linux/drivers/ata/libahci.c

2597 lines
67 KiB

libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00
ahci: disabled FBS prior to issuing software reset Tested with Marvell 88se9125, attached with one port mulitplier(5 ports) and one disk, we will get following boot log messages if using current code: ata8: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier 1.2, 0x1b4b:0x9715 r160, 5 ports, feat 0x1/0x1f ahci 0000:03:00.0: FBS is enabled ata8.00: hard resetting link ata8.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.01: hard resetting link ata8.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.02: hard resetting link ata8.02: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.03: hard resetting link ata8.03: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 133) ata8.04: hard resetting link ata8.04: failed to resume link (SControl 133) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 1 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.03: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (976773168) ata8.03: ATA-8: ST3500413AS, JC4B, max UDMA/133 ata8.03: 976773168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata8.03: configured for UDMA/133 ata8.04: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: failed to recover PMP after 5 tries, giving up ata8.15: Port Multiplier detaching ata8.03: disabled ata8.00: disabled ata8: EH complete The reason is that current detection code doesn't follow AHCI spec: First,the port multiplier detection process look like this: ahci_hardreset(link, class, deadline) if (class == ATA_DEV_PMP) { sata_pmp_attach(dev) /* will enable FBS */ sata_pmp_init_links(ap, nr_ports); ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { sata_std_hardreset(link, class, deadline); if (link_is_online) /* do soft reset */ ahci_softreset(link, class, deadline); } } But, according to chapter 9.3.9 in AHCI spec: Prior to issuing software reset, software shall clear PxCMD.ST to '0' and then clear PxFBS.EN to '0'. The patch test ok with kernel 3.11.1. tj: Patch white space contaminated, applied manually with trivial updates. Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-10-27 08:03:04 -04:00
ahci: disabled FBS prior to issuing software reset Tested with Marvell 88se9125, attached with one port mulitplier(5 ports) and one disk, we will get following boot log messages if using current code: ata8: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier 1.2, 0x1b4b:0x9715 r160, 5 ports, feat 0x1/0x1f ahci 0000:03:00.0: FBS is enabled ata8.00: hard resetting link ata8.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.01: hard resetting link ata8.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.02: hard resetting link ata8.02: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.03: hard resetting link ata8.03: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 133) ata8.04: hard resetting link ata8.04: failed to resume link (SControl 133) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 1 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.03: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (976773168) ata8.03: ATA-8: ST3500413AS, JC4B, max UDMA/133 ata8.03: 976773168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata8.03: configured for UDMA/133 ata8.04: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: failed to recover PMP after 5 tries, giving up ata8.15: Port Multiplier detaching ata8.03: disabled ata8.00: disabled ata8: EH complete The reason is that current detection code doesn't follow AHCI spec: First,the port multiplier detection process look like this: ahci_hardreset(link, class, deadline) if (class == ATA_DEV_PMP) { sata_pmp_attach(dev) /* will enable FBS */ sata_pmp_init_links(ap, nr_ports); ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { sata_std_hardreset(link, class, deadline); if (link_is_online) /* do soft reset */ ahci_softreset(link, class, deadline); } } But, according to chapter 9.3.9 in AHCI spec: Prior to issuing software reset, software shall clear PxCMD.ST to '0' and then clear PxFBS.EN to '0'. The patch test ok with kernel 3.11.1. tj: Patch white space contaminated, applied manually with trivial updates. Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-10-27 08:03:04 -04:00
ahci: disabled FBS prior to issuing software reset Tested with Marvell 88se9125, attached with one port mulitplier(5 ports) and one disk, we will get following boot log messages if using current code: ata8: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier 1.2, 0x1b4b:0x9715 r160, 5 ports, feat 0x1/0x1f ahci 0000:03:00.0: FBS is enabled ata8.00: hard resetting link ata8.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.01: hard resetting link ata8.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.02: hard resetting link ata8.02: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.03: hard resetting link ata8.03: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 133) ata8.04: hard resetting link ata8.04: failed to resume link (SControl 133) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 1 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.03: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (976773168) ata8.03: ATA-8: ST3500413AS, JC4B, max UDMA/133 ata8.03: 976773168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata8.03: configured for UDMA/133 ata8.04: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: failed to recover PMP after 5 tries, giving up ata8.15: Port Multiplier detaching ata8.03: disabled ata8.00: disabled ata8: EH complete The reason is that current detection code doesn't follow AHCI spec: First,the port multiplier detection process look like this: ahci_hardreset(link, class, deadline) if (class == ATA_DEV_PMP) { sata_pmp_attach(dev) /* will enable FBS */ sata_pmp_init_links(ap, nr_ports); ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { sata_std_hardreset(link, class, deadline); if (link_is_online) /* do soft reset */ ahci_softreset(link, class, deadline); } } But, according to chapter 9.3.9 in AHCI spec: Prior to issuing software reset, software shall clear PxCMD.ST to '0' and then clear PxFBS.EN to '0'. The patch test ok with kernel 3.11.1. tj: Patch white space contaminated, applied manually with trivial updates. Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-10-27 08:03:04 -04:00
ahci: disabled FBS prior to issuing software reset Tested with Marvell 88se9125, attached with one port mulitplier(5 ports) and one disk, we will get following boot log messages if using current code: ata8: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier 1.2, 0x1b4b:0x9715 r160, 5 ports, feat 0x1/0x1f ahci 0000:03:00.0: FBS is enabled ata8.00: hard resetting link ata8.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.01: hard resetting link ata8.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.02: hard resetting link ata8.02: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 330) ata8.03: hard resetting link ata8.03: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 133) ata8.04: hard resetting link ata8.04: failed to resume link (SControl 133) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 1 (Emask=0x40) ata8.04: failed to read SCR 0 (Emask=0x40) ata8.03: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (976773168) ata8.03: ATA-8: ST3500413AS, JC4B, max UDMA/133 ata8.03: 976773168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata8.03: configured for UDMA/133 ata8.04: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 330) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps ata8.15: hard resetting link ata8.15: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320) ata8.15: Port Multiplier vendor mismatch '0x1b4b' != '0x133' ata8.15: PMP revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.15: failed to recover PMP after 5 tries, giving up ata8.15: Port Multiplier detaching ata8.03: disabled ata8.00: disabled ata8: EH complete The reason is that current detection code doesn't follow AHCI spec: First,the port multiplier detection process look like this: ahci_hardreset(link, class, deadline) if (class == ATA_DEV_PMP) { sata_pmp_attach(dev) /* will enable FBS */ sata_pmp_init_links(ap, nr_ports); ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { sata_std_hardreset(link, class, deadline); if (link_is_online) /* do soft reset */ ahci_softreset(link, class, deadline); } } But, according to chapter 9.3.9 in AHCI spec: Prior to issuing software reset, software shall clear PxCMD.ST to '0' and then clear PxFBS.EN to '0'. The patch test ok with kernel 3.11.1. tj: Patch white space contaminated, applied manually with trivial updates. Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-10-27 08:03:04 -04:00
libata: reimplement link power management The current LPM implementation has the following issues. * Operation order isn't well thought-out. e.g. HIPM should be configured after IPM in SControl is properly configured. Not the other way around. * Suspend/resume paths call ata_lpm_enable/disable() which must only be called from EH context directly. Also, ata_lpm_enable/disable() were called whether LPM was in use or not. * Implementation is per-port when it should be per-link. As a result, it can't be used for controllers with slave links or PMP. * LPM state isn't managed consistently. After a link reset for whatever reason including suspend/resume the actual LPM state would be reset leaving ap->lpm_policy inconsistent. * Generic/driver-specific logic boundary isn't clear. Currently, libahci has to mangle stuff which libata EH proper should be handling. This makes the implementation unnecessarily complex and fragile. * Tied to ALPM. Doesn't consider DIPM only cases and doesn't check whether the device allows HIPM. * Error handling isn't implemented. Given the extent of mismatch with the rest of libata, I don't think trying to fix it piecewise makes much sense. This patch reimplements LPM support. * The new implementation is per-link. The target policy is still port-wide (ap->target_lpm_policy) but all the mechanisms and states are per-link and integrate well with the rest of link abstraction and can work with slave and PMP links. * Core EH has proper control of LPM state. LPM state is reconfigured when and only when reconfiguration is necessary. It makes sure that LPM state is reset when probing for new device on the link. Controller agnostic logic is now implemented in libata EH proper and driver implementation only has to deal with controller specifics. * Proper error handling. LPM config failure is attributed to the device on the link and LPM is disabled for the link if it fails repeatedly. * ops->enable/disable_pm() are replaced with single ops->set_lpm() which takes @policy and @hints. This simplifies driver specific implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 17:50:06 +02:00