linux/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/README

71 lines
3.9 KiB

perf test: Update command line callchain attribute tests The "struct perf_event_attr setup" entry in 'perf test' is in fact a series of tests that will exec the tools, passing different sets of command line arguments to then intercept the sys_perf_event_open syscall, in user space, to check that the perf_event_attr->sample_type and other feature request bits are setup as expected. We recently restored the callchain requesting command line argument, -g, to not require a parameter ("dwarf" or "fp"), instead using a default ("fp" for now) and making the long option variant, --call-chain, be the one to be used when a different callchain collection method is preferred. The "struct perf_event_attr setup" test failed because we forgot to update the tests involving callchains, not switching from, '-g dwarf' to '--call-chain dwarf', making 'perf test' detect it: [root@sandy ~]# perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-basic' running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-branch-any' <SNIP> running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf' expected sample_type=12583, got 295 expected exclude_callchain_user=1, got 0 expected sample_stack_user=8192, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! [root@sandy ~]# Fix all of them now to use --call-chain when explicitely specifying a method. There is still work to do, as '-g fp', for instance, passed without problems. In that case 'perf test' saw no problems as the intercepted syscall got the bits as expected, i.e. the default is 'fp', but the fact that 'fp' may be an existing program and the specified workload would then be passed as a parameter to it is an usability problem that needs fixing. Next merge window tho. Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jr3oq1k5iywnp7vvqlslzydm@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2013-10-31 09:46:59 -03:00
perf test: Fix arm64 perf_event_attr tests wrt --call-graph initialization The struct perf_event_attr is initialised differently in Arm64 when recording in call-graph fp mode, so update the relevant tests, and add two extra arm64-only tests. Before: $ perf test 17 -v 17: Setup struct perf_event_attr [...] running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' expected sample_type=295, got 4391 expected sample_regs_user=0, got 1073741824 FAILED './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' - match failure test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- After: [...] running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default-aarch64' test limitation 'aarch64' running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-fp-aarch64' test limitation 'aarch64' running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' test limitation '!aarch64' excluded architecture list ['aarch64'] skipped [aarch64] './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-fp' test limitation '!aarch64' excluded architecture list ['aarch64'] skipped [aarch64] './tests/attr/test-record-graph-fp' [...] Fixes: 7248e308a5758761 ("perf tools: Record ARM64 LR register automatically") Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@arm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220125104435.2737-1-german.gomez@arm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-01-25 10:44:34 +00:00
perf test: Update command line callchain attribute tests The "struct perf_event_attr setup" entry in 'perf test' is in fact a series of tests that will exec the tools, passing different sets of command line arguments to then intercept the sys_perf_event_open syscall, in user space, to check that the perf_event_attr->sample_type and other feature request bits are setup as expected. We recently restored the callchain requesting command line argument, -g, to not require a parameter ("dwarf" or "fp"), instead using a default ("fp" for now) and making the long option variant, --call-chain, be the one to be used when a different callchain collection method is preferred. The "struct perf_event_attr setup" test failed because we forgot to update the tests involving callchains, not switching from, '-g dwarf' to '--call-chain dwarf', making 'perf test' detect it: [root@sandy ~]# perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-basic' running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-branch-any' <SNIP> running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf' expected sample_type=12583, got 295 expected exclude_callchain_user=1, got 0 expected sample_stack_user=8192, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! [root@sandy ~]# Fix all of them now to use --call-chain when explicitely specifying a method. There is still work to do, as '-g fp', for instance, passed without problems. In that case 'perf test' saw no problems as the intercepted syscall got the bits as expected, i.e. the default is 'fp', but the fact that 'fp' may be an existing program and the specified workload would then be passed as a parameter to it is an usability problem that needs fixing. Next merge window tho. Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jr3oq1k5iywnp7vvqlslzydm@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2013-10-31 09:46:59 -03:00
perf test: Fix arm64 perf_event_attr tests wrt --call-graph initialization The struct perf_event_attr is initialised differently in Arm64 when recording in call-graph fp mode, so update the relevant tests, and add two extra arm64-only tests. Before: $ perf test 17 -v 17: Setup struct perf_event_attr [...] running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' expected sample_type=295, got 4391 expected sample_regs_user=0, got 1073741824 FAILED './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' - match failure test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- After: [...] running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default-aarch64' test limitation 'aarch64' running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-fp-aarch64' test limitation 'aarch64' running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' test limitation '!aarch64' excluded architecture list ['aarch64'] skipped [aarch64] './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default' running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-fp' test limitation '!aarch64' excluded architecture list ['aarch64'] skipped [aarch64] './tests/attr/test-record-graph-fp' [...] Fixes: 7248e308a5758761 ("perf tools: Record ARM64 LR register automatically") Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@arm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220125104435.2737-1-german.gomez@arm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2022-01-25 10:44:34 +00:00