linux/drivers/dma/dmatest.c

1089 lines
28 KiB

dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal() Commit 981ed70d8e (dmatest: make dmatest threads freezable) made dmatest kthread use set_freezable_with_signal(); however, the interface is scheduled to be removed in the next merge window. The problem is that unlike userland tasks there's no default place which handles signal pending state and it isn't clear who owns and/or is responsible for clearing TIF_SIGPENDING. For example, in the current code, try_to_freeze() clears TIF_SIGPENDING but it isn't sure whether it actually owns the TIF_SIGPENDING nor is it race-free - ie. the task may continue to run with TIF_SIGPENDING set after the freezable section. Unfortunately, we don't have wait_for_completion_freezable_timeout(). This patch open codes it and uses wait_event_freezable_timeout() instead and removes timeout reloading - wait_event_freezable_timeout() won't return across freezing events (currently racy but fix scheduled) and timer doesn't decrement while the task is in freezer. Although this does lose timer-reset-over-freezing, given that timeout is supposed to be long enough and failure to finish inside is considered irrecoverable, I don't think this is worth the complexity. While at it, move completion to outer scope and explain that we're ignoring dangling pointer problem after timeout. This should give slightly better chance at avoiding oops after timeout. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
2011-11-23 09:28:16 -08:00
dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal() Commit 981ed70d8e (dmatest: make dmatest threads freezable) made dmatest kthread use set_freezable_with_signal(); however, the interface is scheduled to be removed in the next merge window. The problem is that unlike userland tasks there's no default place which handles signal pending state and it isn't clear who owns and/or is responsible for clearing TIF_SIGPENDING. For example, in the current code, try_to_freeze() clears TIF_SIGPENDING but it isn't sure whether it actually owns the TIF_SIGPENDING nor is it race-free - ie. the task may continue to run with TIF_SIGPENDING set after the freezable section. Unfortunately, we don't have wait_for_completion_freezable_timeout(). This patch open codes it and uses wait_event_freezable_timeout() instead and removes timeout reloading - wait_event_freezable_timeout() won't return across freezing events (currently racy but fix scheduled) and timer doesn't decrement while the task is in freezer. Although this does lose timer-reset-over-freezing, given that timeout is supposed to be long enough and failure to finish inside is considered irrecoverable, I don't think this is worth the complexity. While at it, move completion to outer scope and explain that we're ignoring dangling pointer problem after timeout. This should give slightly better chance at avoiding oops after timeout. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
2011-11-23 09:28:16 -08:00
dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal() Commit 981ed70d8e (dmatest: make dmatest threads freezable) made dmatest kthread use set_freezable_with_signal(); however, the interface is scheduled to be removed in the next merge window. The problem is that unlike userland tasks there's no default place which handles signal pending state and it isn't clear who owns and/or is responsible for clearing TIF_SIGPENDING. For example, in the current code, try_to_freeze() clears TIF_SIGPENDING but it isn't sure whether it actually owns the TIF_SIGPENDING nor is it race-free - ie. the task may continue to run with TIF_SIGPENDING set after the freezable section. Unfortunately, we don't have wait_for_completion_freezable_timeout(). This patch open codes it and uses wait_event_freezable_timeout() instead and removes timeout reloading - wait_event_freezable_timeout() won't return across freezing events (currently racy but fix scheduled) and timer doesn't decrement while the task is in freezer. Although this does lose timer-reset-over-freezing, given that timeout is supposed to be long enough and failure to finish inside is considered irrecoverable, I don't think this is worth the complexity. While at it, move completion to outer scope and explain that we're ignoring dangling pointer problem after timeout. This should give slightly better chance at avoiding oops after timeout. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
2011-11-23 09:28:16 -08:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00
dmatest: run test via debugfs Instead of doing modprobe dmatest ... modprobe -r dmatest we allow user to run tests interactively. The dmatest could be built as module or inside kernel. Let's consider those cases. 1. When dmatest is built as a module... After mounting debugfs and loading the module, the /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest folder with nodes will be created. They are the same as module parameters with addition of the 'run' node that controls run and stop phases of the test. Note that in this case test will not run on load automatically. Example of usage: % echo dma0chan0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/channel % echo 2000 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/timeout % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/iterations % echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/run After a while you will start to get messages about current status or error like in the original code. Note that running a new test will stop any in progress test. 2. When built-in in the kernel... The module parameters that is supplied to the kernel command line will be used for the first performed test. After user gets a control, the test could be interrupted or re-run with same or different parameters. For the details see the above section "1. When dmatest is built as a module..." In both cases the module parameters are used as initial values for the test case. You always could check them at run-time by running % grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/* Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-03-04 11:09:30 +02:00