linux/drivers/pci/probe.c

1233 lines
33 KiB

[PATCH] PCI: Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:13:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > In drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_scan_bridge(), if this is not the first > > pass (pass != 0) we don't restore the PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL_REGISTER and > > thus leave PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT off: > > > > int __devinit pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev * dev, int max, int pass) > > { > > ... > > /* Disable MasterAbortMode during probing to avoid reporting > > of bus errors (in some architectures) */ > > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl); > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, > > bctl & ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT); > > ... > > if ((buses & 0xffff00) && !pcibios_assign_all_busses() && !is_cardbus) { > > unsigned int cmax, busnr; > > /* > > * Bus already configured by firmware, process it in the first > > * pass and just note the configuration. > > */ > > if (pass) > > return max; > > ... > > } > > > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl); > > ... > > > > This doesn't seem intentional. Agreed, looks like an accident. The patch [1] originally came from Kip Walker (Broadcom back then) between 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test4. As I recall it was supposed to fix an issue with with PCI aborts being signalled by the PCI bridge of the Broadcom BCM1250 family of SOCs when probing behind pci_scan_bridge. It is undeseriable to disable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT in pci_{read,write)_config_* and the behaviour wasn't considered a bug in need of a workaround, so this was put in probe.c. I don't have an affected system at hand, so can't really test but I propose something like the below patch. [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=599457e0cb702a31a3247ea6a5d9c6c99c4cf195 [PCI] Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-14 16:23:57 +00:00
[PATCH] PCI: Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:13:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > In drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_scan_bridge(), if this is not the first > > pass (pass != 0) we don't restore the PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL_REGISTER and > > thus leave PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT off: > > > > int __devinit pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev * dev, int max, int pass) > > { > > ... > > /* Disable MasterAbortMode during probing to avoid reporting > > of bus errors (in some architectures) */ > > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl); > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, > > bctl & ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT); > > ... > > if ((buses & 0xffff00) && !pcibios_assign_all_busses() && !is_cardbus) { > > unsigned int cmax, busnr; > > /* > > * Bus already configured by firmware, process it in the first > > * pass and just note the configuration. > > */ > > if (pass) > > return max; > > ... > > } > > > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl); > > ... > > > > This doesn't seem intentional. Agreed, looks like an accident. The patch [1] originally came from Kip Walker (Broadcom back then) between 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test4. As I recall it was supposed to fix an issue with with PCI aborts being signalled by the PCI bridge of the Broadcom BCM1250 family of SOCs when probing behind pci_scan_bridge. It is undeseriable to disable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT in pci_{read,write)_config_* and the behaviour wasn't considered a bug in need of a workaround, so this was put in probe.c. I don't have an affected system at hand, so can't really test but I propose something like the below patch. [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=599457e0cb702a31a3247ea6a5d9c6c99c4cf195 [PCI] Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-14 16:23:57 +00:00
[PATCH] PCI: Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:13:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > In drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_scan_bridge(), if this is not the first > > pass (pass != 0) we don't restore the PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL_REGISTER and > > thus leave PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT off: > > > > int __devinit pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev * dev, int max, int pass) > > { > > ... > > /* Disable MasterAbortMode during probing to avoid reporting > > of bus errors (in some architectures) */ > > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl); > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, > > bctl & ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT); > > ... > > if ((buses & 0xffff00) && !pcibios_assign_all_busses() && !is_cardbus) { > > unsigned int cmax, busnr; > > /* > > * Bus already configured by firmware, process it in the first > > * pass and just note the configuration. > > */ > > if (pass) > > return max; > > ... > > } > > > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl); > > ... > > > > This doesn't seem intentional. Agreed, looks like an accident. The patch [1] originally came from Kip Walker (Broadcom back then) between 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test4. As I recall it was supposed to fix an issue with with PCI aborts being signalled by the PCI bridge of the Broadcom BCM1250 family of SOCs when probing behind pci_scan_bridge. It is undeseriable to disable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT in pci_{read,write)_config_* and the behaviour wasn't considered a bug in need of a workaround, so this was put in probe.c. I don't have an affected system at hand, so can't really test but I propose something like the below patch. [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=599457e0cb702a31a3247ea6a5d9c6c99c4cf195 [PCI] Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-14 16:23:57 +00:00
[PATCH] PCI: Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:13:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > In drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_scan_bridge(), if this is not the first > > pass (pass != 0) we don't restore the PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL_REGISTER and > > thus leave PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT off: > > > > int __devinit pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev * dev, int max, int pass) > > { > > ... > > /* Disable MasterAbortMode during probing to avoid reporting > > of bus errors (in some architectures) */ > > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl); > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, > > bctl & ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT); > > ... > > if ((buses & 0xffff00) && !pcibios_assign_all_busses() && !is_cardbus) { > > unsigned int cmax, busnr; > > /* > > * Bus already configured by firmware, process it in the first > > * pass and just note the configuration. > > */ > > if (pass) > > return max; > > ... > > } > > > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl); > > ... > > > > This doesn't seem intentional. Agreed, looks like an accident. The patch [1] originally came from Kip Walker (Broadcom back then) between 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test4. As I recall it was supposed to fix an issue with with PCI aborts being signalled by the PCI bridge of the Broadcom BCM1250 family of SOCs when probing behind pci_scan_bridge. It is undeseriable to disable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT in pci_{read,write)_config_* and the behaviour wasn't considered a bug in need of a workaround, so this was put in probe.c. I don't have an affected system at hand, so can't really test but I propose something like the below patch. [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=599457e0cb702a31a3247ea6a5d9c6c99c4cf195 [PCI] Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-14 16:23:57 +00:00
[PATCH] PCI: Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:13:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > In drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_scan_bridge(), if this is not the first > > pass (pass != 0) we don't restore the PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL_REGISTER and > > thus leave PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT off: > > > > int __devinit pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev * dev, int max, int pass) > > { > > ... > > /* Disable MasterAbortMode during probing to avoid reporting > > of bus errors (in some architectures) */ > > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl); > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, > > bctl & ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT); > > ... > > if ((buses & 0xffff00) && !pcibios_assign_all_busses() && !is_cardbus) { > > unsigned int cmax, busnr; > > /* > > * Bus already configured by firmware, process it in the first > > * pass and just note the configuration. > > */ > > if (pass) > > return max; > > ... > > } > > > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl); > > ... > > > > This doesn't seem intentional. Agreed, looks like an accident. The patch [1] originally came from Kip Walker (Broadcom back then) between 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test4. As I recall it was supposed to fix an issue with with PCI aborts being signalled by the PCI bridge of the Broadcom BCM1250 family of SOCs when probing behind pci_scan_bridge. It is undeseriable to disable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT in pci_{read,write)_config_* and the behaviour wasn't considered a bug in need of a workaround, so this was put in probe.c. I don't have an affected system at hand, so can't really test but I propose something like the below patch. [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=599457e0cb702a31a3247ea6a5d9c6c99c4cf195 [PCI] Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-14 16:23:57 +00:00
[PATCH] PCI: PCI/Cardbus cards hidden, needs pci=assign-busses to fix "In some cases, especially on modern laptops with a lot of PCI and cardbus bridges, we're unable to assign correct secondary/subordinate bus numbers to all cardbus bridges due to BIOS limitations unless we are using "pci=assign-busses" boot option." -- Ivan Kokshaysky (from a patch comment) Without it, Cardbus cards inserted are never seen by PCI because the parent PCI-PCI Bridge of the Cardbus bridge will not pass and translate Type 1 PCI configuration cycles correctly and the system will fail to find and initialise the PCI devices in the system. Reference: PCI-PCI Bridges: PCI Configuration Cycles and PCI Bus Numbering: http://www.science.unitn.it/~fiorella/guidelinux/tlk/node72.html The reason for this is that: ``All PCI busses located behind a PCI-PCI bridge must reside between the secondary bus number and the subordinate bus number (inclusive).'' "pci=assign-busses" makes pcibios_assign_all_busses return 1 and this turns on PCI renumbering during PCI probing. Alan suggested to use DMI automatically set assign-busses on problem systems. The only question for me was where to put it. I put it directly before scanning PCI bus into pcibios_scan_root() because it's called from legacy, acpi and numa and so it can be one place for all systems and configurations which may need it. AMD64 Laptops are also affected and fixed by assign-busses, and the code is also incuded from arch/x86_64/pci/ that place will also work for x86_64 kernels, I only ifdef'-ed the x86-only Laptop in this example. Affected and known or assumed to be fixed with it are (found by googling): * ASUS Z71V and L3s * Samsung X20 * Compaq R3140us and all Compaq R3000 series laptops with TI1620 Controller, also Compaq R4000 series (from a kernel.org bugreport) * HP zv5000z (AMD64 3700+, known that fixup_parent_subordinate_busnr fixes it) * HP zv5200z * IBM ThinkPad 240 * An IBM ThinkPad (1.8 GHz Pentium M) debugged by Pavel Machek gives the correspondig message which detects the possible problem. * MSI S260 / Medion SIM 2100 MD 95600 The patch also expands the "try pci=assign-busses" warning so testers will help us to update the DMI table. Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-18 01:36:55 -08:00
[PATCH] PCI: PCI/Cardbus cards hidden, needs pci=assign-busses to fix "In some cases, especially on modern laptops with a lot of PCI and cardbus bridges, we're unable to assign correct secondary/subordinate bus numbers to all cardbus bridges due to BIOS limitations unless we are using "pci=assign-busses" boot option." -- Ivan Kokshaysky (from a patch comment) Without it, Cardbus cards inserted are never seen by PCI because the parent PCI-PCI Bridge of the Cardbus bridge will not pass and translate Type 1 PCI configuration cycles correctly and the system will fail to find and initialise the PCI devices in the system. Reference: PCI-PCI Bridges: PCI Configuration Cycles and PCI Bus Numbering: http://www.science.unitn.it/~fiorella/guidelinux/tlk/node72.html The reason for this is that: ``All PCI busses located behind a PCI-PCI bridge must reside between the secondary bus number and the subordinate bus number (inclusive).'' "pci=assign-busses" makes pcibios_assign_all_busses return 1 and this turns on PCI renumbering during PCI probing. Alan suggested to use DMI automatically set assign-busses on problem systems. The only question for me was where to put it. I put it directly before scanning PCI bus into pcibios_scan_root() because it's called from legacy, acpi and numa and so it can be one place for all systems and configurations which may need it. AMD64 Laptops are also affected and fixed by assign-busses, and the code is also incuded from arch/x86_64/pci/ that place will also work for x86_64 kernels, I only ifdef'-ed the x86-only Laptop in this example. Affected and known or assumed to be fixed with it are (found by googling): * ASUS Z71V and L3s * Samsung X20 * Compaq R3140us and all Compaq R3000 series laptops with TI1620 Controller, also Compaq R4000 series (from a kernel.org bugreport) * HP zv5000z (AMD64 3700+, known that fixup_parent_subordinate_busnr fixes it) * HP zv5200z * IBM ThinkPad 240 * An IBM ThinkPad (1.8 GHz Pentium M) debugged by Pavel Machek gives the correspondig message which detects the possible problem. * MSI S260 / Medion SIM 2100 MD 95600 The patch also expands the "try pci=assign-busses" warning so testers will help us to update the DMI table. Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-18 01:36:55 -08:00
[PATCH] PCI: Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:13:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > In drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_scan_bridge(), if this is not the first > > pass (pass != 0) we don't restore the PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL_REGISTER and > > thus leave PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT off: > > > > int __devinit pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev * dev, int max, int pass) > > { > > ... > > /* Disable MasterAbortMode during probing to avoid reporting > > of bus errors (in some architectures) */ > > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl); > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, > > bctl & ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT); > > ... > > if ((buses & 0xffff00) && !pcibios_assign_all_busses() && !is_cardbus) { > > unsigned int cmax, busnr; > > /* > > * Bus already configured by firmware, process it in the first > > * pass and just note the configuration. > > */ > > if (pass) > > return max; > > ... > > } > > > > pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl); > > ... > > > > This doesn't seem intentional. Agreed, looks like an accident. The patch [1] originally came from Kip Walker (Broadcom back then) between 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test4. As I recall it was supposed to fix an issue with with PCI aborts being signalled by the PCI bridge of the Broadcom BCM1250 family of SOCs when probing behind pci_scan_bridge. It is undeseriable to disable PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_MASTER_ABORT in pci_{read,write)_config_* and the behaviour wasn't considered a bug in need of a workaround, so this was put in probe.c. I don't have an affected system at hand, so can't really test but I propose something like the below patch. [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=599457e0cb702a31a3247ea6a5d9c6c99c4cf195 [PCI] Avoid leaving MASTER_ABORT disabled permanently when returning from pci_scan_bridge. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-02-14 16:23:57 +00:00
PCI: optionally sort device lists breadth-first Problem: New Dell PowerEdge servers have 2 embedded ethernet ports, which are labeled NIC1 and NIC2 on the chassis, in the BIOS setup screens, and in the printed documentation. Assuming no other add-in ethernet ports in the system, Linux 2.4 kernels name these eth0 and eth1 respectively. Many people have come to expect this naming. Linux 2.6 kernels name these eth1 and eth0 respectively (backwards from expectations). I also have reports that various Sun and HP servers have similar behavior. Root cause: Linux 2.4 kernels walk the pci_devices list, which happens to be sorted in breadth-first order (or pcbios_find_device order on i386, which most often is breadth-first also). 2.6 kernels have both the pci_devices list and the pci_bus_type.klist_devices list, the latter is what is walked at driver load time to match the pci_id tables; this klist happens to be in depth-first order. On systems where, for physical routing reasons, NIC1 appears on a lower bus number than NIC2, but NIC2's bridge is discovered first in the depth-first ordering, NIC2 will be discovered before NIC1. If the list were sorted breadth-first, NIC1 would be discovered before NIC2. A PowerEdge 1955 system has the following topology which easily exhibits the difference between depth-first and breadth-first device lists. -[0000:00]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation 5000P Chipset Memory Controller Hub +-02.0-[0000:03-08]--+-00.0-[0000:04-07]--+-00.0-[0000:05-06]----00.0-[0000:06]----00.0 Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (labeled NIC2, 2.4 kernel name eth1, 2.6 kernel name eth0) +-1c.0-[0000:01-02]----00.0-[0000:02]----00.0 Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (labeled NIC1, 2.4 kernel name eth0, 2.6 kernel name eth1) Other factors, such as device driver load order and the presence of PCI slots at various points in the bus hierarchy further complicate this problem; I'm not trying to solve those here, just restore the device order, and thus basic behavior, that 2.4 kernels had. Solution: The solution can come in multiple steps. Suggested fix #1: kernel Patch below optionally sorts the two device lists into breadth-first ordering to maintain compatibility with 2.4 kernels. It adds two new command line options: pci=bfsort pci=nobfsort to force the sort order, or not, as you wish. It also adds DMI checks for the specific Dell systems which exhibit "backwards" ordering, to make them "right". Suggested fix #2: udev rules from userland Many people also have the expectation that embedded NICs are always discovered before add-in NICs (which this patch does not try to do). Using the PCI IRQ Routing Table provided by system BIOS, it's easy to determine which PCI devices are embedded, or if add-in, which PCI slot they're in. I'm working on a tool that would allow udev to name ethernet devices in ascending embedded, slot 1 .. slot N order, subsort by PCI bus/dev/fn breadth-first. It'll be possible to use it independent of udev as well for those distributions that don't use udev in their installers. Suggested fix #3: system board routing rules One can constrain the system board layout to put NIC1 ahead of NIC2 regardless of breadth-first or depth-first discovery order. This adds a significant level of complexity to board routing, and may not be possible in all instances (witness the above systems from several major manufacturers). I don't want to encourage this particular train of thought too far, at the expense of not doing #1 or #2 above. Feedback appreciated. Patch tested on a Dell PowerEdge 1955 blade with 2.6.18. You'll also note I took some liberty and temporarily break the klist abstraction to simplify and speed up the sort algorithm. I think that's both safe and appropriate in this instance. Signed-off-by: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2006-09-29 15:23:23 -05:00