2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-03 16:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-27 02:43:12 -02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-22 15:06:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 22:33:17 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-08 17:25:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-07 00:30:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-08 20:58:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:42:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-26 23:57:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-02 06:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-26 23:57:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:42:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:59:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:42:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:59:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:42:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 22:33:17 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-01 07:03:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:15:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-09-09 19:58:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-01 07:03:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-09-09 19:58:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-24 02:45:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-08 04:37:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-24 03:18:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-01 07:03:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 10:54:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-25 00:29:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-28 19:37:29 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 18:18:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:08:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-14 15:03:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-08 20:58:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-30 21:43:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 18:20:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:47:08 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 18:20:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-30 19:11:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:35:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-24 14:51:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:35:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-13 23:12:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:15:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-14 15:03:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-30 21:43:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-14 15:03:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18 22:42:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18 22:44:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:49:28 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18 22:44:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18 22:42:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-07 20:12:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18 22:42:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:50:36 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18 22:42:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:08:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-04 00:03:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:08:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-11 09:32:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:37:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:51:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 00:14:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:56:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:47:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-20 02:56:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:41:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-11 09:32:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-02 02:51:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:48:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-01 14:59:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:17:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:33:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:40:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-17 22:49:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:33:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-30 19:11:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:31:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-20 13:19:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:51:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 00:07:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:48:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-06 14:24:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-09 19:36:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:41:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:40:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:44:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-14 13:05:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 18:11:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-08 17:25:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:36:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-20 13:18:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-01 00:52:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:59:59 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 17:57:28 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-09 11:47:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:41:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-10 15:44:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:40:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:33:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:31:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-27 23:05:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-24 14:51:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-30 16:40:43 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-22 15:05:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-22 00:46:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-22 00:46:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 17:52:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-01 07:03:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-05 12:52:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:21:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-24 04:45:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-07 00:30:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-07 00:30:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-01 07:03:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-05 12:52:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
[XFRM]: Pack struct xfrm_policy
[acme@newtoy net-2.6.20]$ pahole net/ipv4/tcp.o xfrm_policy
/* /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.20/include/linux/security.h:67 */
struct xfrm_policy {
struct xfrm_policy * next; /* 0 4 */
struct hlist_node bydst; /* 4 8 */
struct hlist_node byidx; /* 12 8 */
rwlock_t lock; /* 20 36 */
atomic_t refcnt; /* 56 4 */
struct timer_list timer; /* 60 24 */
u8 type; /* 84 1 */
/* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */
u32 priority; /* 88 4 */
u32 index; /* 92 4 */
struct xfrm_selector selector; /* 96 56 */
struct xfrm_lifetime_cfg lft; /* 152 64 */
struct xfrm_lifetime_cur curlft; /* 216 32 */
struct dst_entry * bundles; /* 248 4 */
__u16 family; /* 252 2 */
__u8 action; /* 254 1 */
__u8 flags; /* 255 1 */
__u8 dead; /* 256 1 */
__u8 xfrm_nr; /* 257 1 */
/* XXX 2 bytes hole, try to pack */
struct xfrm_sec_ctx * security; /* 260 4 */
struct xfrm_tmpl xfrm_vec[6]; /* 264 360 */
}; /* size: 624, sum members: 619, holes: 2, sum holes: 5 */
So lets have just one hole instead of two, by moving 'type' to just before 'action',
end result:
[acme@newtoy net-2.6.20]$ codiff -s /tmp/tcp.o.before net/ipv4/tcp.o
/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.20/net/ipv4/tcp.c:
struct xfrm_policy | -4
1 struct changed
[acme@newtoy net-2.6.20]$
[acme@newtoy net-2.6.20]$ pahole -c 64 net/ipv4/tcp.o xfrm_policy
/* /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.20/include/linux/security.h:67 */
struct xfrm_policy {
struct xfrm_policy * next; /* 0 4 */
struct hlist_node bydst; /* 4 8 */
struct hlist_node byidx; /* 12 8 */
rwlock_t lock; /* 20 36 */
atomic_t refcnt; /* 56 4 */
struct timer_list timer; /* 60 24 */
u32 priority; /* 84 4 */
u32 index; /* 88 4 */
struct xfrm_selector selector; /* 92 56 */
struct xfrm_lifetime_cfg lft; /* 148 64 */
struct xfrm_lifetime_cur curlft; /* 212 32 */
struct dst_entry * bundles; /* 244 4 */
u16 family; /* 248 2 */
u8 type; /* 250 1 */
u8 action; /* 251 1 */
u8 flags; /* 252 1 */
u8 dead; /* 253 1 */
u8 xfrm_nr; /* 254 1 */
/* XXX 1 byte hole, try to pack */
struct xfrm_sec_ctx * security; /* 256 4 */
struct xfrm_tmpl xfrm_vec[6]; /* 260 360 */
}; /* size: 620, sum members: 619, holes: 1, sum holes: 1 */
Are there any fugly data dependencies here? None that I know.
In the process changed the removed the __ prefixed types, that are just for
userspace visible headers.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
2006-11-27 17:58:59 -02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-01 07:03:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-13 23:12:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:25:19 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:21:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-05 13:33:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 00:02:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-15 10:13:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-24 23:32:20 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-08 00:24:06 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 00:02:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:51:01 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 00:28:01 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-08 17:25:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-12 22:50:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:06:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-12 22:50:35 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-08 17:25:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:40:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-26 16:51:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:40:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-26 16:51:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:40:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:44:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-03 22:54:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-13 21:44:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-27 13:11:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-27 13:11:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-18 10:09:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-27 13:11:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-30 15:50:43 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-21 14:58:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-21 14:58:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-21 14:58:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-21 14:58:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-21 14:58:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:49:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-17 11:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-30 15:50:43 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-03 21:03:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-03 21:03:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-03 21:03:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-03 21:03:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-10 22:39:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-03 21:03:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:08:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-03 21:03:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-30 15:50:43 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-27 13:11:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-07 22:34:29 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:43:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-22 14:47:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 18:02:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 18:02:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 18:02:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-27 18:46:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 18:02:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 18:02:12 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-22 06:46:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-27 18:45:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:29:39 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-27 11:10:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 20:39:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 20:39:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-03 04:41:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-03 04:41:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-27 18:45:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:29:39 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-27 11:10:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-03 04:41:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 00:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-03 04:41:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-13 23:12:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-15 15:04:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-13 23:12:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-15 15:04:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-13 23:12:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-15 15:04:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.
This patch series implements per packet access control via the
extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in
the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security
associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are
included that leverage the patch for this purpose.
This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem,
pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a
socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security
association) to send/receive network packets.
Patch purpose:
The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on
the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access
controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP
address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be
spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote
hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism.
This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application
if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to
enforce the access control policy.
Patch design approach:
The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by
user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a
security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM
subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via
security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those
policies.
A presentation available at
www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf
from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach.
Patch implementation details:
On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or
xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of
the socket and the same security context is required for resultant
security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in
ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find.
On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket
(at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must
also match the security association being used.
The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec.
The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as
before.
Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is
minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the
combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec
processing proceeds as in the original case.
Testing:
The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have
been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version
0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security
associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation
using the security contexts via racoon.
The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set
security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and
contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing
this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-13 23:12:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-07 00:30:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-30 00:33:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-07 00:30:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-26 12:58:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-28 13:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-03 16:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-07 00:30:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-03 16:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-30 00:33:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-03 16:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-28 13:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-03 16:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-03 16:27:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-01 00:54:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-07 04:51:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-19 12:57:34 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 00:19:59 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-19 12:57:34 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:35:16 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:35:16 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-29 12:48:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:35:16 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:35:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:43:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:35:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-02 05:19:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:36:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-02 05:19:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-29 07:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 10:44:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-29 07:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:42:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:42:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-22 14:48:22 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:42:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-22 14:48:22 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-22 14:48:22 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-21 03:39:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-22 14:48:22 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:42:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:42:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-29 12:48:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:42:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 19:12:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:42:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 19:12:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 19:12:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-12 02:42:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 19:12:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 01:42:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-22 15:06:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 17:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-22 15:06:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-28 19:37:29 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:50:00 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-31 12:40:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-28 19:37:29 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 13:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-28 01:12:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-25 21:01:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-28 01:12:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{ipv4,xfrm}: Introduce xfrm_tunnel_notifier for xfrm tunnel mode callback
Some thoughts on IPv4 VTI implementation:
The connection between VTI receiving part and xfrm tunnel mode input process
is hardly a "xfrm_tunnel", xfrm_tunnel is used in places where, e.g ipip/sit
and xfrm4_tunnel, acts like a true "tunnel" device.
In addition, IMHO, VTI doesn't need vti_err to do something meaningful, as all
VTI needs is just a notifier to be called whenever xfrm_input ingress a packet
to update statistics.
A IPsec protected packet is first handled by protocol handlers, e.g AH/ESP,
to check packet authentication or encryption rightness. PMTU update is taken
care of in this stage by protocol error handler.
Then the packet is rearranged properly depending on whether it's transport
mode or tunnel mode packed by mode "input" handler. The VTI handler code
takes effects in this stage in tunnel mode only. So it neither need propagate
PMTU, as it has already been done if necessary, nor the VTI handler is
qualified as a xfrm_tunnel.
So this patch introduces xfrm_tunnel_notifier and meanwhile wipe out vti_err
code.
Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reviewed-by: Saurabh Mohan <saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2013-08-28 15:09:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-28 01:12:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-23 04:31:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-24 21:33:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-28 01:12:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-08 00:14:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-08 00:14:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:42:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-20 20:42:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 18:00:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 18:00:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:48:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:48:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-04 12:55:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-04 12:55:39 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 21:28:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-30 15:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-19 08:07:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-30 15:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-30 15:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-05 17:08:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:21:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-28 21:31:08 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 22:43:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-03-07 15:37:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:33:32 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-26 23:56:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 16:20:22 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-27 23:17:24 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 16:20:22 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-23 11:33:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-29 12:48:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-29 12:48:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-29 12:48:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-05 12:15:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:38:20 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 22:40:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:38:20 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 22:40:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25 17:38:20 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-27 23:07:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-08 23:39:06 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-27 23:07:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-25 00:29:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-28 19:46:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-08 23:39:06 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-25 00:29:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-08 13:11:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-20 19:15:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-28 13:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-11 01:53:43 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-28 13:24:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-11 01:53:43 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-30 10:41:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-27 23:20:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-27 21:57:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-27 21:57:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 11:32:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|