kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-09-24 18:16:04 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/fs/dlm/user.c

798 lines
19 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fs/dlm/user.c should #include "user.h" Every file should include the headers containing the prototypes for it's global functions. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-26 00:18:42 +01:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[PATCH] mark struct file_operations const 6 Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to these shared resources. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 00:55:34 -08:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix leaking user locks User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were never being removed from a process's list of locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-18 11:24:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix leaking user locks User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were never being removed from a process's list of locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-18 11:24:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix whitespace damage My previous dlm patch added trailing whitespace damage, fix that. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-20 08:35:39 -05:00
[DLM] fix leaking user locks User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were never being removed from a process's list of locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-18 11:24:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix leaking user locks User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were never being removed from a process's list of locks. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-18 11:24:04 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] force removal of user lockspace Check if the FORCEFREE flag has been provided from user space. If so, set the force option to dlm_release_lockspace() so that any remaining locks will be freed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-30 10:50:18 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] force removal of user lockspace Check if the FORCEFREE flag has been provided from user space. If so, set the force option to dlm_release_lockspace() so that any remaining locks will be freed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-30 10:50:18 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] force removal of user lockspace Check if the FORCEFREE flag has been provided from user space. If so, set the force option to dlm_release_lockspace() so that any remaining locks will be freed. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-30 10:50:18 -05:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[DLM] fix user unlocking When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it exits. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-01-15 10:34:52 -06:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[PATCH] mark struct file_operations const 6 Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to these shared resources. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 00:55:34 -08:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00
[PATCH] mark struct file_operations const 6 Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to these shared resources. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 00:55:34 -08:00
[DLM] dlm: user locks This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-12 16:44:04 -05:00