circular_bug+0xd2/0xe3 [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0 [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170 [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790 [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0 [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ea30>] ? lock_release_nested+0x100/0x110 [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450 [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450 [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450 [<ffffffffa002ce70>] ? l2cap_security_cfm+0x4e0/0x4e0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340 [<ffffffff81052610>] ? manage_workers+0x110/0x110 [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff813af69d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff81057b20>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff813b1ef0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb Signed-off-by: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
2011-12-21 20:02:36 -02:00
2024-05-01 12:08:58 +02:00
Bluetooth: l2cap: add l2cap_user sub-modules Several sub-modules like HIDP, rfcomm, ... need to track l2cap connections. The l2cap_conn->hcon->dev object is used as parent for sysfs devices so the sub-modules need to be notified when the hci_conn object is removed from sysfs. As submodules normally use the l2cap layer, the l2cap_user objects are registered there instead of on the underlying hci_conn object. This avoids any direct dependency on the HCI layer and lets the l2cap core handle any specifics. This patch introduces l2cap_user objects which contain a "probe" and "remove" callback. You can register them on any l2cap_conn object and if it is active, the "probe" callback will get called. Otherwise, an error is returned. The l2cap_conn object will call your "remove" callback directly before it is removed from user-space. This allows you to remove your submodules _before_ the parent l2cap_conn and hci_conn object is removed. At any time you can asynchronously unregister your l2cap_user object if your submodule vanishes before the l2cap_conn object does. There is no way around l2cap_user. If we want wire-protocols in the kernel, we always want the hci_conn object as parent in the sysfs tree. We cannot use a channel here since we might need multiple channels for a single protocol. But the problem is, we _must_ get notified when an l2cap_conn object is removed. We cannot use reference-counting for object-removal! This is not how it works. If a hardware is removed, we should immediately remove the object from sysfs. Any other behavior would be inconsistent with the rest of the system. Also note that device_del() might sleep, but it doesn't wait for user-space or block very long. It only _unlinks_ the object from sysfs and the whole device-tree. Everything else is handled by ref-counts! This is exactly what the other sub-modules must do: unlink their devices when the "remove" l2cap_user callback is called. They should not do any cleanup or synchronous shutdowns. Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-04-06 20:28:45 +02:00