2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-04 09:59:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-25 23:43:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:20 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-06 14:40:50 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix-tree: fix small lockless radix-tree bug
We shrink a radix tree when its root node has only one child, in the left
most slot. The child becomes the new root node. To perform this
operation in a manner compatible with concurrent lockless lookups, we
atomically switch the root pointer from the parent to its child.
However a concurrent lockless lookup may now have loaded a pointer to the
parent (and is presently deciding what to do next). For this reason, we
also have to keep the parent node in a valid state after shrinking the
tree, until the next RCU grace period -- otherwise this lookup with the
parent pointer may not do the right thing. Notably, we need to keep the
child in the left most slot there in case that is requested by the lookup.
This is all pretty standard RCU stuff. It is worth repeating because in
my eagerness to obey the radix tree node constructor scheme, I had broken
it by zeroing the radix tree node before the grace period.
What could happen is that a lookup can load the parent pointer, then
decide it wants to follow the left most child slot, only to find the slot
contained NULL due to the concurrent shrinker having zeroed the parent
node before waiting for a grace period. The lookup would return a false
negative as a result.
Fix it by doing that clearing in the RCU callback. I would normally want
to rip out the constructor entirely, but radix tree nodes are one of those
places where they make sense (only few cachelines will be touched soon
after allocation).
This was never actually found in any lockless pagecache testing or by the
test harness, but by seeing the odd problem with my scalable vmap rewrite.
I have not tickled the test harness into reproducing it yet, but I'll
keep working at it.
Fortunately, it is not a problem anywhere lockless pagecache is used in
mainline kernels (pagecache probe is not a guarantee, and brd does not
have concurrent lookups and deletes).
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-06-12 15:21:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-04 22:29:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-04 22:29:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-04 22:29:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-04 22:29:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-28 02:12:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-04 22:29:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
radix-tree: fix small lockless radix-tree bug
We shrink a radix tree when its root node has only one child, in the left
most slot. The child becomes the new root node. To perform this
operation in a manner compatible with concurrent lockless lookups, we
atomically switch the root pointer from the parent to its child.
However a concurrent lockless lookup may now have loaded a pointer to the
parent (and is presently deciding what to do next). For this reason, we
also have to keep the parent node in a valid state after shrinking the
tree, until the next RCU grace period -- otherwise this lookup with the
parent pointer may not do the right thing. Notably, we need to keep the
child in the left most slot there in case that is requested by the lookup.
This is all pretty standard RCU stuff. It is worth repeating because in
my eagerness to obey the radix tree node constructor scheme, I had broken
it by zeroing the radix tree node before the grace period.
What could happen is that a lookup can load the parent pointer, then
decide it wants to follow the left most child slot, only to find the slot
contained NULL due to the concurrent shrinker having zeroed the parent
node before waiting for a grace period. The lookup would return a false
negative as a result.
Fix it by doing that clearing in the RCU callback. I would normally want
to rip out the constructor entirely, but radix tree nodes are one of those
places where they make sense (only few cachelines will be touched soon
after allocation).
This was never actually found in any lockless pagecache testing or by the
test harness, but by seeing the odd problem with my scalable vmap rewrite.
I have not tickled the test harness into reproducing it yet, but I'll
keep working at it.
Fortunately, it is not a problem anywhere lockless pagecache is used in
mainline kernels (pagecache probe is not a guarantee, and brd does not
have concurrent lookups and deletes).
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-06-12 15:21:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:19 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix-tree: fix small lockless radix-tree bug
We shrink a radix tree when its root node has only one child, in the left
most slot. The child becomes the new root node. To perform this
operation in a manner compatible with concurrent lockless lookups, we
atomically switch the root pointer from the parent to its child.
However a concurrent lockless lookup may now have loaded a pointer to the
parent (and is presently deciding what to do next). For this reason, we
also have to keep the parent node in a valid state after shrinking the
tree, until the next RCU grace period -- otherwise this lookup with the
parent pointer may not do the right thing. Notably, we need to keep the
child in the left most slot there in case that is requested by the lookup.
This is all pretty standard RCU stuff. It is worth repeating because in
my eagerness to obey the radix tree node constructor scheme, I had broken
it by zeroing the radix tree node before the grace period.
What could happen is that a lookup can load the parent pointer, then
decide it wants to follow the left most child slot, only to find the slot
contained NULL due to the concurrent shrinker having zeroed the parent
node before waiting for a grace period. The lookup would return a false
negative as a result.
Fix it by doing that clearing in the RCU callback. I would normally want
to rip out the constructor entirely, but radix tree nodes are one of those
places where they make sense (only few cachelines will be touched soon
after allocation).
This was never actually found in any lockless pagecache testing or by the
test harness, but by seeing the odd problem with my scalable vmap rewrite.
I have not tickled the test harness into reproducing it yet, but I'll
keep working at it.
Fortunately, it is not a problem anywhere lockless pagecache is used in
mainline kernels (pagecache probe is not a guarantee, and brd does not
have concurrent lookups and deletes).
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-06-12 15:21:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-Cache: Use radix tree preload correctly in tracking of pages to be stored
__fscache_write_page() attempts to load the radix tree preallocation pool for
the CPU it is on before calling radix_tree_insert(), as the insertion must be
done inside a pair of spinlocks.
Use of the preallocation pool, however, is contingent on the radix tree being
initialised without __GFP_WAIT specified. __fscache_acquire_cookie() was
passing GFP_NOFS to INIT_RADIX_TREE() - but that includes __GFP_WAIT.
The solution is to AND out __GFP_WAIT.
Additionally, the banner comment to radix_tree_preload() is altered to make
note of this prerequisite. Possibly there should be a WARN_ON() too.
Without this fix, I have seen the following recursive deadlock caused by
radix_tree_insert() attempting to allocate memory inside the spinlocked
region, which resulted in FS-Cache being called back into to release memory -
which required the spinlock already held.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #24
---------------------------------------------
nfsiod/7916 is trying to acquire lock:
(&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076872>] __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
but task is already holding lock:
(&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076acc>] __fscache_write_page+0x15c/0x3f3 [fscache]
other info that might help us debug this:
5 locks held by nfsiod/7916:
#0: (nfsiod){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81048290>] worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
#1: (&task->u.tk_work#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81048290>] worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
#2: (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076acc>] __fscache_write_page+0x15c/0x3f3 [fscache]
#3: (&object->lock#2){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076b07>] __fscache_write_page+0x197/0x3f3 [fscache]
#4: (&cookie->stores_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0076b0f>] __fscache_write_page+0x19f/0x3f3 [fscache]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 7916, comm: nfsiod Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #24
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8105ac7f>] __lock_acquire+0x1649/0x16e3
[<ffffffff81059ded>] ? __lock_acquire+0x7b7/0x16e3
[<ffffffff8100e27d>] ? dump_trace+0x248/0x257
[<ffffffff8105ad70>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
[<ffffffffa0076872>] ? __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
[<ffffffff8135467c>] _spin_lock+0x2c/0x3b
[<ffffffffa0076872>] ? __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa0076872>] __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa0077eb7>] ? __fscache_check_page_write+0x0/0x71 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa00b4755>] nfs_fscache_release_page+0x86/0xc4 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa00907f0>] nfs_release_page+0x3c/0x41 [nfs]
[<ffffffff81087ffb>] try_to_release_page+0x32/0x3b
[<ffffffff81092c2b>] shrink_page_list+0x316/0x4ac
[<ffffffff81058a9b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
[<ffffffff8135451b>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x31
[<ffffffff81093153>] shrink_inactive_list+0x392/0x67c
[<ffffffff81058a9b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
[<ffffffff810934ca>] shrink_list+0x8d/0x8f
[<ffffffff81093744>] shrink_zone+0x278/0x33c
[<ffffffff81052c70>] ? ktime_get_ts+0xad/0xba
[<ffffffff8109453b>] try_to_free_pages+0x22e/0x392
[<ffffffff8109184c>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x212
[<ffffffff8108e16b>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3dc/0x5cf
[<ffffffff810ae24a>] cache_alloc_refill+0x34d/0x6c1
[<ffffffff811bcf74>] ? radix_tree_node_alloc+0x52/0x5c
[<ffffffff810ae929>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xb2/0x118
[<ffffffff811bcf74>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x52/0x5c
[<ffffffff811bcfd5>] radix_tree_insert+0x57/0x19c
[<ffffffffa0076b53>] __fscache_write_page+0x1e3/0x3f3 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa00b4248>] __nfs_readpage_to_fscache+0x58/0x11e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa009bb77>] nfs_readpage_release+0x34/0x9b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa009c0d9>] nfs_readpage_release_full+0x32/0x4b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0006cff>] rpc_release_calldata+0x12/0x14 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa0006e2d>] rpc_free_task+0x59/0x61 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa0006f03>] rpc_async_release+0x10/0x12 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff810482e5>] worker_thread+0x1ef/0x2e2
[<ffffffff81048290>] ? worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
[<ffffffff81352433>] ? thread_return+0x3e/0x101
[<ffffffffa0006ef3>] ? rpc_async_release+0x0/0x12 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff8104bff5>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
[<ffffffff81058d25>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff810480f6>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x2e2
[<ffffffff8104bd21>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
[<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8104c2b9>] ? add_wait_queue+0x15/0x44
[<ffffffff8104bca7>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
[<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2009-11-19 18:11:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-07 07:46:04 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-28 02:12:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-14 16:05:04 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:33:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:33:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:33:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:33:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-07 00:59:29 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-07 00:59:29 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:33:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree_tag_get() is not as safe as the docs make out [ver #2]
radix_tree_tag_get() is not safe to use concurrently with radix_tree_tag_set()
or radix_tree_tag_clear(). The problem is that the double tag_get() in
radix_tree_tag_get():
if (!tag_get(node, tag, offset))
saw_unset_tag = 1;
if (height == 1) {
int ret = tag_get(node, tag, offset);
may see the value change due to the action of set/clear. RCU is no protection
against this as no pointers are being changed, no nodes are being replaced
according to a COW protocol - set/clear alter the node directly.
The documentation in linux/radix-tree.h, however, says that
radix_tree_tag_get() is an exception to the rule that "any function modifying
the tree or tags (...) must exclude other modifications, and exclude any
functions reading the tree".
The problem is that the next statement in radix_tree_tag_get() checks that the
tag doesn't vary over time:
BUG_ON(ret && saw_unset_tag);
This has been seen happening in FS-Cache:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs/2010-April/msg00013.html
To this end, remove the BUG_ON() from radix_tree_tag_get() and note in various
comments that the value of the tag may change whilst the RCU read lock is held,
and thus that the return value of radix_tree_tag_get() may not be relied upon
unless radix_tree_tag_set/clear() and radix_tree_delete() are excluded from
running concurrently with it.
Reported-by: Romain DEGEZ <romain.degez@smartjog.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-04-06 22:36:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-10-31 17:07:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
radix_tree_tag_get() is not as safe as the docs make out [ver #2]
radix_tree_tag_get() is not safe to use concurrently with radix_tree_tag_set()
or radix_tree_tag_clear(). The problem is that the double tag_get() in
radix_tree_tag_get():
if (!tag_get(node, tag, offset))
saw_unset_tag = 1;
if (height == 1) {
int ret = tag_get(node, tag, offset);
may see the value change due to the action of set/clear. RCU is no protection
against this as no pointers are being changed, no nodes are being replaced
according to a COW protocol - set/clear alter the node directly.
The documentation in linux/radix-tree.h, however, says that
radix_tree_tag_get() is an exception to the rule that "any function modifying
the tree or tags (...) must exclude other modifications, and exclude any
functions reading the tree".
The problem is that the next statement in radix_tree_tag_get() checks that the
tag doesn't vary over time:
BUG_ON(ret && saw_unset_tag);
This has been seen happening in FS-Cache:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs/2010-April/msg00013.html
To this end, remove the BUG_ON() from radix_tree_tag_get() and note in various
comments that the value of the tag may change whilst the RCU read lock is held,
and thus that the return value of radix_tree_tag_get() may not be relied upon
unless radix_tree_tag_set/clear() and radix_tree_delete() are excluded from
running concurrently with it.
Reported-by: Romain DEGEZ <romain.degez@smartjog.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-04-06 22:36:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-10-31 17:07:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-19 14:13:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-19 14:13:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-23 10:33:53 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot() may never return
Executed command: fsstress -d /mnt -n 600 -p 850
crash> bt
PID: 7947 TASK: ffff880160546a70 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "fsstress"
#0 [ffff8800dfc07d00] machine_kexec at ffffffff81030db9
#1 [ffff8800dfc07d70] crash_kexec at ffffffff810a7952
#2 [ffff8800dfc07e40] oops_end at ffffffff814aa7c8
#3 [ffff8800dfc07e70] die_nmi at ffffffff814aa969
#4 [ffff8800dfc07ea0] do_nmi_callback at ffffffff8102b07b
#5 [ffff8800dfc07f10] do_nmi at ffffffff814aa514
#6 [ffff8800dfc07f50] nmi at ffffffff814a9d60
[exception RIP: __lookup_tag+100]
RIP: ffffffff812274b4 RSP: ffff88016056b998 RFLAGS: 00000287
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000006
RDX: 000000000000001d RSI: ffff88016056bb18 RDI: ffff8800c85366e0
RBP: ffff88016056b9c8 R8: ffff88016056b9e8 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000000e R11: ffff8800c8536908 R12: 0000000000000010
R13: 0000000000000040 R14: ffffffffffffffc0 R15: ffff8800c85366e0
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
<NMI exception stack>
#7 [ffff88016056b998] __lookup_tag at ffffffff812274b4
#8 [ffff88016056b9d0] radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot at ffffffff81227605
#9 [ffff88016056ba20] find_get_pages_tag at ffffffff810fc110
#10 [ffff88016056ba80] pagevec_lookup_tag at ffffffff81105e85
#11 [ffff88016056baa0] write_cache_pages at ffffffff81104c47
#12 [ffff88016056bbd0] generic_writepages at ffffffff81105014
#13 [ffff88016056bbe0] do_writepages at ffffffff81105055
#14 [ffff88016056bbf0] __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffff810fb2cb
#15 [ffff88016056bc40] filemap_write_and_wait_range at ffffffff810fb32a
#16 [ffff88016056bc70] generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff810fb3dc
#17 [ffff88016056bce0] __generic_file_aio_write at ffffffff810fcee5
#18 [ffff88016056bda0] generic_file_aio_write at ffffffff810fd085
#19 [ffff88016056bdf0] do_sync_write at ffffffff8114f9ea
#20 [ffff88016056bf00] vfs_write at ffffffff8114fcf8
#21 [ffff88016056bf30] sys_write at ffffffff81150691
#22 [ffff88016056bf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8100c0b2
I think this root cause is the following:
radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() always tags the root tag with settag
if the root tag is set with iftag even if there are no iftag tags
in the specified range (Of course, there are some iftag tags
outside the specified range).
===============================================================================
[[[Detailed description]]]
(1) Why cannot radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot() return forever?
__lookup_tag():
- Return with 0.
- Return with the index which is not bigger than the old one as the
input parameter.
Therefore the following "while" repeats forever because the above
conditions cause "ret" not to be updated and the cur_index cannot be
changed into the bigger one.
(So, radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot() cannot return forever.)
radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot():
1178 while (ret < max_items) {
1179 unsigned int slots_found;
1180 unsigned long next_index; /* Index of next search */
1181
1182 if (cur_index > max_index)
1183 break;
1184 slots_found = __lookup_tag(node, results + ret,
1185 cur_index, max_items - ret, &next_index,
tag);
1186 ret += slots_found;
// cannot update ret because slots_found == 0.
// so, this while loops forever.
1187 if (next_index == 0)
1188 break;
1189 cur_index = next_index;
1190 }
(2) Why does __lookup_tag() return with 0 and doesn't update the index?
Assuming the following:
- the one of the slot in radix_tree_node is NULL.
- the one of the tag which corresponds to the slot sets with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE or other.
- In a certain height(!=0), the corresponding index is 0.
a) __lookup_tag() notices that the tag is set.
1005 static unsigned int
1006 __lookup_tag(struct radix_tree_node *slot, void ***results, unsigned long index,
1007 unsigned int max_items, unsigned long *next_index, unsigned int tag)
1008 {
1009 unsigned int nr_found = 0;
1010 unsigned int shift, height;
1011
1012 height = slot->height;
1013 if (height == 0)
1014 goto out;
1015 shift = (height-1) * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
1016
1017 while (height > 0) {
1018 unsigned long i = (index >> shift) & RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK ;
1019
1020 for (;;) {
1021 if (tag_get(slot, tag, i))
1022 break;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* the index is not updated yet.
b) __lookup_tag() notices that the slot is NULL.
1023 index &= ~((1UL << shift) - 1);
1024 index += 1UL << shift;
1025 if (index == 0)
1026 goto out; /* 32-bit wraparound */
1027 i++;
1028 if (i == RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE)
1029 goto out;
1030 }
1031 height--;
1032 if (height == 0) { /* Bottom level: grab some items */
...
1055 }
1056 shift -= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
1057 slot = rcu_dereference_raw(slot->slots[i]);
1058 if (slot == NULL)
1059 break;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
c) __lookup_tag() doesn't update the index and return with 0.
1060 }
1061 out:
1062 *next_index = index;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1063 return nr_found;
1064 }
(3) Why is the slot NULL even if the tag is set?
Because radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() always sets the root tag with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE if the root tag is set with PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY,
even if there is no tag which can be set with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
in the specified range (from *first_indexp to last_index). Of course,
some PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY nodes must exist outside the specified range.
(radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() is called only from tag_pages_for_writeback())
640 unsigned long radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(struct radix_tree_root
*root,
641 unsigned long *first_indexp, unsigned long last_index,
642 unsigned long nr_to_tag,
643 unsigned int iftag, unsigned int settag)
644 {
645 unsigned int height = root->height;
646 struct radix_tree_path path[height];
647 struct radix_tree_path *pathp = path;
648 struct radix_tree_node *slot;
649 unsigned int shift;
650 unsigned long tagged = 0;
651 unsigned long index = *first_indexp;
652
653 last_index = min(last_index, radix_tree_maxindex(height));
654 if (index > last_index)
655 return 0;
656 if (!nr_to_tag)
657 return 0;
658 if (!root_tag_get(root, iftag)) {
659 *first_indexp = last_index + 1;
660 return 0;
661 }
662 if (height == 0) {
663 *first_indexp = last_index + 1;
664 root_tag_set(root, settag);
665 return 1;
666 }
...
733 root_tag_set(root, settag);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
734 *first_indexp = index;
735
736 return tagged;
737 }
As the result, there is no radix_tree_node which is set with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE but the root tag(radix_tree_root) is set with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE.
[figure: inside radix_tree]
(Please see the figure with typewriter font)
===========================================
[roottag = DIRTY]
| tag=0:NOTHING
tag[0 0 0 1] 1:DIRTY
[x x x +] 2:WRITEBACK
| 3:DIRTY,WRITEBACK
p 4:TOWRITE
<---> 5:DIRTY,TOWRITE ...
specified range (index: 0 to 2)
* There is no DIRTY tag within the specified range.
(But there is a DIRTY tag outside that range.)
| | | | | | | | |
after calling tag_pages_for_writeback()
| | | | | | | | |
v v v v v v v v v
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
| p is "page".
tag[0 0 0 1] x is NULL.
[x x x +] +- is a pointer to "page".
|
p
* But TOWRITE tag is set on the root tag.
============================================
After that, radix_tree_extend() via radix_tree_insert() is called
when the page is added.
This function sets the new radix_tree_node with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
to succeed the status of the root tag.
246 static int radix_tree_extend(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned long
index)
247 {
248 struct radix_tree_node *node;
249 unsigned int height;
250 int tag;
251
252 /* Figure out what the height should be. */
253 height = root->height + 1;
254 while (index > radix_tree_maxindex(height))
255 height++;
256
257 if (root->rnode == NULL) {
258 root->height = height;
259 goto out;
260 }
261
262 do {
263 unsigned int newheight;
264 if (!(node = radix_tree_node_alloc(root)))
265 return -ENOMEM;
266
267 /* Increase the height. */
268 node->slots[0] = radix_tree_indirect_to_ptr(root->rnode);
269
270 /* Propagate the aggregated tag info into the new root */
271 for (tag = 0; tag < RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS; tag++) {
272 if (root_tag_get(root, tag))
273 tag_set(node, tag, 0);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
274 }
===========================================
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
| :
tag[0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 0]
[x x x +] [+ x x x]
| |
p p (new page)
| | | | | | | | |
after calling radix_tree_insert
| | | | | | | | |
v v v v v v v v v
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
|
tag [5 0 0 0] * DIRTY and TOWRITE tags are
[+ + x x] succeeded to the new node.
| |
tag [0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 0]
[x x x +] [+ x x x]
| |
p p
============================================
After that, the index 3 page is released by remove_from_page_cache().
Then we can make the situation that the tag is set with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
and that the slot which corresponds to the tag is NULL.
===========================================
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
|
tag [5 0 0 0]
[+ + x x]
| |
tag [0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 0]
[x x x +] [+ x x x]
| |
p p
(remove)
| | | | | | | | |
after calling remove_page_cache
| | | | | | | | |
v v v v v v v v v
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
|
tag [4 0 0 0] * Only DIRTY tag is cleared
[x + x x] because no TOWRITE tag is existed
| in the bottom node.
[0 0 0 0]
[+ x x x]
|
p
============================================
To solve this problem
Change to that radix_tree_tag_if_tagged() doesn't tag the root tag
if it doesn't set any tags within the specified range.
Like this.
============================================
640 unsigned long radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(struct radix_tree_root
*root,
641 unsigned long *first_indexp, unsigned long last_index,
642 unsigned long nr_to_tag,
643 unsigned int iftag, unsigned int settag)
644 {
650 unsigned long tagged = 0;
...
733 if (tagged)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
734 root_tag_set(root, settag);
735 *first_indexp = index;
736
737 return tagged;
738 }
============================================
Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-01-25 15:07:32 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot() may never return
Executed command: fsstress -d /mnt -n 600 -p 850
crash> bt
PID: 7947 TASK: ffff880160546a70 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "fsstress"
#0 [ffff8800dfc07d00] machine_kexec at ffffffff81030db9
#1 [ffff8800dfc07d70] crash_kexec at ffffffff810a7952
#2 [ffff8800dfc07e40] oops_end at ffffffff814aa7c8
#3 [ffff8800dfc07e70] die_nmi at ffffffff814aa969
#4 [ffff8800dfc07ea0] do_nmi_callback at ffffffff8102b07b
#5 [ffff8800dfc07f10] do_nmi at ffffffff814aa514
#6 [ffff8800dfc07f50] nmi at ffffffff814a9d60
[exception RIP: __lookup_tag+100]
RIP: ffffffff812274b4 RSP: ffff88016056b998 RFLAGS: 00000287
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000006
RDX: 000000000000001d RSI: ffff88016056bb18 RDI: ffff8800c85366e0
RBP: ffff88016056b9c8 R8: ffff88016056b9e8 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000000e R11: ffff8800c8536908 R12: 0000000000000010
R13: 0000000000000040 R14: ffffffffffffffc0 R15: ffff8800c85366e0
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
<NMI exception stack>
#7 [ffff88016056b998] __lookup_tag at ffffffff812274b4
#8 [ffff88016056b9d0] radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot at ffffffff81227605
#9 [ffff88016056ba20] find_get_pages_tag at ffffffff810fc110
#10 [ffff88016056ba80] pagevec_lookup_tag at ffffffff81105e85
#11 [ffff88016056baa0] write_cache_pages at ffffffff81104c47
#12 [ffff88016056bbd0] generic_writepages at ffffffff81105014
#13 [ffff88016056bbe0] do_writepages at ffffffff81105055
#14 [ffff88016056bbf0] __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffff810fb2cb
#15 [ffff88016056bc40] filemap_write_and_wait_range at ffffffff810fb32a
#16 [ffff88016056bc70] generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff810fb3dc
#17 [ffff88016056bce0] __generic_file_aio_write at ffffffff810fcee5
#18 [ffff88016056bda0] generic_file_aio_write at ffffffff810fd085
#19 [ffff88016056bdf0] do_sync_write at ffffffff8114f9ea
#20 [ffff88016056bf00] vfs_write at ffffffff8114fcf8
#21 [ffff88016056bf30] sys_write at ffffffff81150691
#22 [ffff88016056bf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8100c0b2
I think this root cause is the following:
radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() always tags the root tag with settag
if the root tag is set with iftag even if there are no iftag tags
in the specified range (Of course, there are some iftag tags
outside the specified range).
===============================================================================
[[[Detailed description]]]
(1) Why cannot radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot() return forever?
__lookup_tag():
- Return with 0.
- Return with the index which is not bigger than the old one as the
input parameter.
Therefore the following "while" repeats forever because the above
conditions cause "ret" not to be updated and the cur_index cannot be
changed into the bigger one.
(So, radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot() cannot return forever.)
radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot():
1178 while (ret < max_items) {
1179 unsigned int slots_found;
1180 unsigned long next_index; /* Index of next search */
1181
1182 if (cur_index > max_index)
1183 break;
1184 slots_found = __lookup_tag(node, results + ret,
1185 cur_index, max_items - ret, &next_index,
tag);
1186 ret += slots_found;
// cannot update ret because slots_found == 0.
// so, this while loops forever.
1187 if (next_index == 0)
1188 break;
1189 cur_index = next_index;
1190 }
(2) Why does __lookup_tag() return with 0 and doesn't update the index?
Assuming the following:
- the one of the slot in radix_tree_node is NULL.
- the one of the tag which corresponds to the slot sets with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE or other.
- In a certain height(!=0), the corresponding index is 0.
a) __lookup_tag() notices that the tag is set.
1005 static unsigned int
1006 __lookup_tag(struct radix_tree_node *slot, void ***results, unsigned long index,
1007 unsigned int max_items, unsigned long *next_index, unsigned int tag)
1008 {
1009 unsigned int nr_found = 0;
1010 unsigned int shift, height;
1011
1012 height = slot->height;
1013 if (height == 0)
1014 goto out;
1015 shift = (height-1) * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
1016
1017 while (height > 0) {
1018 unsigned long i = (index >> shift) & RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK ;
1019
1020 for (;;) {
1021 if (tag_get(slot, tag, i))
1022 break;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* the index is not updated yet.
b) __lookup_tag() notices that the slot is NULL.
1023 index &= ~((1UL << shift) - 1);
1024 index += 1UL << shift;
1025 if (index == 0)
1026 goto out; /* 32-bit wraparound */
1027 i++;
1028 if (i == RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE)
1029 goto out;
1030 }
1031 height--;
1032 if (height == 0) { /* Bottom level: grab some items */
...
1055 }
1056 shift -= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
1057 slot = rcu_dereference_raw(slot->slots[i]);
1058 if (slot == NULL)
1059 break;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
c) __lookup_tag() doesn't update the index and return with 0.
1060 }
1061 out:
1062 *next_index = index;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1063 return nr_found;
1064 }
(3) Why is the slot NULL even if the tag is set?
Because radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() always sets the root tag with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE if the root tag is set with PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY,
even if there is no tag which can be set with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
in the specified range (from *first_indexp to last_index). Of course,
some PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY nodes must exist outside the specified range.
(radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() is called only from tag_pages_for_writeback())
640 unsigned long radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(struct radix_tree_root
*root,
641 unsigned long *first_indexp, unsigned long last_index,
642 unsigned long nr_to_tag,
643 unsigned int iftag, unsigned int settag)
644 {
645 unsigned int height = root->height;
646 struct radix_tree_path path[height];
647 struct radix_tree_path *pathp = path;
648 struct radix_tree_node *slot;
649 unsigned int shift;
650 unsigned long tagged = 0;
651 unsigned long index = *first_indexp;
652
653 last_index = min(last_index, radix_tree_maxindex(height));
654 if (index > last_index)
655 return 0;
656 if (!nr_to_tag)
657 return 0;
658 if (!root_tag_get(root, iftag)) {
659 *first_indexp = last_index + 1;
660 return 0;
661 }
662 if (height == 0) {
663 *first_indexp = last_index + 1;
664 root_tag_set(root, settag);
665 return 1;
666 }
...
733 root_tag_set(root, settag);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
734 *first_indexp = index;
735
736 return tagged;
737 }
As the result, there is no radix_tree_node which is set with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE but the root tag(radix_tree_root) is set with
PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE.
[figure: inside radix_tree]
(Please see the figure with typewriter font)
===========================================
[roottag = DIRTY]
| tag=0:NOTHING
tag[0 0 0 1] 1:DIRTY
[x x x +] 2:WRITEBACK
| 3:DIRTY,WRITEBACK
p 4:TOWRITE
<---> 5:DIRTY,TOWRITE ...
specified range (index: 0 to 2)
* There is no DIRTY tag within the specified range.
(But there is a DIRTY tag outside that range.)
| | | | | | | | |
after calling tag_pages_for_writeback()
| | | | | | | | |
v v v v v v v v v
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
| p is "page".
tag[0 0 0 1] x is NULL.
[x x x +] +- is a pointer to "page".
|
p
* But TOWRITE tag is set on the root tag.
============================================
After that, radix_tree_extend() via radix_tree_insert() is called
when the page is added.
This function sets the new radix_tree_node with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
to succeed the status of the root tag.
246 static int radix_tree_extend(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned long
index)
247 {
248 struct radix_tree_node *node;
249 unsigned int height;
250 int tag;
251
252 /* Figure out what the height should be. */
253 height = root->height + 1;
254 while (index > radix_tree_maxindex(height))
255 height++;
256
257 if (root->rnode == NULL) {
258 root->height = height;
259 goto out;
260 }
261
262 do {
263 unsigned int newheight;
264 if (!(node = radix_tree_node_alloc(root)))
265 return -ENOMEM;
266
267 /* Increase the height. */
268 node->slots[0] = radix_tree_indirect_to_ptr(root->rnode);
269
270 /* Propagate the aggregated tag info into the new root */
271 for (tag = 0; tag < RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS; tag++) {
272 if (root_tag_get(root, tag))
273 tag_set(node, tag, 0);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
274 }
===========================================
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
| :
tag[0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 0]
[x x x +] [+ x x x]
| |
p p (new page)
| | | | | | | | |
after calling radix_tree_insert
| | | | | | | | |
v v v v v v v v v
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
|
tag [5 0 0 0] * DIRTY and TOWRITE tags are
[+ + x x] succeeded to the new node.
| |
tag [0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 0]
[x x x +] [+ x x x]
| |
p p
============================================
After that, the index 3 page is released by remove_from_page_cache().
Then we can make the situation that the tag is set with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
and that the slot which corresponds to the tag is NULL.
===========================================
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
|
tag [5 0 0 0]
[+ + x x]
| |
tag [0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 0]
[x x x +] [+ x x x]
| |
p p
(remove)
| | | | | | | | |
after calling remove_page_cache
| | | | | | | | |
v v v v v v v v v
[roottag = DIRTY,TOWRITE]
|
tag [4 0 0 0] * Only DIRTY tag is cleared
[x + x x] because no TOWRITE tag is existed
| in the bottom node.
[0 0 0 0]
[+ x x x]
|
p
============================================
To solve this problem
Change to that radix_tree_tag_if_tagged() doesn't tag the root tag
if it doesn't set any tags within the specified range.
Like this.
============================================
640 unsigned long radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(struct radix_tree_root
*root,
641 unsigned long *first_indexp, unsigned long last_index,
642 unsigned long nr_to_tag,
643 unsigned int iftag, unsigned int settag)
644 {
650 unsigned long tagged = 0;
...
733 if (tagged)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
734 root_tag_set(root, settag);
735 *first_indexp = index;
736
737 return tagged;
738 }
============================================
Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-01-25 15:07:32 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-09 17:19:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27 11:42:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-27 11:42:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:31:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:31:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26 14:44:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-06-16 15:31:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices
A patchset to extend tmpfs to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE by abandoning its
peculiar swap vector, instead keeping a file's swap entries in the same
radix tree as its struct page pointers: thus saving memory, and
simplifying its code and locking.
This patch:
The radix_tree is used by several subsystems for different purposes. A
major use is to store the struct page pointers of a file's pagecache for
memory management. But what if mm wanted to store something other than
page pointers there too?
The low bit of a radix_tree entry is already used to denote an indirect
pointer, for internal use, and the unlikely radix_tree_deref_retry()
case.
Define the next bit as denoting an exceptional entry, and supply inline
functions radix_tree_exception() to return non-0 in either unlikely
case, and radix_tree_exceptional_entry() to return non-0 in the second
case.
If a subsystem already uses radix_tree with that bit set, no problem: it
does not affect internal workings at all, but is defined for the
convenience of those storing well-aligned pointers in the radix_tree.
The radix_tree_gang_lookups have an implicit assumption that the caller
can deduce the offset of each entry returned e.g. by the page->index of
a struct page. But that may not be feasible for some kinds of item to
be stored there.
radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() allow for an optional indices argument,
output array in which to return those offsets. The same could be added
to other radix_tree_gang_lookups, but for now keep it to the only one
for which we need it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:04:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tmpfs radix_tree: locate_item to speed up swapoff
We have already acknowledged that swapoff of a tmpfs file is slower than
it was before conversion to the generic radix_tree: a little slower
there will be acceptable, if the hotter paths are faster.
But it was a shock to find swapoff of a 500MB file 20 times slower on my
laptop, taking 10 minutes; and at that rate it significantly slows down
my testing.
Now, most of that turned out to be overhead from PROVE_LOCKING and
PROVE_RCU: without those it was only 4 times slower than before; and
more realistic tests on other machines don't fare as badly.
I've tried a number of things to improve it, including tagging the swap
entries, then doing lookup by tag: I'd expected that to halve the time,
but in practice it's erratic, and often counter-productive.
The only change I've so far found to make a consistent improvement, is
to short-circuit the way we go back and forth, gang lookup packing
entries into the array supplied, then shmem scanning that array for the
target entry. Scanning in place doubles the speed, so it's now only
twice as slow as before (or three times slower when the PROVEs are on).
So, add radix_tree_locate_item() as an expedient, once-off,
single-caller hack to do the lookup directly in place. #ifdef it on
CONFIG_SHMEM and CONFIG_SWAP, as much to document its limited
applicability as save space in other configurations. And, sadly,
#include sched.h for cond_resched().
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-03 16:21:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 01:24:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-11 14:05:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-08 01:01:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-06 15:16:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-25 03:08:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 02:03:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 19:45:34 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:29:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-05-09 02:35:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-28 02:12:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
