linux/net/bluetooth/sco.c

1604 lines
31 KiB

Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: Fix use-after-free bugs caused by sco_sock_timeout When the sco connection is established and then, the sco socket is releasing, timeout_work will be scheduled to judge whether the sco disconnection is timeout. The sock will be deallocated later, but it is dereferenced again in sco_sock_timeout. As a result, the use-after-free bugs will happen. The root cause is shown below: Cleanup Thread | Worker Thread sco_sock_release | sco_sock_close | __sco_sock_close | sco_sock_set_timer | schedule_delayed_work | sco_sock_kill | (wait a time) sock_put(sk) //FREE | sco_sock_timeout | sock_hold(sk) //USE The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below: [ 95.890016] ================================================================== [ 95.890496] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800c388080 by task kworker/0:0/7 ... [ 95.890755] Workqueue: events sco_sock_timeout [ 95.890755] Call Trace: [ 95.890755] <TASK> [ 95.890755] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x110 [ 95.890755] print_address_description+0x78/0x390 [ 95.890755] print_report+0x11b/0x250 [ 95.890755] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xbe/0xf0 [ 95.890755] ? sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] kasan_report+0x139/0x170 [ 95.890755] ? update_load_avg+0xe5/0x9f0 [ 95.890755] ? sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0 [ 95.890755] sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] process_one_work+0x561/0xc50 [ 95.890755] worker_thread+0xab2/0x13c0 [ 95.890755] ? pr_cont_work+0x490/0x490 [ 95.890755] kthread+0x279/0x300 [ 95.890755] ? pr_cont_work+0x490/0x490 [ 95.890755] ? kthread_blkcg+0xa0/0xa0 [ 95.890755] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 [ 95.890755] ? kthread_blkcg+0xa0/0xa0 [ 95.890755] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 95.890755] </TASK> [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] Allocated by task 506: [ 95.890755] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x70 [ 95.890755] __kasan_kmalloc+0x86/0x90 [ 95.890755] __kmalloc+0x17f/0x360 [ 95.890755] sk_prot_alloc+0xe1/0x1a0 [ 95.890755] sk_alloc+0x31/0x4e0 [ 95.890755] bt_sock_alloc+0x2b/0x2a0 [ 95.890755] sco_sock_create+0xad/0x320 [ 95.890755] bt_sock_create+0x145/0x320 [ 95.890755] __sock_create+0x2e1/0x650 [ 95.890755] __sys_socket+0xd0/0x280 [ 95.890755] __x64_sys_socket+0x75/0x80 [ 95.890755] do_syscall_64+0xc4/0x1b0 [ 95.890755] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] Freed by task 506: [ 95.890755] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x70 [ 95.890755] kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 [ 95.890755] poison_slab_object+0x118/0x180 [ 95.890755] __kasan_slab_free+0x12/0x30 [ 95.890755] kfree+0xb2/0x240 [ 95.890755] __sk_destruct+0x317/0x410 [ 95.890755] sco_sock_release+0x232/0x280 [ 95.890755] sock_close+0xb2/0x210 [ 95.890755] __fput+0x37f/0x770 [ 95.890755] task_work_run+0x1ae/0x210 [ 95.890755] get_signal+0xe17/0xf70 [ 95.890755] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3f/0x520 [ 95.890755] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x55/0x120 [ 95.890755] do_syscall_64+0xd1/0x1b0 [ 95.890755] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800c388000 [ 95.890755] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 [ 95.890755] The buggy address is located 128 bytes inside of [ 95.890755] freed 1024-byte region [ffff88800c388000, ffff88800c388400) [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 95.890755] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88800c38a800 pfn:0xc388 [ 95.890755] head: order:3 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0 [ 95.890755] anon flags: 0x100000000000840(slab|head|node=0|zone=1) [ 95.890755] page_type: 0xffffffff() [ 95.890755] raw: 0100000000000840 ffff888006842dc0 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 95.890755] raw: ffff88800c38a800 000000000010000a 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 95.890755] head: 0100000000000840 ffff888006842dc0 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 95.890755] head: ffff88800c38a800 000000000010000a 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 95.890755] head: 0100000000000003 ffffea000030e201 ffffea000030e248 00000000ffffffff [ 95.890755] head: 0000000800000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 95.890755] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 95.890755] ffff88800c387f80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 95.890755] ffff88800c388000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] >ffff88800c388080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] ^ [ 95.890755] ffff88800c388100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] ffff88800c388180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] ================================================================== Fix this problem by adding a check protected by sco_conn_lock to judget whether the conn->hcon is null. Because the conn->hcon will be set to null, when the sock is releasing. Fixes: ba316be1b6a0 ("Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-04-25 22:23:45 +08:00
Bluetooth: Fix use-after-free bugs caused by sco_sock_timeout When the sco connection is established and then, the sco socket is releasing, timeout_work will be scheduled to judge whether the sco disconnection is timeout. The sock will be deallocated later, but it is dereferenced again in sco_sock_timeout. As a result, the use-after-free bugs will happen. The root cause is shown below: Cleanup Thread | Worker Thread sco_sock_release | sco_sock_close | __sco_sock_close | sco_sock_set_timer | schedule_delayed_work | sco_sock_kill | (wait a time) sock_put(sk) //FREE | sco_sock_timeout | sock_hold(sk) //USE The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below: [ 95.890016] ================================================================== [ 95.890496] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800c388080 by task kworker/0:0/7 ... [ 95.890755] Workqueue: events sco_sock_timeout [ 95.890755] Call Trace: [ 95.890755] <TASK> [ 95.890755] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x110 [ 95.890755] print_address_description+0x78/0x390 [ 95.890755] print_report+0x11b/0x250 [ 95.890755] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xbe/0xf0 [ 95.890755] ? sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] kasan_report+0x139/0x170 [ 95.890755] ? update_load_avg+0xe5/0x9f0 [ 95.890755] ? sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0 [ 95.890755] sco_sock_timeout+0x5e/0x1c0 [ 95.890755] process_one_work+0x561/0xc50 [ 95.890755] worker_thread+0xab2/0x13c0 [ 95.890755] ? pr_cont_work+0x490/0x490 [ 95.890755] kthread+0x279/0x300 [ 95.890755] ? pr_cont_work+0x490/0x490 [ 95.890755] ? kthread_blkcg+0xa0/0xa0 [ 95.890755] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 [ 95.890755] ? kthread_blkcg+0xa0/0xa0 [ 95.890755] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 95.890755] </TASK> [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] Allocated by task 506: [ 95.890755] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x70 [ 95.890755] __kasan_kmalloc+0x86/0x90 [ 95.890755] __kmalloc+0x17f/0x360 [ 95.890755] sk_prot_alloc+0xe1/0x1a0 [ 95.890755] sk_alloc+0x31/0x4e0 [ 95.890755] bt_sock_alloc+0x2b/0x2a0 [ 95.890755] sco_sock_create+0xad/0x320 [ 95.890755] bt_sock_create+0x145/0x320 [ 95.890755] __sock_create+0x2e1/0x650 [ 95.890755] __sys_socket+0xd0/0x280 [ 95.890755] __x64_sys_socket+0x75/0x80 [ 95.890755] do_syscall_64+0xc4/0x1b0 [ 95.890755] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] Freed by task 506: [ 95.890755] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x70 [ 95.890755] kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 [ 95.890755] poison_slab_object+0x118/0x180 [ 95.890755] __kasan_slab_free+0x12/0x30 [ 95.890755] kfree+0xb2/0x240 [ 95.890755] __sk_destruct+0x317/0x410 [ 95.890755] sco_sock_release+0x232/0x280 [ 95.890755] sock_close+0xb2/0x210 [ 95.890755] __fput+0x37f/0x770 [ 95.890755] task_work_run+0x1ae/0x210 [ 95.890755] get_signal+0xe17/0xf70 [ 95.890755] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3f/0x520 [ 95.890755] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x55/0x120 [ 95.890755] do_syscall_64+0xd1/0x1b0 [ 95.890755] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800c388000 [ 95.890755] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 [ 95.890755] The buggy address is located 128 bytes inside of [ 95.890755] freed 1024-byte region [ffff88800c388000, ffff88800c388400) [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 95.890755] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88800c38a800 pfn:0xc388 [ 95.890755] head: order:3 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0 [ 95.890755] anon flags: 0x100000000000840(slab|head|node=0|zone=1) [ 95.890755] page_type: 0xffffffff() [ 95.890755] raw: 0100000000000840 ffff888006842dc0 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 95.890755] raw: ffff88800c38a800 000000000010000a 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 95.890755] head: 0100000000000840 ffff888006842dc0 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 95.890755] head: ffff88800c38a800 000000000010000a 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 95.890755] head: 0100000000000003 ffffea000030e201 ffffea000030e248 00000000ffffffff [ 95.890755] head: 0000000800000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 95.890755] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 95.890755] [ 95.890755] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 95.890755] ffff88800c387f80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 95.890755] ffff88800c388000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] >ffff88800c388080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] ^ [ 95.890755] ffff88800c388100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] ffff88800c388180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 95.890755] ================================================================== Fix this problem by adding a check protected by sco_conn_lock to judget whether the conn->hcon is null. Because the conn->hcon will be set to null, when the sock is releasing. Fixes: ba316be1b6a0 ("Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-04-25 22:23:45 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work struct sock.sk_timer should be used as a sock cleanup timer. However, SCO uses it to implement sock timeouts. This causes issues because struct sock.sk_timer's callback is run in an IRQ context, and the timer callback function sco_sock_timeout takes a spin lock on the socket. However, other functions such as sco_conn_del and sco_conn_ready take the spin lock with interrupts enabled. This inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} lock usage could lead to deadlocks as reported by Syzbot [1]: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); <Interrupt> lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); To fix this, we use delayed work to implement SCO sock timouts instead. This allows us to avoid taking the spin lock on the socket in an IRQ context, and corrects the misuse of struct sock.sk_timer. As a note, cancel_delayed_work is used instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync in sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer to avoid a deadlock. In the future, the call to bh_lock_sock inside sco_sock_timeout should be changed to lock_sock to synchronize with other functions using lock_sock. However, since sco_sock_set_timer and sco_sock_clear_timer are sometimes called under the locked socket (in sco_connect and __sco_sock_close), cancel_delayed_work_sync might cause them to sleep until an sco_sock_timeout that has started finishes running. But sco_sock_timeout would also sleep until it can grab the lock_sock. Using cancel_delayed_work is fine because sco_sock_timeout does not change from run to run, hence there is no functional difference between: 1. waiting for a timeout to finish running before scheduling another timeout 2. scheduling another timeout while a timeout is running. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9089d89de0502e120f234ca0fc8a703f7368b31e [1] Reported-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+2f6d7c28bb4bf7e82060@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:05 +08:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init() l2cap_le_flowctl_init() can cause both div-by-zero and an integer overflow since hdev->le_mtu may not fall in the valid range. Move MTU from hci_dev to hci_conn to validate MTU and stop the connection process earlier if MTU is invalid. Also, add a missing validation in read_buffer_size() and make it return an error value if the validation fails. Now hci_conn_add() returns ERR_PTR() as it can fail due to the both a kzalloc failure and invalid MTU value. divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 67 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc5+ #20 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work RIP: 0010:l2cap_le_flowctl_init+0x19e/0x3f0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:547 Code: e8 17 17 0c 00 66 41 89 9f 84 00 00 00 bf 01 00 00 00 41 b8 02 00 00 00 4c 89 fe 4c 89 e2 89 d9 e8 27 17 0c 00 44 89 f0 31 d2 <66> f7 f3 89 c3 ff c3 4d 8d b7 88 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 42 RSP: 0018:ffff88810bc0f858 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 00000000000002a0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dffffc0000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810bc0f7c0 RDI: ffffc90002dcb66f RBP: ffff88810bc0f880 R08: aa69db2dda70ff01 R09: 0000ffaaaaaaaaaa R10: 0084000000ffaaaa R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810d65a084 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 00000000000002a0 R15: ffff88810d65a000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811ac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000100 CR3: 0000000103268003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> l2cap_le_connect_req net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4902 [inline] l2cap_le_sig_cmd net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5420 [inline] l2cap_le_sig_channel net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5486 [inline] l2cap_recv_frame+0xe59d/0x11710 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:6809 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x544/0x10a0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7506 hci_acldata_packet net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3939 [inline] hci_rx_work+0x5e5/0xb20 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4176 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x90f/0x1530 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x926/0xe70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2e3/0x380 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x5c/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: 6ed58ec520ad ("Bluetooth: Use LE buffers for LE traffic") Suggested-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-05-04 15:23:29 -04:00
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init() l2cap_le_flowctl_init() can cause both div-by-zero and an integer overflow since hdev->le_mtu may not fall in the valid range. Move MTU from hci_dev to hci_conn to validate MTU and stop the connection process earlier if MTU is invalid. Also, add a missing validation in read_buffer_size() and make it return an error value if the validation fails. Now hci_conn_add() returns ERR_PTR() as it can fail due to the both a kzalloc failure and invalid MTU value. divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 67 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc5+ #20 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work RIP: 0010:l2cap_le_flowctl_init+0x19e/0x3f0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:547 Code: e8 17 17 0c 00 66 41 89 9f 84 00 00 00 bf 01 00 00 00 41 b8 02 00 00 00 4c 89 fe 4c 89 e2 89 d9 e8 27 17 0c 00 44 89 f0 31 d2 <66> f7 f3 89 c3 ff c3 4d 8d b7 88 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 42 RSP: 0018:ffff88810bc0f858 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 00000000000002a0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dffffc0000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810bc0f7c0 RDI: ffffc90002dcb66f RBP: ffff88810bc0f880 R08: aa69db2dda70ff01 R09: 0000ffaaaaaaaaaa R10: 0084000000ffaaaa R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810d65a084 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 00000000000002a0 R15: ffff88810d65a000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811ac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000100 CR3: 0000000103268003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> l2cap_le_connect_req net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4902 [inline] l2cap_le_sig_cmd net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5420 [inline] l2cap_le_sig_channel net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5486 [inline] l2cap_recv_frame+0xe59d/0x11710 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:6809 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x544/0x10a0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7506 hci_acldata_packet net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3939 [inline] hci_rx_work+0x5e5/0xb20 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4176 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x90f/0x1530 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x926/0xe70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2e3/0x380 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x5c/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: 6ed58ec520ad ("Bluetooth: Use LE buffers for LE traffic") Suggested-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-05-04 15:23:29 -04:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking in bt_accept_enqueue() for BH context With commit e16337622016 ("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket atomically") lock_sock[_nested]() is used to acquire the socket lock before manipulating the socket. lock_sock[_nested]() may block, which is problematic since bt_accept_enqueue() can be called in bottom half context (e.g. from rfcomm_connect_ind()): [<ffffff80080d81ec>] __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80 [<ffffff800876c7b0>] lock_sock_nested+0x24/0x58 [<ffffff8000d7c27c>] bt_accept_enqueue+0x48/0xd4 [bluetooth] [<ffffff8000e67d8c>] rfcomm_connect_ind+0x190/0x218 [rfcomm] Add a parameter to bt_accept_enqueue() to indicate whether the function is called from BH context, and acquire the socket lock with bh_lock_sock_nested() if that's the case. Also adapt all callers of bt_accept_enqueue() to pass the new parameter: - l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() - uses lock_sock() to lock the parent socket => process context - rfcomm_connect_ind() - acquires the parent socket lock with bh_lock_sock() => BH context - __sco_chan_add() - called from sco_chan_add(), which is called from sco_connect(). parent is NULL, hence bt_accept_enqueue() isn't called in this code path and we can ignore it - also called from sco_conn_ready(). uses bh_lock_sock() to acquire the parent lock => BH context Fixes: e16337622016 ("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket atomically") Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2019-01-02 16:11:20 -08:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter: hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member) Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate. Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required: - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones. - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this was modified to use 'obj->member' instead. - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator properly, so those had to be fixed up manually. The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here: @@ iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host; type T; expression a,c,d,e; identifier b; statement S; @@ -T b; <+... when != b ( hlist_for_each_entry(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_from(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a, - b, c) S | for_each_busy_worker(a, c, - b, d) S | ax25_uid_for_each(a, - b, c) S | ax25_for_each(a, - b, c) S | inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sctp_for_each_hentry(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_rcu(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_from -(a, b) +(a) S + sk_for_each_from(a) S | sk_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | sk_for_each_bound(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a, - b, c, d, e) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | nr_node_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_node_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S | for_each_host(a, - b, c) S | for_each_host_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | for_each_mesh_entry(a, - b, c, d) S ) ...+> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes] Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-27 17:06:00 -08:00
hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter: hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member) Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate. Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required: - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones. - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this was modified to use 'obj->member' instead. - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator properly, so those had to be fixed up manually. The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here: @@ iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host; type T; expression a,c,d,e; identifier b; statement S; @@ -T b; <+... when != b ( hlist_for_each_entry(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_from(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a, - b, c) S | for_each_busy_worker(a, c, - b, d) S | ax25_uid_for_each(a, - b, c) S | ax25_for_each(a, - b, c) S | inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sctp_for_each_hentry(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_rcu(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_from -(a, b) +(a) S + sk_for_each_from(a) S | sk_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | sk_for_each_bound(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a, - b, c, d, e) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | nr_node_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_node_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S | for_each_host(a, - b, c) S | for_each_host_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | for_each_mesh_entry(a, - b, c, d) S ) ...+> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes] Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-27 17:06:00 -08:00
hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter: hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member) Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate. Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required: - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones. - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this was modified to use 'obj->member' instead. - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator properly, so those had to be fixed up manually. The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here: @@ iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host; type T; expression a,c,d,e; identifier b; statement S; @@ -T b; <+... when != b ( hlist_for_each_entry(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_from(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a, - b, c) S | for_each_busy_worker(a, c, - b, d) S | ax25_uid_for_each(a, - b, c) S | ax25_for_each(a, - b, c) S | inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sctp_for_each_hentry(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_rcu(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_from -(a, b) +(a) S + sk_for_each_from(a) S | sk_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | sk_for_each_bound(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a, - b, c, d, e) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | nr_node_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_node_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S | for_each_host(a, - b, c) S | for_each_host_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | for_each_mesh_entry(a, - b, c, d) S ) ...+> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes] Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-27 17:06:00 -08:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_conn_free BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sco_conn_free net/bluetooth/sco.c:87 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kref_put include/linux/kref.h:65 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sco_conn_put+0xdd/0x410 net/bluetooth/sco.c:107 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88811cb96b50 by task kworker/u17:4/352 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 352 Comm: kworker/u17:4 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc5-g717368f83676 #4 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci13 hci_cmd_sync_work Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x10b/0x170 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0x191/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0xc4/0x100 mm/kasan/report.c:595 sco_conn_free net/bluetooth/sco.c:87 [inline] kref_put include/linux/kref.h:65 [inline] sco_conn_put+0xdd/0x410 net/bluetooth/sco.c:107 sco_connect_cfm+0xb4/0xae0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:1441 hci_connect_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:2082 [inline] hci_conn_failed+0x20a/0x2e0 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1313 hci_conn_unlink+0x55f/0x810 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1121 hci_conn_del+0xb6/0x1110 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1147 hci_abort_conn_sync+0x8c5/0xbb0 net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:5689 hci_cmd_sync_work+0x281/0x380 net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:332 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x77e/0x1040 kernel/workqueue.c:3319 worker_thread+0xbee/0x1200 kernel/workqueue.c:3400 kthread+0x3c7/0x870 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x13a/0x1e0 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 </TASK> Allocated by task 31370: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x30/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:388 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x82/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:405 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:260 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4382 [inline] __kmalloc_noprof+0x22f/0x390 mm/slub.c:4394 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:909 [inline] sk_prot_alloc+0xae/0x220 net/core/sock.c:2239 sk_alloc+0x34/0x5a0 net/core/sock.c:2295 bt_sock_alloc+0x3c/0x330 net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c:151 sco_sock_alloc net/bluetooth/sco.c:562 [inline] sco_sock_create+0xc0/0x350 net/bluetooth/sco.c:593 bt_sock_create+0x161/0x3b0 net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c:135 __sock_create+0x3ad/0x780 net/socket.c:1589 sock_create net/socket.c:1647 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1684 [inline] __sys_socket+0xd5/0x330 net/socket.c:1731 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1745 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1743 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1743 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xc7/0x240 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Freed by task 31374: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x30/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:576 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:243 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x3d/0x50 mm/kasan/common.c:275 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:233 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2428 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:4701 [inline] kfree+0x199/0x3b0 mm/slub.c:4900 sk_prot_free net/core/sock.c:2278 [inline] __sk_destruct+0x4aa/0x630 net/core/sock.c:2373 sco_sock_release+0x2ad/0x300 net/bluetooth/sco.c:1333 __sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline] sock_close+0xb8/0x230 net/socket.c:1439 __fput+0x3d1/0x9e0 fs/file_table.c:468 task_work_run+0x206/0x2a0 kernel/task_work.c:227 get_signal+0x1201/0x1410 kernel/signal.c:2807 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x34/0x740 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x68/0xc0 kernel/entry/common.c:40 exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:225 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:175 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:210 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x1dd/0x240 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Reported-by: cen zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-09-22 13:13:13 -04:00
Bluetooth: Fix not closing SCO sockets in the BT_CONNECT2 state With deferred setup for SCO, it is possible that userspace closes the socket when it is in the BT_CONNECT2 state, after the Connect Request is received but before the Accept Synchonous Connection is sent. If this happens the following crash was observed, when the connection is terminated: [ +0.000003] hci_sync_conn_complete_evt: hci0 status 0x10 [ +0.000005] sco_connect_cfm: hcon ffff88003d1bd800 bdaddr 40:98:4e:32:d7:39 status 16 [ +0.000003] sco_conn_del: hcon ffff88003d1bd800 conn ffff88003cc8e300, err 110 [ +0.000015] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000199 [ +0.000906] IP: [<ffffffff810620dd>] __lock_acquire+0xed/0xe82 [ +0.000000] PGD 3d21f067 PUD 3d291067 PMD 0 [ +0.000000] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ +0.000000] Modules linked in: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth [ +0.000000] CPU 0 [ +0.000000] Pid: 1481, comm: kworker/u:2H Not tainted 3.9.0-rc1-25019-gad82cdd #1 Bochs Bochs [ +0.000000] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810620dd>] [<ffffffff810620dd>] __lock_acquire+0xed/0xe82 [ +0.000000] RSP: 0018:ffff88003c3c19d8 EFLAGS: 00010002 [ +0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000000] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88003d1be868 [ +0.000000] RBP: ffff88003c3c1a98 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000000] R10: ffff88003d1be868 R11: ffff88003e20b000 R12: 0000000000000002 [ +0.000000] R13: ffff88003aaa8000 R14: 000000000000006e R15: ffff88003d1be850 [ +0.000000] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003e200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000000] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ +0.000000] CR2: 0000000000000199 CR3: 000000003c1cb000 CR4: 00000000000006b0 [ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000000] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ +0.000000] Process kworker/u:2H (pid: 1481, threadinfo ffff88003c3c0000, task ffff88003aaa8000) [ +0.000000] Stack: [ +0.000000] ffffffff81b16342 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff88003d1be868 [ +0.000000] ffffffff00000000 00018c0c7863e367 000000003c3c1a28 ffffffff8101efbd [ +0.000000] 0000000000000000 ffff88003e3d2400 ffff88003c3c1a38 ffffffff81007c7a [ +0.000000] Call Trace: [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8101efbd>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x34/0x3b [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff81007c7a>] ? paravirt_sched_clock+0x9/0xd [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff81007fd4>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xb [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8104fd7a>] ? sched_clock_local+0x12/0x75 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff810632d1>] lock_acquire+0x93/0xb1 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa0022339>] ? spin_lock+0x9/0xb [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8105f3d8>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.22+0x4e/0x55 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff814f6038>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x74 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa0022339>] ? spin_lock+0x9/0xb [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff814f6936>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x23/0x36 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa0022339>] spin_lock+0x9/0xb [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa00230cc>] sco_conn_del+0x76/0xbb [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa002391d>] sco_connect_cfm+0x2da/0x2e9 [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa000862a>] hci_proto_connect_cfm+0x38/0x65 [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa0008d30>] hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.isra.79+0x11a/0x13e [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa000cd96>] hci_event_packet+0x153b/0x239d [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff814f68ff>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x48/0x5c [ +0.000000] [<ffffffffa00025f6>] hci_rx_work+0xf3/0x2e3 [bluetooth] [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8103efed>] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x30b [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8103ef83>] ? process_one_work+0x172/0x30b [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8103e07f>] ? spin_lock_irq+0x9/0xb [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8103fc8d>] worker_thread+0x123/0x1d2 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff8103fb6a>] ? manage_workers+0x240/0x240 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff81044211>] kthread+0x9d/0xa5 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff81044174>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x60/0x60 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff814f75bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ +0.000000] [<ffffffff81044174>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x60/0x60 [ +0.000000] Code: d7 44 89 8d 50 ff ff ff 4c 89 95 58 ff ff ff e8 44 fc ff ff 44 8b 8d 50 ff ff ff 48 85 c0 4c 8b 95 58 ff ff ff 0f 84 7a 04 00 00 <f0> ff 80 98 01 00 00 83 3d 25 41 a7 00 00 45 8b b5 e8 05 00 00 [ +0.000000] RIP [<ffffffff810620dd>] __lock_acquire+0xed/0xe82 [ +0.000000] RSP <ffff88003c3c19d8> [ +0.000000] CR2: 0000000000000199 [ +0.000000] ---[ end trace e73cd3b52352dd34 ]--- Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.8] Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org> Tested-by: Frederic Dalleau <frederic.dalleau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-03-13 19:46:20 -03:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: avoid circular locks in sco_sock_connect In a future patch, calls to bh_lock_sock in sco.c should be replaced by lock_sock now that none of the functions are run in IRQ context. However, doing so results in a circular locking dependency: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/14867 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88803e3c1120 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1613 [inline] ffff88803e3c1120 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_conn_del+0x12a/0x2a0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:191 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8d2dc7c8 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_disconn_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:1497 [inline] ffffffff8d2dc7c8 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_conn_hash_flush+0xda/0x260 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1608 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104 hci_connect_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:1482 [inline] hci_remote_features_evt net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:3263 [inline] hci_event_packet+0x2f4d/0x7c50 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6240 hci_rx_work+0x4f8/0xd30 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:5122 process_one_work+0x98d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:2276 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2422 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104 sco_connect net/bluetooth/sco.c:245 [inline] sco_sock_connect+0x227/0xa10 net/bluetooth/sco.c:601 __sys_connect_file+0x155/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1879 __sys_connect+0x161/0x190 net/socket.c:1896 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1906 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1903 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x6f/0xb0 net/socket.c:1903 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590 lock_sock_nested+0xca/0x120 net/core/sock.c:3170 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1613 [inline] sco_conn_del+0x12a/0x2a0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:191 sco_disconn_cfm+0x71/0xb0 net/bluetooth/sco.c:1202 hci_disconn_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:1500 [inline] hci_conn_hash_flush+0x127/0x260 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:1608 hci_dev_do_close+0x528/0x1130 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:1778 hci_unregister_dev+0x1c0/0x5a0 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4015 vhci_release+0x70/0xe0 drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:340 __fput+0x288/0x920 fs/file_table.c:280 task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:32 [inline] do_exit+0xbd4/0x2a60 kernel/exit.c:825 do_group_exit+0x125/0x310 kernel/exit.c:922 get_signal+0x47f/0x2160 kernel/signal.c:2808 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x2a9/0x1c40 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:865 handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:148 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:172 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x17d/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:209 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:291 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:302 ret_from_fork+0x15/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:288 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** The issue is that the lock hierarchy should go from &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO. For example, one such call trace is: hci_dev_do_close(): hci_dev_lock(); hci_conn_hash_flush(): hci_disconn_cfm(): mutex_lock(&hci_cb_list_lock); sco_disconn_cfm(): sco_conn_del(): lock_sock(sk); However, in sco_sock_connect, we call lock_sock before calling hci_dev_lock inside sco_connect, thus inverting the lock hierarchy. We fix this by pulling the call to hci_dev_lock out from sco_connect. Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2021-08-10 12:14:06 +08:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency on sco_connect_cfm This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g0b93eeba4454 #4703 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u3:0/46 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001fd9130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff831e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_connect+0xfc/0x630 __sys_connect+0x197/0x1b0 __x64_sys_connect+0x37/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO --> &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(&hdev->lock); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u3:0/46: #0: ffff8880028d1130 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #1: ffff8880013dfde0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4c0/0x910 #2: ffff8880025d8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0xa6/0x3d0 #3: ffffffffb79e3340 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:15:50 -07:00
net: make getname() functions return length rather than use int* parameter Changes since v1: Added changes in these files: drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_transport.c drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-socket.c drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c drivers/vhost/net.c fs/dlm/lowcomms.c fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c security/tomoyo/network.c Before: All these functions either return a negative error indicator, or store length of sockaddr into "int *socklen" parameter and return zero on success. "int *socklen" parameter is awkward. For example, if caller does not care, it still needs to provide on-stack storage for the value it does not need. None of the many FOO_getname() functions of various protocols ever used old value of *socklen. They always just overwrite it. This change drops this parameter, and makes all these functions, on success, return length of sockaddr. It's always >= 0 and can be differentiated from an error. Tests in callers are changed from "if (err)" to "if (err < 0)", where needed. rpc_sockname() lost "int buflen" parameter, since its only use was to be passed to kernel_getsockname() as &buflen and subsequently not used in any way. Userspace API is not changed. text data bss dec hex filename 30108430 2633624 873672 33615726 200ef6e vmlinux.before.o 30108109 2633612 873672 33615393 200ee21 vmlinux.o Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-x25@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-02-12 20:00:20 +01:00
net: make getname() functions return length rather than use int* parameter Changes since v1: Added changes in these files: drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_transport.c drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-socket.c drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c drivers/vhost/net.c fs/dlm/lowcomms.c fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c security/tomoyo/network.c Before: All these functions either return a negative error indicator, or store length of sockaddr into "int *socklen" parameter and return zero on success. "int *socklen" parameter is awkward. For example, if caller does not care, it still needs to provide on-stack storage for the value it does not need. None of the many FOO_getname() functions of various protocols ever used old value of *socklen. They always just overwrite it. This change drops this parameter, and makes all these functions, on success, return length of sockaddr. It's always >= 0 and can be differentiated from an error. Tests in callers are changed from "if (err)" to "if (err < 0)", where needed. rpc_sockname() lost "int buflen" parameter, since its only use was to be passed to kernel_getsockname() as &buflen and subsequently not used in any way. Userspace API is not changed. text data bss dec hex filename 30108430 2633624 873672 33615726 200ef6e vmlinux.before.o 30108109 2633612 873672 33615393 200ee21 vmlinux.o Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-x25@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-02-12 20:00:20 +01:00
Bluetooth: Fix type of len in {l2cap,sco}_sock_getsockopt_old() After an innocuous optimization change in LLVM main (19.0.0), x86_64 allmodconfig (which enables CONFIG_KCSAN / -fsanitize=thread) fails to build due to the checks in check_copy_size(): In file included from net/bluetooth/sco.c:27: In file included from include/linux/module.h:13: In file included from include/linux/stat.h:19: In file included from include/linux/time.h:60: In file included from include/linux/time32.h:13: In file included from include/linux/timex.h:67: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:6: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:10: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:15: In file included from include/linux/percpu.h:7: In file included from include/linux/smp.h:118: include/linux/thread_info.h:244:4: error: call to '__bad_copy_from' declared with 'error' attribute: copy source size is too small 244 | __bad_copy_from(); | ^ The same exact error occurs in l2cap_sock.c. The copy_to_user() statements that are failing come from l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old() and sco_sock_getsockopt_old(). This does not occur with GCC with or without KCSAN or Clang without KCSAN enabled. len is defined as an 'int' because it is assigned from '__user int *optlen'. However, it is clamped against the result of sizeof(), which has a type of 'size_t' ('unsigned long' for 64-bit platforms). This is done with min_t() because min() requires compatible types, which results in both len and the result of sizeof() being casted to 'unsigned int', meaning len changes signs and the result of sizeof() is truncated. From there, len is passed to copy_to_user(), which has a third parameter type of 'unsigned long', so it is widened and changes signs again. This excessive casting in combination with the KCSAN instrumentation causes LLVM to fail to eliminate the __bad_copy_from() call, failing the build. The official recommendation from LLVM developers is to consistently use long types for all size variables to avoid the unnecessary casting in the first place. Change the type of len to size_t in both l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old() and sco_sock_getsockopt_old(). This clears up the error while allowing min_t() to be replaced with min(), resulting in simpler code with no casts and fewer implicit conversions. While len is a different type than optlen now, it should result in no functional change because the result of sizeof() will clamp all values of optlen in the same manner as before. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2007 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85647 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-04-01 11:24:17 -07:00
Bluetooth: Fix type of len in {l2cap,sco}_sock_getsockopt_old() After an innocuous optimization change in LLVM main (19.0.0), x86_64 allmodconfig (which enables CONFIG_KCSAN / -fsanitize=thread) fails to build due to the checks in check_copy_size(): In file included from net/bluetooth/sco.c:27: In file included from include/linux/module.h:13: In file included from include/linux/stat.h:19: In file included from include/linux/time.h:60: In file included from include/linux/time32.h:13: In file included from include/linux/timex.h:67: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:6: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:10: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:15: In file included from include/linux/percpu.h:7: In file included from include/linux/smp.h:118: include/linux/thread_info.h:244:4: error: call to '__bad_copy_from' declared with 'error' attribute: copy source size is too small 244 | __bad_copy_from(); | ^ The same exact error occurs in l2cap_sock.c. The copy_to_user() statements that are failing come from l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old() and sco_sock_getsockopt_old(). This does not occur with GCC with or without KCSAN or Clang without KCSAN enabled. len is defined as an 'int' because it is assigned from '__user int *optlen'. However, it is clamped against the result of sizeof(), which has a type of 'size_t' ('unsigned long' for 64-bit platforms). This is done with min_t() because min() requires compatible types, which results in both len and the result of sizeof() being casted to 'unsigned int', meaning len changes signs and the result of sizeof() is truncated. From there, len is passed to copy_to_user(), which has a third parameter type of 'unsigned long', so it is widened and changes signs again. This excessive casting in combination with the KCSAN instrumentation causes LLVM to fail to eliminate the __bad_copy_from() call, failing the build. The official recommendation from LLVM developers is to consistently use long types for all size variables to avoid the unnecessary casting in the first place. Change the type of len to size_t in both l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old() and sco_sock_getsockopt_old(). This clears up the error while allowing min_t() to be replaced with min(), resulting in simpler code with no casts and fewer implicit conversions. While len is a different type than optlen now, it should result in no functional change because the result of sizeof() will clamp all values of optlen in the same manner as before. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2007 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85647 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-04-01 11:24:17 -07:00
Bluetooth: Fix type of len in {l2cap,sco}_sock_getsockopt_old() After an innocuous optimization change in LLVM main (19.0.0), x86_64 allmodconfig (which enables CONFIG_KCSAN / -fsanitize=thread) fails to build due to the checks in check_copy_size(): In file included from net/bluetooth/sco.c:27: In file included from include/linux/module.h:13: In file included from include/linux/stat.h:19: In file included from include/linux/time.h:60: In file included from include/linux/time32.h:13: In file included from include/linux/timex.h:67: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:6: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:10: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:15: In file included from include/linux/percpu.h:7: In file included from include/linux/smp.h:118: include/linux/thread_info.h:244:4: error: call to '__bad_copy_from' declared with 'error' attribute: copy source size is too small 244 | __bad_copy_from(); | ^ The same exact error occurs in l2cap_sock.c. The copy_to_user() statements that are failing come from l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old() and sco_sock_getsockopt_old(). This does not occur with GCC with or without KCSAN or Clang without KCSAN enabled. len is defined as an 'int' because it is assigned from '__user int *optlen'. However, it is clamped against the result of sizeof(), which has a type of 'size_t' ('unsigned long' for 64-bit platforms). This is done with min_t() because min() requires compatible types, which results in both len and the result of sizeof() being casted to 'unsigned int', meaning len changes signs and the result of sizeof() is truncated. From there, len is passed to copy_to_user(), which has a third parameter type of 'unsigned long', so it is widened and changes signs again. This excessive casting in combination with the KCSAN instrumentation causes LLVM to fail to eliminate the __bad_copy_from() call, failing the build. The official recommendation from LLVM developers is to consistently use long types for all size variables to avoid the unnecessary casting in the first place. Change the type of len to size_t in both l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old() and sco_sock_getsockopt_old(). This clears up the error while allowing min_t() to be replaced with min(), resulting in simpler code with no casts and fewer implicit conversions. While len is a different type than optlen now, it should result in no functional change because the result of sizeof() will clamp all values of optlen in the same manner as before. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2007 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85647 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2024-04-01 11:24:17 -07:00
Bluetooth: sco: Fix crash when using BT_SNDMTU/BT_RCVMTU option This commit add the invalid check for connected socket, without it will causes the following crash due to sco_pi(sk)->conn being NULL: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000050-0x0000000000000057] CPU: 3 PID: 4284 Comm: test_sco Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:sco_sock_getsockopt+0x45d/0x8e0 Code: 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 ca 03 00 00 49 8b 9d f8 04 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8d 7b 50 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e b5 03 00 00 8b 43 50 48 8b 0c RSP: 0018:ffff88801bb17d88 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff83a4ecdf RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: ffffc90002fce000 RDI: 0000000000000050 RBP: 1ffff11003762fb4 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88810e1008c0 R10: ffffffffbd695dcf R11: fffffbfff7ad2bb9 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888018ff1000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 000000000000000d FS: 00007fb4f76c1700(0000) GS:ffff88811af80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005555e3b7a938 CR3: 00000001117be001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ? sco_skb_put_cmsg+0x80/0x80 ? sco_skb_put_cmsg+0x80/0x80 __sys_getsockopt+0x12a/0x220 ? __ia32_sys_setsockopt+0x150/0x150 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x18/0x50 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0xba/0x150 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: 0fc1a726f897 ("Bluetooth: sco: new getsockopt options BT_SNDMTU/BT_RCVMTU") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Luiz Augusto Von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2020-11-16 21:24:21 +08:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency sco_sock_getsockopt This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g68fcb3a7bf97 #4706 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sco-tester/31 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880025b8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 but task is already holding lock: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 __sys_getsockopt+0xe9/0x190 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x5b/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&hdev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by sco-tester/31: #0: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 Fixes: 248733e87d50 ("Bluetooth: Allow querying of supported offload codecs over SCO socket") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:45:03 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency sco_sock_getsockopt This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g68fcb3a7bf97 #4706 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sco-tester/31 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880025b8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 but task is already holding lock: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 __sys_getsockopt+0xe9/0x190 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x5b/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&hdev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by sco-tester/31: #0: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 Fixes: 248733e87d50 ("Bluetooth: Allow querying of supported offload codecs over SCO socket") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:45:03 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency sco_sock_getsockopt This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g68fcb3a7bf97 #4706 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sco-tester/31 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880025b8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 but task is already holding lock: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 __sys_getsockopt+0xe9/0x190 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x5b/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&hdev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by sco-tester/31: #0: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 Fixes: 248733e87d50 ("Bluetooth: Allow querying of supported offload codecs over SCO socket") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:45:03 -07:00
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency sco_sock_getsockopt This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g68fcb3a7bf97 #4706 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sco-tester/31 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880025b8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 but task is already holding lock: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 __sys_getsockopt+0xe9/0x190 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x5b/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&hdev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by sco-tester/31: #0: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 Fixes: 248733e87d50 ("Bluetooth: Allow querying of supported offload codecs over SCO socket") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2023-03-30 14:45:03 -07:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking issue during fast SCO reconnection. When SCO connection is requested and disconnected fast, there is a change that sco_sock_shutdown is going to preempt thread started in sco_connect_cfm. When this happens struct sock sk may be removed but a pointer to it is still held in sco_conn_ready, where embedded spinlock is used. If it is used, but struct sock has been removed, it will crash. Block connection object, which will prevent struct sock from being removed and give connection process chance to finish. BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/u:2H/319 lock: 0xe3e99434, .magic: f3000000, .owner: (���/0, .owner_cpu: -203804160 Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 Call Trace: [<c1155659>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x19/0xe9 [<fb75354f>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x92/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [< (null)>] (null) *pdpt = 00000000244e1001 *pde = 0000000000000000 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: evdev ecb rfcomm(O) libcomposite usb2380 udc_core bnep(O) btusb(O) btbcm(O) cdc_acm btintel(O) bluetooth(O) arc4 uinput hid_multitouch usbhid hid iwlmvm(O)e Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 EIP is at 0x0 EAX: e3e99400 EBX: e3e99400 ECX: 00000100 EDX: 00000000 ESI: e3e99434 EDI: fb763ce0 EBP: e49b9e44 ESP: e49b9e14 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000000 CR3: 24444000 CR4: 001007f0 DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 Process kworker/u:2H (pid: 319, ti=e49b8000 task=e4ab9030 task.ti=e49b8000) Stack: fb75355b 00000246 fb763900 22222222 22222222 22222222 e3f94460 e3ca7c0a e49b9e4c e3f34c00 e3ca7c0a fb763ce0 e49b9e6c fb731dbc 02000246 e4cec85c e4cec008 00000000 e3f34c00 e4cec000 e3c2ce00 0000002c e49b9ed0 fb734ee7 Call Trace: [<fb75355b>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x9e/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 Code: Bad EIP value. EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:e49b9e14 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 942a6577c0abd725 ]--- Signed-off-by: Kuba Pawlak <kubax.t.pawlak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-05 18:44:17 +02:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking issue during fast SCO reconnection. When SCO connection is requested and disconnected fast, there is a change that sco_sock_shutdown is going to preempt thread started in sco_connect_cfm. When this happens struct sock sk may be removed but a pointer to it is still held in sco_conn_ready, where embedded spinlock is used. If it is used, but struct sock has been removed, it will crash. Block connection object, which will prevent struct sock from being removed and give connection process chance to finish. BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/u:2H/319 lock: 0xe3e99434, .magic: f3000000, .owner: (���/0, .owner_cpu: -203804160 Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 Call Trace: [<c1155659>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x19/0xe9 [<fb75354f>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x92/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [< (null)>] (null) *pdpt = 00000000244e1001 *pde = 0000000000000000 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: evdev ecb rfcomm(O) libcomposite usb2380 udc_core bnep(O) btusb(O) btbcm(O) cdc_acm btintel(O) bluetooth(O) arc4 uinput hid_multitouch usbhid hid iwlmvm(O)e Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 EIP is at 0x0 EAX: e3e99400 EBX: e3e99400 ECX: 00000100 EDX: 00000000 ESI: e3e99434 EDI: fb763ce0 EBP: e49b9e44 ESP: e49b9e14 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000000 CR3: 24444000 CR4: 001007f0 DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 Process kworker/u:2H (pid: 319, ti=e49b8000 task=e4ab9030 task.ti=e49b8000) Stack: fb75355b 00000246 fb763900 22222222 22222222 22222222 e3f94460 e3ca7c0a e49b9e4c e3f34c00 e3ca7c0a fb763ce0 e49b9e6c fb731dbc 02000246 e4cec85c e4cec008 00000000 e3f34c00 e4cec000 e3c2ce00 0000002c e49b9ed0 fb734ee7 Call Trace: [<fb75355b>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x9e/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 Code: Bad EIP value. EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:e49b9e14 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 942a6577c0abd725 ]--- Signed-off-by: Kuba Pawlak <kubax.t.pawlak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-05 18:44:17 +02:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking issue during fast SCO reconnection. When SCO connection is requested and disconnected fast, there is a change that sco_sock_shutdown is going to preempt thread started in sco_connect_cfm. When this happens struct sock sk may be removed but a pointer to it is still held in sco_conn_ready, where embedded spinlock is used. If it is used, but struct sock has been removed, it will crash. Block connection object, which will prevent struct sock from being removed and give connection process chance to finish. BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/u:2H/319 lock: 0xe3e99434, .magic: f3000000, .owner: (���/0, .owner_cpu: -203804160 Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 Call Trace: [<c1155659>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x19/0xe9 [<fb75354f>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x92/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [< (null)>] (null) *pdpt = 00000000244e1001 *pde = 0000000000000000 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: evdev ecb rfcomm(O) libcomposite usb2380 udc_core bnep(O) btusb(O) btbcm(O) cdc_acm btintel(O) bluetooth(O) arc4 uinput hid_multitouch usbhid hid iwlmvm(O)e Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 EIP is at 0x0 EAX: e3e99400 EBX: e3e99400 ECX: 00000100 EDX: 00000000 ESI: e3e99434 EDI: fb763ce0 EBP: e49b9e44 ESP: e49b9e14 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000000 CR3: 24444000 CR4: 001007f0 DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 Process kworker/u:2H (pid: 319, ti=e49b8000 task=e4ab9030 task.ti=e49b8000) Stack: fb75355b 00000246 fb763900 22222222 22222222 22222222 e3f94460 e3ca7c0a e49b9e4c e3f34c00 e3ca7c0a fb763ce0 e49b9e6c fb731dbc 02000246 e4cec85c e4cec008 00000000 e3f34c00 e4cec000 e3c2ce00 0000002c e49b9ed0 fb734ee7 Call Trace: [<fb75355b>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x9e/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 Code: Bad EIP value. EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:e49b9e14 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 942a6577c0abd725 ]--- Signed-off-by: Kuba Pawlak <kubax.t.pawlak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-05 18:44:17 +02:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking issue during fast SCO reconnection. When SCO connection is requested and disconnected fast, there is a change that sco_sock_shutdown is going to preempt thread started in sco_connect_cfm. When this happens struct sock sk may be removed but a pointer to it is still held in sco_conn_ready, where embedded spinlock is used. If it is used, but struct sock has been removed, it will crash. Block connection object, which will prevent struct sock from being removed and give connection process chance to finish. BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/u:2H/319 lock: 0xe3e99434, .magic: f3000000, .owner: (���/0, .owner_cpu: -203804160 Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 Call Trace: [<c1155659>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x19/0xe9 [<fb75354f>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x92/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [< (null)>] (null) *pdpt = 00000000244e1001 *pde = 0000000000000000 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: evdev ecb rfcomm(O) libcomposite usb2380 udc_core bnep(O) btusb(O) btbcm(O) cdc_acm btintel(O) bluetooth(O) arc4 uinput hid_multitouch usbhid hid iwlmvm(O)e Pid: 319, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-115.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 EIP is at 0x0 EAX: e3e99400 EBX: e3e99400 ECX: 00000100 EDX: 00000000 ESI: e3e99434 EDI: fb763ce0 EBP: e49b9e44 ESP: e49b9e14 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000000 CR3: 24444000 CR4: 001007f0 DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 Process kworker/u:2H (pid: 319, ti=e49b8000 task=e4ab9030 task.ti=e49b8000) Stack: fb75355b 00000246 fb763900 22222222 22222222 22222222 e3f94460 e3ca7c0a e49b9e4c e3f34c00 e3ca7c0a fb763ce0 e49b9e6c fb731dbc 02000246 e4cec85c e4cec008 00000000 e3f34c00 e4cec000 e3c2ce00 0000002c e49b9ed0 fb734ee7 Call Trace: [<fb75355b>] ? sco_connect_cfm+0x9e/0x236 [bluetooth] [<fb731dbc>] ? hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x18b/0x1cb [bluetooth] [<fb734ee7>] ? hci_event_packet+0x1acd/0x21a6 [bluetooth] [<c1041095>] ? finish_task_switch+0x50/0x89 [<c1349a2e>] ? __schedule+0x638/0x6b8 [<fb727918>] ? hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x2b8 [bluetooth] [<c103760a>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x21/0x2a [<c1035df9>] ? process_one_work+0x157/0x21b [<fb72785f>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xef/0xef [bluetooth] [<c1036217>] ? worker_thread+0x16e/0x20a [<c10360a9>] ? manage_workers+0x1cf/0x1cf [<c103a0ef>] ? kthread+0x8d/0x92 [<c134adf7>] ? ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c103a062>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x24/0x24 Code: Bad EIP value. EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:e49b9e14 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 942a6577c0abd725 ]--- Signed-off-by: Kuba Pawlak <kubax.t.pawlak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-05 18:44:17 +02:00
Bluetooth: Reduce critical section in sco_conn_ready This patch reduces the critical section protected by sco_conn_lock in sco_conn_ready function. The lock is acquired only when it is really needed. This patch fixes the following lockdep warning which is generated when the host terminates a SCO connection. Today, this warning is a false positive. There is no way those two threads reported by lockdep are running at the same time since hdev->workqueue (where rx_work is queued) is single-thread. However, if somehow this behavior is changed in future, we will have a potential deadlock. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u:1H/1018 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa003436e>] sco_connect_cfm+0xbe/0x350 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0015d6c>] hci_event_packet+0xd3c/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u:1H/1018: #0: (hdev->name#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #1: ((&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #2: (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa000fbe9>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x59/0x3c0 [bluetooth] #3: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] stack backtrace: Pid: 1018, comm: kworker/u:1H Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813e92f9>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fbd0>] ? hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x40/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81202e90>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x80/0x90 [<ffffffff8133ff7d>] ? kfree_skb+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffffa0021644>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0x1a4/0x1c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104fdc1>] ? worker_thread+0x51/0x3e0 [<ffffffffa0004450>] ? hci_tx_work+0x800/0x800 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff8104fd70>] ? busy_worker_rebind_fn+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-01-29 19:59:56 -03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash on fast disconnect of SCO Fix a crash that may happen when a connection is closed before it was fully established. Mapping conn->hcon was released by shutdown function, but it is still referenced in (not yet finished) connection established handling function. [ 4635.254073] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000013 [ 4635.262058] IP: [<c11659f0>] memcmp+0xe/0x25 [ 4635.266835] *pdpt = 0000000024190001 *pde = 0000000000000000 [ 4635.273261] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 4635.277652] Modules linked in: evdev ecb vfat fat libcomposite usb2380 isofs zlib_inflate rfcomm(O) udc_core bnep(O) btusb(O) btbcm(O) btintel(O) bluetooth(O) cdc_acm arc4 uinput hid_mule [ 4635.321761] Pid: 363, comm: kworker/u:2H Tainted: G O 3.8.0-119.1-plk-adaptation-byt-ivi-brd #1 [ 4635.332642] EIP: 0060:[<c11659f0>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 4635.338767] EIP is at memcmp+0xe/0x25 [ 4635.342852] EAX: e4720678 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000006 EDX: 00000013 [ 4635.349849] ESI: 00000000 EDI: fb85366c EBP: e40c7dc0 ESP: e40c7db4 [ 4635.356846] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 [ 4635.362873] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000013 CR3: 24191000 CR4: 001007f0 [ 4635.369869] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 [ 4635.376865] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 [ 4635.381143] Process kworker/u:2H (pid: 363, ti=e40c6000 task=e40c5510 task.ti=e40c6000) [ 4635.390080] Stack: [ 4635.392319] e4720400 00000000 fb85366c e40c7df4 fb842285 e40c7de2 fb853200 00000013 [ 4635.401003] e3f101c4 e4720678 e3f101c0 e403be0a e40c7dfc e416a000 e403be0a fb85366c [ 4635.409692] e40c7e1c fb820186 020f6c00 e47c49ac e47c4008 00000000 e416a000 e47c402c [ 4635.418380] Call Trace: [ 4635.421153] [<fb842285>] sco_connect_cfm+0xff/0x236 [bluetooth] [ 4635.427893] [<fb820186>] hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.clone.101+0x227/0x268 [bluetooth] [ 4635.436758] [<fb82370f>] hci_event_packet+0x1caa/0x21d3 [bluetooth] [ 4635.443859] [<c106231f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 4635.449502] [<c1375b8a>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x59 [ 4635.456340] [<fb814b67>] hci_rx_work+0xb9/0x350 [bluetooth] [ 4635.462663] [<c1039f1e>] ? process_one_work+0x17b/0x2e6 [ 4635.468596] [<c1039f77>] process_one_work+0x1d4/0x2e6 [ 4635.474333] [<c1039f1e>] ? process_one_work+0x17b/0x2e6 [ 4635.480294] [<fb814aae>] ? hci_cmd_work+0xda/0xda [bluetooth] [ 4635.486810] [<c103a3fa>] worker_thread+0x171/0x20f [ 4635.492257] [<c10456c5>] ? complete+0x34/0x3e [ 4635.497219] [<c103ea06>] kthread+0x90/0x95 [ 4635.501888] [<c103a289>] ? manage_workers+0x1df/0x1df [ 4635.507628] [<c1376537>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [ 4635.513755] [<c103e976>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42 [ 4635.519975] Code: 74 0d 3c 79 74 04 3c 59 75 0c c6 02 01 eb 03 c6 02 00 31 c0 eb 05 b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 56 53 31 db eb 0e 0f b6 34 18 <0f> b6 3c 1a 43 29 fe 75 07 49 85 c9 7f [ 4635.541264] EIP: [<c11659f0>] memcmp+0xe/0x25 SS:ESP 0068:e40c7db4 [ 4635.548166] CR2: 0000000000000013 [ 4635.552177] ---[ end trace e05ce9b8ce6182f6 ]--- Signed-off-by: Kuba Pawlak <kubax.t.pawlak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-26 16:17:14 +00:00
Bluetooth: Reduce critical section in sco_conn_ready This patch reduces the critical section protected by sco_conn_lock in sco_conn_ready function. The lock is acquired only when it is really needed. This patch fixes the following lockdep warning which is generated when the host terminates a SCO connection. Today, this warning is a false positive. There is no way those two threads reported by lockdep are running at the same time since hdev->workqueue (where rx_work is queued) is single-thread. However, if somehow this behavior is changed in future, we will have a potential deadlock. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u:1H/1018 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa003436e>] sco_connect_cfm+0xbe/0x350 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0015d6c>] hci_event_packet+0xd3c/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u:1H/1018: #0: (hdev->name#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #1: ((&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #2: (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa000fbe9>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x59/0x3c0 [bluetooth] #3: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] stack backtrace: Pid: 1018, comm: kworker/u:1H Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813e92f9>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fbd0>] ? hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x40/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81202e90>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x80/0x90 [<ffffffff8133ff7d>] ? kfree_skb+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffffa0021644>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0x1a4/0x1c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104fdc1>] ? worker_thread+0x51/0x3e0 [<ffffffffa0004450>] ? hci_tx_work+0x800/0x800 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff8104fd70>] ? busy_worker_rebind_fn+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-01-29 19:59:56 -03:00
Bluetooth: Reduce critical section in sco_conn_ready This patch reduces the critical section protected by sco_conn_lock in sco_conn_ready function. The lock is acquired only when it is really needed. This patch fixes the following lockdep warning which is generated when the host terminates a SCO connection. Today, this warning is a false positive. There is no way those two threads reported by lockdep are running at the same time since hdev->workqueue (where rx_work is queued) is single-thread. However, if somehow this behavior is changed in future, we will have a potential deadlock. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u:1H/1018 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa003436e>] sco_connect_cfm+0xbe/0x350 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0015d6c>] hci_event_packet+0xd3c/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u:1H/1018: #0: (hdev->name#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #1: ((&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #2: (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa000fbe9>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x59/0x3c0 [bluetooth] #3: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] stack backtrace: Pid: 1018, comm: kworker/u:1H Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813e92f9>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fbd0>] ? hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x40/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81202e90>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x80/0x90 [<ffffffff8133ff7d>] ? kfree_skb+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffffa0021644>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0x1a4/0x1c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104fdc1>] ? worker_thread+0x51/0x3e0 [<ffffffffa0004450>] ? hci_tx_work+0x800/0x800 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff8104fd70>] ? busy_worker_rebind_fn+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-01-29 19:59:56 -03:00
Bluetooth: Reduce critical section in sco_conn_ready This patch reduces the critical section protected by sco_conn_lock in sco_conn_ready function. The lock is acquired only when it is really needed. This patch fixes the following lockdep warning which is generated when the host terminates a SCO connection. Today, this warning is a false positive. There is no way those two threads reported by lockdep are running at the same time since hdev->workqueue (where rx_work is queued) is single-thread. However, if somehow this behavior is changed in future, we will have a potential deadlock. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u:1H/1018 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa003436e>] sco_connect_cfm+0xbe/0x350 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0015d6c>] hci_event_packet+0xd3c/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u:1H/1018: #0: (hdev->name#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #1: ((&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #2: (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa000fbe9>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x59/0x3c0 [bluetooth] #3: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] stack backtrace: Pid: 1018, comm: kworker/u:1H Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813e92f9>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fbd0>] ? hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x40/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81202e90>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x80/0x90 [<ffffffff8133ff7d>] ? kfree_skb+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffffa0021644>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0x1a4/0x1c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104fdc1>] ? worker_thread+0x51/0x3e0 [<ffffffffa0004450>] ? hci_tx_work+0x800/0x800 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff8104fd70>] ? busy_worker_rebind_fn+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
2013-01-29 19:59:56 -03:00
hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter: hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member) Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate. Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required: - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones. - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this was modified to use 'obj->member' instead. - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator properly, so those had to be fixed up manually. The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here: @@ iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host; type T; expression a,c,d,e; identifier b; statement S; @@ -T b; <+... when != b ( hlist_for_each_entry(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_from(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a, - b, c) S | for_each_busy_worker(a, c, - b, d) S | ax25_uid_for_each(a, - b, c) S | ax25_for_each(a, - b, c) S | inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sctp_for_each_hentry(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_rcu(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_from -(a, b) +(a) S + sk_for_each_from(a) S | sk_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | sk_for_each_bound(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a, - b, c, d, e) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | nr_node_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_node_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S | for_each_host(a, - b, c) S | for_each_host_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | for_each_mesh_entry(a, - b, c, d) S ) ...+> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes] Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-27 17:06:00 -08:00
Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup hci_conn on RX path on protocol side The hdev lock/lookup/unlock/use pattern in the packet RX path doesn't ensure hci_conn* is not concurrently modified/deleted. This locking appears to be leftover from before conn_hash started using RCU commit bf4c63252490b ("Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU") and not clear if it had purpose since then. Currently, there are code paths that delete hci_conn* from elsewhere than the ordered hdev->workqueue where the RX work runs in. E.g. commit 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") introduced some of these, and there probably were a few others before it. It's better to do the locking so that even if these run concurrently no UAF is possible. Move the lookup of hci_conn and associated socket-specific conn to protocol recv handlers, and do them within a single critical section to cover hci_conn* usage and lookup. syzkaller has reported a crash that appears to be this issue: [Task hdev->workqueue] [Task 2] hci_disconnect_all_sync l2cap_recv_acldata(hcon) hci_conn_get(hcon) hci_abort_conn_sync(hcon) hci_dev_lock hci_dev_lock hci_conn_del(hcon) v-------------------------------- hci_dev_unlock hci_conn_put(hcon) conn = hcon->l2cap_data (UAF) Fixes: 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") Reported-by: syzbot+d32d77220b92eddd89ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d32d77220b92eddd89ad Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-11-15 18:43:55 +02:00
Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup hci_conn on RX path on protocol side The hdev lock/lookup/unlock/use pattern in the packet RX path doesn't ensure hci_conn* is not concurrently modified/deleted. This locking appears to be leftover from before conn_hash started using RCU commit bf4c63252490b ("Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU") and not clear if it had purpose since then. Currently, there are code paths that delete hci_conn* from elsewhere than the ordered hdev->workqueue where the RX work runs in. E.g. commit 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") introduced some of these, and there probably were a few others before it. It's better to do the locking so that even if these run concurrently no UAF is possible. Move the lookup of hci_conn and associated socket-specific conn to protocol recv handlers, and do them within a single critical section to cover hci_conn* usage and lookup. syzkaller has reported a crash that appears to be this issue: [Task hdev->workqueue] [Task 2] hci_disconnect_all_sync l2cap_recv_acldata(hcon) hci_conn_get(hcon) hci_abort_conn_sync(hcon) hci_dev_lock hci_dev_lock hci_conn_del(hcon) v-------------------------------- hci_dev_unlock hci_conn_put(hcon) conn = hcon->l2cap_data (UAF) Fixes: 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") Reported-by: syzbot+d32d77220b92eddd89ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d32d77220b92eddd89ad Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-11-15 18:43:55 +02:00
Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup hci_conn on RX path on protocol side The hdev lock/lookup/unlock/use pattern in the packet RX path doesn't ensure hci_conn* is not concurrently modified/deleted. This locking appears to be leftover from before conn_hash started using RCU commit bf4c63252490b ("Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU") and not clear if it had purpose since then. Currently, there are code paths that delete hci_conn* from elsewhere than the ordered hdev->workqueue where the RX work runs in. E.g. commit 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") introduced some of these, and there probably were a few others before it. It's better to do the locking so that even if these run concurrently no UAF is possible. Move the lookup of hci_conn and associated socket-specific conn to protocol recv handlers, and do them within a single critical section to cover hci_conn* usage and lookup. syzkaller has reported a crash that appears to be this issue: [Task hdev->workqueue] [Task 2] hci_disconnect_all_sync l2cap_recv_acldata(hcon) hci_conn_get(hcon) hci_abort_conn_sync(hcon) hci_dev_lock hci_dev_lock hci_conn_del(hcon) v-------------------------------- hci_dev_unlock hci_conn_put(hcon) conn = hcon->l2cap_data (UAF) Fixes: 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") Reported-by: syzbot+d32d77220b92eddd89ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d32d77220b92eddd89ad Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-11-15 18:43:55 +02:00
Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup hci_conn on RX path on protocol side The hdev lock/lookup/unlock/use pattern in the packet RX path doesn't ensure hci_conn* is not concurrently modified/deleted. This locking appears to be leftover from before conn_hash started using RCU commit bf4c63252490b ("Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU") and not clear if it had purpose since then. Currently, there are code paths that delete hci_conn* from elsewhere than the ordered hdev->workqueue where the RX work runs in. E.g. commit 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") introduced some of these, and there probably were a few others before it. It's better to do the locking so that even if these run concurrently no UAF is possible. Move the lookup of hci_conn and associated socket-specific conn to protocol recv handlers, and do them within a single critical section to cover hci_conn* usage and lookup. syzkaller has reported a crash that appears to be this issue: [Task hdev->workqueue] [Task 2] hci_disconnect_all_sync l2cap_recv_acldata(hcon) hci_conn_get(hcon) hci_abort_conn_sync(hcon) hci_dev_lock hci_dev_lock hci_conn_del(hcon) v-------------------------------- hci_dev_unlock hci_conn_put(hcon) conn = hcon->l2cap_data (UAF) Fixes: 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") Reported-by: syzbot+d32d77220b92eddd89ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d32d77220b92eddd89ad Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-11-15 18:43:55 +02:00
Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup hci_conn on RX path on protocol side The hdev lock/lookup/unlock/use pattern in the packet RX path doesn't ensure hci_conn* is not concurrently modified/deleted. This locking appears to be leftover from before conn_hash started using RCU commit bf4c63252490b ("Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU") and not clear if it had purpose since then. Currently, there are code paths that delete hci_conn* from elsewhere than the ordered hdev->workqueue where the RX work runs in. E.g. commit 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") introduced some of these, and there probably were a few others before it. It's better to do the locking so that even if these run concurrently no UAF is possible. Move the lookup of hci_conn and associated socket-specific conn to protocol recv handlers, and do them within a single critical section to cover hci_conn* usage and lookup. syzkaller has reported a crash that appears to be this issue: [Task hdev->workqueue] [Task 2] hci_disconnect_all_sync l2cap_recv_acldata(hcon) hci_conn_get(hcon) hci_abort_conn_sync(hcon) hci_dev_lock hci_dev_lock hci_conn_del(hcon) v-------------------------------- hci_dev_unlock hci_conn_put(hcon) conn = hcon->l2cap_data (UAF) Fixes: 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") Reported-by: syzbot+d32d77220b92eddd89ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d32d77220b92eddd89ad Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-11-15 18:43:55 +02:00
Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup hci_conn on RX path on protocol side The hdev lock/lookup/unlock/use pattern in the packet RX path doesn't ensure hci_conn* is not concurrently modified/deleted. This locking appears to be leftover from before conn_hash started using RCU commit bf4c63252490b ("Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU") and not clear if it had purpose since then. Currently, there are code paths that delete hci_conn* from elsewhere than the ordered hdev->workqueue where the RX work runs in. E.g. commit 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") introduced some of these, and there probably were a few others before it. It's better to do the locking so that even if these run concurrently no UAF is possible. Move the lookup of hci_conn and associated socket-specific conn to protocol recv handlers, and do them within a single critical section to cover hci_conn* usage and lookup. syzkaller has reported a crash that appears to be this issue: [Task hdev->workqueue] [Task 2] hci_disconnect_all_sync l2cap_recv_acldata(hcon) hci_conn_get(hcon) hci_abort_conn_sync(hcon) hci_dev_lock hci_dev_lock hci_conn_del(hcon) v-------------------------------- hci_dev_unlock hci_conn_put(hcon) conn = hcon->l2cap_data (UAF) Fixes: 5af1f84ed13a ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on hci_abort_conn_sync") Reported-by: syzbot+d32d77220b92eddd89ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d32d77220b92eddd89ad Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-11-15 18:43:55 +02:00
hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter: hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member) Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate. Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required: - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones. - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this was modified to use 'obj->member' instead. - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator properly, so those had to be fixed up manually. The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here: @@ iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host; type T; expression a,c,d,e; identifier b; statement S; @@ -T b; <+... when != b ( hlist_for_each_entry(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_from(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a, - b, c) S | for_each_busy_worker(a, c, - b, d) S | ax25_uid_for_each(a, - b, c) S | ax25_for_each(a, - b, c) S | inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sctp_for_each_hentry(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_rcu(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_from -(a, b) +(a) S + sk_for_each_from(a) S | sk_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | sk_for_each_bound(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a, - b, c, d, e) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | nr_node_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_node_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S | for_each_host(a, - b, c) S | for_each_host_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | for_each_mesh_entry(a, - b, c, d) S ) ...+> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes] Tested-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-27 17:06:00 -08:00