kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-13 07:31:07 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/fs/exofs/file.c

85 lines
2.5 KiB
Raw Normal View History

exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00
exofs: Remove IBM copyrights Boaz, Congrats on getting all the OSD stuff into 2.6.30! I just pulled the git, and saw that the IBM copyrights are still there. Please remove them from all files: * Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 * International Business Machines IBM has revoked all rights on the code - they gave it to me. Thanks! Avishay Signed-off-by: Avishay Traeger <avishay@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2009-06-14 17:23:09 +03:00
exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00
exofs: exofs_file_fsync and exofs_file_flush correctness As per Christoph advise: no need to call filemap_write_and_wait(). In exofs all metadata is at the inode so just writing the inode is all is needed. ->fsync implies this must be done synchronously. But now exofs_file_fsync can not be used by exofs_file_flush. vfs_fsync() should do that job correctly. FIXME: remove the sb_sync and fix that sb_update better. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2010-05-31 18:02:39 +03:00
fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there. Thanks, Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-07-16 20:44:56 -04:00
exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00
fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there. Thanks, Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-07-16 20:44:56 -04:00
exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00
exofs: Avoid using file_fsync() The use of file_fsync() in exofs_file_sync() is not necessary since it does some extra stuff not used by exofs. Open code just the parts that are currently needed. TODO: Farther optimization can be done to sync the sb only on inode update of new files, Usually the sb update is not needed in exofs. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2009-06-14 16:52:10 +03:00
fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there. Thanks, Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-07-16 20:44:56 -04:00
exofs: Write sbi->s_nextid as part of the Create command Before when creating a new inode, we'd set the sb->s_dirt flag, and sometime later the system would write out s_nextid as part of the sb_info. Also on inode sync we would force the sb sync as well. Define the s_nextid as a new partition attribute and set it every time we create a new object. At mount we read it from it's new place. We now never set sb->s_dirt anywhere in exofs. write_super is actually never called. The call to exofs_write_super from exofs_put_super is also removed because the VFS always calls ->sync_fs before calling ->put_super twice. To stay backward-and-forward compatible we also write the old s_nextid in the super_block object at unmount, and support zero length attribute on mount. This also fixes a BUG where in layouts when group_width was not a divisor of EXOFS_SUPER_ID (0x10000) the s_nextid was not read from the device it was written to. Because of the sliding window layout trick, and because the read was always done from the 0 device but the write was done via the raid engine that might slide the device view. Now we read and write through the raid engine. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2011-02-03 17:53:25 +02:00
fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there. Thanks, Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-07-16 20:44:56 -04:00
exofs: Avoid using file_fsync() The use of file_fsync() in exofs_file_sync() is not necessary since it does some extra stuff not used by exofs. Open code just the parts that are currently needed. TODO: Farther optimization can be done to sync the sb only on inode update of new files, Usually the sb update is not needed in exofs. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2009-06-14 16:52:10 +03:00
exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00
exofs: exofs_file_fsync and exofs_file_flush correctness As per Christoph advise: no need to call filemap_write_and_wait(). In exofs all metadata is at the inode so just writing the inode is all is needed. ->fsync implies this must be done synchronously. But now exofs_file_fsync can not be used by exofs_file_flush. vfs_fsync() should do that job correctly. FIXME: remove the sb_sync and fix that sb_update better. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2010-05-31 18:02:39 +03:00
exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00
exofs: exofs_file_fsync and exofs_file_flush correctness As per Christoph advise: no need to call filemap_write_and_wait(). In exofs all metadata is at the inode so just writing the inode is all is needed. ->fsync implies this must be done synchronously. But now exofs_file_fsync can not be used by exofs_file_flush. vfs_fsync() should do that job correctly. FIXME: remove the sb_sync and fix that sb_update better. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2010-05-31 18:02:39 +03:00
exofs: file and file_inode operations implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for regular data files. Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except: - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync on the file. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
2008-10-27 18:37:02 +02:00