linux/fs/btrfs/backref.c

2236 lines
59 KiB

Btrfs: fix a crash when running balance and defrag concurrently Running balance and defrag concurrently can end up with a crash: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4528! RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01ac33b>] [<ffffffffa01ac33b>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+ 0x1eb/0x230 [btrfs] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa01398c1>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x241/0x380 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0180bad>] ? copy_extent_buffer+0xad/0x110 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0139da1>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x3a1/0x520 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013a0b6>] btrfs_cow_block+0x116/0x1b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013ddad>] btrfs_search_slot+0x43d/0x970 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0153c57>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0172a5e>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x11e/0xae0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013b3fd>] ? generic_bin_search.constprop.39+0x8d/0x1a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8117d14a>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1da/0x200 [<ffffffffa0138e7a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0173ef0>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x60/0x90 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016b24d>] relink_extent_backref+0x2ed/0x780 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0162fe0>] ? btrfs_submit_bio_hook+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa01b8ed7>] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016b909>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x229/0xac0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016c3b5>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa018cbe5>] worker_loop+0x125/0x4e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa018cac0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x300/0x300 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81075ea0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 [<ffffffff8164796c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It turns out to be that balance operation will bump root's @last_snapshot, which enables snapshot-aware defrag path, and backref walking stuff will find data reloc tree as refs' parent, and hit the BUG_ON() during COW. As data reloc tree's data is just for relocation purpose, and will be deleted right after relocation is done, it's unnecessary to walk those refs belonged to data reloc tree, it'd be better to skip them. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-10-30 13:25:24 +08:00
Btrfs: teach backref walking about backrefs with underflowed offset values When cloning/deduplicating file extents (through the clone and extent_same ioctls) we can get data back references with offset values that are a result of an unsigned integer arithmetic underflow, that is, values that are much larger then they could be otherwise. This is not a problem when decrementing or dropping the back references (happens when we overwrite the extents or punch a hole for example, through __btrfs_drop_extents()), since we compute the same too large offset value, but it is a problem for the backref walking code, used by an incremental send and the ioctls that are used by the btrfs tool "inspect-internal" commands, as it makes it miss the corresponding file extent items because the search key is set for an extent item that starts at an offset matching the exceptionally large offset value of the data back reference. For an incremental send this causes the send ioctl to fail with -EIO. So teach the backref walking code to deal with these cases by setting the search key's offset to 0 if the backref's offset value is larger than LLONG_MAX (the largest possible file offset). This makes sure the backref walking code finds the corresponding file extent items at the expense of scanning more items and leafs in the btree. Fixing the clone/dedup ioctls to not produce such underflowed results would require major changes breaking backward compatibility, updating user space tools, etc. Simple reproducer case for fstests: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _require_cloner _need_to_be_root send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K starting at file # offset 128K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 128K 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo \ | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 # Now clone parts of the original extent into lower offsets of the file. # # The first clone operation adds a file extent item to file offset 0 # that points to our initial extent with a data offset of 16K. The # corresponding data back reference in the extent tree has an offset of # 18446744073709535232, which is the result of file_offset - data_offset # = 0 - 16K. # # The second clone operation adds a file extent item to file offset 16K # that points to our initial extent with a data offset of 48K. The # corresponding data back reference in the extent tree has an offset of # 18446744073709518848, which is the result of file_offset - data_offset # = 16K - 48K. # # Those large back reference offsets (result of unsigned arithmetic # underflow) confused the back reference walking code (used by an # incremental send and the multiple inspect-internal ioctls) and made it # miss the back references, which for the case of an incremental send it # made it fail with -EIO and print a message like the following to # dmesg: # # "BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. \ # inode=257, offset=0, disk_byte=12845056 found extent=12845056" # $CLONER_PROG -s $(((128 + 16) * 1024)) -d 0 -l $((16 * 1024)) \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $CLONER_PROG -s $(((128 + 48) * 1024)) -d $((16 * 1024)) \ -l $((16 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch status=0 exit The test's expected golden output is: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 131072 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) File digest in the original filesystem: 6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo File digest in the new filesystem: 6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo But it failed with: (...) @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 097 wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 131072 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) -File digest in the original filesystem: -6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo -File digest in the new filesystem: -6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo ... $ cat /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/097.full (...) ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-07-29 17:21:17 +01:00
Btrfs: teach backref walking about backrefs with underflowed offset values When cloning/deduplicating file extents (through the clone and extent_same ioctls) we can get data back references with offset values that are a result of an unsigned integer arithmetic underflow, that is, values that are much larger then they could be otherwise. This is not a problem when decrementing or dropping the back references (happens when we overwrite the extents or punch a hole for example, through __btrfs_drop_extents()), since we compute the same too large offset value, but it is a problem for the backref walking code, used by an incremental send and the ioctls that are used by the btrfs tool "inspect-internal" commands, as it makes it miss the corresponding file extent items because the search key is set for an extent item that starts at an offset matching the exceptionally large offset value of the data back reference. For an incremental send this causes the send ioctl to fail with -EIO. So teach the backref walking code to deal with these cases by setting the search key's offset to 0 if the backref's offset value is larger than LLONG_MAX (the largest possible file offset). This makes sure the backref walking code finds the corresponding file extent items at the expense of scanning more items and leafs in the btree. Fixing the clone/dedup ioctls to not produce such underflowed results would require major changes breaking backward compatibility, updating user space tools, etc. Simple reproducer case for fstests: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _require_cloner _need_to_be_root send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K starting at file # offset 128K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 128K 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo \ | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 # Now clone parts of the original extent into lower offsets of the file. # # The first clone operation adds a file extent item to file offset 0 # that points to our initial extent with a data offset of 16K. The # corresponding data back reference in the extent tree has an offset of # 18446744073709535232, which is the result of file_offset - data_offset # = 0 - 16K. # # The second clone operation adds a file extent item to file offset 16K # that points to our initial extent with a data offset of 48K. The # corresponding data back reference in the extent tree has an offset of # 18446744073709518848, which is the result of file_offset - data_offset # = 16K - 48K. # # Those large back reference offsets (result of unsigned arithmetic # underflow) confused the back reference walking code (used by an # incremental send and the multiple inspect-internal ioctls) and made it # miss the back references, which for the case of an incremental send it # made it fail with -EIO and print a message like the following to # dmesg: # # "BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. \ # inode=257, offset=0, disk_byte=12845056 found extent=12845056" # $CLONER_PROG -s $(((128 + 16) * 1024)) -d 0 -l $((16 * 1024)) \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $CLONER_PROG -s $(((128 + 48) * 1024)) -d $((16 * 1024)) \ -l $((16 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch status=0 exit The test's expected golden output is: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 131072 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) File digest in the original filesystem: 6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo File digest in the new filesystem: 6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo But it failed with: (...) @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 097 wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 131072 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) -File digest in the original filesystem: -6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo -File digest in the new filesystem: -6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo ... $ cat /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/097.full (...) ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-07-29 17:21:17 +01:00
Btrfs: teach backref walking about backrefs with underflowed offset values When cloning/deduplicating file extents (through the clone and extent_same ioctls) we can get data back references with offset values that are a result of an unsigned integer arithmetic underflow, that is, values that are much larger then they could be otherwise. This is not a problem when decrementing or dropping the back references (happens when we overwrite the extents or punch a hole for example, through __btrfs_drop_extents()), since we compute the same too large offset value, but it is a problem for the backref walking code, used by an incremental send and the ioctls that are used by the btrfs tool "inspect-internal" commands, as it makes it miss the corresponding file extent items because the search key is set for an extent item that starts at an offset matching the exceptionally large offset value of the data back reference. For an incremental send this causes the send ioctl to fail with -EIO. So teach the backref walking code to deal with these cases by setting the search key's offset to 0 if the backref's offset value is larger than LLONG_MAX (the largest possible file offset). This makes sure the backref walking code finds the corresponding file extent items at the expense of scanning more items and leafs in the btree. Fixing the clone/dedup ioctls to not produce such underflowed results would require major changes breaking backward compatibility, updating user space tools, etc. Simple reproducer case for fstests: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _require_cloner _need_to_be_root send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K starting at file # offset 128K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 128K 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo \ | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 # Now clone parts of the original extent into lower offsets of the file. # # The first clone operation adds a file extent item to file offset 0 # that points to our initial extent with a data offset of 16K. The # corresponding data back reference in the extent tree has an offset of # 18446744073709535232, which is the result of file_offset - data_offset # = 0 - 16K. # # The second clone operation adds a file extent item to file offset 16K # that points to our initial extent with a data offset of 48K. The # corresponding data back reference in the extent tree has an offset of # 18446744073709518848, which is the result of file_offset - data_offset # = 16K - 48K. # # Those large back reference offsets (result of unsigned arithmetic # underflow) confused the back reference walking code (used by an # incremental send and the multiple inspect-internal ioctls) and made it # miss the back references, which for the case of an incremental send it # made it fail with -EIO and print a message like the following to # dmesg: # # "BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. \ # inode=257, offset=0, disk_byte=12845056 found extent=12845056" # $CLONER_PROG -s $(((128 + 16) * 1024)) -d 0 -l $((16 * 1024)) \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $CLONER_PROG -s $(((128 + 48) * 1024)) -d $((16 * 1024)) \ -l $((16 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch status=0 exit The test's expected golden output is: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 131072 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) File digest in the original filesystem: 6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo File digest in the new filesystem: 6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo But it failed with: (...) @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 097 wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 131072 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) -File digest in the original filesystem: -6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo -File digest in the new filesystem: -6c6079335cff141b8a31233ead04cbff SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo ... $ cat /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/097.full (...) ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-07-29 17:21:17 +01:00
Btrfs: Fix memory corruption by ulist_add_merge() on 32bit arch We've got bug reports that btrfs crashes when quota is enabled on 32bit kernel, typically with the Oops like below: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004 IP: [<f9234590>] find_parent_nodes+0x360/0x1380 [btrfs] *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 PID: 151 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G S W 3.15.2-1.gd43d97e-default #1 Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan normal_work_helper [btrfs] task: f1478130 ti: f147c000 task.ti: f147c000 EIP: 0060:[<f9234590>] EFLAGS: 00010213 CPU: 0 EIP is at find_parent_nodes+0x360/0x1380 [btrfs] EAX: f147dda8 EBX: f147ddb0 ECX: 00000011 EDX: 00000000 ESI: 00000000 EDI: f147dda4 EBP: f147ddf8 ESP: f147dd38 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000004 CR3: 00bf3000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: 00000000 00000000 f147dda4 00000050 00000001 00000000 00000001 00000050 00000001 00000000 d3059000 00000001 00000022 000000a8 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000a1 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 11800000 Call Trace: [<f923564d>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x9d/0xf0 [btrfs] [<f9237bb1>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x401/0x760 [btrfs] [<f9206148>] normal_work_helper+0xc8/0x270 [btrfs] [<c025e38b>] process_one_work+0x11b/0x390 [<c025eea1>] worker_thread+0x101/0x340 [<c026432b>] kthread+0x9b/0xb0 [<c0712a71>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c0264290>] kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110 This indicates a NULL corruption in prefs_delayed list. The further investigation and bisection pointed that the call of ulist_add_merge() results in the corruption. ulist_add_merge() takes u64 as aux and writes a 64bit value into old_aux. The callers of this function in backref.c, however, pass a pointer of a pointer to old_aux. That is, the function overwrites 64bit value on 32bit pointer. This caused a NULL in the adjacent variable, in this case, prefs_delayed. Here is a quick attempt to band-aid over this: a new function, ulist_add_merge_ptr() is introduced to pass/store properly a pointer value instead of u64. There are still ugly void ** cast remaining in the callers because void ** cannot be taken implicitly. But, it's safer than explicit cast to u64, anyway. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887046 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v3.11+] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-07-28 10:57:04 +02:00
Btrfs: Fix memory corruption by ulist_add_merge() on 32bit arch We've got bug reports that btrfs crashes when quota is enabled on 32bit kernel, typically with the Oops like below: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004 IP: [<f9234590>] find_parent_nodes+0x360/0x1380 [btrfs] *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 PID: 151 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G S W 3.15.2-1.gd43d97e-default #1 Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan normal_work_helper [btrfs] task: f1478130 ti: f147c000 task.ti: f147c000 EIP: 0060:[<f9234590>] EFLAGS: 00010213 CPU: 0 EIP is at find_parent_nodes+0x360/0x1380 [btrfs] EAX: f147dda8 EBX: f147ddb0 ECX: 00000011 EDX: 00000000 ESI: 00000000 EDI: f147dda4 EBP: f147ddf8 ESP: f147dd38 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000004 CR3: 00bf3000 CR4: 00000690 Stack: 00000000 00000000 f147dda4 00000050 00000001 00000000 00000001 00000050 00000001 00000000 d3059000 00000001 00000022 000000a8 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000a1 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 11800000 Call Trace: [<f923564d>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x9d/0xf0 [btrfs] [<f9237bb1>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x401/0x760 [btrfs] [<f9206148>] normal_work_helper+0xc8/0x270 [btrfs] [<c025e38b>] process_one_work+0x11b/0x390 [<c025eea1>] worker_thread+0x101/0x340 [<c026432b>] kthread+0x9b/0xb0 [<c0712a71>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30 [<c0264290>] kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110 This indicates a NULL corruption in prefs_delayed list. The further investigation and bisection pointed that the call of ulist_add_merge() results in the corruption. ulist_add_merge() takes u64 as aux and writes a 64bit value into old_aux. The callers of this function in backref.c, however, pass a pointer of a pointer to old_aux. That is, the function overwrites 64bit value on 32bit pointer. This caused a NULL in the adjacent variable, in this case, prefs_delayed. Here is a quick attempt to band-aid over this: a new function, ulist_add_merge_ptr() is introduced to pass/store properly a pointer value instead of u64. There are still ugly void ** cast remaining in the callers because void ** cannot be taken implicitly. But, it's safer than explicit cast to u64, anyway. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887046 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v3.11+] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-07-28 10:57:04 +02:00
Btrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots() I can easily trigger the following warnings when enabling quota in my virtual machine(running Opensuse), Steps are firstly creating a subvolume full of fragment extents, and then create many snapshots (500 in my test case). [ 2362.808459] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [btrfs-qgroup-re:1970] [ 2362.809023] task: e4af8450 ti: e371c000 task.ti: e371c000 [ 2362.809026] EIP: 0060:[<fa38f4ae>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0 [ 2362.809049] EIP is at __merge_refs+0x5e/0x100 [btrfs] [ 2362.809051] EAX: 00000000 EBX: cfadbcf0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cfadbcb0 [ 2362.809052] ESI: dd8d3370 EDI: e371dde0 EBP: e371dd6c ESP: e371dd5c [ 2362.809054] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 [ 2362.809055] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ac454d50 CR3: 009a9000 CR4: 001407d0 [ 2362.809099] Stack: [ 2362.809100] 00000001 e371dde0 dfcc6890 f29f8000 e371de28 fa39016d 00000011 00000001 [ 2362.809105] 99bfc000 00000000 93928000 00000000 00000001 00000050 e371dda8 00000001 [ 2362.809109] f3a31000 f3413000 00000001 e371ddb8 000040a8 00000202 00000000 00000023 [ 2362.809113] Call Trace: [ 2362.809136] [<fa39016d>] find_parent_nodes+0x34d/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 2362.809156] [<fa391172>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0xb2/0x110 [btrfs] [ 2362.809174] [<fa3934a8>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x358/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 2362.809180] [<c024d0ce>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.39+0x1e/0x40 [ 2362.809199] [<fa3648df>] worker_loop+0xff/0x470 [btrfs] [ 2362.809204] [<c027a88a>] ? __wake_up_locked+0x1a/0x20 [ 2362.809221] [<fa3647e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2b0/0x2b0 [btrfs] [ 2362.809225] [<c025ebbc>] kthread+0x9c/0xb0 [ 2362.809229] [<c06b487b>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x30 [ 2362.809233] [<c025eb20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110 By adding a reschedule point at the end of btrfs_find_all_roots(), i no longer hit these warnings. Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-26 22:32:18 +08:00
Btrfs: fix hang on extent buffer lock caused by the inode_paths ioctl While doing some tests I ran into an hang on an extent buffer's rwlock that produced the following trace: [39389.800012] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#15 stuck for 22s! [fdm-stress:32166] [39389.800016] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#14 stuck for 22s! [fdm-stress:32165] [39389.800016] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod ppdev xor sha256_generic hmac raid6_pq drbg ansi_cprng aesni_intel i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq aes_x86_64 ablk_helper tpm_tis parport_pc i2c_core sg cryptd evdev psmouse lrw tpm parport gf128mul serio_raw pcspkr glue_helper processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [39389.800016] irq event stamp: 0 [39389.800016] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800016] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800016] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800016] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800016] CPU: 14 PID: 32165 Comm: fdm-stress Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [39389.800016] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [39389.800016] task: ffff880175b1ca40 ti: ffff8800a185c000 task.ti: ffff8800a185c000 [39389.800016] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810902af>] [<ffffffff810902af>] queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x57/0x158 [39389.800016] RSP: 0018:ffff8800a185fb80 EFLAGS: 00000202 [39389.800016] RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffff8801710c4e9c RCX: 0000000000000101 [39389.800016] RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000001 [39389.800016] RBP: ffff8800a185fb98 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [39389.800016] R10: ffff8800a185fb68 R11: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R12: ffff8801710c4e98 [39389.800016] R13: ffff880175b1ca40 R14: ffff8800a185fc10 R15: ffff880175b1ca40 [39389.800016] FS: 00007f6d37fff700(0000) GS:ffff8802be9c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [39389.800016] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [39389.800016] CR2: 00007f6d300019b8 CR3: 0000000037c93000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [39389.800016] Stack: [39389.800016] ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8801710c4e98 ffff880175b1ca40 ffff8800a185fbb0 [39389.800016] ffffffff81091e11 ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8800a185fbc8 ffffffff81091895 [39389.800016] ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8800a185fbe8 ffffffff81486c5c ffffffffa067288c [39389.800016] Call Trace: [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81091e11>] queued_read_lock_slowpath+0x46/0x60 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81091895>] do_raw_read_lock+0x3e/0x41 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81486c5c>] _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0x44 [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa067288c>] ? btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x54/0x125 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa067288c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x54/0x125 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0622ced>] ? btrfs_find_item+0xa7/0xd2 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa069363f>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xd6/0x174 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0693730>] inode_to_path+0x53/0xa2 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0693e2e>] paths_from_inode+0x117/0x2ec [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0670cff>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd5b/0x2793 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81276727>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d [39389.800016] [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [39389.800016] Code: b9 01 01 00 00 f7 c6 00 ff ff ff 75 32 83 fe 01 89 ca 89 f0 0f 45 d7 f0 0f b1 13 39 f0 74 04 89 c6 eb e2 ff ca 0f 84 fa 00 00 00 <8b> 03 84 c0 74 04 f3 90 eb f6 66 c7 03 01 00 e9 e6 00 00 00 e8 [39389.800012] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod ppdev xor sha256_generic hmac raid6_pq drbg ansi_cprng aesni_intel i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq aes_x86_64 ablk_helper tpm_tis parport_pc i2c_core sg cryptd evdev psmouse lrw tpm parport gf128mul serio_raw pcspkr glue_helper processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [39389.800012] irq event stamp: 0 [39389.800012] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800012] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800012] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800012] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800012] CPU: 15 PID: 32166 Comm: fdm-stress Tainted: G L 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [39389.800012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [39389.800012] task: ffff880179294380 ti: ffff880034a60000 task.ti: ffff880034a60000 [39389.800012] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81091e8d>] [<ffffffff81091e8d>] queued_write_lock_slowpath+0x62/0x72 [39389.800012] RSP: 0018:ffff880034a639f0 EFLAGS: 00000206 [39389.800012] RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffff8801710c4e98 RCX: 0000000000000000 [39389.800012] RDX: 00000000000000ff RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8801710c4e9c [39389.800012] RBP: ffff880034a639f8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [39389.800012] R10: ffff880034a639b0 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8801710c4e98 [39389.800012] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff880172cbc000 R15: ffff8801710c4e00 [39389.800012] FS: 00007f6d377fe700(0000) GS:ffff8802be9e0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [39389.800012] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [39389.800012] CR2: 00007f6d3d3c1000 CR3: 0000000037c93000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [39389.800012] Stack: [39389.800012] ffff8801710c4e98 ffff880034a63a10 ffffffff81091963 ffff8801710c4e98 [39389.800012] ffff880034a63a30 ffffffff81486f1b ffffffffa0672cb3 ffff8801710c4e00 [39389.800012] ffff880034a63a78 ffffffffa0672cb3 ffff8801710c4e00 ffff880034a63a58 [39389.800012] Call Trace: [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81091963>] do_raw_write_lock+0x72/0x8c [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81486f1b>] _raw_write_lock+0x3a/0x41 [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0672cb3>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0x119/0x251 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0672cb3>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x119/0x251 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa061aeba>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x5d [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa061ce13>] ? btrfs_root_node+0xda/0xe6 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa061ce83>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x22/0x42 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa062046b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1b8/0x758 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff810fc6b0>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28 [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa06365db>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x31/0x95 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8108d62f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8148482b>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x397/0x3bc [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa068821b>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x59/0x1c0 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa068858e>] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x194/0x5aa [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81486ab7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x44 [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0688a48>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xa4/0x15c [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0688d62>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x11/0x13 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa064048e>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x234/0x96e [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0618d10>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x145/0x1ad [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0671176>] btrfs_ioctl+0x11d2/0x2793 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81140261>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81140261>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d [39389.800012] [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [39389.800012] Code: f0 0f b1 13 85 c0 75 ef eb 2a f3 90 8a 03 84 c0 75 f8 f0 0f b0 13 84 c0 75 f0 ba ff 00 00 00 eb 0a f0 0f b1 13 ff c8 74 0b f3 90 <8b> 03 83 f8 01 75 f7 eb ed c6 43 04 00 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 This happens because in the code path executed by the inode_paths ioctl we end up nesting two calls to read lock a leaf's rwlock when after the first call to read_lock() and before the second call to read_lock(), another task (running the delayed items as part of a transaction commit) has already called write_lock() against the leaf's rwlock. This situation is illustrated by the following diagram: Task A Task B btrfs_ref_to_path() btrfs_commit_transaction() read_lock(&eb->lock); btrfs_run_delayed_items() __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() btrfs_lookup_inode() write_lock(&eb->lock); --> task waits for lock read_lock(&eb->lock); --> makes this task hang forever (and task B too of course) So fix this by avoiding doing the nested read lock, which is easily avoidable. This issue does not happen if task B calls write_lock() after task A does the second call to read_lock(), however there does not seem to exist anything in the documentation that mentions what is the expected behaviour for recursive locking of rwlocks (leaving the idea that doing so is not a good usage of rwlocks). Also, as a side effect necessary for this fix, make sure we do not needlessly read lock extent buffers when the input path has skip_locking set (used when called from send). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2016-02-03 19:17:27 +00:00
Btrfs: fix hang on extent buffer lock caused by the inode_paths ioctl While doing some tests I ran into an hang on an extent buffer's rwlock that produced the following trace: [39389.800012] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#15 stuck for 22s! [fdm-stress:32166] [39389.800016] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#14 stuck for 22s! [fdm-stress:32165] [39389.800016] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod ppdev xor sha256_generic hmac raid6_pq drbg ansi_cprng aesni_intel i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq aes_x86_64 ablk_helper tpm_tis parport_pc i2c_core sg cryptd evdev psmouse lrw tpm parport gf128mul serio_raw pcspkr glue_helper processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [39389.800016] irq event stamp: 0 [39389.800016] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800016] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800016] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800016] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800016] CPU: 14 PID: 32165 Comm: fdm-stress Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [39389.800016] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [39389.800016] task: ffff880175b1ca40 ti: ffff8800a185c000 task.ti: ffff8800a185c000 [39389.800016] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810902af>] [<ffffffff810902af>] queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x57/0x158 [39389.800016] RSP: 0018:ffff8800a185fb80 EFLAGS: 00000202 [39389.800016] RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffff8801710c4e9c RCX: 0000000000000101 [39389.800016] RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000001 [39389.800016] RBP: ffff8800a185fb98 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [39389.800016] R10: ffff8800a185fb68 R11: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R12: ffff8801710c4e98 [39389.800016] R13: ffff880175b1ca40 R14: ffff8800a185fc10 R15: ffff880175b1ca40 [39389.800016] FS: 00007f6d37fff700(0000) GS:ffff8802be9c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [39389.800016] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [39389.800016] CR2: 00007f6d300019b8 CR3: 0000000037c93000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [39389.800016] Stack: [39389.800016] ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8801710c4e98 ffff880175b1ca40 ffff8800a185fbb0 [39389.800016] ffffffff81091e11 ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8800a185fbc8 ffffffff81091895 [39389.800016] ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8800a185fbe8 ffffffff81486c5c ffffffffa067288c [39389.800016] Call Trace: [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81091e11>] queued_read_lock_slowpath+0x46/0x60 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81091895>] do_raw_read_lock+0x3e/0x41 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81486c5c>] _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0x44 [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa067288c>] ? btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x54/0x125 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa067288c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x54/0x125 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0622ced>] ? btrfs_find_item+0xa7/0xd2 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa069363f>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xd6/0x174 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0693730>] inode_to_path+0x53/0xa2 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0693e2e>] paths_from_inode+0x117/0x2ec [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffffa0670cff>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd5b/0x2793 [btrfs] [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800016] [<ffffffff81276727>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d [39389.800016] [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [39389.800016] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [39389.800016] Code: b9 01 01 00 00 f7 c6 00 ff ff ff 75 32 83 fe 01 89 ca 89 f0 0f 45 d7 f0 0f b1 13 39 f0 74 04 89 c6 eb e2 ff ca 0f 84 fa 00 00 00 <8b> 03 84 c0 74 04 f3 90 eb f6 66 c7 03 01 00 e9 e6 00 00 00 e8 [39389.800012] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod ppdev xor sha256_generic hmac raid6_pq drbg ansi_cprng aesni_intel i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq aes_x86_64 ablk_helper tpm_tis parport_pc i2c_core sg cryptd evdev psmouse lrw tpm parport gf128mul serio_raw pcspkr glue_helper processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [39389.800012] irq event stamp: 0 [39389.800012] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800012] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800012] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35 [39389.800012] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) [39389.800012] CPU: 15 PID: 32166 Comm: fdm-stress Tainted: G L 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [39389.800012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [39389.800012] task: ffff880179294380 ti: ffff880034a60000 task.ti: ffff880034a60000 [39389.800012] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81091e8d>] [<ffffffff81091e8d>] queued_write_lock_slowpath+0x62/0x72 [39389.800012] RSP: 0018:ffff880034a639f0 EFLAGS: 00000206 [39389.800012] RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffff8801710c4e98 RCX: 0000000000000000 [39389.800012] RDX: 00000000000000ff RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8801710c4e9c [39389.800012] RBP: ffff880034a639f8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [39389.800012] R10: ffff880034a639b0 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8801710c4e98 [39389.800012] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff880172cbc000 R15: ffff8801710c4e00 [39389.800012] FS: 00007f6d377fe700(0000) GS:ffff8802be9e0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [39389.800012] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [39389.800012] CR2: 00007f6d3d3c1000 CR3: 0000000037c93000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [39389.800012] Stack: [39389.800012] ffff8801710c4e98 ffff880034a63a10 ffffffff81091963 ffff8801710c4e98 [39389.800012] ffff880034a63a30 ffffffff81486f1b ffffffffa0672cb3 ffff8801710c4e00 [39389.800012] ffff880034a63a78 ffffffffa0672cb3 ffff8801710c4e00 ffff880034a63a58 [39389.800012] Call Trace: [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81091963>] do_raw_write_lock+0x72/0x8c [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81486f1b>] _raw_write_lock+0x3a/0x41 [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0672cb3>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0x119/0x251 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0672cb3>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x119/0x251 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa061aeba>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x5d [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa061ce13>] ? btrfs_root_node+0xda/0xe6 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa061ce83>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x22/0x42 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa062046b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1b8/0x758 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff810fc6b0>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28 [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa06365db>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x31/0x95 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8108d62f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8148482b>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x397/0x3bc [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa068821b>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x59/0x1c0 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa068858e>] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x194/0x5aa [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81486ab7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x44 [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0688a48>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xa4/0x15c [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0688d62>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x11/0x13 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa064048e>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x234/0x96e [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0618d10>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x145/0x1ad [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffffa0671176>] btrfs_ioctl+0x11d2/0x2793 [btrfs] [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81140261>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff81140261>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d [39389.800012] [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [39389.800012] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [39389.800012] Code: f0 0f b1 13 85 c0 75 ef eb 2a f3 90 8a 03 84 c0 75 f8 f0 0f b0 13 84 c0 75 f0 ba ff 00 00 00 eb 0a f0 0f b1 13 ff c8 74 0b f3 90 <8b> 03 83 f8 01 75 f7 eb ed c6 43 04 00 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 This happens because in the code path executed by the inode_paths ioctl we end up nesting two calls to read lock a leaf's rwlock when after the first call to read_lock() and before the second call to read_lock(), another task (running the delayed items as part of a transaction commit) has already called write_lock() against the leaf's rwlock. This situation is illustrated by the following diagram: Task A Task B btrfs_ref_to_path() btrfs_commit_transaction() read_lock(&eb->lock); btrfs_run_delayed_items() __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() btrfs_lookup_inode() write_lock(&eb->lock); --> task waits for lock read_lock(&eb->lock); --> makes this task hang forever (and task B too of course) So fix this by avoiding doing the nested read lock, which is easily avoidable. This issue does not happen if task B calls write_lock() after task A does the second call to read_lock(), however there does not seem to exist anything in the documentation that mentions what is the expected behaviour for recursive locking of rwlocks (leaving the idea that doing so is not a good usage of rwlocks). Also, as a side effect necessary for this fix, make sure we do not needlessly read lock extent buffers when the input path has skip_locking set (used when called from send). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2016-02-03 19:17:27 +00:00
Btrfs: fix deadlock when iterating inode refs and running delayed inodes While running btrfs/004 from xfstests, after 503 iterations, dmesg reported a deadlock between tasks iterating inode refs and tasks running delayed inodes (during a transaction commit). It turns out that iterating inode refs implies doing one tree search and release all nodes in the path except the leaf node, and then passing that leaf node to btrfs_ref_to_path(), which in turn does another tree search without releasing the lock on the leaf node it received as parameter. This is a problem when other task wants to write to the btree as well and ends up updating the leaf that is read locked - the writer task locks the parent of the leaf and then blocks waiting for the leaf's lock to be released - at the same time, the task executing btrfs_ref_to_path() does a second tree search, without releasing the lock on the first leaf, and wants to access a leaf (the same or another one) that is a child of the same parent, resulting in a deadlock. The trace reported by lockdep follows. [84314.936373] INFO: task fsstress:11930 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [84314.936381] Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [84314.936383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [84314.936386] fsstress D ffff8806e1bf8000 0 11930 11926 0x00000000 [84314.936393] ffff8804d6d89b78 0000000000000046 ffff8804d6d89b18 ffffffff810bd8bd [84314.936399] ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 [84314.936405] ffff880806308000 ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89c08 ffff8804deb8f190 [84314.936410] Call Trace: [84314.936421] [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [84314.936428] [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [84314.936451] [<ffffffffa0715bf5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x75/0x270 [btrfs] [84314.936457] [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [84314.936470] [<ffffffffa06ba231>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f1/0x930 [btrfs] [84314.936489] [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936504] [<ffffffffa06d2e1f>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs] [84314.936510] [<ffffffff810bd6ef>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x1e0 [84314.936528] [<ffffffffa073173c>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x4c/0x1d0 [btrfs] [84314.936543] [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936558] [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936573] [<ffffffffa0731c82>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x192/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936589] [<ffffffffa0731d03>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] [84314.936604] [<ffffffffa06dbcd4>] btrfs_flush_all_pending_stuffs+0x24/0x80 [btrfs] [84314.936620] [<ffffffffa06ddc13>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x223/0xa20 [btrfs] [84314.936630] [<ffffffffa06ae5ae>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x6e/0x110 [btrfs] [84314.936635] [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60 [84314.936639] [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60 [84314.936643] [<ffffffff811d0b70>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30 [84314.936648] [<ffffffff811a3541>] iterate_supers+0xf1/0x100 [84314.936652] [<ffffffff811d0c45>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90 [84314.936658] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [84314.936660] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [84314.936663] INFO: task btrfs:11955 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [84314.936666] Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [84314.936668] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [84314.936670] btrfs D ffff880541729a88 0 11955 11608 0x00000000 [84314.936674] ffff880541729a38 0000000000000046 ffff8805417299d8 ffffffff810bd8bd [84314.936680] ffff88075430c8a0 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 [84314.936685] ffffffff81c104e0 ffff88075430c8a0 ffff8804de8b00b8 ffff8804de8b0000 [84314.936690] Call Trace: [84314.936695] [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [84314.936700] [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [84314.936717] [<ffffffffa0715815>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xd5/0x140 [btrfs] [84314.936721] [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [84314.936733] [<ffffffffa06ba201>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7c1/0x930 [btrfs] [84314.936746] [<ffffffffa06bd505>] btrfs_find_item+0x55/0x160 [btrfs] [84314.936763] [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs] [84314.936780] [<ffffffffa073c9ca>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xba/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936797] [<ffffffffa06f9719>] ? release_extent_buffer+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs] [84314.936813] [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs] [84314.936830] [<ffffffffa073cb50>] inode_to_path+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs] [84314.936846] [<ffffffffa073d365>] paths_from_inode+0x115/0x3c0 [btrfs] [84314.936851] [<ffffffff8118dd44>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x200 [84314.936868] [<ffffffffa0714494>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf14/0x2030 [btrfs] [84314.936873] [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50 [84314.936877] [<ffffffff8116598f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x34f/0xb00 [84314.936882] [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40 [84314.936886] [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0 [84314.936892] [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570 [84314.936896] [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6 [84314.936901] [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [84314.936906] [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13 [84314.936910] [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [84314.936915] [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [84314.936920] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [84314.936922] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [84434.866873] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:11921 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [84434.866881] Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [84434.866883] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [84434.866886] btrfs-transacti D ffff880755b6a478 0 11921 2 0x00000000 [84434.866893] ffff8800735b9ce8 0000000000000046 ffff8800735b9c88 ffffffff810bd8bd [84434.866899] ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 [84434.866904] ffffffff81c104e0 ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff880755b6a478 ffff8804cece78f0 [84434.866910] Call Trace: [84434.866920] [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [84434.866927] [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [84434.866948] [<ffffffffa06dd2ef>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs] [84434.866954] [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [84434.866970] [<ffffffffa06dec18>] start_transaction+0x388/0x5a0 [btrfs] [84434.866985] [<ffffffffa06db9b5>] ? transaction_kthread+0xb5/0x280 [btrfs] [84434.866999] [<ffffffffa06dee97>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs] [84434.867012] [<ffffffffa06dba9e>] transaction_kthread+0x19e/0x280 [btrfs] [84434.867026] [<ffffffffa06db900>] ? open_ctree+0x2260/0x2260 [btrfs] [84434.867030] [<ffffffff81070dad>] kthread+0xed/0x100 [84434.867035] [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190 [84434.867040] [<ffffffff8177ee6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [84434.867044] [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190 Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-15 12:43:58 +00:00
Btrfs: fix deadlock when iterating inode refs and running delayed inodes While running btrfs/004 from xfstests, after 503 iterations, dmesg reported a deadlock between tasks iterating inode refs and tasks running delayed inodes (during a transaction commit). It turns out that iterating inode refs implies doing one tree search and release all nodes in the path except the leaf node, and then passing that leaf node to btrfs_ref_to_path(), which in turn does another tree search without releasing the lock on the leaf node it received as parameter. This is a problem when other task wants to write to the btree as well and ends up updating the leaf that is read locked - the writer task locks the parent of the leaf and then blocks waiting for the leaf's lock to be released - at the same time, the task executing btrfs_ref_to_path() does a second tree search, without releasing the lock on the first leaf, and wants to access a leaf (the same or another one) that is a child of the same parent, resulting in a deadlock. The trace reported by lockdep follows. [84314.936373] INFO: task fsstress:11930 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [84314.936381] Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [84314.936383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [84314.936386] fsstress D ffff8806e1bf8000 0 11930 11926 0x00000000 [84314.936393] ffff8804d6d89b78 0000000000000046 ffff8804d6d89b18 ffffffff810bd8bd [84314.936399] ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 [84314.936405] ffff880806308000 ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89c08 ffff8804deb8f190 [84314.936410] Call Trace: [84314.936421] [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [84314.936428] [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [84314.936451] [<ffffffffa0715bf5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x75/0x270 [btrfs] [84314.936457] [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [84314.936470] [<ffffffffa06ba231>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f1/0x930 [btrfs] [84314.936489] [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936504] [<ffffffffa06d2e1f>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs] [84314.936510] [<ffffffff810bd6ef>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x1e0 [84314.936528] [<ffffffffa073173c>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x4c/0x1d0 [btrfs] [84314.936543] [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936558] [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936573] [<ffffffffa0731c82>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x192/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936589] [<ffffffffa0731d03>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] [84314.936604] [<ffffffffa06dbcd4>] btrfs_flush_all_pending_stuffs+0x24/0x80 [btrfs] [84314.936620] [<ffffffffa06ddc13>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x223/0xa20 [btrfs] [84314.936630] [<ffffffffa06ae5ae>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x6e/0x110 [btrfs] [84314.936635] [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60 [84314.936639] [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60 [84314.936643] [<ffffffff811d0b70>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30 [84314.936648] [<ffffffff811a3541>] iterate_supers+0xf1/0x100 [84314.936652] [<ffffffff811d0c45>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90 [84314.936658] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [84314.936660] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [84314.936663] INFO: task btrfs:11955 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [84314.936666] Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [84314.936668] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [84314.936670] btrfs D ffff880541729a88 0 11955 11608 0x00000000 [84314.936674] ffff880541729a38 0000000000000046 ffff8805417299d8 ffffffff810bd8bd [84314.936680] ffff88075430c8a0 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 [84314.936685] ffffffff81c104e0 ffff88075430c8a0 ffff8804de8b00b8 ffff8804de8b0000 [84314.936690] Call Trace: [84314.936695] [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [84314.936700] [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [84314.936717] [<ffffffffa0715815>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xd5/0x140 [btrfs] [84314.936721] [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [84314.936733] [<ffffffffa06ba201>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7c1/0x930 [btrfs] [84314.936746] [<ffffffffa06bd505>] btrfs_find_item+0x55/0x160 [btrfs] [84314.936763] [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs] [84314.936780] [<ffffffffa073c9ca>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xba/0x1e0 [btrfs] [84314.936797] [<ffffffffa06f9719>] ? release_extent_buffer+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs] [84314.936813] [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs] [84314.936830] [<ffffffffa073cb50>] inode_to_path+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs] [84314.936846] [<ffffffffa073d365>] paths_from_inode+0x115/0x3c0 [btrfs] [84314.936851] [<ffffffff8118dd44>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x200 [84314.936868] [<ffffffffa0714494>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf14/0x2030 [btrfs] [84314.936873] [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50 [84314.936877] [<ffffffff8116598f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x34f/0xb00 [84314.936882] [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40 [84314.936886] [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0 [84314.936892] [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570 [84314.936896] [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6 [84314.936901] [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [84314.936906] [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13 [84314.936910] [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [84314.936915] [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [84314.936920] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [84314.936922] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [84434.866873] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:11921 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [84434.866881] Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [84434.866883] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [84434.866886] btrfs-transacti D ffff880755b6a478 0 11921 2 0x00000000 [84434.866893] ffff8800735b9ce8 0000000000000046 ffff8800735b9c88 ffffffff810bd8bd [84434.866899] ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 [84434.866904] ffffffff81c104e0 ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff880755b6a478 ffff8804cece78f0 [84434.866910] Call Trace: [84434.866920] [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [84434.866927] [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [84434.866948] [<ffffffffa06dd2ef>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs] [84434.866954] [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [84434.866970] [<ffffffffa06dec18>] start_transaction+0x388/0x5a0 [btrfs] [84434.866985] [<ffffffffa06db9b5>] ? transaction_kthread+0xb5/0x280 [btrfs] [84434.866999] [<ffffffffa06dee97>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs] [84434.867012] [<ffffffffa06dba9e>] transaction_kthread+0x19e/0x280 [btrfs] [84434.867026] [<ffffffffa06db900>] ? open_ctree+0x2260/0x2260 [btrfs] [84434.867030] [<ffffffff81070dad>] kthread+0xed/0x100 [84434.867035] [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190 [84434.867040] [<ffffffff8177ee6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [84434.867044] [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190 Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-15 12:43:58 +00:00