2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-16 23:57:37 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-29 13:59:26 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-21 17:03:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
signal/timer/event: KAIO eventfd support example
This is an example about how to add eventfd support to the current KAIO code,
in order to enable KAIO to post readiness events to a pollable fd (hence
compatible with POSIX select/poll). The KAIO code simply signals the eventfd
fd when events are ready, and this triggers a POLLIN in the fd. This patch
uses a reserved for future use member of the struct iocb to pass an eventfd
file descriptor, that KAIO will use to post events every time a request
completes. At that point, an aio_getevents() will return the completed result
to a struct io_event. I made a quick test program to verify the patch, and it
runs fine here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-aio-test.c
The test program uses poll(2), but it'd, of course, work with select and epoll
too.
This can allow to schedule both block I/O and other poll-able devices
requests, and wait for results using select/poll/epoll. In a typical
scenario, an application would submit KAIO request using aio_submit(), and
will also use epoll_ctl() on the whole other class of devices (that with the
addition of signals, timers and user events, now it's pretty much complete),
and then would:
epoll_wait(...);
for_each_event {
if (curr_event_is_kaiofd) {
aio_getevents();
dispatch_aio_events();
} else {
dispatch_epoll_event();
}
}
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-10 22:23:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-02 18:57:36 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-17 10:18:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-19 15:26:04 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-07 00:59:31 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:20 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-17 10:18:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-13 10:49:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-17 10:18:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-17 10:18:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-06 14:49:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:43:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-26 20:34:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-26 20:34:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-19 17:33:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-19 17:33:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-17 09:34:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-26 20:34:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-26 20:34:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-26 20:34:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 17:56:08 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-17 09:34:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-17 09:34:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-17 09:34:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: clean up and fix aio_setup_ring page mapping
Since commit 36bc08cc01709 ("fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages
migration") the aio ring setup code has used a special per-ring backing
inode for the page allocations, rather than just using random anonymous
pages.
However, rather than remembering the pages as it allocated them, it
would allocate the pages, insert them into the file mapping (dirty, so
that they couldn't be free'd), and then forget about them. And then to
look them up again, it would mmap the mapping, and then use
"get_user_pages()" to get back an array of the pages we just created.
Now, not only is that incredibly inefficient, it also leaked all the
pages if the mmap failed (which could happen due to excessive number of
mappings, for example).
So clean it all up, making it much more straightforward. Also remove
some left-overs of the previous (broken) mm_populate() usage that was
removed in commit d6c355c7dabc ("aio: fix race in ring buffer page
lookup introduced by page migration support") but left the pointless and
now misleading MAP_POPULATE flag around.
Tested-and-acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-20 05:11:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-17 10:18:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: clean up and fix aio_setup_ring page mapping
Since commit 36bc08cc01709 ("fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages
migration") the aio ring setup code has used a special per-ring backing
inode for the page allocations, rather than just using random anonymous
pages.
However, rather than remembering the pages as it allocated them, it
would allocate the pages, insert them into the file mapping (dirty, so
that they couldn't be free'd), and then forget about them. And then to
look them up again, it would mmap the mapping, and then use
"get_user_pages()" to get back an array of the pages we just created.
Now, not only is that incredibly inefficient, it also leaked all the
pages if the mmap failed (which could happen due to excessive number of
mappings, for example).
So clean it all up, making it much more straightforward. Also remove
some left-overs of the previous (broken) mm_populate() usage that was
removed in commit d6c355c7dabc ("aio: fix race in ring buffer page
lookup introduced by page migration support") but left the pointless and
now misleading MAP_POPULATE flag around.
Tested-and-acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-20 05:11:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: clean up and fix aio_setup_ring page mapping
Since commit 36bc08cc01709 ("fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages
migration") the aio ring setup code has used a special per-ring backing
inode for the page allocations, rather than just using random anonymous
pages.
However, rather than remembering the pages as it allocated them, it
would allocate the pages, insert them into the file mapping (dirty, so
that they couldn't be free'd), and then forget about them. And then to
look them up again, it would mmap the mapping, and then use
"get_user_pages()" to get back an array of the pages we just created.
Now, not only is that incredibly inefficient, it also leaked all the
pages if the mmap failed (which could happen due to excessive number of
mappings, for example).
So clean it all up, making it much more straightforward. Also remove
some left-overs of the previous (broken) mm_populate() usage that was
removed in commit d6c355c7dabc ("aio: fix race in ring buffer page
lookup introduced by page migration support") but left the pointless and
now misleading MAP_POPULATE flag around.
Tested-and-acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-20 05:11:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
aio: clean up and fix aio_setup_ring page mapping
Since commit 36bc08cc01709 ("fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages
migration") the aio ring setup code has used a special per-ring backing
inode for the page allocations, rather than just using random anonymous
pages.
However, rather than remembering the pages as it allocated them, it
would allocate the pages, insert them into the file mapping (dirty, so
that they couldn't be free'd), and then forget about them. And then to
look them up again, it would mmap the mapping, and then use
"get_user_pages()" to get back an array of the pages we just created.
Now, not only is that incredibly inefficient, it also leaked all the
pages if the mmap failed (which could happen due to excessive number of
mappings, for example).
So clean it all up, making it much more straightforward. Also remove
some left-overs of the previous (broken) mm_populate() usage that was
removed in commit d6c355c7dabc ("aio: fix race in ring buffer page
lookup introduced by page migration support") but left the pointless and
now misleading MAP_POPULATE flag around.
Tested-and-acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-20 05:11:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: clean up and fix aio_setup_ring page mapping
Since commit 36bc08cc01709 ("fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages
migration") the aio ring setup code has used a special per-ring backing
inode for the page allocations, rather than just using random anonymous
pages.
However, rather than remembering the pages as it allocated them, it
would allocate the pages, insert them into the file mapping (dirty, so
that they couldn't be free'd), and then forget about them. And then to
look them up again, it would mmap the mapping, and then use
"get_user_pages()" to get back an array of the pages we just created.
Now, not only is that incredibly inefficient, it also leaked all the
pages if the mmap failed (which could happen due to excessive number of
mappings, for example).
So clean it all up, making it much more straightforward. Also remove
some left-overs of the previous (broken) mm_populate() usage that was
removed in commit d6c355c7dabc ("aio: fix race in ring buffer page
lookup introduced by page migration support") but left the pointless and
now misleading MAP_POPULATE flag around.
Tested-and-acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-20 05:11:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 17:56:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: clean up and fix aio_setup_ring page mapping
Since commit 36bc08cc01709 ("fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages
migration") the aio ring setup code has used a special per-ring backing
inode for the page allocations, rather than just using random anonymous
pages.
However, rather than remembering the pages as it allocated them, it
would allocate the pages, insert them into the file mapping (dirty, so
that they couldn't be free'd), and then forget about them. And then to
look them up again, it would mmap the mapping, and then use
"get_user_pages()" to get back an array of the pages we just created.
Now, not only is that incredibly inefficient, it also leaked all the
pages if the mmap failed (which could happen due to excessive number of
mappings, for example).
So clean it all up, making it much more straightforward. Also remove
some left-overs of the previous (broken) mm_populate() usage that was
removed in commit d6c355c7dabc ("aio: fix race in ring buffer page
lookup introduced by page migration support") but left the pointless and
now misleading MAP_POPULATE flag around.
Tested-and-acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-20 05:11:12 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 11:57:59 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-25 23:14:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 14:45:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 14:45:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 12:29:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-30 11:12:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 12:29:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 12:29:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 12:29:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-30 11:12:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-06 14:33:22 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-30 12:06:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-10 01:45:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-31 10:34:18 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-10 23:14:05 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-30 12:06:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-10 23:10:35 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-10 23:14:05 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-04 18:19:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-10 23:10:35 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-10 23:14:05 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-21 15:49:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-05 13:21:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-05 13:21:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-04 18:19:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-06 14:33:22 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 12:29:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-30 11:12:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-09 12:29:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-03 01:13:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-12 14:04:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-12 14:04:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:27:20 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:43:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-08 04:19:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-09 08:11:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-12-09 08:11:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-20 21:49:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-02 13:40:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:39 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-30 11:41:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-29 00:58:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-09 08:11:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-18 17:04:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-09 08:11:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-09 08:11:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-07 18:23:48 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-12-09 08:11:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-18 17:04:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-13 16:07:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:39 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-03 15:09:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-01 08:59:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-25 23:14:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-10 21:29:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-18 17:04:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-10 21:29:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aio: bad AIO race in aio_complete() leads to process hang
My group ran into a AIO process hang on a 2.6.24 kernel with the process
sleeping indefinitely in io_getevents(2) waiting for the last wakeup to come
and it never would.
We ran the tests on x86_64 SMP. The hang only occurred on a Xeon box
("Clovertown") but not a Core2Duo ("Conroe"). On the Xeon, the L2 cache isn't
shared between all eight processors, but is L2 is shared between between all
two processors on the Core2Duo we use.
My analysis of the hang is if you go down to the second while-loop
in read_events(), what happens on processor #1:
1) add_wait_queue_exclusive() adds thread to ctx->wait
2) aio_read_evt() to check tail
3) if aio_read_evt() returned 0, call [io_]schedule() and sleep
In aio_complete() with processor #2:
A) info->tail = tail;
B) waitqueue_active(&ctx->wait)
C) if waitqueue_active() returned non-0, call wake_up()
The way the code is written, step 1 must be seen by all other processors
before processor 1 checks for pending events in step 2 (that were recorded by
step A) and step A by processor 2 must be seen by all other processors
(checked in step 2) before step B is done.
The race I believed I was seeing is that steps 1 and 2 were
effectively swapped due to the __list_add() being delayed by the L2
cache not shared by some of the other processors. Imagine:
proc 2: just before step A
proc 1, step 1: adds to ctx->wait, but is not visible by other processors yet
proc 1, step 2: checks tail and sees no pending events
proc 2, step A: updates tail
proc 1, step 3: calls [io_]schedule() and sleeps
proc 2, step B: checks ctx->wait, but sees no one waiting, skips wakeup
so proc 1 sleeps indefinitely
My patch adds a memory barrier between steps A and B. It ensures that the
update in step 1 gets seen on processor 2 before continuing. If processor 1
was just before step 1, the memory barrier makes sure that step A (update
tail) gets seen by the time processor 1 makes it to step 2 (check tail).
Before the patch our AIO process would hang virtually 100% of the time. After
the patch, we have yet to see the process ever hang.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Barnes <qbarnes+linux@yahoo-inc.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[ We should probably disallow that "if (waitqueue_active()) wake_up()"
coding pattern, because it's so often buggy wrt memory ordering ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-19 17:00:39 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-22 16:43:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:36:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:36:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:36:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:36:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:36:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 11:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:36:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-14 14:14:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-07 00:59:31 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-20 16:27:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-05 11:23:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-14 14:14:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:14:40AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:40:55PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > When using a large number of threads performing AIO operations the
> > IOCTX list may get a significant number of entries which will cause
> > significant overhead. For example, when running this fio script:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=256k ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=512; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on an EXT2 filesystem mounted on top of a ramdisk we can observe up to
> > 30% CPU time spent by lookup_ioctx:
> >
> > 32.51% [guest.kernel] [g] lookup_ioctx
> > 9.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __lock_acquire.isra.28
> > 4.40% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release
> > 4.19% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_local
> > 3.86% [guest.kernel] [g] local_clock
> > 3.68% [guest.kernel] [g] native_sched_clock
> > 3.08% [guest.kernel] [g] sched_clock_cpu
> > 2.64% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_release_holdtime.part.11
> > 2.60% [guest.kernel] [g] memcpy
> > 2.33% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquired
> > 2.25% [guest.kernel] [g] lock_acquire
> > 1.84% [guest.kernel] [g] do_io_submit
> >
> > This patchs converts the ioctx list to a radix tree. For a performance
> > comparison the above FIO script was run on a 2 sockets 8 core
> > machine. This are the results (average and %rsd of 10 runs) for the
> > original list based implementation and for the radix tree based
> > implementation:
> >
> > cores 1 2 4 8 16 32
> > list 109376 ms 69119 ms 35682 ms 22671 ms 19724 ms 16408 ms
> > %rsd 0.69% 1.15% 1.17% 1.21% 1.71% 1.43%
> > radix 73651 ms 41748 ms 23028 ms 16766 ms 15232 ms 13787 ms
> > %rsd 1.19% 0.98% 0.69% 1.13% 0.72% 0.75%
> > % of radix
> > relative 66.12% 65.59% 66.63% 72.31% 77.26% 83.66%
> > to list
> >
> > To consider the impact of the patch on the typical case of having
> > only one ctx per process the following FIO script was run:
> >
> > rw=randrw; size=100m ;directory=/mnt/fio; ioengine=libaio; iodepth=1
> > blocksize=1024; numjobs=1; thread; loops=100
> >
> > on the same system and the results are the following:
> >
> > list 58892 ms
> > %rsd 0.91%
> > radix 59404 ms
> > %rsd 0.81%
> > % of radix
> > relative 100.87%
> > to list
>
> So, I was just doing some benchmarking/profiling to get ready to send
> out the aio patches I've got for 3.11 - and it looks like your patch is
> causing a ~1.5% throughput regression in my testing :/
... <snip>
I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
header to index an array pointing the ioctx. It's not finished yet, and
it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
kmo> And, a rework of Ben's code, but this was entirely his idea
kmo> -Kent
bcrl> And fix the code to use the right mm_struct in kill_ioctx(), actually
free memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
2013-07-30 12:54:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-21 16:06:20 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-21 16:06:20 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-30 23:28:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:03:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:03:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-29 00:58:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
signal/timer/event: KAIO eventfd support example
This is an example about how to add eventfd support to the current KAIO code,
in order to enable KAIO to post readiness events to a pollable fd (hence
compatible with POSIX select/poll). The KAIO code simply signals the eventfd
fd when events are ready, and this triggers a POLLIN in the fd. This patch
uses a reserved for future use member of the struct iocb to pass an eventfd
file descriptor, that KAIO will use to post events every time a request
completes. At that point, an aio_getevents() will return the completed result
to a struct io_event. I made a quick test program to verify the patch, and it
runs fine here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-aio-test.c
The test program uses poll(2), but it'd, of course, work with select and epoll
too.
This can allow to schedule both block I/O and other poll-able devices
requests, and wait for results using select/poll/epoll. In a typical
scenario, an application would submit KAIO request using aio_submit(), and
will also use epoll_ctl() on the whole other class of devices (that with the
addition of signals, timers and user events, now it's pretty much complete),
and then would:
epoll_wait(...);
for_each_event {
if (curr_event_is_kaiofd) {
aio_getevents();
dispatch_aio_events();
} else {
dispatch_epoll_event();
}
}
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-10 22:23:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:37 -07:00
|
|
|
|
signal/timer/event: KAIO eventfd support example
This is an example about how to add eventfd support to the current KAIO code,
in order to enable KAIO to post readiness events to a pollable fd (hence
compatible with POSIX select/poll). The KAIO code simply signals the eventfd
fd when events are ready, and this triggers a POLLIN in the fd. This patch
uses a reserved for future use member of the struct iocb to pass an eventfd
file descriptor, that KAIO will use to post events every time a request
completes. At that point, an aio_getevents() will return the completed result
to a struct io_event. I made a quick test program to verify the patch, and it
runs fine here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-aio-test.c
The test program uses poll(2), but it'd, of course, work with select and epoll
too.
This can allow to schedule both block I/O and other poll-able devices
requests, and wait for results using select/poll/epoll. In a typical
scenario, an application would submit KAIO request using aio_submit(), and
will also use epoll_ctl() on the whole other class of devices (that with the
addition of signals, timers and user events, now it's pretty much complete),
and then would:
epoll_wait(...);
for_each_event {
if (curr_event_is_kaiofd) {
aio_getevents();
dispatch_aio_events();
} else {
dispatch_epoll_event();
}
}
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-10 22:23:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-30 11:41:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-29 01:03:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
signal/timer/event: KAIO eventfd support example
This is an example about how to add eventfd support to the current KAIO code,
in order to enable KAIO to post readiness events to a pollable fd (hence
compatible with POSIX select/poll). The KAIO code simply signals the eventfd
fd when events are ready, and this triggers a POLLIN in the fd. This patch
uses a reserved for future use member of the struct iocb to pass an eventfd
file descriptor, that KAIO will use to post events every time a request
completes. At that point, an aio_getevents() will return the completed result
to a struct io_event. I made a quick test program to verify the patch, and it
runs fine here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-aio-test.c
The test program uses poll(2), but it'd, of course, work with select and epoll
too.
This can allow to schedule both block I/O and other poll-able devices
requests, and wait for results using select/poll/epoll. In a typical
scenario, an application would submit KAIO request using aio_submit(), and
will also use epoll_ctl() on the whole other class of devices (that with the
addition of signals, timers and user events, now it's pretty much complete),
and then would:
epoll_wait(...);
for_each_event {
if (curr_event_is_kaiofd) {
aio_getevents();
dispatch_aio_events();
} else {
dispatch_epoll_event();
}
}
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-10 22:23:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-18 17:04:19 -07:00
|
|
|
|
signal/timer/event: KAIO eventfd support example
This is an example about how to add eventfd support to the current KAIO code,
in order to enable KAIO to post readiness events to a pollable fd (hence
compatible with POSIX select/poll). The KAIO code simply signals the eventfd
fd when events are ready, and this triggers a POLLIN in the fd. This patch
uses a reserved for future use member of the struct iocb to pass an eventfd
file descriptor, that KAIO will use to post events every time a request
completes. At that point, an aio_getevents() will return the completed result
to a struct io_event. I made a quick test program to verify the patch, and it
runs fine here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-aio-test.c
The test program uses poll(2), but it'd, of course, work with select and epoll
too.
This can allow to schedule both block I/O and other poll-able devices
requests, and wait for results using select/poll/epoll. In a typical
scenario, an application would submit KAIO request using aio_submit(), and
will also use epoll_ctl() on the whole other class of devices (that with the
addition of signals, timers and user events, now it's pretty much complete),
and then would:
epoll_wait(...);
for_each_event {
if (curr_event_is_kaiofd) {
aio_getevents();
dispatch_aio_events();
} else {
dispatch_epoll_event();
}
}
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-10 22:23:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-09 15:03:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:36:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-25 14:44:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-26 10:58:39 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 19:31:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 13:42:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-02 13:40:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-01 07:55:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-10 14:16:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-01 07:55:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-01 07:55:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-25 08:18:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-13 16:07:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:19:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-14 14:14:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 14:45:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 14:45:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-13 14:45:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-07 16:18:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-05 11:23:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-24 15:55:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-14 14:14:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-12 17:01:08 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 15:14:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|