2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-26 22:12:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-04 15:02:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-10 16:01:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-17 17:55:31 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 19:46:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-14 16:06:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-10 20:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 12:13:14 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-09 21:29:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-04 15:42:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-04 15:28:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-27 00:51:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-27 00:51:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-18 16:25:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Add speed tests for async hashing
These are invoked in the 'mode' range of 400 to 499.
The cost of async vs. sync for the software algorithm implementations
varies. It can be as low as 16 cycles but as much as a couple hundred.
Here two runs of md5 testing, async then sync:
testing speed of async md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2448 cycles/operation, 153 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 4992 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3808 cycles/operation, 59 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14000 cycles/operation, 54 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8480 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7280 cycles/operation, 28 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50016 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22496 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 21232 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 117184 cycles/operation, 57 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43008 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40176 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39888 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 194176 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 84096 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 78336 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 77120 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 403056 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 166112 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 154768 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 151904 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 155456 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
testing speed of md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2208 cycles/operation, 138 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 5008 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3600 cycles/operation, 56 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14080 cycles/operation, 55 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8560 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7040 cycles/operation, 27 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50592 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22736 cycles/operation, 22 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 24960 cycles/operation, 24 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 99312 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43520 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40704 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39552 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 196720 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 85152 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 79408 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 76816 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 391520 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 168464 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 156912 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 154016 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153856 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
We can ditch the sync hash code at some point if we feel that makes
sense. For now I've left it there.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2010-05-19 14:11:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Add speed tests for async hashing
These are invoked in the 'mode' range of 400 to 499.
The cost of async vs. sync for the software algorithm implementations
varies. It can be as low as 16 cycles but as much as a couple hundred.
Here two runs of md5 testing, async then sync:
testing speed of async md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2448 cycles/operation, 153 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 4992 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3808 cycles/operation, 59 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14000 cycles/operation, 54 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8480 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7280 cycles/operation, 28 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50016 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22496 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 21232 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 117184 cycles/operation, 57 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43008 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40176 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39888 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 194176 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 84096 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 78336 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 77120 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 403056 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 166112 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 154768 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 151904 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 155456 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
testing speed of md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2208 cycles/operation, 138 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 5008 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3600 cycles/operation, 56 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14080 cycles/operation, 55 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8560 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7040 cycles/operation, 27 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50592 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22736 cycles/operation, 22 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 24960 cycles/operation, 24 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 99312 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43520 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40704 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39552 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 196720 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 85152 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 79408 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 76816 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 391520 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 168464 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 156912 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 154016 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153856 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
We can ditch the sync hash code at some point if we feel that makes
sense. For now I've left it there.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2010-05-19 14:11:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-10 18:30:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-29 15:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Add speed tests for async hashing
These are invoked in the 'mode' range of 400 to 499.
The cost of async vs. sync for the software algorithm implementations
varies. It can be as low as 16 cycles but as much as a couple hundred.
Here two runs of md5 testing, async then sync:
testing speed of async md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2448 cycles/operation, 153 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 4992 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3808 cycles/operation, 59 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14000 cycles/operation, 54 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8480 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7280 cycles/operation, 28 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50016 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22496 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 21232 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 117184 cycles/operation, 57 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43008 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40176 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39888 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 194176 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 84096 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 78336 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 77120 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 403056 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 166112 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 154768 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 151904 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 155456 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
testing speed of md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2208 cycles/operation, 138 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 5008 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3600 cycles/operation, 56 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14080 cycles/operation, 55 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8560 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7040 cycles/operation, 27 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50592 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22736 cycles/operation, 22 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 24960 cycles/operation, 24 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 99312 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43520 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40704 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39552 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 196720 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 85152 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 79408 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 76816 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 391520 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 168464 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 156912 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 154016 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153856 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
We can ditch the sync hash code at some point if we feel that makes
sense. For now I've left it there.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2010-05-19 14:11:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-04 17:41:07 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-26 18:12:40 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-10 23:03:03 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-10 23:03:12 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-09 21:29:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-01 17:42:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-01 17:42:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 12:13:14 +11:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-16 12:13:14 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-10 20:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-10 20:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-23 19:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-23 19:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-02 14:55:47 +11:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-02 14:55:47 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-07 16:53:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-07 16:53:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 20:24:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-12 20:24:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-24 21:26:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-24 21:26:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-09 21:29:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-09 21:29:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 15:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-09 21:29:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-04 15:42:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-04 15:42:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-04 19:23:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-04 19:23:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:26:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-10 12:10:20 +11:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-10 12:10:20 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-10 12:10:20 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-01 15:59:28 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-10 20:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-10 20:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-01 15:59:28 +11:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-01 15:59:28 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-02 20:05:22 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-04 19:46:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-04 19:46:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-04 15:02:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-29 19:01:41 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-29 19:01:41 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-19 20:23:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-09-19 20:23:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-26 16:34:01 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 17:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-09-26 16:47:15 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-09-02 01:45:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-13 08:26:09 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-24 21:48:19 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-07 17:17:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-11 21:24:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-07 17:17:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-19 21:38:49 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-10 20:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-07 22:16:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-09 21:29:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-10 18:30:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 22:04:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Add speed tests for async hashing
These are invoked in the 'mode' range of 400 to 499.
The cost of async vs. sync for the software algorithm implementations
varies. It can be as low as 16 cycles but as much as a couple hundred.
Here two runs of md5 testing, async then sync:
testing speed of async md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2448 cycles/operation, 153 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 4992 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3808 cycles/operation, 59 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14000 cycles/operation, 54 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8480 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7280 cycles/operation, 28 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50016 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22496 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 21232 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 117184 cycles/operation, 57 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43008 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40176 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39888 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 194176 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 84096 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 78336 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 77120 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 403056 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 166112 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 154768 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 151904 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 155456 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
testing speed of md5
test 0 ( 16 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 1 updates): 2208 cycles/operation, 138 cycles/byte
test 1 ( 64 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 4 updates): 5008 cycles/operation, 78 cycles/byte
test 2 ( 64 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3600 cycles/operation, 56 cycles/byte
test 3 ( 256 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 16 updates): 14080 cycles/operation, 55 cycles/byte
test 4 ( 256 byte blocks, 64 bytes per update, 4 updates): 8560 cycles/operation, 33 cycles/byte
test 5 ( 256 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 1 updates): 7040 cycles/operation, 27 cycles/byte
test 6 ( 1024 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 64 updates): 50592 cycles/operation, 49 cycles/byte
test 7 ( 1024 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 4 updates): 22736 cycles/operation, 22 cycles/byte
test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 24960 cycles/operation, 24 cycles/byte
test 9 ( 2048 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 128 updates): 99312 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 10 ( 2048 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 8 updates): 43520 cycles/operation, 21 cycles/byte
test 11 ( 2048 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 2 updates): 40704 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 12 ( 2048 byte blocks, 2048 bytes per update, 1 updates): 39552 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 13 ( 4096 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 256 updates): 196720 cycles/operation, 48 cycles/byte
test 14 ( 4096 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 16 updates): 85152 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 15 ( 4096 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 4 updates): 79408 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 16 ( 4096 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 1 updates): 76816 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 17 ( 8192 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 512 updates): 391520 cycles/operation, 47 cycles/byte
test 18 ( 8192 byte blocks, 256 bytes per update, 32 updates): 168464 cycles/operation, 20 cycles/byte
test 19 ( 8192 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 8 updates): 156912 cycles/operation, 19 cycles/byte
test 20 ( 8192 byte blocks, 4096 bytes per update, 2 updates): 154016 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
test 21 ( 8192 byte blocks, 8192 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153856 cycles/operation, 18 cycles/byte
We can ditch the sync hash code at some point if we feel that makes
sense. For now I've left it there.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2010-05-19 14:11:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-14 16:06:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 19:46:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-07-14 16:06:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 19:46:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-05 21:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-26 22:12:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-26 22:12:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 19:46:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-07-14 16:06:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 19:46:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 14:49:38 +10:00
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-05-30 14:49:38 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto: tcrypt - Do not exit on success in fips mode
At present, the tcrypt module always exits with an -EAGAIN upon
successfully completing all the tests its been asked to run. In fips
mode, integrity checking is done by running all self-tests from the
initrd, and its much simpler to check the ret from modprobe for
success than to scrape dmesg and/or /proc/crypto. Simply stay
loaded, giving modprobe a retval of 0, if self-tests all pass and
we're in fips mode.
A side-effect of tracking success/failure for fips mode is that in
non-fips mode, self-test failures will return the actual failure
return codes, rather than always returning -EAGAIN, which seems more
correct anyway.
The tcrypt_test() portion of the patch is dependent on my earlier
pair of patches that skip non-fips algs in fips mode, at least to
achieve the fully intended behavior.
Nb: testing this patch against the cryptodev tree revealed a test
failure for sha384, which I have yet to look into...
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-05-27 15:10:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-26 22:12:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-31 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-11-26 22:12:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-05 21:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-05 21:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 19:46:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-14 16:06:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:27:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 13:29:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
