linux/fs/ext4/inline.c

2037 lines
50 KiB

ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00
ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca. The deadlock can be reproduced via: dmesg -n 7 mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768 mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc mkdir /vdc/a umount /vdc mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc echo foo > /vdc/a/foo and looks like this: [ 11.158815] [ 11.160276] ============================================= [ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W [ 11.161960] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] CPU0 [ 11.161960] ---- [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem); [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519: [ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e [ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a [ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622 [ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152 [ 11.161960] [ 11.161960] stack backtrace: [ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 [ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 11.161960] Call Trace: [ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3 [ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9 [ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66 [ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd [ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262 [ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60 [ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d [ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2 [ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152 [ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848 [ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f [ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b [ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133 [ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f [ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb [ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40 [ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a [ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a [ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2 [ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c [ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c [ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173 [ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc [ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f [ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469 [ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 [ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6 [ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0 [ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq) Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-11 21:50:46 -05:00