kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-13 07:31:07 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/drivers/vhost/vringh.c

1038 lines
28 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Despite living under drivers/ vringh.c is also used as part of the userspace virtio tools. Before we can kill off the ACCESS_ONCE()definition in the tools, we must convert vringh.c to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(). This patch does so, along with the required include of <linux/compiler.h> for the relevant definitions. The userspace tools provide their own definitions in their own <linux/compiler.h>. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
2016-11-24 10:25:13 +00:00
Add missing module license tag to vring helpers. [ 624.286653] vringh: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2013-05-03 16:40:09 -04:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: 64 bit features Pass u64 everywhere. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 00:36:06 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Despite living under drivers/ vringh.c is also used as part of the userspace virtio tools. Before we can kill off the ACCESS_ONCE()definition in the tools, we must convert vringh.c to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(). This patch does so, along with the required include of <linux/compiler.h> for the relevant definitions. The userspace tools provide their own definitions in their own <linux/compiler.h>. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
2016-11-24 10:25:13 +00:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Despite living under drivers/ vringh.c is also used as part of the userspace virtio tools. Before we can kill off the ACCESS_ONCE()definition in the tools, we must convert vringh.c to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(). This patch does so, along with the required include of <linux/compiler.h> for the relevant definitions. The userspace tools provide their own definitions in their own <linux/compiler.h>. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
2016-11-24 10:25:13 +00:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: 64 bit features Pass u64 everywhere. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 00:36:06 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
vringh: update for virtio 1.0 APIs When switching everything over to virtio 1.0 memory access APIs, I missed converting vringh. Fortunately, it's straight-forward. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2014-12-12 01:10:49 +02:00
vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings. Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This abstracts the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2013-03-20 13:50:14 +10:30
Add missing module license tag to vring helpers. [ 624.286653] vringh: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2013-05-03 16:40:09 -04:00