linux/drivers/dma/edma.c

2560 lines
66 KiB

dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dma: edma: Find missed events and issue them In an effort to move to using Scatter gather lists of any size with EDMA as discussed at [1] instead of placing limitations on the driver, we work through the limitations of the EDMAC hardware to find missed events and issue them. The sequence of events that require this are: For the scenario where MAX slots for an EDMA channel is 3: SG1 -> SG2 -> SG3 -> SG4 -> SG5 -> SG6 -> Null The above SG list will have to be DMA'd in 2 sets: (1) SG1 -> SG2 -> SG3 -> Null (2) SG4 -> SG5 -> SG6 -> Null After (1) is succesfully transferred, the events from the MMC controller donot stop coming and are missed by the time we have setup the transfer for (2). So here, we catch the events missed as an error condition and issue them manually. In the second part of the patch, we make handle the NULL slot cases: For crypto IP, we continue to receive events even continuously in NULL slot, the setup of the next set of SG elements happens after the error handler executes. This is results in some recursion problems. Due to this, we continously receive error interrupts when we manually trigger an event from the error handler. We fix this, by first detecting if the Channel is currently transferring from a NULL slot or not, that's where the edma_read_slot in the error callback from interrupt handler comes in. With this we can determine if the set up of the next SG list has completed, and we manually trigger only in this case. If the setup has _not_ completed, we are still in NULL so we just set a missed flag and allow the manual triggerring to happen in edma_execute which will be eventually called. This fixes the above mentioned race conditions seen with the crypto drivers. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137416733628831&w=2 Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-08-29 18:05:43 -05:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: Rename set_bits and remove unused clear_bits helper The clear_bits() helper is not used by the driver so it can be removed. powerpc architecture defines the set_bits() in arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h which results failed compile testing on powerpc architecture: >> drivers/dma/edma.c:415:20: error: conflicting types for 'set_bits' static inline void set_bits(int offset, int len, unsigned long *p) ^~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0, from include/linux/kernel.h:10, from include/linux/list.h:8, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/device.h:17, from include/linux/dmaengine.h:20, from drivers/dma/edma.c:16: arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:75:14: note: previous definition of 'set_bits' was here DEFINE_BITOP(set_bits, or, "") ^ arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:58:24: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_BITOP' static __inline__ void fn(unsigned long mask, \ ^~ >> drivers/dma/edma.c:421:20: error: conflicting types for 'clear_bits' static inline void clear_bits(int offset, int len, unsigned long *p) ^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0, from include/linux/kernel.h:10, from include/linux/list.h:8, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/device.h:17, from include/linux/dmaengine.h:20, from drivers/dma/edma.c:16: arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:76:14: note: previous definition of 'clear_bits' was here DEFINE_BITOP(clear_bits, andc, "") ^ arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:58:24: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_BITOP' static __inline__ void fn(unsigned long mask, \ ^~ Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2016-09-22 09:31:04 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dma: edma: Find missed events and issue them In an effort to move to using Scatter gather lists of any size with EDMA as discussed at [1] instead of placing limitations on the driver, we work through the limitations of the EDMAC hardware to find missed events and issue them. The sequence of events that require this are: For the scenario where MAX slots for an EDMA channel is 3: SG1 -> SG2 -> SG3 -> SG4 -> SG5 -> SG6 -> Null The above SG list will have to be DMA'd in 2 sets: (1) SG1 -> SG2 -> SG3 -> Null (2) SG4 -> SG5 -> SG6 -> Null After (1) is succesfully transferred, the events from the MMC controller donot stop coming and are missed by the time we have setup the transfer for (2). So here, we catch the events missed as an error condition and issue them manually. In the second part of the patch, we make handle the NULL slot cases: For crypto IP, we continue to receive events even continuously in NULL slot, the setup of the next set of SG elements happens after the error handler executes. This is results in some recursion problems. Due to this, we continously receive error interrupts when we manually trigger an event from the error handler. We fix this, by first detecting if the Channel is currently transferring from a NULL slot or not, that's where the edma_read_slot in the error callback from interrupt handler comes in. With this we can determine if the set up of the next SG list has completed, and we manually trigger only in this case. If the setup has _not_ completed, we are still in NULL so we just set a missed flag and allow the manual triggerring to happen in edma_execute which will be eventually called. This fixes the above mentioned race conditions seen with the crypto drivers. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137416733628831&w=2 Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-08-29 18:05:43 -05:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: Rename set_bits and remove unused clear_bits helper The clear_bits() helper is not used by the driver so it can be removed. powerpc architecture defines the set_bits() in arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h which results failed compile testing on powerpc architecture: >> drivers/dma/edma.c:415:20: error: conflicting types for 'set_bits' static inline void set_bits(int offset, int len, unsigned long *p) ^~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0, from include/linux/kernel.h:10, from include/linux/list.h:8, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/device.h:17, from include/linux/dmaengine.h:20, from drivers/dma/edma.c:16: arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:75:14: note: previous definition of 'set_bits' was here DEFINE_BITOP(set_bits, or, "") ^ arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:58:24: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_BITOP' static __inline__ void fn(unsigned long mask, \ ^~ >> drivers/dma/edma.c:421:20: error: conflicting types for 'clear_bits' static inline void clear_bits(int offset, int len, unsigned long *p) ^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0, from include/linux/kernel.h:10, from include/linux/list.h:8, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/device.h:17, from include/linux/dmaengine.h:20, from drivers/dma/edma.c:16: arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:76:14: note: previous definition of 'clear_bits' was here DEFINE_BITOP(clear_bits, andc, "") ^ arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:58:24: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_BITOP' static __inline__ void fn(unsigned long mask, \ ^~ Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2016-09-22 09:31:04 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00
dmaengine: edma: New device tree binding With the old binding and driver architecture we had many issues: No way to assign eDMA channels to event queues, thus not able to tune the system by moving specific DMA channels to low/high priority servicing. We moved the cyclic channels to high priority within the code, but that was just a workaround to this issue. Memcopy was fundamentally broken: even if the driver scanned the DT/devices in the booted system for direct DMA users (which is not effective when the events are going through a crossbar) and created a map of 'used' channels, this information was not really usable. Since via dmaengien API the eDMA driver will be called with _some_ channel number, we would try to request this channel when any channel is requested for memcpy. By luck we got channel which is not used by any device most of the time so things worked, but if a device would have been using the given channel, but not requested it, the memcpy channel would have been waiting for HW event. The old code had the am33xx/am43xx DMA event router handling embedded. This should have been done in a separate driver since it is not part of the actual eDMA IP. There were no way to 'lock' PaRAM slots to be used by the DSP for example when booting with DT. In DT boot the edma node used more than one hwmod which is not a good practice and the kernel prints warning because of this. With the new bindings and the changes in the driver we can: - No regression with Legacy binding and non DT boot - DMA channels can be assigned to any TC (to set priority) - PaRAM slots can be reserved for other cores to use - Dynamic power management for CC and TCs, if only TC0 is used all other TC can be powered down for example Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2015-10-16 10:18:10 +03:00