linux/net/bluetooth/smp.c

3847 lines
94 KiB

Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix debugfs NULL pointer dereference Fix crash caused by NULL pointer dereference when debugfs functions le_max_key_read, le_max_key_size_write, le_min_key_size_read or le_min_key_size_write and Bluetooth adapter was powered off. Fix is to move max_key_size and min_key_size from smp_dev to hci_dev. At the same time they were renamed to le_max_key_size and le_min_key_size. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000002e8 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#24] SMP PTI CPU: 2 PID: 6255 Comm: cat Tainted: G D OE 4.18.9-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: LENOVO 4286CTO/4286CTO, BIOS 8DET76WW (1.46 ) 06/21/2018 RIP: 0010:le_max_key_size_read+0x45/0xb0 [bluetooth] Code: 00 00 00 48 83 ec 10 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 31 c0 48 8b 87 c8 00 00 00 48 8d 7c 24 04 48 8b 80 48 0a 00 00 <48> 8b 80 e8 02 00 00 0f b6 48 52 e8 fb b6 b3 ed be 04 00 00 00 48 RSP: 0018:ffffab23c3ff3df0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0b4ca2e000 RCX: ffffab23c3ff3f08 RDX: ffffffffc0ddb033 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffab23c3ff3df4 RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffab23c3ff3ed8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffab23c3ff3f08 R13: 00007f0b4ca2e000 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: ffffab23c3ff3f08 FS: 00007f0b4ca0f540(0000) GS:ffff91bd5e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000002e8 CR3: 00000000629fa006 CR4: 00000000000606e0 Call Trace: full_proxy_read+0x53/0x80 __vfs_read+0x36/0x180 vfs_read+0x8a/0x140 ksys_read+0x4f/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2018-09-28 21:54:30 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix debugfs NULL pointer dereference Fix crash caused by NULL pointer dereference when debugfs functions le_max_key_read, le_max_key_size_write, le_min_key_size_read or le_min_key_size_write and Bluetooth adapter was powered off. Fix is to move max_key_size and min_key_size from smp_dev to hci_dev. At the same time they were renamed to le_max_key_size and le_min_key_size. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000002e8 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#24] SMP PTI CPU: 2 PID: 6255 Comm: cat Tainted: G D OE 4.18.9-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: LENOVO 4286CTO/4286CTO, BIOS 8DET76WW (1.46 ) 06/21/2018 RIP: 0010:le_max_key_size_read+0x45/0xb0 [bluetooth] Code: 00 00 00 48 83 ec 10 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 31 c0 48 8b 87 c8 00 00 00 48 8d 7c 24 04 48 8b 80 48 0a 00 00 <48> 8b 80 e8 02 00 00 0f b6 48 52 e8 fb b6 b3 ed be 04 00 00 00 48 RSP: 0018:ffffab23c3ff3df0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0b4ca2e000 RCX: ffffab23c3ff3f08 RDX: ffffffffc0ddb033 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffab23c3ff3df4 RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffab23c3ff3ed8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffab23c3ff3f08 R13: 00007f0b4ca2e000 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: ffffab23c3ff3f08 FS: 00007f0b4ca0f540(0000) GS:ffff91bd5e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000002e8 CR3: 00000000629fa006 CR4: 00000000000606e0 Call Trace: full_proxy_read+0x53/0x80 __vfs_read+0x36/0x180 vfs_read+0x8a/0x140 ksys_read+0x4f/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2018-09-28 21:54:30 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix debugfs NULL pointer dereference Fix crash caused by NULL pointer dereference when debugfs functions le_max_key_read, le_max_key_size_write, le_min_key_size_read or le_min_key_size_write and Bluetooth adapter was powered off. Fix is to move max_key_size and min_key_size from smp_dev to hci_dev. At the same time they were renamed to le_max_key_size and le_min_key_size. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000002e8 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#24] SMP PTI CPU: 2 PID: 6255 Comm: cat Tainted: G D OE 4.18.9-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: LENOVO 4286CTO/4286CTO, BIOS 8DET76WW (1.46 ) 06/21/2018 RIP: 0010:le_max_key_size_read+0x45/0xb0 [bluetooth] Code: 00 00 00 48 83 ec 10 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 31 c0 48 8b 87 c8 00 00 00 48 8d 7c 24 04 48 8b 80 48 0a 00 00 <48> 8b 80 e8 02 00 00 0f b6 48 52 e8 fb b6 b3 ed be 04 00 00 00 48 RSP: 0018:ffffab23c3ff3df0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0b4ca2e000 RCX: ffffab23c3ff3f08 RDX: ffffffffc0ddb033 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffab23c3ff3df4 RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffab23c3ff3ed8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffab23c3ff3f08 R13: 00007f0b4ca2e000 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: ffffab23c3ff3f08 FS: 00007f0b4ca0f540(0000) GS:ffff91bd5e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000002e8 CR3: 00000000629fa006 CR4: 00000000000606e0 Call Trace: full_proxy_read+0x53/0x80 __vfs_read+0x36/0x180 vfs_read+0x8a/0x140 ksys_read+0x4f/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2018-09-28 21:54:30 +03:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add workaround for broken OS X legacy SMP pairing OS X version 10.10.2 (and possibly older versions) doesn't support LE Secure Connections but incorrectly copies all authentication request bits from a Security Request to its Pairing Request. The result is that an SC capable initiator (such as BlueZ) will think OS X intends to do SC when in fact it's incapable of it: < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 6 SMP: Security Request (0x0b) len 1 Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Request (0x01) len 6 IO capability: KeyboardDisplay (0x04) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey IdKey Sign (0x07) < ACL Data TX: Handle 3585 flags 0x00 dlen 11 SMP: Pairing Response (0x02) len 6 IO capability: NoInputNoOutput (0x03) OOB data: Authentication data not present (0x00) Authentication requirement: Bonding, No MITM, SC, No Keypresses (0x09) Max encryption key size: 16 Initiator key distribution: EncKey (0x01) Responder key distribution: EncKey Sign (0x05) The pairing eventually fails when we get an unexpected Pairing Confirm PDU instead of a Public Key PDU: > ACL Data RX: Handle 3585 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Pairing Confirm (0x03) len 16 Confim value: bcc3bed31b8f313a78ec3cce32685faf It is only at this point that we can speculate that the remote doesn't really support SC. This patch creates a workaround for the just-works model, however the MITM case is unsolvable because the OS X user has already been requested to enter a PIN which we're now expected to randomly generate and show the user (i.e. a chicken-and-egg problem). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-03-15 19:34:04 +02:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix SMP context tracking leading to a kernel crash The HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag is supposed to indicate whether we have an SMP context or not. If the context creation fails, or some other error is indicated between setting the flag and creating the context the flag must be cleared first. This patch ensures that smp_chan_create() clears the flag in case of allocation failure as well as reorders code in smp_cmd_security_req() that could lead to returning an error between setting the flag and creating the context. Without the patch the following kind of kernel crash could be observed (this one because of unacceptable authentication requirements in a Security Request): [ +0.000855] kernel BUG at net/bluetooth/smp.c:606! [ +0.000000] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ +0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Tainted: G W 3.16.0-rc1+ #785 [ +0.008391] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ +0.000000] Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [ +0.000000] task: f4dc8f90 ti: f4ef0000 task.ti: f4ef0000 [ +0.000000] EIP: 0060:[<c13432b6>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 [ +0.000000] EIP is at smp_chan_destroy+0x1e/0x145 [ +0.000709] EAX: f46db870 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000005 [ +0.000000] ESI: f46db870 EDI: f46db870 EBP: f4ef1dc0 ESP: f4ef1db0 [ +0.000000] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 [ +0.000000] CR0: 8005003b CR2: b666b0b0 CR3: 00022000 CR4: 00000690 [ +0.000000] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 [ +0.000000] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400 [ +0.000000] Stack: [ +0.000000] 00000005 f17b7840 f46db870 f4ef1dd4 f4ef1de4 c1343441 c134342e 00000000 [ +0.000000] c1343441 00000005 00000002 00000000 f17b7840 f4ef1e38 c134452a 00002aae [ +0.000000] 01ef1e00 00002aae f46bd980 f46db870 00000039 ffffffff 00000007 f4ef1e34 [ +0.000000] Call Trace: [ +0.000000] [<c1343441>] smp_failure+0x64/0x6c [ +0.000000] [<c134342e>] ? smp_failure+0x51/0x6c [ +0.000000] [<c1343441>] ? smp_failure+0x64/0x6c [ +0.000000] [<c134452a>] smp_sig_channel+0xad6/0xafc [ +0.000000] [<c1053b61>] ? vprintk_emit+0x343/0x366 [ +0.000000] [<c133f34e>] l2cap_recv_frame+0x1337/0x1ac4 [ +0.000000] [<c133f34e>] ? l2cap_recv_frame+0x1337/0x1ac4 [ +0.000000] [<c1172307>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x3e/0x40 [ +0.000000] [<c11702a1>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x12/0x14 [ +0.000000] [<c1340bc9>] l2cap_recv_acldata+0xe8/0x239 [ +0.000000] [<c1340bc9>] ? l2cap_recv_acldata+0xe8/0x239 [ +0.000000] [<c1169931>] ? __const_udelay+0x1a/0x1c [ +0.000000] [<c131f120>] hci_rx_work+0x1a1/0x286 [ +0.000000] [<c137244e>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa [ +0.000000] [<c131f120>] ? hci_rx_work+0x1a1/0x286 [ +0.000000] [<c1038fe5>] process_one_work+0x128/0x1df [ +0.000000] [<c1038fe5>] ? process_one_work+0x128/0x1df [ +0.000000] [<c10392df>] worker_thread+0x222/0x2de [ +0.000000] [<c10390bd>] ? process_scheduled_works+0x21/0x21 [ +0.000000] [<c103d34c>] kthread+0x82/0x87 [ +0.000000] [<c1040000>] ? create_new_namespaces+0x90/0x105 [ +0.000000] [<c13738e1>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [ +0.000000] [<c103d2ca>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x50/0x50 [ +0.000000] Code: 65 f4 89 f0 5b 5e 5f 5d 8d 67 f8 5f c3 57 8d 7c 24 08 83 e4 f8 ff 77 fc 55 89 e5 57 89 c7 56 53 52 8b 98 e0 00 00 00 85 db 75 02 <0f> 0b 8b b3 80 00 00 00 8b 00 c1 ee 03 83 e6 01 89 f2 e8 ef 09 [ +0.000000] EIP: [<c13432b6>] smp_chan_destroy+0x1e/0x145 SS:ESP 0068:f4ef1db0 Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-07-29 14:18:48 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in SMP If a sudden disconnection happens the l2cap_conn pointer may already have been cleaned up by the time hci_conn_security gets called, resulting in the following oops if we don't have a proper NULL check: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000c8 IP: [<c132e2ed>] smp_conn_security+0x26/0x151 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC CPU: 1 PID: 673 Comm: memcheck-x86-li Not tainted 3.14.0-rc2+ #437 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: f0ef0520 ti: f0d6a000 task.ti: f0d6a000 EIP: 0060:[<c132e2ed>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1 EIP is at smp_conn_security+0x26/0x151 EAX: f0ec1770 EBX: f0ec1770 ECX: 00000002 EDX: 00000002 ESI: 00000002 EDI: 00000000 EBP: f0d6bdc0 ESP: f0d6bda0 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 80050033 CR2: 000000c8 CR3: 30f0f000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f4f55000 00000002 f0d6bdcc c1097a2b c1319f40 f0ec1770 00000002 f0d6bdd0 f0d6bde8 c1312a82 f0d6bdfc c1312a82 c1319f84 00000008 f4d81c20 f0e5fd86 f0ec1770 f0d6bdfc f0d6be28 c131be3b c131bdc1 f0d25270 c131be3b 00000008 Call Trace: [<c1097a2b>] ? __kmalloc+0x118/0x128 [<c1319f40>] ? mgmt_pending_add+0x49/0x9b [<c1312a82>] hci_conn_security+0x4a/0x1dd [<c1312a82>] ? hci_conn_security+0x4a/0x1dd [<c1319f84>] ? mgmt_pending_add+0x8d/0x9b [<c131be3b>] pair_device+0x1e1/0x206 [<c131bdc1>] ? pair_device+0x167/0x206 [<c131be3b>] ? pair_device+0x1e1/0x206 [<c131ed44>] mgmt_control+0x275/0x2d6 Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-03-24 14:39:03 +02:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in SMP If a sudden disconnection happens the l2cap_conn pointer may already have been cleaned up by the time hci_conn_security gets called, resulting in the following oops if we don't have a proper NULL check: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000c8 IP: [<c132e2ed>] smp_conn_security+0x26/0x151 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC CPU: 1 PID: 673 Comm: memcheck-x86-li Not tainted 3.14.0-rc2+ #437 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: f0ef0520 ti: f0d6a000 task.ti: f0d6a000 EIP: 0060:[<c132e2ed>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1 EIP is at smp_conn_security+0x26/0x151 EAX: f0ec1770 EBX: f0ec1770 ECX: 00000002 EDX: 00000002 ESI: 00000002 EDI: 00000000 EBP: f0d6bdc0 ESP: f0d6bda0 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 80050033 CR2: 000000c8 CR3: 30f0f000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f4f55000 00000002 f0d6bdcc c1097a2b c1319f40 f0ec1770 00000002 f0d6bdd0 f0d6bde8 c1312a82 f0d6bdfc c1312a82 c1319f84 00000008 f4d81c20 f0e5fd86 f0ec1770 f0d6bdfc f0d6be28 c131be3b c131bdc1 f0d25270 c131be3b 00000008 Call Trace: [<c1097a2b>] ? __kmalloc+0x118/0x128 [<c1319f40>] ? mgmt_pending_add+0x49/0x9b [<c1312a82>] hci_conn_security+0x4a/0x1dd [<c1312a82>] ? hci_conn_security+0x4a/0x1dd [<c1319f84>] ? mgmt_pending_add+0x8d/0x9b [<c131be3b>] pair_device+0x1e1/0x206 [<c131bdc1>] ? pair_device+0x167/0x206 [<c131be3b>] ? pair_device+0x1e1/0x206 [<c131ed44>] mgmt_control+0x275/0x2d6 Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-03-24 14:39:03 +02:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: fix crash in unpairing In case unpair_device() was called through mgmt interface at the same time when pairing was in progress, Bluetooth kernel module crash was seen. [ 600.351225] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 600.351235] CPU: 1 PID: 11096 Comm: btmgmt Tainted: G OE 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 [ 600.351238] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E5440/08RCYC, BIOS A18 05/14/2017 [ 600.351272] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351276] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351279] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351282] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351285] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351287] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351290] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351295] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351298] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351300] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 600.351302] Call Trace: [ 600.351325] smp_failure+0x4f/0x70 [bluetooth] [ 600.351345] smp_cancel_pairing+0x74/0x80 [bluetooth] [ 600.351370] unpair_device+0x1c1/0x330 [bluetooth] [ 600.351399] hci_sock_sendmsg+0x960/0x9f0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351409] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x1e/0x20 [ 600.351417] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x50 [ 600.351422] sock_write_iter+0x85/0xf0 [ 600.351429] do_iter_readv_writev+0x12b/0x1b0 [ 600.351434] do_iter_write+0x87/0x1a0 [ 600.351439] vfs_writev+0x98/0x110 [ 600.351443] ? ep_poll+0x16d/0x3d0 [ 600.351447] ? ep_modify+0x73/0x170 [ 600.351451] do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351455] ? do_writev+0x61/0xf0 [ 600.351460] __x64_sys_writev+0x1c/0x20 [ 600.351465] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 600.351471] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 600.351474] RIP: 0033:0x7fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351477] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b8 6e 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 69 c7 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 de 80 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 600.351479] RSP: 002b:00007ffe062cb8f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014 [ 600.351484] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000255b3d0 RCX: 00007fb2bdb62fe0 [ 600.351487] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffe062cb920 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 600.351490] RBP: 00007ffe062cb920 R08: 000000000255bd80 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351494] R10: 0000000000000353 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 600.351497] R13: 00007ffe062cbbe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 600.351501] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay arc4 nls_iso8859_1 dm_crypt intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp dell_laptop kvm_intel crct10dif_pclmul dell_smm_hwmon crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_rapl_perf uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev media hid_multitouch input_leds joydev serio_raw dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic dell_smbios dcdbas sparse_keymap [ 600.351569] snd_hda_intel btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_core bluetooth(OE) snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlmvm ecdh_generic wmi_bmof dell_wmi_descriptor snd_seq_midi mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer cfg80211 snd soundcore mei_me mei dell_rbtn dell_smo8800 mac_hid parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid i915 nouveau kvmgt vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm irqbypass i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi psmouse ahci sdhci_pci cqhci libahci fb_sys_fops sdhci drm e1000e video wmi [ 600.351637] ---[ end trace e49e9f1df09c94fb ]--- [ 600.351664] RIP: 0010:smp_chan_destroy.isra.10+0xce/0x2c0 [bluetooth] [ 600.351666] Code: c0 0f 84 b4 01 00 00 80 78 28 04 0f 84 53 01 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 48 8b 08 48 8b 50 08 be 10 00 00 00 48 89 51 08 <48> 89 0a 48 b9 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 89 48 08 48 8b 83 00 01 [ 600.351669] RSP: 0018:ffffa9be839b3b50 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 600.351672] RAX: ffff9c999ac565a0 RBX: ffff9c9996e98c00 RCX: ffff9c999aa28b60 [ 600.351674] RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff9c999e403500 [ 600.351676] RBP: ffffa9be839b3b70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff92a25c00 [ 600.351679] R10: ffffa9be839b3ae8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9c995375b800 [ 600.351681] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9c99619a5000 R15: ffff9c9962a01c00 [ 600.351684] FS: 00007fb2be27c700(0000) GS:ffff9c999e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 600.351686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 600.351689] CR2: 00007fb2bdadbad0 CR3: 000000041c328001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Crash happened because list_del_rcu() was called twice for smp->ltk. This was possible if unpair_device was called right after ltk was generated but before keys were distributed. In this commit smp_cancel_pairing was refactored to cancel pairing if it is in progress and otherwise just removes keys. Once keys are removed from rcu list, pointers to smp context's keys are set to NULL to make sure removed list items are not accessed later. This commit also adjusts the functionality of mgmt unpair_device() little bit. Previously pairing was canceled only if pairing was in state that keys were already generated. With this commit unpair_device() cancels pairing already in earlier states. Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Pekka Oikarainen <pekka.oikarainen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
2018-09-26 09:13:46 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix crash in SMP when unpairing When unpairing the keys stored in hci_dev are removed. If SMP is ongoing the SMP context will also have references to these keys, so removing them from the hci_dev lists will make the pointers invalid. This can result in the following type of crashes: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b IP: [<c11f26be>] __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: hci_uart btqca btusb btintel btbcm btrtl hci_vhci rfcomm bluetooth_6lowpan bluetooth CPU: 0 PID: 723 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc3+ #1379 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] task: f19da940 ti: f1a94000 task.ti: f1a94000 EIP: 0060:[<c11f26be>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at __list_del_entry+0x44/0x71 EAX: c0088d20 EBX: f30fcac0 ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: 6b6b6b6b ESI: f4b60000 EDI: c0088d20 EBP: f1a95d90 ESP: f1a95d8c DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 6b6b6b6b CR3: 319e5000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: f30fcac0 f1a95db0 f82dc3e1 f1bfc000 00000000 c106524f f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95dc0 f1a95dd0 f82dcbdb f1a95de0 f82dcbdb 00000067 f1bfc000 f30fd020 f1a95de0 f1a95df0 f82d1126 00000067 f82d1126 00000006 f30fd020 f1bfc000 Call Trace: [<f82dc3e1>] smp_chan_destroy+0x192/0x240 [bluetooth] [<c106524f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14e/0x169 [<f82dcbdb>] smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82dcbdb>] ? smp_teardown_cb+0x47/0x64 [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d1126>] ? l2cap_chan_del+0x5d/0x14d [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82d40ef>] ? l2cap_conn_del+0x109/0x17b [bluetooth] [<f82c0205>] ? hci_event_packet+0x5b1/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82d41aa>] ? l2cap_disconn_cfm+0x49/0x50 [bluetooth] [<f82c0228>] hci_event_packet+0x5d4/0x2092 [bluetooth] [<c1332c16>] ? skb_release_data+0x6a/0x95 [<f82ce5d4>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0xe7/0xf4 [bluetooth] [<c1409708>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x57 [<f82b3bb0>] hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<f82b3bb0>] ? hci_rx_work+0xf1/0x28b [bluetooth] [<c10635a0>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c104772e>] process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1071ddc>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x50/0x5a [<c104772e>] ? process_one_work+0x232/0x432 [<c1047d48>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x255 [<c1047b90>] ? rescuer_thread+0x23c/0x23c [<c104bb71>] kthread+0x91/0x96 [<c14096a7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x44 [<c1409d61>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c104bae0>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1e/0x1e To solve the issue, introduce a new smp_cancel_pairing() API that can be used to clean up the SMP state before touching the hci_dev lists. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2015-10-22 09:38:35 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Use correct tfm to generate OOB data In case local OOB data was generated and other device initiated pairing claiming that it has got OOB data, following crash occurred: [ 222.847853] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 222.848025] CPU: 1 PID: 42 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Tainted: G C 4.18.0-custom #4 [ 222.848158] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 222.848307] Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [bluetooth] [ 222.848416] RIP: 0010:compute_ecdh_secret+0x5a/0x270 [bluetooth] [ 222.848540] Code: 0c af f5 48 8b 3d 46 de f0 f6 ba 40 00 00 00 be c0 00 60 00 e8 b7 7b c5 f5 48 85 c0 0f 84 ea 01 00 00 48 89 c3 e8 16 0c af f5 <49> 8b 47 38 be c0 00 60 00 8b 78 f8 48 83 c7 48 e8 51 84 c5 f5 48 [ 222.848914] RSP: 0018:ffffb1664087fbc0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [ 222.849021] RAX: ffff8a5750d7dc00 RBX: ffff8a5671096780 RCX: ffffffffc08bc32a [ 222.849111] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000006000c0 RDI: ffff8a5752003800 [ 222.849192] RBP: ffffb1664087fc60 R08: ffff8a57525280a0 R09: ffff8a5752003800 [ 222.849269] R10: ffffb1664087fc70 R11: 0000000000000093 R12: ffff8a5674396e00 [ 222.849350] R13: ffff8a574c2e79aa R14: ffff8a574c2e796a R15: 020e0e100d010101 [ 222.849429] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a5752500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 222.849518] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 222.849586] CR2: 000055856016a038 CR3: 0000000110d2c005 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 222.849671] Call Trace: [ 222.849745] ? sc_send_public_key+0x110/0x2a0 [bluetooth] [ 222.849825] ? sc_send_public_key+0x115/0x2a0 [bluetooth] [ 222.849925] smp_recv_cb+0x959/0x2490 [bluetooth] [ 222.850023] ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x40 [ 222.850105] ? mutex_lock+0x12/0x40 [ 222.850202] l2cap_recv_frame+0x109d/0x3420 [bluetooth] [ 222.850315] ? l2cap_recv_frame+0x109d/0x3420 [bluetooth] [ 222.850426] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70 [ 222.850515] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 [ 222.850625] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70 [ 222.850724] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 [ 222.850786] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70 [ 222.850846] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 [ 222.852581] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70 [ 222.854976] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 [ 222.857475] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 [ 222.859775] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70 [ 222.861218] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 [ 222.862327] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70 [ 222.863758] l2cap_recv_acldata+0x266/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [ 222.865122] hci_rx_work+0x1c9/0x430 [bluetooth] [ 222.867144] process_one_work+0x210/0x4c0 [ 222.868248] worker_thread+0x41/0x4d0 [ 222.869420] kthread+0x141/0x160 [ 222.870694] ? process_one_work+0x4c0/0x4c0 [ 222.871668] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x90/0x90 [ 222.872896] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 [ 222.874132] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg rfcomm bnep btusb btrtl btbcm btintel snd_intel8x0 cmac intel_rapl_perf vboxvideo(C) snd_ac97_codec bluetooth ac97_bus joydev ttm snd_pcm ecdh_generic drm_kms_helper snd_timer snd input_leds drm serio_raw fb_sys_fops soundcore syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mac_hid sch_fq_codel ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear hid_generic usbhid hid crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper ahci psmouse libahci i2c_piix4 video e1000 pata_acpi [ 222.883153] fbcon_switch: detected unhandled fb_set_par error, error code -16 [ 222.886774] fbcon_switch: detected unhandled fb_set_par error, error code -16 [ 222.890503] ---[ end trace 6504aa7a777b5316 ]--- [ 222.890541] RIP: 0010:compute_ecdh_secret+0x5a/0x270 [bluetooth] [ 222.890551] Code: 0c af f5 48 8b 3d 46 de f0 f6 ba 40 00 00 00 be c0 00 60 00 e8 b7 7b c5 f5 48 85 c0 0f 84 ea 01 00 00 48 89 c3 e8 16 0c af f5 <49> 8b 47 38 be c0 00 60 00 8b 78 f8 48 83 c7 48 e8 51 84 c5 f5 48 [ 222.890555] RSP: 0018:ffffb1664087fbc0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [ 222.890561] RAX: ffff8a5750d7dc00 RBX: ffff8a5671096780 RCX: ffffffffc08bc32a [ 222.890565] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000006000c0 RDI: ffff8a5752003800 [ 222.890571] RBP: ffffb1664087fc60 R08: ffff8a57525280a0 R09: ffff8a5752003800 [ 222.890576] R10: ffffb1664087fc70 R11: 0000000000000093 R12: ffff8a5674396e00 [ 222.890581] R13: ffff8a574c2e79aa R14: ffff8a574c2e796a R15: 020e0e100d010101 [ 222.890586] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a5752500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 222.890591] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 222.890594] CR2: 000055856016a038 CR3: 0000000110d2c005 CR4: 00000000000606e0 This commit fixes a bug where invalid pointer to crypto tfm was used for SMP SC ECDH calculation when OOB was in use. Solution is to use same crypto tfm than when generating OOB material on generate_oob() function. This bug was introduced in commit c0153b0b901a ("Bluetooth: let the crypto subsystem generate the ecc privkey"). Bug was found by fuzzing kernel SMP implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2018-09-11 14:10:13 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: If an unallowed command is received consider it a failure If a command is received while a bonding is ongoing consider it a pairing failure so the session is cleanup properly and the device is disconnected immediately instead of continuing with other commands that may result in the session to get stuck without ever completing such as the case bellow: > ACL Data RX: Handle 2048 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Identity Information (0x08) len 16 Identity resolving key[16]: d7e08edef97d3e62cd2331f82d8073b0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 2048 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Signing Information (0x0a) len 16 Signature key[16]: 1716c536f94e843a9aea8b13ffde477d Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected SMP command 0x0a from XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > ACL Data RX: Handle 2048 flags 0x02 dlen 12 SMP: Identity Address Information (0x09) len 7 Address: XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX (Intel Corporate) While accourding to core spec 6.1 the expected order is always BD_ADDR first first then CSRK: When using LE legacy pairing, the keys shall be distributed in the following order: LTK by the Peripheral EDIV and Rand by the Peripheral IRK by the Peripheral BD_ADDR by the Peripheral CSRK by the Peripheral LTK by the Central EDIV and Rand by the Central IRK by the Central BD_ADDR by the Central CSRK by the Central When using LE Secure Connections, the keys shall be distributed in the following order: IRK by the Peripheral BD_ADDR by the Peripheral CSRK by the Peripheral IRK by the Central BD_ADDR by the Central CSRK by the Central According to the Core 6.1 for commands used for key distribution "Key Rejected" can be used: '3.6.1. Key distribution and generation A device may reject a distributed key by sending the Pairing Failed command with the reason set to "Key Rejected". Fixes: b28b4943660f ("Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-06-30 14:42:23 -04:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: SMP: If an unallowed command is received consider it a failure If a command is received while a bonding is ongoing consider it a pairing failure so the session is cleanup properly and the device is disconnected immediately instead of continuing with other commands that may result in the session to get stuck without ever completing such as the case bellow: > ACL Data RX: Handle 2048 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Identity Information (0x08) len 16 Identity resolving key[16]: d7e08edef97d3e62cd2331f82d8073b0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 2048 flags 0x02 dlen 21 SMP: Signing Information (0x0a) len 16 Signature key[16]: 1716c536f94e843a9aea8b13ffde477d Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected SMP command 0x0a from XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > ACL Data RX: Handle 2048 flags 0x02 dlen 12 SMP: Identity Address Information (0x09) len 7 Address: XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX (Intel Corporate) While accourding to core spec 6.1 the expected order is always BD_ADDR first first then CSRK: When using LE legacy pairing, the keys shall be distributed in the following order: LTK by the Peripheral EDIV and Rand by the Peripheral IRK by the Peripheral BD_ADDR by the Peripheral CSRK by the Peripheral LTK by the Central EDIV and Rand by the Central IRK by the Central BD_ADDR by the Central CSRK by the Central When using LE Secure Connections, the keys shall be distributed in the following order: IRK by the Peripheral BD_ADDR by the Peripheral CSRK by the Peripheral IRK by the Central BD_ADDR by the Central CSRK by the Central According to the Core 6.1 for commands used for key distribution "Key Rejected" can be used: '3.6.1. Key distribution and generation A device may reject a distributed key by sending the Pairing Failed command with the reason set to "Key Rejected". Fixes: b28b4943660f ("Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
2025-06-30 14:42:23 -04:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Add strict checks for allowed SMP PDUs SMP defines quite clearly when certain PDUs are to be expected/allowed and when not, but doesn't have any explicit request/response definition. So far the code has relied on each PDU handler to behave correctly if receiving PDUs at an unexpected moment, however this requires many different checks and is prone to errors. This patch introduces a generic way to keep track of allowed PDUs and thereby reduces the responsibility & load on individual command handlers. The tracking is implemented using a simple bit-mask where each opcode maps to its own bit. If the bit is set the corresponding PDU is allow and if the bit is not set the PDU is not allowed. As a simple example, when we send the Pairing Request we'd set the bit for Pairing Response, and when we receive the Pairing Response we'd clear the bit for Pairing Response. Since the disallowed PDU rejection is now done in a single central place we need to be a bit careful of which action makes most sense to all cases. Previously some, such as Security Request, have been simply ignored whereas others have caused an explicit disconnect. The only PDU rejection action that keeps good interoperability and can be used for all the applicable use cases is to drop the data. This may raise some concerns of us now being more lenient for misbehaving (and potentially malicious) devices, but the policy of simply dropping data has been a successful one for many years e.g. in L2CAP (where this is the *only* policy for such cases - we never request disconnection in l2cap_core.c because of bad data). Furthermore, we cannot prevent connected devices from creating the SMP context (through a Security or Pairing Request), and once the context exists looking up the corresponding bit for the received opcode and deciding to reject it is essentially an equally lightweight operation as the kind of rejection that l2cap_core.c already successfully does. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:55 +03:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking of the SMP context Before the move the l2cap_chan the SMP context (smp_chan) didn't have any kind of proper locking. The best there existed was the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag which was used to enable mutual exclusion for potential multiple creators of the SMP context. Now that SMP has been converted to use the l2cap_chan infrastructure and since the SMP context is directly mapped to a corresponding l2cap_chan we get the SMP context locking essentially for free through the l2cap_chan lock. For all callbacks that l2cap_core.c makes for each channel implementation (smp.c in the case of SMP) the l2cap_chan lock is held through l2cap_chan_lock(chan). Since the calls from l2cap_core.c to smp.c are covered the only missing piece to have the locking implemented properly is to ensure that the lock is held for any other call path that may access the SMP context. This means user responses through mgmt.c, requests to elevate the security of a connection through hci_conn.c, as well as any deferred work through workqueues. This patch adds the necessary locking to all these other code paths that try to access the SMP context. Since mutual exclusion for the l2cap_chan access is now covered from all directions the patch also removes unnecessary HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag (once we've acquired the chan lock we can simply check whether chan->smp is set to know if there's an SMP context). Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
2014-09-05 22:19:52 +03:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-06 23:18:13 -07:00
2016-09-09 20:24:40 +02:00